Home Physical Sciences Lab-on-a-chip devices for gold nanoparticle synthesis and their role as a catalyst support for continuous flow catalysis
Article Open Access

Lab-on-a-chip devices for gold nanoparticle synthesis and their role as a catalyst support for continuous flow catalysis

  • Chelliah V. Navin

    Chelliah V. Navin joined Dr. Challa Kumar’s research group at the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD) in 2011 as a graduate student and is also a part of Dr. Chandra Theegala’s team. He holds a MS by research in Biological and Agricultural Engineering (BAE) from the Louisiana State University (LSU) and his PhD dissertation at CAMD, LSU focussed on millifluidic-based nanomaterial synthesis for catalytic applications. His technical interests include bio-energy, bio-chemical engineering, and catalysis.

    , Katla Sai Krishna

    Katla Sai Krishna earned his PhD from Jawaharlal Nehru Center for Advanced Scientific Research, India, in 2011. He joined Dr. Challa Kumar’s group as a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD), Louisiana State University, in 2011. His current research interests include millifluidics-based synthesis of metal nanostructures for flow catalytic applications and synthesis of atomically precise gold clusters for applications in catalysis and magnetism.

    , Chandra S. Theegala

    Chandra Theegala is currently working as an Associate Professor in the Biological and Agricultural Engineering (BAE) Department at the Louisiana State University (LSU). Dr. Theegala holds a PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from LSU. His doctoral research focused on mass production of weaker microalgal strains in open-unprotected environments. He is the founder and group coordinator of the “Renewable Energy, Byproduct Utilization and Biosystems (REBUB)” research group in the BAE Department. In the energy arena, he is actively working on biomass gasifiers, cost-effective microalgal cell harvesting, microalgal lipid yield intensification and extraction, light optimization in phototrophic cultures, hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass and wastes, cellulase enzyme recycling, solar drying, and energy conservation.

    and Challa S.S.R. Kumar

    Challa S.S.R. Kumar is the Director of Nanofabrication and Nanomaterials at the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices at the Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. He is a winner of the 2006 Nano 50 Technology Award for his work on magnetic-based nanoparticles for cancer imaging and treatment. His research interests are in developing novel synthetic methods, including those based on microfluidic reactors for multifunctional nanomaterials. He has 8 years of industrial R&D experience working for Imperial Chemical Industries and United Breweries. He is the Editor of two online series on Nanotechnologies for the Life Sciences (NtLS) and Nanomaterials for the Life Sciences (NmLS) and a book series on the characterization of nanomaterials. He is also currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Nanotechnology Reviews and founding editor of the Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. Numerous books and original research papers are part of his extensive publication record.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 14, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) systems are extensively used in recent times for applications in nanotechnology ranging from synthesis of nanomaterials to their utilization in catalysis, biomedicine, and drug delivery. A variety of nanomaterials – inorganic materials such as metal, metal oxide, quantum dots, and organic materials based on polymers and biological molecules – have been synthesized and their applications explored based on LOC devices. Among several inorganic nanomaterials, the applications of LOC devices for gold-based nanomaterials have been widely investigated over the past couple of decades. Though the synthesis and applications of inorganic nanomaterials using these systems have been thoroughly reviewed earlier, including those from our group, there are only a few recent review articles that cover gold-based nanomaterials. As the promise of supported gold nanoparticles (NPs) as exceptionally effective catalysts is beginning to be realized, LOC-based approach for continuous flow gold catalysis has begun to be exploited. Here, in this review, we focus on synthesis and catalysis applications of nanostructured gold using the LOC systems. With millifluidics-based LOCs gaining traction, this review fulfills the need for a comprehensive analysis covering both traditional microfluidics as well as recent millifluidics for catalysis applications utilizing gold nanomaterials.

1 Introduction

Gold catalysts have been receiving a lot of interest from researchers since Haruta and coworkers observed that gold nanoparticles (NPs) <5 nm in size offered considerable enhancement in the catalytic activity and selectivity for low-temperature oxidation of CO when supported on metal oxides [1, 2]. Catalysis using gold nanomaterials (i.e., both supported and unsupported gold NPs as catalysts) is often preferred, as the reactions can be carried out under mild conditions, with less need for additives, better chemoselectivity, and the ability to carry out a variety of reactions [3]. Quantum size effects, presence of high densities to low coordinate atoms, excess electronic charge, and active perimeter sites are a few models that were proposed to explain high catalytic activity of gold NPs [4]. Yet another important criterion for modulating catalytic activity is the shape of the catalyst, which can be tuned by controlling the reaction conditions. As most catalytic reactions occur at the interfaces porosity of the nanomaterials also tend to play an important role in catalytic activity. Gold NPs supported over high surface area substrates play a crucial role in chemical reactions by enhancing the chemical performance of the catalyst and in preventing agglomeration of the supported NPs [5]. The ability to easily make changes to the design and carry out their synthesis depending on the type of chemical reaction to be catalyzed is an advantage these catalysts offer over others. Gold nanocatalyst synthesis has been advancing from the use of traditional coprecipitation and impregnation to using modern lab-on-a-chip (LOC) techniques such as microfluidics and millifluidics. These new techniques have significantly enhanced controlled synthesis and application of gold nanocatalysts in recent times [6]. Based on the way the nanocatalysts are created within the LOC devices, these can be broadly categorized into two types. The first type can be named as impregnated flow catalysis (IFC) in which the metal catalysts are prepared in a separate step and then incorporated within the flow device. In the second type, the nanocatalysts are grown (as a coating) within the flow device using bottom-up approaches and can be named as coated flow catalysis (CFC). In a recent review [7], advances in the design of flow catalysis reactors with a variety of supported catalysts have been utilized to promote a range of reactions including Heck, Sonogashira, Suzuki, Kumada, olefin metathesis, hydrogenation, and benzannulation reactions. These two generalized approaches for supporting catalysts in a flow reactor, schematically represented in Figure 1, are also applicable in the case of continuous flow nanostructured gold catalysis.

Figure 1 A schematic representation of the two types of processes for preparing nanocatalysts for flow catalysis. (A) IFC process and (B) CFC process.
Figure 1

A schematic representation of the two types of processes for preparing nanocatalysts for flow catalysis. (A) IFC process and (B) CFC process.

Some of the most recent reviews related to nanostructured gold catalysis and synthesis can be summarized as follows. Barakat and coworkers [8] reviewed gold catalysis for environmental applications, for oxidation of CO and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and in water-gas shift (WGS) reaction for the production of hydrogen. Ma and coworkers [9] highlighted gold nanocatalysts of various sizes and shapes, including unsupported or supported, those encapsulated in an inorganic matrix, postmodified gold catalysts, gold-based alloy catalysts, and gold catalysts with additional interfacial sites (or metal oxide components). A number of review articles on gold NP catalysis of organic reactions have also been published. For example, reduction reactions including chemoselective hydrogenation of nitro aromatic compounds [10] and hydrogenation of multiple double bonds [11, 12], selective oxidation of organics [13–15], complex organic transformations such as rearrangement of ω-alkynylfurans to phenols and the benzannulation of O-ethynyl benzaldehydes [16], and in the formation of nitrogen-containing compounds [17]. The catalytic activity of unsupported gold NPs for CO oxidation, aerobic oxidation of alcohols and diols, borohydride reductions and carbon-carbon cross-coupling reaction, among other reactions, has also been recently reviewed [18]. Surprisingly, not many investigations have been reported on nanogold catalysis in either in-flow conditions or using LOC devices [19–22]. The topic also has not been completely reviewed except for being a small part in the analysis of the field of LOC devices for the synthesis of inorganic nanomaterials and quantum dots for biomedical applications [23]. While the latest exhaustive review on gold NP catalysis was reported in the year 2008 [24], it did not include any continuous flow catalysis. On the other hand, a thorough analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of flow chemistry and continuous processing, in general, has just been published [25], and this analysis demonstrates how flow methods of synthesis can be greener than batch synthesis and that these are applicable over different scales of synthesis. Therefore, in this review, we present an analysis of the most recent literature on synthesis and application of gold nanocatalysts from the viewpoint of flow chemistry, in general, and LOC systems in particular. Although there have been several reports in using LOCs for synthesis of gold NPs, this review article covers only the catalytic aspect of gold nanomaterials and not their other applications related to biosensing, nanomedicine, biochemical analysis, diagnostics, drug discovery, microscopy, and spectroscopy, etc. The review is divided into four major sections including the introduction, overview of catalysis, and two flow catalysis systems, namely, plug flow reactors and LOC reactors based on tubular or chips.

2 An overview of gold catalysis and current challenges

The selection of a proper gold catalyst is influenced by various factors such as the amount of reactants, product properties, size of the reactor, operating costs, energy required for the chemical conversion, etc. Therefore, a proper understanding of the catalyst-reactant interaction and dynamics is needed to have a good influence on the structure and bonding of species involved in the catalyzed conversions. Loss of activity and selectivity due to deactivation, decomposition, and fouling with a need for catalyst regeneration is a challenge for traditional flask-based as well as flow-based catalysis in LOC devices [26, 27].

Gold nanocatalysis is a rapidly evolving research field which involves the use of gold-based nanomaterials as catalysts. A main aspect of the gold nanocatalyst revolves around complex interplay of physicochemical properties at the nanometer scale. The modulations of selectivity, activity, energy barrier etc. are few important factors that have to be considered before choosing a gold nanocatalyst for any chemical conversion. These are in-turn governed by the physical and chemical properties of the catalyst at nanoscale viz. size, shape, spatial distribution, surface composition, electronic structure, and if the catalyst is homogeneous or heterogeneous [28].

An important factor when synthesizing a gold nanocatalyst to be used in a solution is to prevent agglomeration, which is known to decrease its surface area. This has been accomplished using stabilizers or surfactants that prevent agglomeration either through steric or charge repulsion. However, the challenge is to have sufficient access to the surface for enhanced catalytic activity. Yet, another challenge is to separate the gold nanocatalysts from the reaction solution without the need for tedious postprocessing steps to completely recover from the products [28, 29]. In the case of heterogeneous gold nanocatalysis, the gold nanocatalysts are immobilized on to a solid support, and the supported catalysts can be recovered and recycled [28, 29]. However, the challenge here is to prevent agglomeration when the supported catalysts are subjected to high-temperature reaction conditions [30]. While several of these challenges remain to be addressed, the field of gold catalysis has been moving clearly in the direction of gold nanocatalysis, which in turn is going in the direction of the atomically precise gold catalysis [31–39]. The traditional batch catalysis has already seen developments in this direction (Figure 2). However, there is yet to be an investigation reported of flow catalysis utilizing atomically precise catalysts, in general, or atomically precise gold catalysts, in particular.

Figure 2 A schematic representation of the overview of the direction the field of gold catalysis is moving: from bulk catalysis to atomically precise catalysis.
Figure 2

A schematic representation of the overview of the direction the field of gold catalysis is moving: from bulk catalysis to atomically precise catalysis.

In addition to the above challenges in terms of modulating the morphology of the gold catalyst, there are also several challenges with respect to preparation of supported gold catalysts. In general, some of the currently used approaches for preparing supported gold catalysts and their drawbacks are as follows [40]. In the first approach, typically, a catalyst is supported on a catalyst support and tested in a reaction flask. The disadvantage with this approach is that there is a need for preparing the supported catalyst, and it needs to be separated and reused after the reaction [41, 42]. The other disadvantage is the reproducibility of the supported catalyst preparation. In the second approach, catalysts are supported within large columns, and the reagents are flown through such fixed bed reactor columns [40]. The disadvantage with this approach is that there is no control over the structure of the catalyst (micro- and nano-precision) and, hence, the surface area of the catalysts. In the third approach, the catalysts are embedded within microfluidic channels, and catalysis is carried out as in the previous case [43]. However, fabrication of microfluidic catalyst beds is expensive.

3 An overview of flow catalysis devices

Currently, most chemical conversion reactions need a catalyst to enhance their reaction rate in order to obtain increased yield and selectivity in a shorter span of time. The process of catalysis is carried out using two methods: (a) batch catalysis and (b) flow catalysis. Both the batch and the flow catalytic systems use homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts for chemical conversion. In a typical batch catalysis, a catalyst either in homogeneous phase or heterogeneous phase is added to the reaction mixture initially, and the products are collected after the reaction is complete. The catalyst is then recovered and recycled for the next batch. In contrast, in a flow catalytic system, the reaction mixture is treated with the catalyst either in homogeneous or heterogeneous phase continuously, and the products are collected separately as they are formed. In most cases, flow catalytic systems use heterogeneous catalyst, as the separation of the catalyst and the product happens easily without any further processing, thereby, reducing the time and effort required for recovery of the catalyst [44, 45].

