Home Brain–body communication in stroke
Article Open Access

Brain–body communication in stroke

Mens sana in corpore sano
  • Katarzyna Winek

    Katarzyna Winek graduated as MD/PhD in Medical Neurosciences at the Charité, Berlin, in 2017, studying the role of the gut microbiota in experimental stroke under the supervision of Ulrich Dirnagl. She also worked in Andreas Meisel’s group focusing on the neuroimmune interplay after ischemic stroke. In 2018, Katarzyna received a postdoctoral fellowship from ELSC and joined the group of Hermona Soreq at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem where she pursues investigations on molecular mechanisms in stroke and neurodegenerative diseases.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    , Daniel Cuervo Zanatta

    Daniel Cuervo Zanatta obtained his Ph.D. in Genetics and Molecular Biology from the Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute in Mexico City in 2021. Daniel was awarded a scholarship to work on the characterization and description of gut microbiota modulation in Alzheimer disease. In 2021, he joined the Anáhuac University as a professor of Biophysics, Biostatistics and Chemistry at the Faculty of Health Sciences and the School of Engineering.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    and Marietta Zille

    Marietta Zille obtained her Ph.D. in Medical Neurosciences from the Charité, Berlin, studying cell death mechanisms in ischemic stroke. She pursued a postdoc at Burke Neurological Institute of Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, NY, USA, to elucidate neuronal cell death mechanisms in hemorrhagic stroke. In 2017, she joined the Fraunhofer Research Institution in Lübeck and the University of Lübeck as Junior Group Leader. In October 2021, she was appointed assistant professor at the University of Vienna, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 20, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide with limited therapeutic options available for selected groups of patients. The susceptibility to stroke depends also on systemic parameters, and some stroke risk factors are modifiable, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) or hypertension. When considering new treatment strategies, it is important to remember that the consequences of stroke are not limited to the central nervous system (CNS) injury, but reach beyond the boundaries of the brain. We provide here a brief overview of the mechanisms of how the brain communicates with the body, focusing on the heart, immune system, and gut microbiota (GM).

Zusammenfassung

Schlaganfall ist weltweit eine der häufigsten Ursachen für Tod und Behinderungen, wobei nur limitierte Therapieoptionen für bestimmte Patientengruppen zur Verfügung stehen. Ob ein Mensch anfällig für einen Schlaganfall ist, hängt auch von systemischen Parametern ab und einige Risikofaktoren für Schlaganfall lassen sich beeinflussen, wie z. B. Vorhofflimmern oder Bluthochdruck. Bei der Erwägung neuer Behandlungsstrategien ist es wichtig zu bedenken, dass die Folgen eines Schlaganfalls nicht auf den zentralnervösen Schaden beschränkt sind, sondern über die Grenzen des Gehirns hinausreichen. Im Folgenden geben wir einen kurzen Überblick über die Mechanismen der Kommunikation zwischen Gehirn und Körper, wobei wir uns auf das Herz, das Immunsystem und die Darmmikrobiota konzentriert haben.

Introduction and objectives

Worldwide, stroke is the second leading cause of death and third leading cause of death and disability combined. Ischemic stroke, which occurs when an artery supplying oxygen and nutrients to the brain is blocked, accounted for 62.4% of all incident strokes in 2019. Hemorrhagic stroke is defined by the rupture of a blood vessel. Depending on the location of bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke is further divided into intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH, 27.9%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH, 9.7% of all strokes in 2019) (GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators, 2021).

We illustrate here that the etiology, pathophysiology, and consequences of stroke are not confined to the nervous system but extend to, among others, the heart, immune system, and gut microbiota (GM) (Figure 1). Understanding how brain–body communication leads to brain disease and is modified during the course of stroke is indispensable for the discovery of new therapeutic targets and the development of novel, more effective treatment approaches for stroke and other neurological diseases.

Figure 1: 
The three systems involved in the brain–body communication in stroke. AF, atrial fibrillation; HPA, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IS, ischemic stroke; PNS, parasympathetic nervous system; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; SNS, sympathetic nervous system.
Figure 1:

The three systems involved in the brain–body communication in stroke. AF, atrial fibrillation; HPA, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IS, ischemic stroke; PNS, parasympathetic nervous system; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; SNS, sympathetic nervous system.

Brain–heart communication

The brain is exceptionally dependent on an adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients because of its high demand and inability to store energy. In healthy adults at the age of 20, the brain receives around 20% of the cardiac output at rest, a rate that decreases by 1.3% each decade (Xing et al., 2017).

The heart is innervated by sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers (SNS and PNS, respectively, autonomic nervous system). Sympathetic innervation of the heart muscle results in the release of catecholamines from presynaptic terminals that activate postsynaptic adrenergic receptors on cardiac myocytes. This increases heart rate (chronotropy), cardiac muscle contraction (inotropy), and conduction velocity (dromotropy) and decreases heart rate variability (HRV). HRV is the variation in time interval between consecutive heartbeats. On the other hand, parasympathetic stimulation of the heart is mediated by muscarinic receptors and has opposite effects.

Heart rate and blood pressure are also regulated by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis that mediates the body’s response to stress. Corticotropin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin are released from the hypothalamus leading to the liberation of adrenocorticotropic hormone from the pituitary gland. This induces the release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex into the systemic circulation. Glucocorticoids then exert their effects on the heart and the vasculature via the glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid receptor.

