Abstract
Postcolonial discourses often view globality as marking the continuation of the imperialist project. However, discourses entailing a genetic assessment of globality have identified that the workings of the neoliberal economy are largely responsible for its undoing. This mutually destructive relationship between globality and neoliberalism makes it even more necessary to strike a rupture between them. This article illustrates the strands of global and neoliberal discontent, positioning both globality and neoliberalism as arriving at cul-de sac despite vigorous effort to pretend otherwise. In particular, it dwells on the ontological status of the migrants in India by discussing the current strategy to criminalize them and uses Rahul Pandita’s Our Moon has Blood Clots: A Memoir of a Lost Home in Kashmir to show how criminalized migrants may be turned, by de-globing, into natural inhabitants of the Earth.
References
Ahuja, R. 2015. Criminology. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1997. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brenner, N. 1998. “Global Cities, Glocal States: Global City Formation and State Territorial Restructuring in Contemporary Europe.” Review of International Political Economy 5 (1): 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347633.Search in Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P. 1993. Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691201429Search in Google Scholar
Dean, J. 2008. “Enjoying Neoliberalism.” Cultural Politics 4 (1): 47–72, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/584222/summary.10.2752/175174308X266398Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, T. 2007. The World is Flat. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar
Gorringe, H., S. S. Jodhka, and O. K. Takhar. 2017. “Caste: Experiences in South Asia and Beyond.” Contemporary South Asia 25 (3): 230–7, https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2017.1360246.Search in Google Scholar
Gülmez, D. B. 2017. “Globalization.” In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, edited by B. S. Turner, 1–10. London: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118430873.est0842Search in Google Scholar
Hall, S., D. Massey, and M. Rustin. 2013. “After Neoliberalism: Analysing the Present.” Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 53: 8–22, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/522108.10.3898/136266213806045656Search in Google Scholar
Harney, N. D., and L. Baldassar. 2007. “Tracking Transnationalism: Migrancy and its Futures.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33 (2): 189–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830601154088.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
International Labour Office 2010. International Labour Migration: A Rights-Based Approach. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_125361/lang--en/index.htm (accessed July 7, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Kotsko, A. 2017. “Neoliberalism’s Demons.” Theory & Event 20 (2): 493–509, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/655782.10.1515/9781503607132Search in Google Scholar
Loomba, A. 2016. “The Everyday Violence of Caste.” College Literature 43 (1): 220–5, https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2016.0001.Search in Google Scholar
Nail, T. 2015. The Figure of a Migrant. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804796682Search in Google Scholar
Pandita, R. 2017. Our Moon has Blood Clots: A Memoir of a Lost Home in Kashmir. Haryana: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Paranjape, N. V. 2017. Criminology, Penology and Victimology. Allahabad: Central Law Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Robbins, B. 2019. “Everything is not Neoliberalism.” American Literary History 31 (4): 840–9, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/745444.10.1093/alh/ajz034Search in Google Scholar
Robertson, R. 1983. “Interpreting Globality.” In World Realities and International Studies Today, 7–20. Glenside, PA: Pennsylvania Council on International Education.Search in Google Scholar
Sanchez Otero, G. 1993. “Neoliberalism and its Discontents.” Report on the Americas 26 (4): 18–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.1993.11723051.Search in Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2002. “How to Judge Globalism.” The American Prospect, 5 January.Search in Google Scholar
Stieglitz, J. 2002. “Globalism’s Dissents.” The American Prospect, 5 January.Search in Google Scholar
Sumter, M., F. Wood, I. Whitaker, and D. Berger-Hill. 2018. “Religion and Crime Studies: Assessing What Has Been Learned.” Religions 9 (193): 1–15, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9060193.Search in Google Scholar
Swyngedouw, E. 2004. “Globalisation or ‘Glocalisation’? Networks, Territories and Rescaling.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (1): 25–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000203632.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editors’ Forum on Globality
- Editorial
- The State of Globality in a (Post)-COVID World
- Fear of Disconnecting: Global Health Imaginations and the Transformations of the Taiwanese State
- Globality and Entangled Security: Rethinking the Post-1945 Order
- Retrospective Redundancy: The Anthropocene and the Crisis of Historical Comprehension
- Against Global Literary Studies
- “The Future’s So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades”: Globality and Our Common Dystopian Eco-Apocalyptic Science Fiction Streaming Future
- International Relations, New Global Studies, and the Epistemic Power of the Image
- What’s Wrong with the Global? The Interconnected Roles of Inequality, Migrancy, Criminality, Religion, Class, and Caste in India
- What’s Happened to Global News?
- Coda: Ten Questions on Globality
- Review Essays
- Ludger Kühnhardt and Tilman Mayer: The Bonn Handbook of Globality
- Sean Metzger: The Chinese Atlantic; Karel Davids: Global Ocean of Knowledge
- Brian Russell Roberts: Borderwaters: Amid the Archipelagic States of America
- Sianne Ngai. Theory of the Gimmick: Aesthetic Judgment and Capitalist Form
- Book Reviews
- Trond Undheim: Pandemic Aftermath: How Coronavirus Changes Global Society
- Stephen Wertheim: Tomorrow the World: The Birth of U.S. Global Supremacy
- David Sepkoski: Catastrophic Thinking: Extinction and the Value of Diversity from Darwin to the Anthropocene
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editors’ Forum on Globality
- Editorial
- The State of Globality in a (Post)-COVID World
- Fear of Disconnecting: Global Health Imaginations and the Transformations of the Taiwanese State
- Globality and Entangled Security: Rethinking the Post-1945 Order
- Retrospective Redundancy: The Anthropocene and the Crisis of Historical Comprehension
- Against Global Literary Studies
- “The Future’s So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades”: Globality and Our Common Dystopian Eco-Apocalyptic Science Fiction Streaming Future
- International Relations, New Global Studies, and the Epistemic Power of the Image
- What’s Wrong with the Global? The Interconnected Roles of Inequality, Migrancy, Criminality, Religion, Class, and Caste in India
- What’s Happened to Global News?
- Coda: Ten Questions on Globality
- Review Essays
- Ludger Kühnhardt and Tilman Mayer: The Bonn Handbook of Globality
- Sean Metzger: The Chinese Atlantic; Karel Davids: Global Ocean of Knowledge
- Brian Russell Roberts: Borderwaters: Amid the Archipelagic States of America
- Sianne Ngai. Theory of the Gimmick: Aesthetic Judgment and Capitalist Form
- Book Reviews
- Trond Undheim: Pandemic Aftermath: How Coronavirus Changes Global Society
- Stephen Wertheim: Tomorrow the World: The Birth of U.S. Global Supremacy
- David Sepkoski: Catastrophic Thinking: Extinction and the Value of Diversity from Darwin to the Anthropocene