The flow catalytic devices offer a number of advantages over batch catalytic systems; which are more relevant in the case of heterogeneous catalysts. Using them, the reaction processes can be controlled easily, thereby, specifically directing the conversion of a reactant to the desired products. They are flexible enough to be designed and modified depending on the type of reaction and reaction conditions as the reaction progresses, leading to a better control of the products formed in a reaction. They also help in facilitating the scale up of processes, and the catalyst regeneration can be made simpler. For reactions involving the production of secondary products, they offer a possibility for their continuous removal without interfering with the main catalytic process. Several recent innovations have been reported in the design and fabrication of flow catalysis systems. Some of these are continuous flow silicon-pyrex microreactor for catalytic oxidation and hydrogenation [45], macroporous monolithic microreactors for the synthesis of fine chemicals [46], in situ continuous flow MAS NMR coupled with hyperpolarized 129Xe for investigating reaction mechanisms and kinetics in heterogeneous catalysis [47], and spinning disc microreactors for oxidation of alcohols, axial flow, spherical packed bed reactor for methanol synthesis [48]. Jensen and group reported a variety of flow catalysis reactors with unique capabilities for carrying out multiphase catalytic reactions, such as gas-liquid trickle bed reactor, porous silicon posts, crossflow packed bed, and parallel packed bed with integrated temperature sensors (Figure 3) [49]. An interesting new concept for the immobilization of nano-sized catalyst on microreactor walls was described by Stubenrauch et al. [50] and Roumanie et al. [51]. Both authors made use of black-silicon microneedles in order to increase the active surface area of the silicon microsystems, which enhanced the reactor wall surface. The needle arrays were used, on the one hand, for direct immobilization of catalytic metals and, on the other hand, to stabilize a catalytic wash coat.

Figure 3 Microfabricated devices developed for studying supported catalysts: (A) gas-liquid trickle bed reactor, (B) porous silicon posts, (C) cross-flow packed bed, (D) parallel packed bed with integrated temperature sensors, (E) current design enabling facile catalyst loading and unloading, (F) SEM micrograph of weir in current design. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [49], Copyright Teknoscienze, 2011.)
Figure 3

Microfabricated devices developed for studying supported catalysts: (A) gas-liquid trickle bed reactor, (B) porous silicon posts, (C) cross-flow packed bed, (D) parallel packed bed with integrated temperature sensors, (E) current design enabling facile catalyst loading and unloading, (F) SEM micrograph of weir in current design. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [49], Copyright Teknoscienze, 2011.)

Brivio and co-workers [52] highlighted a variety of innovative flow reactors utilized for catalysis of a number of organic reactions. These range from flow reactors with electro-osmotically driven fluidics systems to those that have low dead volume connectors. In addition, the designs include those containing independent microfluidic units in a parallel configuration to “pile-up” reactors with a number of piled-up glass plates and those for combinatorial flow catalysis. Yet, another novel design is a set of modular and monolithic microreactors based on the integration of microfluidics and a thermal platform [53] as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Layer by layer design of both platforms integrating the LTCC microreactor. (A) Thermal platform; (a) top layer (4×); (b) screen-printed heater (1×); (c) bottom layer (4×). (B) Picture of the thermal platform fabricated. (C) Microfluidic platform; layers (a) and (f) were fabricated by duplicate; the microfluidic structure was embedded at layer (e). (D) Picture of the microfluidic platform, which includes an exposed section regarding the micromixer. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [53], Copyright Elsevier, 2013.)
Figure 4

Layer by layer design of both platforms integrating the LTCC microreactor. (A) Thermal platform; (a) top layer (4×); (b) screen-printed heater (1×); (c) bottom layer (4×). (B) Picture of the thermal platform fabricated. (C) Microfluidic platform; layers (a) and (f) were fabricated by duplicate; the microfluidic structure was embedded at layer (e). (D) Picture of the microfluidic platform, which includes an exposed section regarding the micromixer. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [53], Copyright Elsevier, 2013.)

The key point here is the immense potential in developing newer reactor designs to meet the requirements of any catalytic reaction. The flow catalytic reactors can be broadly classified into plug flow (or tubular) reactors and chip-based reactors. The chip-based reactors are traditionally called as LOC devices. However, a more inclusive definition of LOC devices could cover both tubular as well as chip-based devices with channel dimensions in the micro to millimeter range. These could also be easily distinguished from flow systems with larger dimensions for large-scale synthesis. A brief description of these different types of flow reactors for catalysis is given below.

3.1 Tubular or plug flow reactors

Plug flow reactors are tubular reactors that are utilized for continuous chemical processes. These types of reactors are filled with the desired catalyst for chemical conversion to take place. The geometry of a plug flow reactor plays an important role depending on the type of chemical reaction, required selectivity and conversion efficiency. They also have the ability to add multiple reactant mixtures at different points if needed. Usually, a plug flow reactor is called a packed bed reactor when it is packed with a solid material, in most cases, a solid catalyst. The reactant to product conversion within the plug flow reactor is measured with respect to the residence time of the plug, which is a function of its position in the reactor. Plug flow reactors have the ability to run for extended periods and have high volumetric unit conversion. In a plug flow reactor, a stable concentration profile can be obtained at steady state with concentrations varying in space as the reaction happens in the flow path. The heat transfer rate can be controlled with ease when the reactor is packed with thinner tubes or fewer thicker tubes packed parallel. Another advantage of using a plug flow reactor is its low operational cost. However, undesired thermal gradients, poor temperature control, gas exchange limitations in a sealed reactor and expensive maintenance are some of the current challenges [54]. A typical millifluidic tubular reactor is made up of polymer or glass capillaries with a diameter in the order of 1 mm. Tubular millifluidics has also been utilized to produce hierarchically organized multiple emulsions or particles with a good control over sizes and shapes [55].

The other types of reactors such as gas-liquid trickle bed reactor, crossflow packed bed, parallel packed bed with integrated temperature sensors [49] (Figure 3), flow cell reactor [56], drip flow reactor [57], capillary reactor [58], membrane reactors [59], etc. are few examples of tubular or plug flow reactors that can be used for biological, chemical, physical analyses, and studies.

3.2 Lab-on-a-chip systems: microfluidic and millifluidics

A LOC device is a single chip designed to have components with varying dimensions. The size of this device can range from a few centimeters to nanometers and can handle lesser volumes of fluid. Various laboratory functions can be integrated into a LOC device when all the components are precisely positioned in order to have reliable and repeatable reaction conditions [60]. Some of the challenges in tubular reactors such as requirement for larger space, unavoidable zero dead fluid volume, longer response time, higher power consumption, lower reproducibility, higher waste, and so on can be addressed using chip-based LOC devices [61, 62]. A variety of designs of chip-based LOC devices have been reported demonstrating flow principles, mixers, and traps ranging from the simplest form of the T-section systems, where two fluid inputs enter through channels at the bottom and slowly diffuse over the length of the microchannel to tangential microchannels, where the channels can exchange fluid through the shared area of contact [63]. More sophisticated designs include a pillar array PDMS-based microfluidic channel for the SERS detection of hazardous materials to microfluidic traps using optical, mechanical, dielectrophoretic, electrophoretic, acoustic, and magnetic forces.

In a LOC device, scaling up of the reaction conditions is simple and straightforward, which is done either by carrying out the reaction in continuous flow mode or by increasing the throughput through parallel processing. The use of LOC devices can also decrease the time for process transfer from lab to pilot-plant and then to industrial scale, and the products can be monitored online [62]. The kinetics, selectivity, and the product yield can also be improved easily, given that the external parameters like pressure, temperature, and reactant mixing is taken into account [64]. As the volume needed for the LOC experiments is very less, i.e., in the range of microliters to nanoliters, miniaturization of the flow channels allows us to change the experimental conditions along the reaction path in a shorter time (milli- to microseconds). Hence, LOC devices allow systematic investigation for the development of new synthetic strategies for investigating larger parameters if an online readout is available [65].

To overcome the demerits of conventional-based methods for NP preparation, LOCs can be operated at optimized and steady state with control over the reaction conditions like reagent addition, mixing, temperature, and scaling higher throughputs involving parallel operation of multiple reactor units [62, 66]. There have been reports on demonstration of wet chemical synthesis of semiconducting, metallic, dielectric, magnetic, and core shell NPs using the microfluidic methods [67–74]. However, prohibiting the NPs from growing over the walls of the LOCs is a challenge in the continuous flow reactor while preparing colloidal metal dispersions. Significant deposition of NPs and aggregation over the reactor walls has been attributed to the high surface to volume ratios [65]. For reactions happening at laminar flow within a microreactor, by selecting the appropriate choice of reaction conditions and microreactor wall material, polymer additives, and developing concentric laminar flow patterns, the issue over the particle deposition and aggregation can be overcome or minimized [65, 75–78]. It should also be noted that broader particle size distributions within a millifluidic or microfluidic reactor can be achieved with higher residence time of reactants [79].

LOC devices such as the microfluidic systems are constructed to perform chemical reactions, which are designed in such a way to maximize the efficiency of the reaction conditions. The significant aspect of performing a reaction in a microfluidic reactor is that the reaction conditions can be controlled desirably according to flow rate, concentration, pressure, etc. Early microfluidic devices had stainless steel, polymer tubing to provide reactant flow into the reactor. However, with repeated experiments, silica tubing is being used nowadays to achieve proper mixing and preparing hydrodynamic micro- and nanostructures. Other advantages of using microfluidic devices are low fluid volumes, good process control, quicker analysis, compact, safe, and reproducible results [80]. Especially for flow catalysis, an ideal microfluidic reactor should be capable of working at the desired working conditions (pressure, temperature, chemical compatibility, concentration, etc.) without breaking the system. A few examples of such microfluidic reactors are shown in Figure 5 [81].

Figure 5 Examples of (A) metal, (B) glass/glass, and (C) silicon/Pyrex and microreactors. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [81], Copyright Elsevier, 2012.)
Figure 5

Examples of (A) metal, (B) glass/glass, and (C) silicon/Pyrex and microreactors. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [81], Copyright Elsevier, 2012.)

Millifluidic devices can be considered as low-cost LOC devices that have been utilized for synthesis of a variety of micro- and nanomaterials. They offer more advantages over the microfluidic devices. For example, larger quantities of NPs can be produced with good control over their size-distribution and shape. They do not require expensive lithography for their fabrication. They can also be used as flow reactors with potential opportunities to manipulate and functionalize the products at different stages of synthesis [82].

The flow rates of the reactants that are fed into the millifluidic reactor can be increased, thereby, reaching easy scale up by integrating several reactors on a single platform. Owing to the continuous reaction conditions and low-cost methodology, millifluidic devices are used as a potential production tool in industries. The millifluidic devices can be easily assembled and disassembled without any expensive techniques such as lithography or etching for fabrication. As the channel dimensions are increased when compared to the microfluidic reactor, channels are less prone to clogging in a millifluidic reactor, thereby, resulting in lesser residence time of the reactants. The millifluidic devices can also be used to prepare atomically precise nanomaterials and study their formation in situ in order to obtain time-resolved kinetic details of the nanomaterials formed. A chip-based LOC is a device that is made up of polymer or glass as a substrate. These devices can be fabricated into any desirable shape, which can be fully integrated to analytical equipment for characterization, identification, and separation processes. Moreover, the reaction channel in a chip-based LOC can be designed into various shapes (like zigzag, spiral-shaped, serpentine-shaped channels) according to the experimental conditions. To summarize, a simple millifluidic device bridges the gap between a microfluidic device and bulk reactor. A traditional microfluidic device has a channel dimension in micrometer scale and can hold a fluid volume of about nanoliters to a few microliters. In contrast, a millifluidic device has a channel dimension in millimeter scale, which can carry fluid volume up to milliliters and offers high throughput without compromising on the flow properties. In addition, it offers superior in situ monitoring capabilities due to higher signal-to noise ratio than traditional microfluidic devices.