Cardiac dysfunction leads to stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia and one of the main risk factors for embolic stroke. In the atrial endocardium, hypercoagulability, flow abnormalities, and endothelial changes must coexist to induce thrombogenesis (Goette et al., 2016). Blot clots formed in the left atrium may travel further with the flow and occlude a blood vessel in the brain. Due to its high dependence on blood supply, already a short period of supply shortage has detrimental consequences to motor, sensory, and cognitive function. AF can also lead to reduced cardiac output as well as transient cerebral hypoperfusion and hypertension involved in cognitive impairment and brain damage (Anselmino et al., 2016).

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy causes the heart muscle to enlarge and may occur together with AF. In an observational study, patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had a 1% yearly risk for embolic events including stroke, of which half of the patients were not previously documented to have AF (Haruki et al., 2016). Although the prevalence of AF in this population may vary due to ethnic/racial differences and under-recognition of AF, this indicates that hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is an independent cardiac risk factor for stroke.

Atrial cardiomyopathy has been suggested as another source for embolic stroke. It refers to abnormal atrial substrate and function, such as chamber dilation, impaired myocyte function, and fibrosis. Atrial cardiomyopathy can occur in the presence or absence of AF and may explain some of the embolic strokes without a history of AF (Ning et al., 2021). However, the molecular mechanisms of how cardiomyopathy leads to stroke remain to be elucidated.

Oral anticoagulants are commonly used to treat AF to prevent embolic stroke. However, the anticoagulant use is associated with a 7–10-fold increased risk for hemorrhagic stroke (Morotti and Goldstein, 2020). Compared to the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants confer a significantly lower risk in patients (Bai et al., 2017). This is in line with a preclinical study demonstrating that warfarin promoted deadly ICH in mice with induced microbleeds, whereas direct oral anticoagulants augmented the number of microbleeds without inducing long-term cognitive impairment (Pétrault et al., 2019).

Stroke leads to cardiac dysfunction

Cardiac complications, including acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmia, frequently occur after ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke (Chen et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2016; Scheitz et al., 2018).

Acute autonomic imbalance has been proposed as a trigger for newly occurring AF after stroke (Paquet et al., 2018). It may be induced due to damage to specific brain regions including the insular cortex that regulates the autonomic control of the heart rhythm or due to inflammatory mechanisms that result in abnormal autonomic responses. In contrast to ischemic stroke, where sympathetic predominance during the first three days and reduced HRV as a risk factor for short-term mortality and cardiac death are well-established (Yperzeele et al., 2015), a shift to parasympathetic predominance and higher HRV within the first 24 h related to the poor three month outcome has been observed in acute ICH (Rass et al., 2021; Szabo et al., 2018). This may be related to increased intracranial pressure that occurs in critically ill patients with large ICH; patients with traumatic brain injury and increased intracranial pressure were also reported to have higher HRV (Szabo et al., 2018).

Another cardiac dysfunction, commonly associated with SAH, which can also develop after ischemic stroke, is Takotsubo cardiomyopathy or Takotsubo syndrome. This syndrome presents as a transient dysfunction of the left heart ventricle and occurs in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Cardiac dysfunction typically recovers spontaneously within days to weeks (Baker et al., 2021). Sympathetic overactivity due to physical or emotional stress (the latter has also led to the term “broken-heart syndrome”) results in a supraphysiological release of catecholamines that directly damages myocytes by inducing a shift from the positive inotropic to a negative inotropic response (Baker et al., 2021).

In mice, ICH induced progressive cardiac dysfunction associated with systemic and cardiac inflammation as well as oxidative stress (Li et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021), which were abrogated by splenectomy that also improved neurological outcome (Li et al., 2020). The authors further showed that deficiency in small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO1) exacerbates cardiac and neurological dysfunction (Li et al., 2021).

Further, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying poststroke cardiac vulnerability and cardiac dysfunction leading to stroke is of major importance to identify therapeutic targets to successfully protect the heart and the brain.

Brain–immune communication

Another important player in the pathophysiology of stroke is the immune system. The brain receives constant input about inflammatory cues in peripheral tissues over visceral sensory (the vagus nerve and spinal afferents) and somatosensory nerves (spinal afferent fibers), enabling feedback and fine-tuning of immune responses (Chavan et al., 2017). Additionally, cytokines produced in the periphery may also reach the brain through the bloodstream (Meisel et al., 2005). The communication between the central nervous system (CNS) and the immune system occurs mainly over the three routes that are also involved in the brain–heart connection, i.e., the SNS, PNS, and the HPA axis (Meisel et al., 2005). Cholinergic preganglionic sympathetic fibers originating from the thoracic and lumbar parts of the spinal cord connect with postganglionic neurons secreting noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y arriving to multiple organs including blood vessels, spleen, bone marrow, and lymphoid tissue (Chavan et al., 2017). Vagal efferents starting in the dorsal motor nucleus and nucleus ambiguous provide the parasympathetic innervation of the heart and other thoracic and abdominal organs (Chavan et al., 2017).

The role of the brain–immune links after brain injury has been extensively studied in ischemic stroke. Generally, neuroimmune communication is a complex topic, and the effects in health and disease are context- and tissue-specific (Chu et al., 2020). Neuroimmune mediators can be simultaneously proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory depending on the time of exposure or type of the cellular receptor (Chavan et al., 2017).