4 LOC devices for synthesis gold nanoparticles and their catalysis

4.1 Overview of LOC synthesis of metal nanocatalysts

Many inorganic and organic nanocatalysts have been synthesized in a continuous manner with more control over the particle size distribution, shape, and quality of the nanomaterial. LOC devices for synthesis of inorganic nanomaterials have recently been reviewed [23]. A variety of metal NPs, oxide NPs, semiconductor NPs, quantum dot (QD) core-shell-structured micro-, and nanostructures are few types of nanomaterials synthesized using the LOC devices. Most often, reducing agents such as sodium borohydride, lithium hydrotriethyl borate, 3-(N,N-dimethyldodecylammonia) propane sulfonate, and sodium citrate are used as the reducing salts for synthesizing metal NPs. Ligands, though required to stabilize NPs from agglomeration, have a deleterious effect on the catalytic activity of NPs. For example, the most commonly used ligands like thiols, phosphines, amines, etc., for gold NP synthesis hinder the reactant to reach the metal surface when they are in heterogeneous phase, thereby, reducing their catalytic activity. A well-known example for heterogeneous-phase gold catalysis is the gas-phase CO oxidation reaction [83]. However, in solution-based homogeneous catalysis, the ligands tend to disperse in the solvent, thereby, allowing the reactants to reach the metal surface and, hence, resulting in increased catalytic activity, for example, styrene oxidation in toluene [84]. In general, these ligands can be removed from the NP surface by several methods like calcination [85], oxygen treatment [86], and ozone treatment [87]. The synthesis of metal nanocatalysts within the LOC devices is carried out in two ways. The first method is where the metal precursors are fed into the reactor followed by the addition of the second reactant into it as shown in Figure 6 [88]. To reduce the risk of agglomeration, ligands and surfactants are passed through the reactor in the final step. The disadvantage of using this approach toward the nanocatalyst synthesis is that the reactants are fed into the LOC one after the other leading to a large residence time distribution. Owing to the continuous single-phase reaction condition, the possibility of reactant clogging within the channel is high, thereby, resulting in loss of optical and absorption information. The second approach toward the synthesis of metal nanocatalyst using the LOC devices is that the reaction solutions are fed simultaneously within the reactor through separate inlets as shown in Figure 7 [79]. These reactants mix together within the LOC device, where the nucleation and the growth of the nanocatalyst take place. The second approach for the synthesis of the metal nanocatalyst is preferred due to its short residence time distribution and less chances of clogging [89].

Figure 6 Schematic illustration of reactant feed into the LOC device. Modular microreactor arrangement for flow-through process. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [88], Copyright Elsevier, 2008.)
Figure 6

Schematic illustration of reactant feed into the LOC device. Modular microreactor arrangement for flow-through process. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [88], Copyright Elsevier, 2008.)

Figure 7 LOC device for simultaneous mixing of the reactants. A gold nanoparticle seed suspension (S) and aqueous reagent solutions (R1 and R2) are separately delivered into one arm of a microfluidic T-junction, and silicone oil is delivered into the other arm. Droplets are pinched off at the T-junction. Reagents and seeds are rapidly mixed by chaotic advection. The oil forms a thin lubricating layer around the translating droplets, and prevents contact between growing particles and the microchannel walls. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [76], Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 2009.)
Figure 7

LOC device for simultaneous mixing of the reactants. A gold nanoparticle seed suspension (S) and aqueous reagent solutions (R1 and R2) are separately delivered into one arm of a microfluidic T-junction, and silicone oil is delivered into the other arm. Droplets are pinched off at the T-junction. Reagents and seeds are rapidly mixed by chaotic advection. The oil forms a thin lubricating layer around the translating droplets, and prevents contact between growing particles and the microchannel walls. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [76], Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 2009.)

Several metal nanocatalysts have been synthesized using the microfluidic devices. A few common nanocatalysts that were prepared using the microfluidic devices are gold NPs and nanorods [65, 73, 75, 77, 79], silver NPs [89] and nanorods [65, 88, 90], copper NPs [91], palladium NPs [92, 93], CdSe@ZnS [93], CdSe@ZnSe [94], SiO2@TiO2 [72], γ-Fe2O3@SiO2 [95], [CdSe@ZnS] in PLGA microgels and microcapsules [96], γ-Fe2O3 in microhydrogels [97], γ-Fe2O3 or QDs in PNIPAM microcapsules [98], and superparamagnetic Janus particles [99]. The syntheses of these nanocatalysts vary accordingly with respect to the temperature and the type of microfluidic reactor used. SU-8-PEEK, glass capillary, PVC and PEEK tubing, silicon Pyrex, silica capillary, PDMS glass, PDMS glass+aluminum reflectors, etc., are few types of microreactors that were used to prepare these nanocatalysts [100].

Although millifluidic devices prove to be an efficient tool in continuous flow catalysis, there are only a few reports on millifluidic nanocatalysts, and these are discussed in this review. Millifluidic systems offer similar reaction conditions for the synthesis of metal nanocatalysts like that of the microfluidic systems. Unlike microfluidic devices, metal nanocatalysts synthesized using millifluidic reactors withstand higher pressures and velocity distribution confined to the width of the interfacial zone [101–103].

4.2 Synthesis of nanostructured gold catalysts using LOC devices

Owing to its intrinsic value and properties, gold has always been considered as a noble metal of all the elements [104]. When gold catalyst is in nanoparticulate form, it possesses several unique properties. At nanoscale, gold can be used to transform carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide. It is used to remove toxins from exhaust gases. Gold NPs have different properties from those of bulk gold [105–107]. A number of reactions have been efficiently catalyzed by gold NPs. For example, carbon monoxide oxidation [2], catalytic combustion of hydrocarbons [108], hydrochlorination of ethyne [109], hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide removal, oxidation of glucose to gluconic acid [110], oxidative decomposition of dioxins, oxidative removal of mercury, ozone decomposition [111], reduction of NOx with propene [112], carbon monoxide or hydrogen, selective oxidation, e.g., epoxidation of olefins, selective hydrogenation [113], e.g., of alkynes and dienes to mono-olefins, vinyl acetate synthesis from ethene, acetic acid, and oxygen, etc. However, atomically precise gold NPs catalysts have not yet been explored for their effectiveness in these reactions [85, 114].

Capping agents such as ligands, surfactants, polymers, and dendrimers are commonly used to confine the growth of the gold NPs in a controlled synthesis [115–122]. A good control over the growth of NP with respect to its size, diameters <150 nm was seen in the reduction of tetrachloroaurate ion in aqueous solution along with a reducing agent. In most cases, sodium borohydride has been used as the reducing agent, which is one of the most preferred methods to synthesize spherical gold NPs. Various other methods that were carried out for synthesis of gold NPs were by using poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) as a protective agent in ethylene glycol for shape control [119]. A seed-mediated growth approach was carried out with the surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as the directing agent in order to prepare gold nanorods in aqueous solution [117, 123]. Another method of preparation involved the use of [Au(SO3)2]3-, which was decomposed and precipitated under acidic conditions to synthesize the quasi monodisperse gold microspheres [124]. Also, gold microspheres with diameters of more than 1 mm were synthesized in a controlled flower-like fashion using a simple electrochemical route [125]. Reactants like poly(sodium 4-styrene sulfonate) was used as an emulsifier, water treatment agents like dispersants, flocculation agents, sulfur exchange resin, etc. have been used along with various gold salts for preparing the gold NPs [126].

Owing to a smaller dimension of the microfluidic devices, characterization of gold NPs in order to study its morphology and structural chemistry becomes tedious. In recent times, this disadvantage is overcome by synthesizing catalytically active gold micro- and nanostructures in a millifluidic platform. Gold catalysts prepared in this method offered a greater scope for spectroscopic probing catalysis of reactions as it happens. A comparative study between millifluidics-based synthesis and traditional flask-based synthesis of gold micro-/nanostructures shows that size and morphology of the gold can be better controlled by varying the flow rates using millifluidic systems [102].

There have been several reports on the synthesis of gold NPs using LOC devices. Influence in the reaction conditions such as flow rate, temperature, reducing agent, concentration, catalyst support, etc., play a vital role in particle synthesis using the LOC devices. Gold NPs of proper size and shapes have been synthesized using stabilizing agents. These agents help in preventing particle agglomeration during the synthesis. Tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB), 1-dodecanethiol, 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid, polyvinyl pyrolidone (PVP), etc., are a few reagents that have been used in the preparation of ligand-stabilized gold NPs.

Lohse and coworkers studied high-throughput synthesis and functionalization of gold NPs with different sizes and shapes using a simple bench top reactor system [127]. A flow reactor assembly (Figure 8) was used to operate for the synthesis of gold NPs by modifying previously reported synthetic procedures [128, 129]. Citrate-stabilized gold NPs of size 4 nm were synthesized by mixing tetrachloroauric acid and sodium citrate with a residence time of 3 min to obtain a reddish brown solution. An experiment based on the Brust-Schiffrin procedure was also carried out to synthesize 3 nm of mercaptohexanoic acid-stabilized gold NPs [130–132] and CTAB-stabilized Au NP growth procedures [133]. CTAB-stabilized 2- and 8-nm gold NPs were synthesized by mixing tetrachloroauric acid and CTAB with sodium borohydride solution to give deep brown and vibrant red color solutions, respectively.

Figure 8 The integrated millifluidic reactor used for gold nanoparticle synthesis and functionalization is shown. (A) Diagram and picture of the rector for AuNPs synthesis. The reactor is composed of multiple modular commercially available components, and fluid flow is driven by the peristaltic pump. (B) In this reactor, mixing of the growth solution and the seed/borohydride solution occurs in a simple polyethylene Y-mixer. (C) The reactor also features an integrated flow-based purification system, in which a commercially available tangential flow filtration cartridge can be attached to an additional peristaltic pump in order to integrate high-throughput approach for nanoparticle purification or functionalization. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [127], Copyright ACS Publications, 2013.)
Figure 8

The integrated millifluidic reactor used for gold nanoparticle synthesis and functionalization is shown. (A) Diagram and picture of the rector for AuNPs synthesis. The reactor is composed of multiple modular commercially available components, and fluid flow is driven by the peristaltic pump. (B) In this reactor, mixing of the growth solution and the seed/borohydride solution occurs in a simple polyethylene Y-mixer. (C) The reactor also features an integrated flow-based purification system, in which a commercially available tangential flow filtration cartridge can be attached to an additional peristaltic pump in order to integrate high-throughput approach for nanoparticle purification or functionalization. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [127], Copyright ACS Publications, 2013.)

They used the 8-nm gold NPs as the seeds for the synthesis of the 20-nm gold NPs, and in a similar fashion, 20-nm gold NPs were used as seeds for the synthesis of 40-nm gold NPs. All the gold seeds and NPs were stabilized using CTAB in solution.

Lohse and coworkers [127] have also reported the synthesis of gold nanorods using different synthesis protocols. They synthesized gold nanorods with the flow reactor by the seeded growth approach [132–134] where growth solutions containing tetrachloroauric acid, silver nitrate, and l-ascorbic acid were mixed with aqueous CTAB solution. These solutions that were prepared were fed into the flow reactor at 50 ml/min having a residence time of 3 min where they mix with each other within the reactor before they get deposited into a conical flask. Similarly, gold nanorods were prepared by using borohydride and ascorbic acid method within the flow reactor using the reported procedures [135–137]. Gold nanorods with dog bone structure and nanorods with large transverse diameters were prepared by modifying the isotropic overgrowth with the increased ascorbic acid addition [138–140]. As before, the growth solution was prepared by mixing tetrachloroauric acid with silver nitrate and L-ascorbic acid. CTAB solution was mixed with 4 nm of gold seed dispersion, and the mixture was aged for 2 h to prepare the seed solution. The growth and the seed solutions were then fed within the flow reactor at 50 ml/min and deposited into a conical tube. The nanorods formed through this procedure were 1.2 nm in size.

Tsunoyama and coworkers [141] reported the synthesis of gold clusters of size ∼1 nm stabilized by PVP using a microfluidic reactor. Syringes were used to feed the aqueous HAuCl4 and PVP solutions into the microfluidic reactor kept in a methanol bath at 0°C. The individual solutions were overlaid in an interdigital arrangement in region I (Figure 9), where the solutions were laminated into 16 substreams, and region II had wide multilamellar flow, which was compressed into a single 0.5-mm-wide stream. An Erlenmeyer flask was used to collect the mixed solution eluted from the outlet in an ice bath and was stirred for 1 h. Au clusters stabilized by PVP were obtained by ultrafiltration after subsequent deionization.

Figure 9 Schematic diagram for the synthesis of PVP-stabilized Au clusters in a micromixer. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [141], Copyright ACS Publications, 2008.)
Figure 9

Schematic diagram for the synthesis of PVP-stabilized Au clusters in a micromixer. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [141], Copyright ACS Publications, 2008.)

Shalom and coworkers [73] also reported the synthesis of thiol-stabilized gold NPs of sizes ranging from 2.9 to 3.7 nm with standard deviations of particles of size range between 0.6 and 0.9 nm respectively, using the microfluidic reactor. The thiol-functionalized gold NPs were often called as monolayer-protected clusters (MPCs). The gold-thiolate polymer was prepared by phase transfer of HAuCl4 into toluene using TOAB followed by the addition of 1-dodecanetiol. A three-layer micromixer (Figure 10) was used to mix the thiol-stabilized gold NPs with NaBH4, which acts as the reducing agent [116]. Different mole ratios of gold-thiolate polymer were fed into the microfluidic device with NaBH4 to produce the monolayer-protected NPs.

Figure 10 (A) Three-dimensional schematic of a radial interdigitated mixer. Each mixer is fabricated in three layers. In the first two layers, input flows are directed to two circular bus channels, which, in turn, split the flow into eight identical fluid laminae and deliver reagent streams toward a central mixing chamber. The final layer acts as a cap to enclose channels and as a guide for input and output capillaries. The output is from the center of the uppermost layer. (B) Photograph of the fabricated mixer. Microchannels are filled with dye solutions to show different shadings for the different channels. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [73], Copyright Elsevier, 2007.)
Figure 10

(A) Three-dimensional schematic of a radial interdigitated mixer. Each mixer is fabricated in three layers. In the first two layers, input flows are directed to two circular bus channels, which, in turn, split the flow into eight identical fluid laminae and deliver reagent streams toward a central mixing chamber. The final layer acts as a cap to enclose channels and as a guide for input and output capillaries. The output is from the center of the uppermost layer. (B) Photograph of the fabricated mixer. Microchannels are filled with dye solutions to show different shadings for the different channels. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [73], Copyright Elsevier, 2007.)

Pedro and coworkers [142] reported similarly prepared gold NPs with an average diameter of 2.7 nm stabilized by 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) using microfluidics. In their report, the gold colloid was prepared by one phase reaction by reducing gold (III) chloride with NaBH4 prior to stabilizing it with MUA. Syringes were used to control the flow rate of the reactants within the microfluidic device fabricated by low-temperature co-fired ceramics technology (LTCC). A multilayer design of 3D structures was integrated into these static mixers along with electric, mechanic, and fluidic components using LTCC technology. With this static microfluidic mixer, the overall process of MUA-stabilized gold NP synthesis was split into two steps. The first step involved the preparation of gold NPs, where the respective reactants, gold (III) chloride and NaBH4 were hydraulically focused in a laminar fashion within the microfluidic device. The gold chloride solution was then fed into the microfluidic device between two streams of NaBH4 in order to have efficient mixture. In the next step, the as-formed gold NPs were stabilized by feeding MUA into the microfluidic device through a separate inlet. The resulting solution that was collected out from the device was found to be fully protected MUA gold NPs.

Polte and coworkers [143] also reported a different method for growth of gold NPs with an average radius of 0.8 nm to about 2 nm using a microstructured static mixer. These gold NPs were prepared at room temperature by homogeneously mixing aqueous tetrachloroauric acid (HAuCl4) with NaBH4 within the static micromixer (Figure 11). Different residence times were applied to synthesize the gold NPs. At an increased residence time, it was observed that there was no apparent effect on the particle size suggesting that the growth of the particles happens at a shorter scale. The experimental setup was used successfully for gold NP synthesis using the sodium borohydride as the reducing agent. It was analyzed that the gold nuclei Au0 was formed initially at a rapid complete conversion from the gold precursor when the setup was coupled to X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES). These gold nuclei coalesced into larger particles, and within 100 ms, the gold precursor was completely converted to metallic gold due to rapid mixing within the microstructure mixer.

Figure 11 Experimental setup for particle synthesis in continuous flow mode coupling of a microstructured static mixer directly to SAXS analysis in a flow cell. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [143], Copyright ACS Publications, 2010.)
Figure 11

Experimental setup for particle synthesis in continuous flow mode coupling of a microstructured static mixer directly to SAXS analysis in a flow cell. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [143], Copyright ACS Publications, 2010.)

A similar time-resolution study on the size evolution of gold NP with an average particle size of 2.53 nm in a millifluidic reactor was reported by Li and coworkers [102]. Different residence times of the reactants HAuCl4 and NaBH4 were applied to prepare the gold NPs using a millifluidic device, and the spatially resolved size evolution of the gold NP was investigated using transmission electron microscope. They prepared the gold NPs by mixing aqueous HAuCl4 and DMSA within the millifluidic device followed by the addition of NaBH4. The flow of the reactants was controlled using a syringe pump (Figure 12). It was observed that the gold NPs showed a broader size distribution at a residence time of 3.53 s, and the control of particle size was much easier with a milliscale LOC device when compared to the conventional-based synthesis of gold NPs.

Figure 12 Schematic illustration of the millifluidic reactor channel used for the synthesis of gold NPs using HAuCl4 and DMSA. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [102], Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012.)
Figure 12

Schematic illustration of the millifluidic reactor channel used for the synthesis of gold NPs using HAuCl4 and DMSA. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [102], Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012.)

Saikrishna et al. [103] have reported on the time-resolved mapping of the growth of gold nanostructures using similar millifluidic chip. The millifluidic chip used in their study had serpentine channel through which HAuCl4 and DMSA solutions were fed at different flow times (such as 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 h) to form different gold nano/microstructures (Figure 13). The mixing of the precursors resulted in the formation of gold sulfide clusters of size 1–2 nm, which were later reduced by washing them with NaBH4 solution. The authors have studied the in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) of the formation process of the nanoclusters (Figure 14) and also their further growth into microstructures. They also demonstrated flow catalysis using the gold-deposited chips for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol and ferricyanide.

Figure 13 Schematic for the formation steps of gold structures within millifluidic reactor.
Figure 13

Schematic for the formation steps of gold structures within millifluidic reactor.

Figure 14 (A) Millifluidic chip marked with different zones where in situ XAS was performed. (B) In situ XAS analysis at different zones within the millifluidic channel. (C) Reaction scheme of precursors. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [103], Copyright ACS Publications, 2013.)
Figure 14

(A) Millifluidic chip marked with different zones where in situ XAS was performed. (B) In situ XAS analysis at different zones within the millifluidic channel. (C) Reaction scheme of precursors. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [103], Copyright ACS Publications, 2013.)

Synthesis of gold NPs of size 5.6 nm using multistep microfluidic reaction system was reported by Ishizaka and coworkers [144]. They used facile methods to synthesize highly dispersed gold NPs using three micromixers, which had two inlets each in order to prepare the gold NPs by NaBH4 reduction. The precursor solutions, HAuCl4 and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) solution of the poly-(amic acid) (PAA), were fed into the first Y-shaped micromixer using pumps to prepare a homogeneous mixed solution. This homogenous mixed solution was then fed simultaneously with the NaBH4 solution to form the homogeneously dispersed gold NP in the PAA solutions. Finally, a microemulsion was formed by feeding the resulting solution along with n-hexane. The microemulsion was then collected and heated in a microheat exchanger, and a dispersion of the liquid containing polyimide NPs confining Au NPs were obtained after several processing procedures.

Kohler and coworkers [77] also reported a three-step mixing synthesis of gold NPs at room temperature using a microflow channel. Unlike the previous case, gold NPs synthesized by these authors used ascorbic acid as the reducing agent. There were three mixing zones for their synthesis process. In the first zone, the reducing agent, i.e., the ascorbic acid (educt solution 1) and Fe (II) sulfate (educt solution 2) were mixed at low flow rates within the micromixer. The Fe (II) was then added to polyvinyl alcohol solution before the first mixing step. The second mixing zone had sodium metasilicate solution (educt solution 3) reacting with the mixture from the first step. Finally, 1 mm of HAuCl4 (educt solution 4) was introduced to the mixture from the second step to form 5-nm-sized Au NPs.

Wagner and coworkers [75] reported the synthesis of gold NPs with size ranges of about 5 to 50 nm using a hydrophobic continuous flow microreactor channel. The microreactor channel walls were made hydrophobic using trichloro (1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluoro-octyl) silane. In their procedure, 1 mm of aqueous HAuCl4 containing PVP was mixed with ascorbic acid within a microreactor as shown in the Figure 15. The reactant solutions were then fed into the micromixer by polypropylene syringe pumps, and the gold sol was collected separately through the mixer outlet. The pH of the reactant solution was altered in order to suppress microreactor fouling.

Figure 15 Schematic of the experimental setup showing the connectivity of the microreactor (STATMIX 6, area 22×14 mm). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [75], Copyright ACS Publications, 2005.)
Figure 15

Schematic of the experimental setup showing the connectivity of the microreactor (STATMIX 6, area 22×14 mm). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [75], Copyright ACS Publications, 2005.)

Similar to the work carried out by Wagner and group [75], Cabeza and coworkers [145] also synthesized gold NPs by controlling its size with a segmented flow microfluidic platform under hydrophobic conditions (Figure 16). The channel of the microfluidic platform was precoated with poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) hydrophobic layer in order to study the effect of axial dispersion of the gold NP size distribution. Segmented flow of reagents were achieved by feeding three separate streams of reactants viz. NaBH4, aqueous mixture of chloroauric acid and tetracyltrimethylammonium bromide (TTABr), and the third stream had either air, toluene, or silicone oil. The process was carried out for 10, 20, and 40 s, and different flow rates were maintained for each reagent to get particle sizes of 3.8±0.3, 4.6±2.1, and 4.9±3.0 nm, respectively.

Figure 16 Synthesis of gold NPs using segmented flow system under hydrophobic conditions. The hydrophobic microchannel (water is the dispersed phase). Fluorescein was added to the aqueous phase to improve the optical resolution. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [145], Copyright ACS Publications, 2012.)
Figure 16

Synthesis of gold NPs using segmented flow system under hydrophobic conditions. The hydrophobic microchannel (water is the dispersed phase). Fluorescein was added to the aqueous phase to improve the optical resolution. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [145], Copyright ACS Publications, 2012.)

Yet, another hydrophobic-channeled poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidic device was used by Lazarus and coworkers [146] for synthesizing monodisperse gold NPs of size 4.3±0.5 nm. In this process, an interdiffusion between the two reagent streams, i.e., chloroauric acid/1-methylimidazole and NaBH4 in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (BMIM-BF4) was achieved by injecting a stream of pure BMIM-BF4 using a syringe pump at various flow rates through different inlets. In addition, inert oil (polychlorotrifluoroethylene) was pumped into the microfluidic device to define the flow regimes of the reagent stream, and the final product was collected through the outlet in ethanol.

In a different procedure, Duraiswamy and coworkers [79] reported the synthesis of gold NPs of sizes <5 nm using droplet microfluidics in order to prevent the contact between the solutions and the microreactor channel walls. Their procedure involved the production of zero-valent gold (Au0) NPs by reducing trivalent gold (Au3+) chloride with ascorbic acid in the presence of CTAB as the surfactant. The seed and the reagent solutions were fed into the microfluidic mixer at equal flow rates. The gold NP seed suspension and the aqueous reagent solutions were mixed rapidly by chaotic advection within the T-junction microfluidic device to form droplets. Silicone oil was fed along with the seed and the growth solutions through a separate arm of the T-junction device (Figure 17), which prevented contact of the growing particles with the microchannel walls by forming a thin lubricating layer around the droplets. The droplets were then collected separately in a sampling reservoir and aged to ensure growth completion.

Figure 17 Schematic of the experimental setup for the production of gold NPs using a T-junction microfluidic device. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [79], Copyright John Wiley and Sons 2009.)
Figure 17

Schematic of the experimental setup for the production of gold NPs using a T-junction microfluidic device. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [79], Copyright John Wiley and Sons 2009.)

Boleininger and coworkers [65] used microfluidic mixers to synthesize gold NPs with a high concentration of CTAB, which acts as the surfactant for forming rod-shaped gold particles. Millimolar concentration of the spherical metal seed crystals in aqueous growth solution (HAuCl4) was mixed with ascorbic acid in the micromixer. These metal seeds were produced by reducing the metal salt with freshly prepared NaBH4. The flow rates of the growth solution and the seeds were maintained independently using the syringe pumps. The seed crystals were allowed to grow at a fixed temperature by directing the seed and the growth solution mixture from the microfluidic device through a temperature-controlled tubing and collected separately.