Local and peripheral immune cells are involved in poststroke neuroinflammation

In the CNS, an abrupt drop in perfusion leads to the depolarization of neuronal cells and glia, glutamate release, and triggering of the ischemic cascade involving excitotoxicity, peri-infarct depolarization, and cell death (Dirnagl et al., 1999). Resident phagocytes, microglia, become activated before neuronal death, upregulating proinflammatory genes. Also, astrocytes, local mast cells, and brain-resident macrophages react to the injury contributing to the neuroinflammatory response and disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) facilitating the infiltration of peripheral immune cells (Iadecola et al., 2020).

Neutrophils are the first peripheral cells arriving to the brain and advancing local inflammation and BBB breakdown by secreting proteases, interleukin (IL)-1β, and neutrophil extracellular traps. Neutrophils are followed by monocyte-derived macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, T cells activated in antigen-dependent and independent processes, and B cells (Iadecola et al., 2020). The kinetics of the immune response and the infiltration of peripheral immune cells have been relatively well-characterized in rodent models of stroke as well as human patients (Beuker et al., 2021). Notably, there are still many gaps in the detailed understanding of the impact of certain cell subpopulations and their roles for the evolution of the lesion and outcome.

Specific immune cells can have distinct (beneficial/detrimental) roles depending on the subpopulation and time after stroke (acute/chronic phase). For example, B regulatory cells are linked to favorable outcomes in experimental stroke settings due to their anti-inflammatory phenotype and ability to attract T regulatory cells to the lesion site (Seifert et al., 2018). On the other hand, B cells and plasma cells have been proposed to contribute to the development of poststroke cognitive impairment by producing antibodies against CNS antigens in the chronic phase of stroke (Doyle et al., 2015). Also, T cells secreting IL-17 (Th17 cells, ɣδT cells) have been linked to detrimental outcome after ischemic stroke, whereas T regs are generally associated with beneficial prognosis (Cramer et al., 2019).

CNS-resident and peripheral immune cells are also important players in the pathophysiological sequelae of hemorrhagic stroke; the detailed mechanisms are, however, less-characterized than in ischemic stroke (Shao et al., 2019).

Brain–body signaling leads to poststroke immunosuppression

Simultaneously, it is important to highlight the role of the brain–body communication axes and the fact that, after brain lesion, the immune response differs between the injured CNS and the rest of the body. In ischemic stroke, the initial systemic inflammatory boost is followed by a suppression of immune functions in the periphery (Meisel et al., 2005). It has been proposed that systemic dampening of the immune response poses, in fact, a protective mechanism to limit the infiltration of peripheral immune cells to the brain (Dirnagl et al., 2007).

Systemic immunosuppression after the insult leads, however, to increased susceptibility to infections that occur in ∼30% of ischemic stroke patients. Specifically, pneumonia has been linked to increased mortality and worsening of neurological outcome (Westendorp et al., 2011). Immunosuppression mediated by the PNS (over the vagus nerve) is mostly connected to the actions of acetylcholine on macrophages upon binding to the ɑ7 nicotinic receptor, decreasing the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1 (Tracey, 2002). Stimulating the vagus nerve is known to have anti-inflammatory effects, but interestingly, as shown in experimental models, acetylcholine is not derived directly from the vagal fibers. The vagus nerve provides input to the celiac ganglion, the origin of the catecholaminergic splenic nerve. It has been therefore proposed that T cells expressing β2-adrenergic receptors are the producers of acetylcholine reaching the macrophages (Rosas-Ballina and Tracey, 2009).

Concurrently, the SNS can suppress immune function over direct actions of noradrenaline leading to a diminished production of proinflammatory cytokines in cells of the innate and adaptive immune system (Sharma and Farrar, 2020), including invariant NKT cells in the liver, where a decreased intravascular crawling of these cells and increased production of anti-inflammatory IL-10 and IL-5 were shown as effects of increased noradrenergic signaling (Wong et al., 2011). Newly identified indirect effects of SNS activation on immune cells, not explored in experimental stroke settings yet, comprise the inhibition of leukocyte migration via limiting local tissue blood flow leading to decreased leukocyte movement (Devi et al., 2021).

Finally, glucocorticoids as mediators of the HPA axis have been known for their anti-inflammatory actions, decreasing cytokine production, expression of adhesion molecules and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and induction of apoptosis in cells of innate and adaptive immunity (Cain and Cidlowski, 2017).

A further detailed characterization of regulatory mechanisms in poststroke peripheral immune responses is of great importance for both systemic complications after stroke and pathophysiological events in the CNS, since immune cells from the periphery will be recruited to the site of the lesion.

Brain–gut communication

Intriguingly, in recent years, the GM (microbial community inhabiting the intestines) has been identified as a potential immunomodulator in health and disease, including stroke (Cryan et al., 2020). Besides other functions, gut bacteria influence the balance between proinflammatory IL-17-producing T cells and T regs, which plays an important role in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, as already discussed above (Benakis et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2016).