Another report by Jun and coworkers [147] describes the synthesis of gold NPs of final size range from 3 to 35 nm [148] through a wet chemical synthesis technique using both millifluidic and microfluidic mixers at room temperature (Figure 18). The precursor solution HAuCl4 was mixed with ascorbic acid (whose pH was adjusted with a calculated amount of NaOH). Rapid mixing of these solutions was achieved by feeding them into the millifluidic mixer aided by two syringe pumps. A separate glass vessel was used to collect the colloidal gold solution for further analysis. The reactants were mixed at various flow rates in order to investigate its effect on the gold NP synthesis. Ball-Berger mixer was used to achieve very fast mixing conditions for high flow rate reactions [149], whereas a butterfly mixer built with poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microchip was connected to the syringe pump for low flow rate reactions [150], and the colloidal gold solution obtained was collected through the microtube outlet.

Figure 18 Illustration of the experimental setup. The mixer can be a pressed Teflon tube (millifluidic mixer) (7 or 22 cm length) (left), a Ball-Berger mixer (not shown), or a microfluidic mixer with a butterfly geometry (right). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [147], Copyright ACS Publications, 2012.)
Figure 18

Illustration of the experimental setup. The mixer can be a pressed Teflon tube (millifluidic mixer) (7 or 22 cm length) (left), a Ball-Berger mixer (not shown), or a microfluidic mixer with a butterfly geometry (right). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [147], Copyright ACS Publications, 2012.)

Kitson and coworkers [151] reported the synthesis of gold NPs of size 10 nm using a 3D-printed millifluidic and microfluidic devices. These 3D-printed reactors had two and three inlets for introducing the reactant solutions (Figure 19). Gold NPs were synthesized using a premixed solution of aqueous HAuCl4 and sodium citrate. The solutions were fed into the 3D reactor through the first inlet and mixed with NaBH4, which was fed simultaneously through the second inlet. The formation of the gold NPs was observed by in-line UV-Vis spectroscopy, which decreased over time due to the gold deposition over the channel walls.

Figure 19 3D-printed millifluidic reactors for synthesis of gold NPs. The devices with three inlets each connected to a pump, and the in-line ATR-IR and/or UV-Vis flow cells connected to the outlet. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [151], Copyright ACS Publications, 2008.)
Figure 19

3D-printed millifluidic reactors for synthesis of gold NPs. The devices with three inlets each connected to a pump, and the in-line ATR-IR and/or UV-Vis flow cells connected to the outlet. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [151], Copyright ACS Publications, 2008.)

Weng and coworkers [152] reported the synthesis of citrate-based gold NPs of size 35±2 nm using PDMS-based microfluidic device. They used a pneumatic rotary micromixer with four peristaltic membrane layouts for the synthesis of hexagonal gold NPs with trisodium citrate as the primary reducing agent. Trisodium citrate and preheated HAuCl4 solutions were fed within the micromixer and mixed vigorously to obtain a ruby red solution, which was then heated to 115°C for the reaction completion. Different heating times and concentrations of the HAuCl4 and tri-sodium citrate were also tested within the micromixer to synthesize the hexagonal gold NPs with different sizes.

Similar to the previous report, Yang and coworkers [153] used a microfluidic chip on a thermoelectric device (TE) to synthesize gold NPs with different sizes (19, 28, 37, and 58 nm) by manipulating the volumes of the reactant, i.e., chloroauric acid and trisodium citrate at a constant reaction temperature of 100oC. A cone-shaped condenser was placed on top of the chamber after the reagents were mixed into it to maintain a constant reactant concentration. A micropump was used to inject the sodium citrate, and a vortex-type micromixer was used to stir the reagents in the mixing chamber in order to form gold NPs by reducing the chloroauric acid solution, which was observed by a color change from light yellow to ruby red. The reaction process was carried out for 10 min before the solution was cooled down to room temperature.

4.3 Gold nanocatalysts supported within LOC systems

In the previous section, various synthetic protocols that have been used for making gold NPs using the LOC systems were summarized. In this section, the focus is on gold NPs that are supported within the LOC devices for catalysis. The gold NPs catalysts were either prepared in situ enabling attachment to the channel walls or synthesized using conventional methods and loaded or immobilized over the channels of the LOC system (Figure 1). Loading the gold NPs into the LOC systems are carried out by various methods. For example, Abahmane and coworkers loaded the gold nanocatalysts into the capillaries and packed it by supporting vibrations [20]. Similarly, dip coating the internal surface of the capillary [154], calcination [155], crosslinking the copolymer to the gold NP [156, 157] spin-coating techniques [158] were used in order to make gold nanocatalyst-supported reaction systems.

Synthesis of polypyridine derivatives using alumina-supported gold NPs of size 2 nm using microcontinuous flow conditions has been reported by Abahmane and coworkers [20]. After supporting the gold NPs on Al2O3 through impregnation, the heterogeneous catalysts were used in the microcontinuous flow system (Figure 20) as the packed bed capillary reactor (PBCR). Reactants were fed through the PBCR under optimized continuous flow conditions to retrieve the products. The authors also reported the synthesis of pyridine [159] and propargylamines (Figure 21) [21] using similar continuous microflow system packed with gold NP-impregnated alumina.

Figure 20 Synthesis of polypyridine derivatives using alumina-supported gold NPs using microcontinuous flow setup (feedstock 1: bis-α-H-ketone solution, feedstock 2: propargylamine solution; M, micro mixer; PBCR1, PBCR2, packed bed capillary reactors (ID: 1 mm, 50 cm length); P, pressure sensor; T1, T2, temperature sensors; S1, S2, syringe pumps). Inlay: image of the PBCRs. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [20], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2009.)
Figure 20

Synthesis of polypyridine derivatives using alumina-supported gold NPs using microcontinuous flow setup (feedstock 1: bis-α-H-ketone solution, feedstock 2: propargylamine solution; M, micro mixer; PBCR1, PBCR2, packed bed capillary reactors (ID: 1 mm, 50 cm length); P, pressure sensor; T1, T2, temperature sensors; S1, S2, syringe pumps). Inlay: image of the PBCRs. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [20], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2009.)

Figure 21 Flow chemistry setup schemes for the different reaction regimes for the synthesis of propargylamines. (A–C). P1, P2, pumps; P(1), pressure sensor; T(1), T(2), temperature sensors; PBCR1 (Montmorillonite K-10) and PBCR2 (Au-NP@Al2O3), packed-bed capillary reactors; BPR, back-pressure regulator. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [21], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2011.)
Figure 21

Flow chemistry setup schemes for the different reaction regimes for the synthesis of propargylamines. (A–C). P1, P2, pumps; P(1), pressure sensor; T(1), T(2), temperature sensors; PBCR1 (Montmorillonite K-10) and PBCR2 (Au-NP@Al2O3), packed-bed capillary reactors; BPR, back-pressure regulator. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [21], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2011.)

Packed bed capillary reactors were also used for liquid phase hydrogenation of citral on Au/TiO2 thin films within capillary microreactors by Protasova and coworkers [154]. Gold NPs of size 4.5±0.5 nm prepared by NaBH4 reduction were doped on titania films to form the Au/TiO2 sol. The coating of Au/TiO2 sol within the capillary reactor was done after pretreatment and calcination processes and used to study the kinetics of citral hydrogenation. A similar Au/TiO2 catalyst was reported by Cao and coworkers [160]. They used Au-Pd over TiO2 for benzyl alcohol oxidation within the microstructured reactors (Figure 22). The Au-Pd/TiO2 catalyst was prepared separately and loaded into the microreactors and was later used for catalytic studies.

Figure 22 Microreactor, reactor assembly with temperature control and the schematic of the experimental setup for benzyl alcohol oxidation reaction. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [160], Copyright Elsevier, 2011.)
Figure 22

Microreactor, reactor assembly with temperature control and the schematic of the experimental setup for benzyl alcohol oxidation reaction. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [160], Copyright Elsevier, 2011.)

Juarez and coworkers [155] reported the continuous flow carbamoylation of aniline by dimethyl carbonate using Au/CeO2 of size 3–4 nm within a microreactor (Figure 23). The Au NPs supported on CeO2 support was prepared using convention wet impregnation method, coated within the stainless steel microreactor plate and used for carbamyoylation reaction.

Figure 23 Parts of the microreactor showing the microchannel plate coated with a thin film of nanoparticulated ceria. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [155], Copyright Elsevier, 2011.)
Figure 23

Parts of the microreactor showing the microchannel plate coated with a thin film of nanoparticulated ceria. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [155], Copyright Elsevier, 2011.)

Wang and coworkers [156] reported the oxidation of alcohols with molecular oxygen using the gold-immobilized mirochannel flow reactor. Microencapsulated gold prepared from chlorotriphenylphosphine gold (AuClPPh3) and copolymer in THF solution, was used as a gold source for the immobilization [157, 161]. Gold was immobilized on the capillary column reactor by reducing the cyanopropyl groups using lithium aluminum hydride to the corresponding amine (Figure 24). The modified capillary column was pumped with a colloidal solution of the microencapsulated gold and heated to 170°C for 5 h in order to have a crosslinking of the copolymer to result in the gold immobilization, which was further used for oxidation studies (Figure 25).

Figure 24 Immobilization of the gold catalyst into capillary column reactor. (A) Reduction of the cyano group to an amine. (B) Preparation of microencapsulated gold. (C) Immobilization of the gold catalyst. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [156], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2009.)
Figure 24

Immobilization of the gold catalyst into capillary column reactor. (A) Reduction of the cyano group to an amine. (B) Preparation of microencapsulated gold. (C) Immobilization of the gold catalyst. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [156], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2009.)

Figure 25 Experimental setup of the gold-catalyzed oxidation of alcohols. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [156], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2009.)
Figure 25

Experimental setup of the gold-catalyzed oxidation of alcohols. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [156], Copyright John Wiley and Sons, 2009.)

Apart from using immobilized gold nanocatalyst prepared through the bottom-up approaches, gold NPs synthesized using the top-down method were also used within the microfluidic reactors for catalytic applications. For example, Adleman and coworkers [158] carried out heterogeneous catalysis mediated by plasmon heating with gold NPs of estimated average diameter size of 20±5 nm prepared by lithography and immobilized over a glass microscope slide, which was temporarily bonded to PDMS. Figure 26 shows the schematic of gold NPs immobilized on the microfluidic channel attached to the PDMS support.

Figure 26 Schematic of the process of plasmonic heating (side view). A microfluidic channel with gold nanoparticles attached to a glass support; fluid flows from left to right. (Top) A laser at or near the frequency of the plasmon resonance of the gold nanoparticles is focused on the top of the support, and the subsequent heat generated in the nanoparticles is transferred to the surrounding fluid and forms vapor. The vapor phase components react on the catalyst forming gas bubbles, which are carried downstream. (The channel height is 40 μm, and the radius of the nanoparticles is ∼10 nm). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [158], Copyright ACS Publications, 2009.)
Figure 26

Schematic of the process of plasmonic heating (side view). A microfluidic channel with gold nanoparticles attached to a glass support; fluid flows from left to right. (Top) A laser at or near the frequency of the plasmon resonance of the gold nanoparticles is focused on the top of the support, and the subsequent heat generated in the nanoparticles is transferred to the surrounding fluid and forms vapor. The vapor phase components react on the catalyst forming gas bubbles, which are carried downstream. (The channel height is 40 μm, and the radius of the nanoparticles is ∼10 nm). (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [158], Copyright ACS Publications, 2009.)

Saikrishna et al. [103] have demonstrated reduction reactions of 4-nitrophenol and ferricyanide using a gold microstructure-coated millifluidic chip. The authors achieved ∼90% conversion of the reactants using gold-coated chip compared to 20% conversion using a chip without gold coated within the channel. Their gold catalysts were also reusable up to 40 catalytic cycles (80 h), which establishes the significant advantage of flow catalytic process.

There are some challenges that need to be addressed when a NP-supported LOC device is used for catalytic conversion reactions. While loading a metal catalyst like gold NP onto a support or a reactor, there are chances that these particles might lose their functional activity and selectivity due to environmental conditions. For example, while immobilizing the NPs onto a substrate, proper pretreatment procedures have to be carried out in advance in order to have an improved catalyst attachment. There are chances that the catalyst might undergo agglomeration due to the thermal pretreatment like calcination, mechanical vibrations, etc.

5 Conclusions and future perspective

Controlled synthesis of Au NPs with better stability and selectivity either by top-down or bottom-up approach is very important for their application as catalysts. Advances in synthetic protocols for Au NPs from conventional methods to LOC systems have proven to be successful with respect to control over their size, size distribution, and shape. Facile synthesis of Au NPs using LOC devices has been favorable due to the possibility for easy manipulation of reagents and reaction conditions along with the possibility for in-line characterization during synthesis. While the LOC-based synthesis of gold NPs has not produced better quality materials in comparison with traditional flask-based synthesis, the ability to combine synthesis with in-line probing of the reaction offers a distinct advantage in LOC devices. Therefore, the application of LOC devices for synthesis and characterization of gold NPs could lead to new analogs based on their structure (size distribution, shape, porosity), and functional properties (stability, catalytic activity) in the near future. As the synthetic efforts are currently being directed toward the synthesis of atomically precise gold catalysts, we anticipate a bigger role for the development of LOC devices for these investigations. With the option to study time-resolved particle growth within the millifluidic channel, the synthesis conditions can be well controlled to investigate the surface growth kinetics of the gold NPs [102, 103] and to prepare atomically precise gold NPs. As discussed in the review with several examples, the use of LOC systems with control over the residence time, precursor volume and concentration, and surfactant, surface modifications would definitely create a paradigm shift in designing unique Au NPs catalysts.

From the extensive literature presented in this review, it is clear that LOC devices offer many opportunities for flow catalysis based on gold NPs. This opportunity is particularly attractive as a large number of gold catalyzed organic and inorganic reactions [162–165] are yet to be exploited using continuous flow catalysis based on LOC devices. It is now well established that gold is effective for reactions under mild conditions, particularly CO oxidation, which is possible at sub-ambient temperatures. We hope that flow catalysis of such heterogeneous reactions will be carried out in the near future [166, 167]. With the ability to probe reactions within LOC devices with unparalleled time resolution using various spectroscopy tools, one can foresee investigations to unravel the mechanism of gold-catalyzed reactions (both solution phase as well as gas phase) ranging from fine chemical conversions to more complicated biomass conversion processes.

The discovery that incorporating a second metal as an alloy with gold can enhance the catalyst performance [168] is anticipated to lead to further utilization of LOC-based approaches for both synthesis and flow catalysis of gold-based bimetallic nanocatalysts.


Corresponding author: Challa S.S.R. Kumar, Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD), Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70806, USA; and Center for Atomic-Level Catalyst Design, Cain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, #324, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA, e-mail:

About the authors

Chelliah V. Navin

Chelliah V. Navin joined Dr. Challa Kumar’s research group at the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD) in 2011 as a graduate student and is also a part of Dr. Chandra Theegala’s team. He holds a MS by research in Biological and Agricultural Engineering (BAE) from the Louisiana State University (LSU) and his PhD dissertation at CAMD, LSU focussed on millifluidic-based nanomaterial synthesis for catalytic applications. His technical interests include bio-energy, bio-chemical engineering, and catalysis.

Katla Sai Krishna

Katla Sai Krishna earned his PhD from Jawaharlal Nehru Center for Advanced Scientific Research, India, in 2011. He joined Dr. Challa Kumar’s group as a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD), Louisiana State University, in 2011. His current research interests include millifluidics-based synthesis of metal nanostructures for flow catalytic applications and synthesis of atomically precise gold clusters for applications in catalysis and magnetism.

Chandra S. Theegala

Chandra Theegala is currently working as an Associate Professor in the Biological and Agricultural Engineering (BAE) Department at the Louisiana State University (LSU). Dr. Theegala holds a PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from LSU. His doctoral research focused on mass production of weaker microalgal strains in open-unprotected environments. He is the founder and group coordinator of the “Renewable Energy, Byproduct Utilization and Biosystems (REBUB)” research group in the BAE Department. In the energy arena, he is actively working on biomass gasifiers, cost-effective microalgal cell harvesting, microalgal lipid yield intensification and extraction, light optimization in phototrophic cultures, hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass and wastes, cellulase enzyme recycling, solar drying, and energy conservation.

Challa S.S.R. Kumar

Challa S.S.R. Kumar is the Director of Nanofabrication and Nanomaterials at the Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices at the Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. He is a winner of the 2006 Nano 50 Technology Award for his work on magnetic-based nanoparticles for cancer imaging and treatment. His research interests are in developing novel synthetic methods, including those based on microfluidic reactors for multifunctional nanomaterials. He has 8 years of industrial R&D experience working for Imperial Chemical Industries and United Breweries. He is the Editor of two online series on Nanotechnologies for the Life Sciences (NtLS) and Nanomaterials for the Life Sciences (NmLS) and a book series on the characterization of nanomaterials. He is also currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Nanotechnology Reviews and founding editor of the Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. Numerous books and original research papers are part of his extensive publication record.

This research work is supported as part of the Center for Atomic Level Catalyst Design, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DE-SC0001058 and also supported by Board of Regents under grants award number LEQSF (2009-14)-EFRC-MATCH and LEDSF-EPS(2012)-OPT-IN-15.

References

[1] Haruta M. Size- and support-dependency in the catalysis of gold. Catal. Today 1997, 36, 153–166.10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00208-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] Haruta M, Kobayashi T, Sano H, Yamada N. Novel gold catalysts for the oxidation of carbon monoxide at a temperature far below 0oC. Chem. Lett. 1987, 16, 405–408.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Thompson DT. Using gold nanoparticles for catalysis. Nano. Today 2007, 2, 40–43.10.1016/S1748-0132(07)70116-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cho A. Connecting the dots to custom catalysts. Science 2003, 299, 1684–1685.10.1126/science.299.5613.1684Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Shaikhutdinov SK, Meyer R, Naschitzki M, Bäumer M, Freund HJ. Size and support effects for CO adsorption on gold model catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2003, 86, 211–219.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cuenya BR. Synthesis and catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles: size, shape, support, composition, and oxidation state effects. Thin. Solid Films 2010, 518, 3127–3150.10.1016/j.tsf.2010.01.018Search in Google Scholar

[7] Frost CG, Mutton L. Heterogeneous catalytic synthesis using microreactor technology. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1687–1703.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Barakat T, Rooke JC, Genty E, Cousin R, Siffert S, Su BL. Gold catalysts in environmental remediation and water-gas shift technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 371–391.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ma Z, Dai S. Design of novel structured gold nanocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 805–818.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Serna P, Boronat M, Corma A. Tuning the behavior of Au and Pt catalysts for the chemoselective hydrogenation of nitroaromatic compounds. Topics Catal. 2011, 54, 439–446.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Corma A, Serna P. Gold-catalyzed reduction reactions. In Modern Gold Catalyzed Synthesis, Hashmi ASK, Toste FD, Eds., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2012, pp. 27–54.10.1002/9783527646869.ch2Search in Google Scholar

[12] Pan M, Brush AJ, Pozun ZD, Ham HC, Yu WY, Henkelman G, Hwang GS, Mullins CB. Model studies of heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation reactions with gold. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5002–5013.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wu P, Loh KP, Zhao XS. Supported gold catalysts for selective oxidation of organics. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2011, 3, 970–983.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Zhang H, Toshima N. Glucose oxidation using Au-containing bimetallic and trimetallic nanoparticles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 268–278.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kusema BT, Murzin DY. Catalytic oxidation of rare sugars over gold catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 297–307.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Stratakis M, Garcia H. Catalysis by supported gold nanoparticles: beyond aerobic oxidative processes. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4469–4506.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mielby J, Kegnæs S, Fristrup P. Gold nanoparticle-catalyzed formation of nitrogen-containing compounds – from mechanistic understanding to synthetic exploitation. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 1037–1047.10.1002/cctc.201200314Search in Google Scholar

[18] Mikami Y, Dhakshinamoorthy A, Alvaro M, Garcia H. Catalytic activity of unsupported gold nanoparticles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 58–69.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Jamal F, Jean-Sébastien G, Maël P, Edmond P, Christian R. Gold nanoparticle synthesis in microfluidic systems and immobilisation in microreactors designed for the catalysis of fine organic reactions. Microsyst. Technol. 2012, 18, 151–158.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Abahmane L, Knauer A, Köhler JM, Groß GA. Synthesis of polypyridine derivatives using alumina supported gold nanoparticles under micro continuous flow conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 167, 519–526.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Abahmane L, Köhler JM, Groß, GA. Gold-nanoparticle-catalyzed synthesis of propargylamines: the traditional A3-multicomponent reaction performed as a two-step flow process. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3005–3010.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Wang L, Yang P, Li Y, Chen H, Li M, Luo F. A flow injection chemiluminescence method for the determination of fluoroquinolone derivative using the reaction of luminol and hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by gold nanoparticles. Talanta 2007, 72, 1066–1072.10.1016/j.talanta.2006.12.050Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Krishna KS, Li Y, Li S, Kumar CSSR. Lab on a chip synthesis of inorganic nanomaterials and quantum dots for biomedical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013. In press.10.1016/j.addr.2013.05.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Corma A, Garcia H. Supported gold nanoparticles as catalysts for organic reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2096–2126.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Newman SG, Jensen KF. The role of flow in green chemistry and engineering. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1456–1472.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Dunnewijk J, Bosch H, De Haan AB. Reverse flow adsorption: integrating the recovery and recycling of homogeneous catalysts. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40, 317–320.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Taniike T, Tada M, Coquet R, Morikawa Y, Sasaki T, Iwasawa Y. A new aspect of heterogeneous catalysis: highly reactive cis-(NO)2 dimer and Eley-Rideal mechanism for NO-CO reaction on a Co-dimer/γ-alumina catalyst. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 443, 66–70.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Chaturvedi S, Dave PN, Shah NK. Applications of nano-catalyst in new era. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2012 16, 307–325.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Polshettiwar V, Luque R, Fihri A, Zhu H, Bouhrara M, Basset JM. Magnetically recoverable nanocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3036–3075.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Gaur S, Johansson S, Mohammad F, Kumar C, Spivey JJ. Catalytic activity of titania-supported core-shell Fe3O4@Au nano-catalysts for CO oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 22319–22326.10.1021/jp3045725Search in Google Scholar

[31] Qian H, Jin R. Controlling nanoparticles with atomic precision: the case of Au144(SCH2CH2Ph)60. Nano. Lett. 2009, 9, 4083–4087.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Zhu Y, Qian H, Drake BA, Jin R. Atomically precise Au25(SR)18 nanoparticles as catalysts for selective hydrogenation of α, β-unsaturated ketones and aldehydes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1295–1298.Search in Google Scholar

[33] MacDonald MA, Zhang P, Qian H, Jin R. Site-specific and size-dependent bonding of compositionally precise gold-thiolate nanoparticles from X-ray spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 1821–1825.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Jin R, Qian H, Wu Z, Zhu Y, Zhu M, Mohanty A, Garg N. Size focusing: a methodology for synthesizing atomically precise gold nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2903–2910.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Zhu Y, Qian H, Jin R. Catalysis opportunities of atomically precise gold nanoclusters. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6793–6799.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Jin R, Qian H, Zhu Y, Das A. Atomically precise nanoparticles: a new frontier in nanoscience. J. Nanosci. Lett. 2011, 1, 72–86.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Wu Z, MacDonald M, Chen J, Zhang P, Jin R. Kinetic control and thermodynamic selection in the synthesis of atomically precise gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9670–9673.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Qian H, Zhu Y, Jin R. Atomically precise gold nanocrystal molecules with surface plasmon resonance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 696–700.10.1073/pnas.1115307109Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Qian H, Zhu M, Wu Z, Jin R. Quantum sized gold nanoclusters with atomic precision. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1470–1479.Search in Google Scholar

[40] De Jong KP. Synthesis of Solid Catalysts. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, May 2009.10.1002/9783527626854Search in Google Scholar

[41] Gaur S, Miller JT, Stellwagen D, Sanampudi A, Kumar CSSR, Spivey JJ. Synthesis, characterization, and testing of supported Au catalysts prepared from atomically-tailored Au38(SC12H25)24 clusters. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 1627–1634.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Turner M, Golovko VB, Vaughan OPH, Abdulkin P, Berenguer-Murcia A, Tikhov MS, Johnson BFG, Lambert RM. Selective oxidation with dioxygen by gold nanoparticle catalysts derived from 55-atom clusters. Nature 2008, 454, 981–983.10.1038/nature07194Search in Google Scholar

[43] Ismagilov IZ, Michurin EM, Sukhova OB, Tsykoza LT, Matus EV, Kerzhentsev MA, Ismagilov ZR, Zagoruiko AN, Rebrov EV, De Croon MHJM, Schouten JC. Oxidation of organic compounds in a microstructured catalytic reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 135S, S57–S65.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Donati G, Paludetto R. Batch and semibatch catalytic reactors (from theory to practice). Catal. Today 1999, 52, 183–195.10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00075-9Search in Google Scholar