But, how is it possible that what happens at the gut microbiota level reverberates on the CNS? One of the first things we need to understand to answer this question is that there is a bidirectional communication between the brain and the gut. Both neuronal and nonneuronal communication pathways are involved in this crosstalk. For brain → gut signaling, the gut wall receives direct and indirect communication from the PNS, SNS, and the enteric nervous system, which together influence microbiota makeup, resident immune cell activation, gut motility, and permeability. Moreover, the HPA axis also represents an important input to the gut in response to stress. For gut → brain signaling, afferent fibers of the vagus nerve can be stimulated by microbial molecules and enteroendocrine hormones released in the gut epithelial layer (e.g., serotonin and glucagon-like peptide-1) that influence hypothalamic neurons and the activity of the pituitary gland. Bacterial cellular components, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have been shown to induce neuroinflammation, whereas GM metabolites such as neurotransmitters, indoles, bile acids, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; acetate, propionate, and butyrate) are able to travel to the brain through blood and modulate the function of glia, neurons, and the BBB (Durgan et al., 2019).

Stroke is associated with gut dysbiosis

Gut dysbiosis refers to a detrimental imbalance in bacterial composition, metabolic activity, and distribution in the gut. It can result from (1) a diminished representation of beneficial bacteria, (2) overgrowth of “pathobionts” – potentially pathogenic bacteria, and (3) decreased bacterial diversity (DeGruttola et al., 2016).

Gut dysbiosis has been linked to several risk factors for stroke such as hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, aging, vascular dysfunction, and obesity (Durgan et al., 2019) and was reported after stroke (Holmes et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2021). It has the potential to impact ischemic stroke outcome, e.g., through the fine-tuning of the immune response (Benakis et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2016). Additionally, other mechanisms such as increased intestinal permeability and potential bacterial translocation have been proposed as modulators of stroke prognosis (Durgan et al., 2019).

Clinical cohort studies suggested that ischemic stroke triggers dysbiosis due to the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria that reciprocally exacerbates brain damage (Xu et al., 2021). In another study in patients exhibiting three or more risk factors for stroke without prior history of stroke, opportunistic pathogenic bacteria were reported to be enriched, whereas beneficial bacteria were depleted (Zeng et al., 2019). Hypertensive patients also demonstrated reduced levels of beneficial bacteria, whereas the levels of pathogenic bacteria were increased (Avery et al., 2021). Rodent models of hypertension generally replicate these findings. However, data are still controversial when it comes to the ideal microbial makeup, especially concerning some phyla (i.e., Bacteroidetes) (Marques et al., 2017).

Despite some insight into gut dysbiosis in ischemic stroke, little is known about hemorrhagic stroke. In a mouse model of ICH, alterations of microbial diversity and gut dysbiosis were related to reduced intestinal motility and increased gut permeability. Interestingly, recolonizing ICH mice with healthy microbiota ameliorated neuroinflammation and functional deficits after ICH (Yu et al., 2021).

Microbial metabolites modulate stroke risk and outcome

GM metabolizes phosphatidylcholine from dietary sources (e.g., eggs and red meat), leading to the formation of trimethylamine and finally trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), which was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, carotid artery stenting, and first stroke (Lee et al., 2021). A recent systematic review proposed that inflammation and aging simultaneously contribute to changes in GM composition, and ischemic stroke predisposition was linked to significantly higher TMAO levels and a reduction of SCFA-producing bacteria (Lee et al., 2021). In addition, other GM-derived metabolites such as phenylacetylglutamine enhanced thrombosis risk through the activation of adrenergic receptors in platelets (Nemet et al., 2020).

SCFAs are one of the main bioactive microbial metabolites that constitute major products from bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber in the intestine (mainly acetate, propionate, and butyrate), favoring usually beneficial actions in the host. Propionate showed cardioprotective effects through attenuating systemic inflammation and abrogating cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, vascular dysfunction, and hypertension (Bartolomaeus et al., 2019). GM modulation and acetate supplementation protected against obstructive sleep apnea-induced gut inflammation and hypertension and mitigated blood pressure increases, cardiac fibrosis, and left ventricular hypertrophy (Marques et al., 2017).

In acute ischemic stroke patients, SCFA levels were inversely correlated with stroke severity and prognosis, suggesting SCFAs as potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets (Tan et al., 2021). In aged mice subjected to ischemic stroke, fecal transplantation of SCFA producers attenuated inflammation and neurological deficits, increasing the concentration of SCFAs in the gut, plasma, and brain (Lee et al., 2020). Moreover, acetate, propionate, and butyrate supplementation in drinking water before induction of stroke in the photothrombotic mouse model facilitated lymphocyte recruitment to the infarcted area, resulting in microglial activation and neuronal plasticity as well as improved limb motor function recovery (Sadler et al., 2020). Among the most abundant SCFAs, levels of butyrate were most strongly negatively correlated with neurological outcome and infarct size in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Its supplementation effectively remodeled GM and repaired the leaky gut, not to mention that transplanting SCFA-enriched fecal microbiota also reduced neurological deficits, brain edema, and infarct sizes (Chen et al., 2019).

The described roles of gut commensals and their connection to the brain function offer a new and exciting area of research potentially providing more options in search for therapeutic targets (Durgan et al., 2019).

Is it possible to therapeutically target the brain through the periphery?

Considering the fact that neuroprotective strategies have not been successful in clinical trials, new therapies targeting the brain–body communication after stroke and poststroke complications may help improve the outcome after CNS lesion.

Protecting the brain is protecting the heart

Tremendous effort has helped to improve anticoagulants for the treatment of AF and to reduce the risk of brain hemorrhage. When it comes to poststroke cardiac dysfunction, alleviating autonomic imbalance will be key to protect the heart. This may be achieved by decreasing sympathetic overactivation inhibiting beta-adrenergic receptors or the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. However, pharmacological treatments remain insufficient. Recently, cardiac neuromodulation of various types to restore sympathovagal balance has emerged. Preclinical studies have shown promising results of bioelectric therapies for cardiac diseases, but more clinical studies are needed to identify optimal stimulation parameters and location (Hanna et al., 2018). Whereas neuromodulation of the brain is currently investigated for poststroke motor recovery, its effect on the heart is an outstanding area of research. An alternative approach is to improve heart function and ameliorate autonomic dysfunction of the heart by exercise (Katz-Leurer and Shochina, 2007). Thus, clinical trials on neurorehabilitation should focus on identifying the most beneficial exercise regime that also targets heart health.

Fine-tuning the immune response to impact the poststroke outcome

Most drugs already tested in clinical trials and directed against the poststroke neuroinflammatory response interfered with the entry of peripheral immune cells to the brain or inhibited proinflammatory signaling (Iadecola et al., 2020). When it comes to limiting poststroke pneumonia, preventive antibiotic treatment has not been established as a successful approach (Meisel and Smith, 2015). Also, more studies would be necessary in the field of immunostimulatory therapies to boost peripheral immune responses or block stroke-induced immunosuppression (Faura et al., 2021). Selected agents (beta blockers) modulating the poststroke brain–body signaling have also been tested in clinical studies; however, current data do not show significant benefits in acute ischemic stroke (Balla et al., 2021). Therefore, more research on neuroimmune interactions after stroke is urgently needed to pinpoint potential therapeutic targets.

You are what you eat!

There are several options to target the gut–brain axis and the GM for therapy in stroke: (1) Fecal microbiota transplantation, whereby the microbiota of a healthy donor is transferred to a patient, can be used to increase microbial diversity and the percentage of beneficial microbiota in the gut. Fecal microbiota transplants are currently investigated in a clinical trial for Alzheimer disease and have been successful in preclinical models of stroke (Holmes et al., 2020). (2) Probiotics (live and beneficial bacteria) and prebiotics (nondigestible dietary substances to foster the growth of favorable microorganisms) have been demonstrated to decrease gut inflammation as well as improve cognitive performance in middle-aged and older adults with cognitive impairment (Sanborn et al., 2020). Data on the beneficial effects of probiotics and prebiotics are currently limited to preclinical studies; however, a clinical trial evaluating probiotics for ischemic stroke patients is under way (Holmes et al., 2020). (3) Dietary interventions aim to foster the growth of beneficial bacteria already present in the gut. Whereas certain diets are known to promote healthy aging including cognitive function and have been shown to have significant effects on microbial diversity (Holmes et al., 2020), data on stroke are limited. Overall, further clinical trials are needed to assess the benefit of targeting the GM and gut–brain signaling for stroke therapy.

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure

Whereas most therapeutic targets are developed to ameliorate poststroke outcomes, we also need to better understand how cardiac dysfunction, immune imbalance, and gut dysbiosis lead to CNS vulnerability to stroke. Hence, model systems addressing body–brain communication imbalances should be developed to study these axes and to develop further preventative treatments.


Corresponding authors: Katarzyna Winek, The Edmond & Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel; and The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel, E-mail: . Daniel Cuervo Zanatta, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac, Córdoba, Veracruz C.P. 94500, Mexico, E-mail: ; and Marietta Zille, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria, E-mail:
Katarzyna Winek, Daniel Cuervo Zanatta and Marietta Zille contributed equally to this work.

Über die Autoren

Katarzyna Winek

Katarzyna Winek graduated as MD/PhD in Medical Neurosciences at the Charité, Berlin, in 2017, studying the role of the gut microbiota in experimental stroke under the supervision of Ulrich Dirnagl. She also worked in Andreas Meisel’s group focusing on the neuroimmune interplay after ischemic stroke. In 2018, Katarzyna received a postdoctoral fellowship from ELSC and joined the group of Hermona Soreq at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem where she pursues investigations on molecular mechanisms in stroke and neurodegenerative diseases.

Daniel Cuervo Zanatta

Daniel Cuervo Zanatta obtained his Ph.D. in Genetics and Molecular Biology from the Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute in Mexico City in 2021. Daniel was awarded a scholarship to work on the characterization and description of gut microbiota modulation in Alzheimer disease. In 2021, he joined the Anáhuac University as a professor of Biophysics, Biostatistics and Chemistry at the Faculty of Health Sciences and the School of Engineering.