[45] Liu X, Unal B, Jensen KF. Heterogeneous catalysis with continuous flow microreactors. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 2134–2138.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Sachse A, Galarneau A, Coq B, Fajula F. Monolithic flow microreactors improve fine chemicals synthesis. New J. Chem. 2011, 35, 259–264.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Zhang W, Xu S, Han X, Bao X. In situ solid-state NMR for heterogeneous catalysis: a joint experimental and theoretical approach. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 192–210.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Rahimpour MR, Pourazadi E, Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM. Methanol synthesis in a novel axial-flow, spherical packed bed reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2011, 89, 2457–2469.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Nagy KD, Jensen KF. Catalytic processes in small scale flow reactors status and opportunities. Chim. Oggi/Chem. Today 2011, 29, 18–23.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Stubenrauch M, Fischer M, Kremin C, Stoebenau S, Albrecht A, Nagel O. Black silicon – new functionalities in microsystems. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2006, 16, S82–S87.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Roumanie M, Delattreb C, Mittler F, Marchandb G, Meille V, De Bellefonc C, Pijolata C, Tourniera G, Pouteau P. Enhancing surface activity in silicon microreactors: sse of black silicon and alumina as catalyst supports for chemical and biological applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 135, Supplement 1: S317–S326.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Brivio M, Verboom W, Reinhoudt DN. Miniaturized continuous flow reaction vessels: influence on chemical reactions. Lab. Chip 2006, 6, 329–344.10.1039/b510856jSearch in Google Scholar

[53] Martínez-Cisneros CS, Pedro SGD, Puyol M, García-García J, Alonso-Chamarro J. Design, fabrication and characterization of microreactors for high temperature syntheses. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 211–212, 432–441.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Walter E, Pronzato L, Soong Y, Otarod M, Happel J. Modeling transient tracing in plug-flow reactors: a case study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 483–487.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Lorber N, Sarrazin F, Guillot P, Panizza P, Colin A, Pavageau B, Mignard E. Some recent advances in the design and the use of miniaturized droplet-based continuous process: applications in chemistry and high-pressure microflows. Lab. Chip 2011, 11, 779–787.10.1039/C0LC00058BSearch in Google Scholar

[56] Huang CT, Peretfi SW, Bryers JD. Use of flow cell reactors to quantify biofilm formation kinetics. Biotechnol. Tech. 1992, 6, 193–198.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Goeres DM, Hamilton MA, Beck NA, Buckingham-Meyer K, Hilyard JD, Loetterle LR, Lorenz LA, Walker DK, Stewart PS. A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 783–788.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Powell MS, Slater NKH. The deposition of bacterial cells from laminar flows onto solid surfaces. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25, 891–900.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Tosti S, Basileb A, Chiappettab G, Rizzelloc C, Violantea V. Pd-Ag membrane reactors for water gas shift reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2003, 93, 23–30.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Li P, Lei N, Sheadel DA, Xu J, Xue W. Integration of nanosensors into a sealed microchannel in a hybrid lab-on-a-chip device. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 166–167, 870–877.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Gravesen P, Branebjerg J, Jensen OS. Microfluidics – a review. J. Micromech. Microeng. 1993, 3, 168–182.Search in Google Scholar

[62] Jensen KF. Microreaction engineering – is small better? Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 293–303.10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00230-XSearch in Google Scholar

[63] Chrimes AF, Khoshmanesh K, Stoddart PR, Mitchell A, Kalantar-zadeh K. Microfluidics and Raman microscopy: current applications and future challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5880–5906.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Ratner DM, Murphy ER, Jhunjhunwala M, Snyder DA, Jensen KF, Seeberger PH. Microreactor-based reaction optimization in organic chemistry-glycosylation as a challenge. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5, 578–580.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Boleininger, J, Kurz A, Reuss V, Sonnichsen C. Microfluidic continuous flow synthesis of rod-shaped gold and silver nanocrystals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3824–3827.Search in Google Scholar

[66] DeMello AJ. Control and detection of chemical reactions in microfluidic systems. Nature 2006, 442, 394–402.10.1038/nature05062Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Chan EM, Mathies RA, Alivisatos AP. Size-controlled growth of CdSe nanocrystals in microfluidic reactors. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 199–201.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Edel JB, Fortt R, DeMello JC, DeMello AJ. Microfluidic routes to the controlled production of nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2002, 10, 1136–1137.Search in Google Scholar

[69] He S, Liu Y, Uehara M, Maeda H. Continuous micro flow synthesis of ZnO nanorods with UV emissions. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 137, 295–298.10.1016/j.mseb.2006.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[70] Nakamura H, Yamaguchi Y, Miyazaki M, Maeda H, Uehara M, Mulvaney P. Preparation of CdSe nanocrystals in a micro-flow-reactor. Chem. Commun. 2002, 23, 2844–2845.Search in Google Scholar

[71] Abou Hassan A, Sandre O, Cabuil V, Tabeling P. Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles in a microfluidic device: preliminary results in a coaxial flow millichannel. Chem. Commun. 2008, 15, 1783–1785.Search in Google Scholar

[72] Khan SA, Jensen KF. Microfluidic synthesis of titania shells on colloidal silica. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2556–2560.Search in Google Scholar

[73] Shalom D, Wootton RCR, Winkle RF, Cottam BF, Vilar R, DeMello AJ, Wilde CP. Synthesis of thiol functionalized gold nanoparticles using a continuous flow microfluidic reactor. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 1146–1150.Search in Google Scholar

[74] Song Y, Hormes J, Kumar CSSR. Microfluidic synthesis of nanomaterials. Small 2008, 4, 698–711.10.1002/smll.200701029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Wagner J, Köhler JM. Continuous synthesis of gold nanoparticles in a microreactor. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 685–691.Search in Google Scholar

[76] Wagner J, Kirner T, Mayer G, Albert J, Köhler JM. Generation of metal nanoparticles in a microchannel reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 101, 251–260.Search in Google Scholar

[77] Kohler JM, Wagner J, Albert J. Formation of isolated and clustered Au nanoparticles in the presence of polyelectrolyte molecules using a flow-through Si chip reactor. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 1924–1930.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Takagi M, Maki T, Miyahara M, Mae K. Production of titania nanoparticles by using a new microreactor assembled with same axle dual pipe. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 101, 269–276.Search in Google Scholar

[79] Duraiswamy S, Khan SA. Droplet-based microfluidic synthesis of anisotropic metal nanocrystals. Small 2009, 5, 2828–2834.10.1002/smll.200901453Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Fair RB, Khlystov A, Tailor TD, Ivanov V, Evans RD, Griffin PB, Zhou J. Chemical and biological applications of digital-microfluidic devices. Des. Test Comput. IEEE 2007, 24, 10–24.10.1109/MDT.2007.8Search in Google Scholar

[81] Marre S, Roig Y, Aymonier C. Supercritical microfluidics: opportunities in flow-through chemistry and materials science. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 66, 251–264.10.1016/j.supflu.2011.11.029Search in Google Scholar

[82] Engl W, Tachibana M, Panizza P, Backov R. Millifluidic as a versatile reactor to tune size and aspect ratio of large polymerized objects. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2007, 33, 897–903.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[83] Gaur S, Wu H, Stanley GG, More K, Kumar CSSR, Spivey JJ. CO oxidation studies over cluster-derived Au/TiO2 and AUROlite™ Au/TiO2 catalysts using DRIFTS. Catal. Today 2013, 208, 72–81.10.1016/j.cattod.2012.10.029Search in Google Scholar

[84] Zhu Y, Qian H, Jin R. An atomic-level strategy for unraveling gold nanocatlaysis from the perspective of Aun(SR)m nanoclusters. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11455–11462.Search in Google Scholar

[85] Liu J, Krishna KS, Losovyj YB, Chattopadhyay S, Lozova N, Miller JT, Spivey JJ, Kumar CSSR. Ligand-stabilized and atomically precise gold nanocluster catalysis: a case study for correlating fundamental electronic properties with catalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10201–10208.Search in Google Scholar

[86] Nie X, Qian H, Ge Q, Xu H, Jin R. CO oxidation catalyzed by oxide-supported Au25(SR)18 nanoclusters and identification of perimeter sites as active centers. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 6014–6022.10.1021/nn301019fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Lopez-Sanchez JA, Dimitratos N, Hammond C, Brett GL, Kesavan L, White S, Miedziak P, Tiruvalam R, Jenkins RL, Carley AF, Knight D, Kiely CJ, Hutchings GJ. Facile removal of stabilizer-ligands from supported gold nanoparticles. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 551–556.Search in Google Scholar

[88] Wagner J, Tshikhudo TR, Köhler JM. Microfluidic generation of metal nanoparticles by borohydride reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 135, Supplement 1, S104–S109.Search in Google Scholar

[89] Liu H, Huang J, Sun D, Lin L, Lin W, Li J, Li Q. Microfluidic biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles: effect of process parameters on size distribution. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 209, 568–576.Search in Google Scholar

[90] Köhler JM, Abahmane L, Wagner J, Albert J, Mayer G. Preparation of metal nanoparticles with varied composition for catalytical applications in microreactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 5048–5055.Search in Google Scholar

[91] Song Y, Doomes EE, Prindle J, Tittsworth R, Hormes J, Kumar CSSR. Investigations into sulfobetaine-stabilized Cu nanoparticle formation: toward development of a microfluidic synthesis. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 9330–9338.10.1021/jp044777gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[92] Song Y, Kumar CSSR, Hormes J. Synthesis of Pd nanoparticles using a continuous flow polymeric micro reactor. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2004, 4, 788–793.Search in Google Scholar

[93] Torigoe K, Watanabe Y, Endo T, Sakai K, Sakai H, Abe M. Microflow reactor synthesis of palladium nanoparticles stabilized with poly(benzyl ether) dendron ligands. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 951–960.Search in Google Scholar

[94] Yen BHK. Microfluidic reactors for the synthesis of nanocrystals. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[95] Abou-Hassan A, Bazzi R, Cabuil V. Multistep continuous-flow microsynthesis of magnetic and fluorescent γ-Fe2O3@SiO2 core/shell nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7180–7183.Search in Google Scholar

[96] Chang JY, Yang CH, Huang KS. Microfluidic assisted preparation of CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals encapsulated into poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) microcapsules. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 305305.10.1088/0957-4484/18/30/305305Search in Google Scholar

[97] Hwang DK, Dendukuri D, Doyle PS. Microfluidic-based synthesis of non-spherical magnetic hydrogel microparticles. Lab. Chip. 2008, 8, 1640–1647.Search in Google Scholar

[98] Kim JW, Utada AS, Fernández-Nieves A, Hu Z, Weitz DA. Fabrication of monodisperse gel shells and functional microgels in microfluidic devices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1819–1822.Search in Google Scholar

[99] Yuet KP, Hwang DK, Haghgooie R, Doyle PS. Multifunctional superparamagnetic Janus particles. Langmuir 2009, 26, 4281–4287.10.1021/la903348sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Marre S, Jensen KF. Synthesis of micro and nanostructures in microfluidic systems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1183–1202.Search in Google Scholar

[101] Biswas S, Miller JT, Li Y, Nandakumar K, Kumar CSSR. Developing a millifluidic platform for the synthesis of ultrasmall nanoclusters: ultrasmall copper nanoclusters as a case study. Small 2012, 8, 687–697.10.1002/smll.201290031Search in Google Scholar

[102] Li Y, Sanampudi A, Raji Reddy V, Biswas S, Nandakumar K, Yemane D, Kumar CSSR. Size evolution of gold nanoparticles in a millifluidic reactor. ChemPhysChem 2012, 13, 177–182.10.1002/cphc.201100726Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[103] Saikrishna K, Navin CV, Biswas S, Singh V, Ham K, Bovenkamp GL, Kumar CSSR. Millifluidics for time-resolved mapping of the growth of gold nanostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5450–5456.Search in Google Scholar

[104] Hammer B, Norskov JK. Why gold is the noblest of all the metals? Nature 2002, 376, 238–240.10.1038/376238a0Search in Google Scholar

[105] Eustis S, El-Sayed MA. Why gold nanoparticles are more precious than pretty gold: noble metal surface plasmon resonance and its enhancement of the radiative and nonradiative properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 209–217.Search in Google Scholar

[106] Chen MS, Goodman DW. The structure of catalytically active gold on titania. Science 2004, 306, 252–255.10.1126/science.1102420Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] Valden M, Lai X, Goodman DW. Onset of catalytic activity of gold clusters on titania with the appearance of nonmetallic properties. Science 1998, 281, 1647–1650.10.1126/science.281.5383.1647Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[108] Haruta M. Novel catalysis of gold deposited on metal oxides. Catal. Surv. Jpn. 1997, 1, 61–73.10.1023/A:1019068728295Search in Google Scholar