Marietta Zille

Marietta Zille obtained her Ph.D. in Medical Neurosciences from the Charité, Berlin, studying cell death mechanisms in ischemic stroke. She pursued a postdoc at Burke Neurological Institute of Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, NY, USA, to elucidate neuronal cell death mechanisms in hemorrhagic stroke. In 2017, she joined the Fraunhofer Research Institution in Lübeck and the University of Lübeck as Junior Group Leader. In October 2021, she was appointed assistant professor at the University of Vienna, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Anselmino, M., Scarsoglio, S., Saglietto, A., Gaita, F., and Ridolfi, L. (2016). Transient cerebral hypoperfusion and hypertensive events during atrial fibrillation: A plausible mechanism for cognitive impairment. Sci. Rep. 6, 28635, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28635.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Avery, E.G., Bartolomaeus, H., Maifeld, A., Marko, L., Wiig, H., Wilck, N., Rosshart, S.P., Forslund, S.K., and Müller, D.N. (2021). The gut microbiome in hypertension: Recent advances and future perspectives. Circ. Res. 128, 934–950, https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.121.318065.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bai, Y., Deng, H., Shantsila, A., and Lip, G.Y.H. (2017). Rivaroxaban versus dabigatran or warfarin in real-world studies of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 48, 970–976, https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.116.016275.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Baker, C., Muse, J., and Taussky, P. (2021). Takotsubo syndrome in neurologic disease. World Neurosurg. 149, 26–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.139.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Balla, H.Z., Cao, Y., and Ström, J.O. (2021). Effect of beta-blockers on stroke outcome: A meta-analysis. Clin. Epidemiol. 13, 225–236, https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s268105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Bartolomaeus, H., Balogh, A., Yakoub, M., Homann, S., Markó, L., Höges, S., Tsvetkov, D., Krannich, A., Wundersitz, S., Avery, E.G., et al.. (2019). Short-chain fatty acid propionate protects from hypertensive cardiovascular damage. Circulation 139, 1407–1421, https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.036652.Search in Google Scholar

Benakis, C., Brea, D., Caballero, S., Faraco, G., Moore, J., Murphy, M., Sita, G., Racchumi, G., Ling, L., Pamer, E.G., et al.. (2016). Commensal microbiota affects ischemic stroke outcome by regulating intestinal γδ T cells. Nat. Med. 22, 516–523, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4068.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Beuker, C., Strecker, J.-K., Rawal, R., Schmidt-Pogoda, A., Ruck, T., Wiendl, H., Klotz, L., Schäbitz, W.-R., Sommer, C.J., Minnerup, H., et al.. (2021). Immune cell infiltration into the brain after ischemic stroke in humans compared to mice and rats: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl. Stroke Res. 12, 976–990, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-021-00887-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Cain, D.W. and Cidlowski, J.A. (2017). Immune regulation by glucocorticoids. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 233–247, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chavan, S.S., Pavlov, V.A., and Tracey, K.J. (2017). Mechanisms and therapeutic relevance of neuro-immune communication. Immunity 46, 927–942, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Chen, R., Xu, Y., Wu, P., Zhou, H., Lasanajak, Y., Fang, Y., Tang, L., Ye, L., Li, X., Cai, Z., et al.. (2019). Transplantation of fecal microbiota rich in short chain fatty acids and butyric acid treat cerebral ischemic stroke by regulating gut microbiota. Pharmacol. Res. 148, 104403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104403.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Venkat, P., Seyfried, D., Chopp, M., Yan, T., and Chen, J. (2017). Brain-heart interaction: Cardiac complications after stroke. Circ. Res. 121, 451–468, https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.117.311170.Search in Google Scholar

Chu, C., Artis, D., and Chiu, I.M. (2020). Neuro-immune interactions in the tissues. Immunity 52, 464–474, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.017.Search in Google Scholar

Cramer, J.V., Benakis, C., and Liesz, A. (2019). T cells in the post-ischemic brain: Troopers or paramedics? J. Neuroimmunol. 326, 33–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

Cryan, J.F., O’Riordan, K.J., Sandhu, K., Peterson, V., and Dinan, T.G. (2020). The gut microbiome in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 19, 179–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30356-4.Search in Google Scholar

DeGruttola, A.K., Low, D., Mizoguchi, A., and Mizoguchi, E. (2016). Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 22, 1137–1150, https://doi.org/10.1097/mib.0000000000000750.Search in Google Scholar

Devi, S., Alexandre, Y.O., Loi, J.K., Gillis, R., Ghazanfari, N., Creed, S.J., Holz, L.E., Shackleford, D., Mackay, L.K., Heath, W.R., et al.. (2021). Adrenergic regulation of the vasculature impairs leukocyte interstitial migration and suppresses immune responses. Immunity 54, 1219–1230.e7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.03.025.Search in Google Scholar

Dirnagl, U., Iadecola, C., and Moskowitz, M.A. (1999). Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 22, 391–397, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01401-0.Search in Google Scholar

Dirnagl, U., Klehmet, J., Braun, J.S., Harms, H., Meisel, C., Ziemssen, T., Prass, K., and Meisel, A. (2007). Stroke-induced immunodepression: Experimental evidence and clinical relevance. Stroke 38, 770–773, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000251441.89665.bc.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Doyle, K.P., Quach, L.N., Solé, M., Axtell, R.C., Nguyen, T.-V.V., Soler-Llavina, G.J., Jurado, S., Han, J., Steinman, L., Longo, F.M., et al.. (2015). B-lymphocyte-mediated delayed cognitive impairment following stroke. J. Neurosci. 35, 2133–2145, https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4098-14.2015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Durgan, D.J., Lee, J., McCullough, L.D., and Bryan, R.M. (2019). Examining the role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in stroke. Stroke 50, 2270–2277, https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.119.025140.Search in Google Scholar

Faura, J., Bustamante, A., Miró-Mur, F., and Montaner, J. (2021). Stroke-induced immunosuppression: Implications for the prevention and prediction of post-stroke infections. J. Neuroinflammation 18, 127, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02177-0.Search in Google Scholar

GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators (2021). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 20, 795–820, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0.Search in Google Scholar

Goette, A., Kalman, J.M., Aguinaga, L., Akar, J., Cabrera, J.A., Chen, S.A., Chugh, S.S., Corradi, D., D’Avila, A., Dobrev, D., et al.. (2016). EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: Definition, characterization, and clinical implication. Europace 18, 1455–1490, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw161.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Hanna, P., Shivkumar, K., and Ardell, J.L. (2018). Calming the nervous heart: Autonomic therapies in heart failure. Card. Fail. Rev. 4, 92–98, https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2018.20.2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Haruki, S., Minami, Y., and Hagiwara, N. (2016). Stroke and embolic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Risk stratification in patients without atrial fibrillation. Stroke 47, 936–942, https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.115.012130.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Holmes, A., Finger, C., Morales-Scheihing, D., Lee, J., and McCullough, L.D. (2020). Gut dysbiosis and age-related neurological diseases; an innovative approach for therapeutic interventions. Transl. Res. 226, 39–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2020.07.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Iadecola, C., Buckwalter, M.S., and Anrather, J. (2020). Immune responses to stroke: Mechanisms, modulation, and therapeutic potential. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 2777–2788, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci135530.Search in Google Scholar

Katz-Leurer, M. and Shochina, M. (2007). The influence of autonomic impairment on aerobic exercise outcome in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation 22, 267–272, https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-2007-22403.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J., d’Aigle, J., Atadja, L., Quaicoe, V., Honarpisheh, P., Ganesh, B.P., Hassan, A., Graf, J., Petrosino, J., Putluri, N., et al.. (2020). Gut microbiota–derived short-chain fatty acids promote poststroke recovery in aged mice. Circ. Res. 127, 453–465, https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.119.316448.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, M., Oh, J.H., Lee, K.B., Kang, G.H., Park, Y.H., Jang, W.J., Chun, W.J., Lee, S.H., and Lee, I.C. (2016). Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of acute cardiac dysfunction associated with acute brain hemorrhage - difference from takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Circ. J. 80, 2026–2032, https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-16-0395.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Y.T., Mohd Ismail, N.I., and Wei, L.K. (2021). Microbiome and ischemic stroke: A systematic review. PLoS One 16, e0245038, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245038.Search in Google Scholar

Li, W., Li, L., Chopp, M., Venkat, P., Zacharek, A., Chen, Z., Landschoot-Ward, J., Yan, T., and Chen, J. (2018). Intracerebral hemorrhage induces cardiac dysfunction in mice without primary cardiac disease. Front. Neurol. 9, 965, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00965.Search in Google Scholar

Li, W., Li, L., Li, W., Chopp, M., Venkat, P., Zacharek, A., Chen, Z., Landschoot-Ward, J., and Chen, J. (2020). Spleen associated immune-response mediates brain-heart interaction after intracerebral hemorrhage. Exp. Neurol. 327, 113209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113209.Search in Google Scholar

Li, W., Chopp, M., Zacharek, A., Yang, W., Chen, Z., Landschoot-Ward, J., Venkat, P., and Chen, J. (2021). SUMO1 deficiency exacerbates neurological and cardiac dysfunction after intracerebral hemorrhage in aged mice. Transl. Stroke Res. 12, 631–642, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-020-00837-6.Search in Google Scholar

Marques, F.Z., Nelson, E., Chu, P.-Y., Horlock, D., Fiedler, A., Ziemann, M., Tan, J.K., Kuruppu, S., Rajapakse, N.W., El-Osta, A., et al.. (2017). High-fiber diet and acetate supplementation change the gut microbiota and prevent the development of hypertension and heart failure in hypertensive mice. Circulation 135, 964–977, https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.024545.Search in Google Scholar

Meisel, A. and Smith, C.J. (2015). Prevention of stroke-associated pneumonia: Where next? Lancet 386, 1802–1804, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00127-0.Search in Google Scholar

Meisel, C., Schwab, J.M., Prass, K., Meisel, A., and Dirnagl, U. (2005). Central nervous system injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 775–786, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1765.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Morotti, A. and Goldstein, J.N. (2020). Anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Brain Hemorrhages 1, 89–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hest.2020.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Nemet, I., Saha, P.P., Gupta, N., Zhu, W., Romano, K.A., Skye, S.M., Cajka, T., Mohan, M.L., Li, L., Wu, Y., et al.. (2020). A cardiovascular disease-linked gut microbial metabolite acts via adrenergic receptors. Cell 180, 862–877.e22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ning, Y., Tse, G., Luo, G., and Li, G. (2021). Atrial cardiomyopathy: An emerging cause of the embolic stroke of undetermined source. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8, 674612, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674612.Search in Google Scholar

Paquet, M., Cerasuolo, J.O., Thorburn, V., Fridman, S., Alsubaie, R., Lopes, R.D., Cipriano, L.E., Salamone, P., Melling, C.W.J., Khan, A.R., et al.. (2018). Pathophysiology and risk of atrial fibrillation detected after ischemic stroke (PARADISE): A translational, integrated, and transdisciplinary approach. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 27, 606–619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.038.Search in Google Scholar

Pétrault, M., Ouk, T., Pétrault, O., Bastide, M., Bordet, R., and Bérézowski, V. (2019). Safety of oral anticoagulants on experimental brain microbleeding and cognition. Neuropharmacology 155, 162–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.05.030.Search in Google Scholar