[109] Conte M, Carleya AF, Heirene C, Willocka DJ, Johnston P, Herzing AA, Kielyc CJ, Hutchings GJ. Hydrochlorination of acetylene using a supported gold catalyst: a study of the reaction mechanism. J. Catal. 2007, 250, 231–239.Search in Google Scholar

[110] Ma C, Xue W, Li J, Xing W, Hao Z. Mesoporous carbon-confined Au catalysts with superior activity for selective oxidation of glucose to gluconic acid. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1035–1041.Search in Google Scholar

[111] Zhang P, Zhang B, Shi R. Catalytic decomposition of low level ozone with gold nanoparticles supported on activated carbon. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2009, 3, 281–288.10.1007/s11783-009-0032-5Search in Google Scholar

[112] Seker E, Gulari E. Single step sol-gel made gold on alumina catalyst for selective reduction of NOx under oxidizing conditions: effect of gold precursor and reaction conditions. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2002, 232, 203–217.Search in Google Scholar

[113] McEwana L, Juliusa M, Roberts S, Fletcher JCQ. A review of the use of gold catalysts in selective hydrogenation reactions. Gold Bull. Vol. 2010, 43, 298–306.Search in Google Scholar

[114] Li G, Jin R. Atomically precise gold nanoclusters as new model catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1749–1758.Search in Google Scholar

[115] Frens G. Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in monodisperse gold suspensions. Nat. Phys. Sci. (Lond.) 1973, 241, 20–22.10.1038/physci241020a0Search in Google Scholar

[116] Brust M, Walker M, Bethell D, Schiffrin DJ, Whyman R. Synthesis of thiol-derivatised gold nanoparticles in a two-phase liquid-liquid system. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 7, 801–802.Search in Google Scholar

[117] Jana NR, Gearheart L, Murphy CJ. Seed-mediated growth approach for shape-controlled synthesis of spheroidal and rod-like gold nanoparticles using a surfactant template. Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 1389–1393.Search in Google Scholar

[118] Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed MA. Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957–1962.Search in Google Scholar

[119] Sun Y, Xia Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science 2002, 298, 2176–2179.10.1126/science.1077229Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[120] Ahmadi TS, Wang ZL, Green TC, Henglein A, El-Sayed MA. Shape-controlled synthesis of colloidal platinum nanoparticles. Science 1996, 272, 1924–1925.10.1126/science.272.5270.1924Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[121] Porel S, Singh S, Radhakrishnan TP. Polygonal gold nanoplates in a polymer matrix. Chem. Commun. 2005, 18, 2387–2389.Search in Google Scholar

[122] Sun X, Dong S, Wang E. One-step preparation of highly concentrated well-stable gold colloids by direct mix of polyelectrolyte and HAuCl4 aqueous solutions at room temperature. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 288, 301–303.Search in Google Scholar

[123] Murphy CJ, Jana NR. Controlling the aspect ratio of inorganic nanorods and nanowires. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 80–82.Search in Google Scholar

[124] Li Z, Ravaine V, Ravaine S, Garrigue P, Kuhn A. Raspberry-like gold microspheres: preparation and electrochemical characterization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 618–622.Search in Google Scholar

[125] Guo S, Wang L, Wang E. Templateless, surfactantless, simple electrochemical route to rapid synthesis of diameter-controlled 3D flowerlike gold microstructure with “clean” surface. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 2007, 30, 3163–3165.10.1039/b705630cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Shan C, Han D, Song J, Ivaska A, Niu L. Flowerlike submicrometer gold particles: Size- and surface roughness-controlled synthesis and electrochemical characterization. J. Mater. Res. 2010, 25, 1755–1760.Search in Google Scholar

[127] Lohse SE, Eller JR, Sivapalan ST, Plews MR, Murphy CJ. A simple benchtop reactor system for the high-throughput synthesis and functionalization of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with different sizes and shapes. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4135–4150.10.1021/nn4005022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[128] Dahl JA, Maddux BLS, Hutchison JE. Toward greener nanosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2228–2269.Search in Google Scholar

[129] Gole A, Murphy CJ. Seed-mediated synthesis of gold nanorods: role of the size and nature of the seed. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3633–3640.Search in Google Scholar

[130] Sweeney SF, Woehrle GH, Hutchison JE. Rapid purification and size separation of gold nanoparticles via diafiltration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3190–3197.Search in Google Scholar

[131] De Menech M, Garstecki P, Jousse F, Stone HA. Transition from squeezing to dripping in a microfluidic T-shaped junction. J. Fluid Mech. 2008, 595, 141–161.Search in Google Scholar

[132] Murphy CJ. Sustainability as an emerging design criterion in nanoparticle synthesis and applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 2173–2176.10.1039/b717456jSearch in Google Scholar

[133] Orendorff CJ, Murphy CJ. Quantitation of metal content in the silver-assisted growth of gold nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 3990–3994.10.1021/jp0570972Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Sau TK, Murphy CJ. Seeded high yield synthesis of short au nanorods in aqueous solution. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6414–6420.10.1021/la049463zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[135] Jana NR. Gram-scale synthesis of soluble, near-monodisperse gold nanorods and other anisotropic nanoparticles. Small 2005, 1, 875–882.10.1002/smll.200500014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Si S, Leduc C, Delville MH, Lounis B. Short gold nanorod growth revisited: the critical role of the bromide counterion. ChemPhysChem 2010, 13, 193–202.10.1002/cphc.201100710Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[137] Ali MRK, Snyder B, El-Sayed MA. Synthesis and optical properties of small Au nanorods using a seedless growth technique. Langmuir 2012, 28, 9807–9815.10.1021/la301387pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] Gou L, Murphy CJ. Fine-tuning the shape of gold nanorods. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 3668–3672.Search in Google Scholar

[139] Ni W, Kou X, Yang Z, Wang J. Tailoring longitudinal surface plasmon wavelengths, scattering and absorption cross sections of gold nanorods. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 677–686.10.1021/nn7003603Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[140] Song JH, Kim F, Kim D, Yang P. Crystal overgrowth on gold nanorods: tuning the shape, facet, aspect ratio, and composition of the nanorods. Chemistry 2005, 11, 910–916.10.1002/chem.200400805Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[141] Tsunoyama H, Ichikuni N, Tsukuda T. Microfluidic synthesis and catalytic application of PVP-stabilized, approximately 1 nm gold clusters. Langmuir 2008, 24, 11327–11330.10.1021/la801372jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[142] Pedro SG, Puyol M, Izquierdo D, Salinas I, Alonso J. Synthesis of MUA-protected gold nanoparticles in microfluidic devices with in situ UV-vis characterization. Ibersensor 2010, 9–11.Search in Google Scholar

[143] Polte J, Erler R, Thünemann AF, Sokolov S, Ahner TT, Rademann K, Kraehnert R. Nucleation and growth of gold nanoparticles studied via in situ small angle X-ray scattering at millisecond time resolution. ACS Nano. 2010, 4, 1076–1082.Search in Google Scholar

[144] Ishizaka T, Ishigaki A, Chatterjee M, Suzuki A, Suzuki TM, Kawanami H. Continuous fabrication of novel polyimide nanoparticles confining highly dispersed gold nanoparticles by a multistep microfluidic reaction system and their catalytic application. Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 447–449.Search in Google Scholar

[145] Cabeza VS, Kuhn S, Kulkarni AA, Jensen KF. Size-controlled flow synthesis of gold nanoparticles using a segmented flow microfluidic platform. Langmuir 2012, 28, 7007–7013.10.1021/la205131eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[146] Lazarus LL, Yang ASJ, Chu S, Brutchey RL, Malmstadt N. Flow-focused synthesis of monodisperse gold nanoparticles using ionic liquids on a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 2010, 10, 3377–3379.10.1039/c0lc00297fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[147] Jun H, Fabienne T, Florent M, Coulon PE, Nicolas M, Olivier S. Understanding of the size control of biocompatible gold nanoparticles in millifluidic channels. Langmuir 2012, 28, 15966–15974.10.1021/la303439fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[148] Andreescu D, Sau TK, Goia, DV. Stabilizer-free nanosized gold sols. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 298, 742–751.Search in Google Scholar

[149] Berger RL, Balko B, Chapman HF. High resolution mixer for the study of the kinetics of rapid reactions in solution. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1968, 39, 493–498.Search in Google Scholar

[150] Lu Z, McMahon J, Mohamed H, Barnard D, Shaikh TR, Mannella CA, Lu TM. Passive microfluidic device for sub millisecond mixing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 144, 301–309.Search in Google Scholar

[151] Kitson PJ, Rosnes MH, Sans V, Dragone V, Cronin L. Configurable 3D-Printed millifluidic and microfluidic ‘lab on a chip’ reactionware devices. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 3267–3271.10.1039/c2lc40761bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Chen-Hsun W, Chih-Chia H, Chen-Sheng Y, Huan-Yao L, Gwo-Bin L. Synthesis of hexagonal gold nanoparticles using a microfluidic reaction system. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2008, 18, 035019.Search in Google Scholar

[153] Yang SY, Cheng FY, Yeh CS, Lee GB. Size-controlled synthesis of gold nanoparticles using a micro-mixing system. Microfluid Nanofluid 2010, 8, 303–311.10.1007/s10404-009-0461-2Search in Google Scholar

[154] Protasova LN, Rebrov EV, Skelton HE, Wheatley AEH, Schouten JC. A kinetic study of the liquid-phase hydrogenation of citral on Au/TiO2 and Pt-Sn/TiO2 thin films in capillary microreactors. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 399, 12–21.Search in Google Scholar

[155] Juárez R, Pennemann H, García H. Continuous flow carbamoylation of aniline by dimethyl carbonate using a microreactor coated with a thin film of ceria supported gold nanoparticles. Catal. Today 2011, 159, 25–28.10.1016/j.cattod.2010.07.023Search in Google Scholar

[156] Wang N, Matsumoto T, Ueno M, Miyamura H, Kobayashi S. A gold-immobilized microchannel flow reactor for oxidation of alcohols with molecular oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4744–4746.Search in Google Scholar

[157] Miyamura H, Matsubara R, Miyazaki Y, Kobayashi S. Aerobic oxidation of alcohols at room temperature and atmospheric conditions catalyzed by reusable gold nanoclusters stabilized by the benzene rings of polystyrene derivatives. Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 4229–4232.Search in Google Scholar

[158] Adleman JR, Boyd DA, Goodwin DG, Psaltis D. Heterogenous catalysis mediated by plasmon heating. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 4417–4423.Search in Google Scholar

[159] Abahmane L, Knauer A, Ritter U, Köhler JM, Groß GA. Heterogeneous catalyzed pyridine synthesis using Montmorillionite and nanoparticle-impregnated alumina in a continuous micro flow system. Chem. Eng. Techno 2009, 32, 1799–1805.10.1002/ceat.200900368Search in Google Scholar

[160] Cao E, Sankar M, Firth S, Lam KF, Bethell D, Knight DK, Gavriilidis A. Reaction and Raman spectroscopic studies of alcohol oxidation on gold-palladium catalysts in microstructured reactors. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 167, 734–743.Search in Google Scholar

[161] Miyamura H, Matsubara R, Miyazaki Y, Kobayashi S. Aerobic oxidation of alcohols at room temperature and atmospheric conditions catalyzed by reusable gold nanoclusters stabilized by the benzene rings of polystyrene derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4151–4154.Search in Google Scholar

[162] Hashmi SK, Hutchings GJ. Gold catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7896–7936.Search in Google Scholar

[163] Toste D. Gold catalysis for organic synthesis. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 553–1525.10.3762/bjoc.7.63Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[164] Coquet R, Howard KL, Willock DJ. Theory and simulation in heterogeneous gold catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2046–2076.Search in Google Scholar

[165] Rudolph M, Hashmi ASK. Gold catalysis in total synthesis – an update. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2448–2462.10.1039/C1CS15279CSearch in Google Scholar

[166] Min BK, Friend CM. Heterogeneous gold-based catalysis for green chemistry: low-temperature CO oxidation and propene oxidation. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2709–2724.Search in Google Scholar

[167] Bond GC, Louis C, Thompson DT. Catalysis by gold. Catalytic Science Series, Vol. 6, World Scientific.Search in Google Scholar

[168] Hutchings GJ, Kiely CJ. Strategies for the synthesis of supported gold palladium nanoparticles with controlled morphology and composition. 2013, 46, 1759–1772.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-5-15
Accepted: 2013-8-13
Published Online: 2013-10-14
Published in Print: 2014-02-01

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 10.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2013-0028/html
Scroll to top button