Rass, V., Lindner, A., Ianosi, B.-A., Schiefecker, A.J., Loveys, S., Kofler, M., Rass, S., Pfausler, B., Beer, R., Schmutzhard, E., et al.. (2021). Early alterations in heart rate are associated with poor outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J. Crit. Care 61, 199–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.10.027.Search in Google Scholar

Rosas-Ballina, M. and Tracey, K.J. (2009). Cholinergic control of inflammation. J. Intern. Med. 265, 663–679, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02098.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sadler, R., Cramer, J.V., Heindl, S., Kostidis, S., Betz, D., Zuurbier, K.R., Northoff, B.H., Heijink, M., Goldberg, M.P., Plautz, E.J., et al.. (2020). Short-chain fatty acids improve poststroke recovery via immunological mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 40, 1162–1173, https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1359-19.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Sanborn, V., Azcarate-Peril, M.A., Updegraff, J., Manderino, L., and Gunstad, J. (2020). Randomized clinical trial examining the impact of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG probiotic supplementation on cognitive functioning in middle-aged and older adults. Neuropsychiatric Dis. Treat. 16, 2765–2777, https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s270035.Search in Google Scholar

Scheitz, J.F., Nolte, C.H., Doehner, W., Hachinski, V., and Endres, M. (2018). Stroke-heart syndrome: Clinical presentation and underlying mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 17, 1109–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30336-3.Search in Google Scholar

Seifert, H.A., Vandenbark, A.A., and Offner, H. (2018). Regulatory B cells in experimental stroke. Immunology 154, 169–177, https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12887.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Shao, A., Zhu, Z., Li, L., Zhang, S., and Zhang, J. (2019). Emerging therapeutic targets associated with the immune system in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH): From mechanisms to translation. EBioMedicine 45, 615–623, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Sharma, D. and Farrar, J.D. (2020). Adrenergic regulation of immune cell function and inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol. 42, 709–717, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-020-00829-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Singh, V., Roth, S., Llovera, G., Sadler, R., Garzetti, D., Stecher, B., Dichgans, M., and Liesz, A. (2016). Microbiota dysbiosis controls the neuroinflammatory response after stroke. J. Neurosci. 36, 7428–7440, https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1114-16.2016.Search in Google Scholar

Szabo, J., Smielewski, P., Czosnyka, M., Jakubicek, S., Krebs, S., Siarnik, P., and Sykora, M. (2018). Heart rate variability is associated with outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J. Crit. Care 48, 85–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Tan, C., Wu, Q., Wang, H., Gao, X., Xu, R., Cui, Z., Zhu, J., Zeng, X., Zhou, H., He, Y., et al.. (2021). Dysbiosis of gut microbiota and short‐chain fatty acids in acute ischemic stroke and the subsequent risk for poor functional outcomes. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 45, 518–529, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1861.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Tracey, K.J. (2002). The inflammatory reflex. Nature 420, 853–859, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01321.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Westendorp, W.F., Nederkoorn, P.J., Vermeij, J.-D., Dijkgraaf, M.G., and van de Beek, D. (2011). Post-stroke infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 11, 110, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-110.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wong, C.H.Y., Jenne, C.N., Lee, W.-Y., Léger, C., and Kubes, P. (2011). Functional innervation of hepatic iNKT cells is immunosuppressive following stroke. Science 334, 101–105, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210301.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Xing, C.-Y., Tarumi, T., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Turner, M., Riley, J., Tinajero, C.D., Yuan, L.-J., and Zhang, R. (2017). Distribution of cardiac output to the brain across the adult lifespan. J. Cerebr. Blood Flow Metabol. 37, 2848–2856, https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x16676826.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Xu, K., Gao, X., Xia, G., Chen, M., Zeng, N., Wang, S., You, C., Tian, X., Di, H., Tang, W., et al.. (2021). Rapid gut dysbiosis induced by stroke exacerbates brain infarction in turn. Gut 70, 1486–1494, https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323263.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Yperzeele, L., van Hooff, R.-J., Nagels, G., De Smedt, A., De Keyser, J., and Brouns, R. (2015). Heart rate variability and baroreceptor sensitivity in acute stroke: A systematic review. Int. J. Stroke 10, 796–800, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12573.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Yu, X., Zhou, G., Shao, B., Zhou, H., Xu, C., Yan, F., Wang, L., Chen, G., Li, J., and Fu, X. (2021). Gut microbiota dysbiosis induced by intracerebral hemorrhage aggravates neuroinflammation in mice. Front. Microbiol. 12, 647304, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.647304.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zeng, X., Gao, X., Peng, Y., Wu, Q., Zhu, J., Tan, C., Xia, G., You, C., Xu, R., Pan, S., et al.. (2019). Higher risk of stroke is correlated with increased opportunistic pathogen load and reduced levels of butyrate-producing bacteria in the gut. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9, 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zhang, L., Wuri, J., An, L., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Hu, H., Wu, R., Su, Y., Yuan, Q., and Yan, T. (2021). Metoprolol attenuates intracerebral hemorrhage-induced cardiac damage by suppression of sympathetic overactivity in mice. Auton. Neurosci. 234, 102832, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102832.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Online erschienen: 2021-12-20
Erschienen im Druck: 2022-02-23

© 2021 Katarzyna Winek et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nf-2021-0030/html
Scroll to top button