Home Perspective on 3D vertically-integrated photonic neural networks based on VCSEL arrays
Article Open Access

Perspective on 3D vertically-integrated photonic neural networks based on VCSEL arrays

  • Min Gu ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Yibo Dong EMAIL logo , Haoyi Yu , Haitao Luan and Qiming Zhang
Published/Copyright: January 13, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence has stimulated the interest in the novel designs of photonic neural networks. As three-dimensional (3D) neural networks, the diffractive neural networks (DNNs) relying on the diffractive phenomena of light, has demonstrated their superb performance in the direct parallel processing of two-dimensional (2D) optical data at the speed of light. Despite the outstanding achievements, DNNs utilize centimeter-scale devices to generate the input data passively, making the miniaturization and on-chip integration of DNNs a challenging task. Here, we provide our perspective on utilizing addressable vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) arrays as a promising data input device and integrated platform to achieve compact, active DNNs for next-generation on-chip vertical-stacked photonic neural networks. Based on the VCSEL array, micron-scale 3D photonic chip with a modulation bandwidth at tens of GHz can be available. The possible future directions and challenges of the 3D photonic chip are analyzed.

1 Introduction

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), traditional complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) electronic chips based on von Neumann architectures gradually could not satisfy the computational power required by AI training tasks. According to a report by OpenAI [1], after 2012, the computational power required to train the largest AI program will double every 3.4 months. Due to the gradual failure of Moore’s law [2], and the serial nature of von Neumann architectures where the memory and processor are separated [3], current AI training and operational tasks require large numbers of GPUs (graphics processing units) and CPUs (central processing units), lead to an astronomical amount of time and energy costs [4]. Therefore, developing non-von Neumann computing systems are of great importance for various AI applications, such as autonomous vehicles, facial recognition, and robotics.

Photonic neural networks (PNNs), which mimic the key functions of biological neuronal systems, are regarded as a promising next-generation computing architecture [3, 5]. Compared with electrons, photons have more degrees of freedom (wavelength, phase, polarization and angular momentum), enabling high-bandwidth data transmission. As a data carrier, photons travel at the speed of light with extremely low delay which is 300 times faster than that of electrons [6]. Since the propagation of light is passive, the calculation is completed after the light propagates through the predefined structures [5]. Therefore, PNNs have extremely low energy consumption which is mainly concentrated in the laser source, the synaptic weight modulation, and the output signal reading. Theoretically, the potential processing speed of PNNs can reach petaMAC/s/mm2 (MAC: multiply-accumulate operations) with an energy efficiency of attojoule/MAC [2, 7]. On the contrary, the maximum processing speed of von Neumann electronics is only at the level of GMAC/s/mm2 with picojoule/MAC energy efficiency [2].

Integrated on-chip and compact sized PNNs are becoming an attractive field. The emergence of two-dimensional (2D) PNNs based on Si-photonics, where the light propagates within a plane, have demonstrated their versatility in numerous AI applications, including image classification [8], vowel recognition [9] and unsupervised correlation detection [10]. Through the utilization of Mach–Zehnder interferometers [9], phase change materials with photonic circuits [11, 12], and micro-ring resonators [13], various integrated PNNs have been achieved including deep neural networks [9, 14], spiking neural networks [15], tensor cores [16] and convolutional accelerators [17], showing the advantages of neuromorphic photonic computing. However, the 2D cascade architecture of PNNs based on Si-photonics set a natural constraint on their intelligence and parallelism. As PNNs based on Si-photonics have a limited wafer size [9, 15], and the size of photonic components cannot be much smaller than the working wavelength [18], making it impossible to realize large number of synaptic connections on a Si-wafer. Additionally, the cascade design of photonic circuits may lead to uncontrollable noises/errors in the PNNs when scaling up [9].

Recently, three-dimensional (3D) PNNs based on the diffraction phenomenon of light have proved to be a promising solution: diffractive neural networks (DNNs). The concept of 3D PNNs based on diffractive holograms was proposed in the 1990s [19, 20], and firstly realized in the terahertz range in 2018 [21]. The DNN is physically created by using several cascaded transmissive and/or reflective layers, where the incoming wave propagates in free space, and each pixel on a given layer either transmits or reflects the incoming wave, representing an artificial neuron that is connected to other neurons of the following layers through optical diffraction. Due to the 3D architecture, DNNs have demonstrated their superb performance in direct parallel processing of two-dimensional data without the need to convert the data to sequential inputs as in 2D PNNs [16]. Important applications, such as image classification [2125], optical logic operation [26, 27], image reconstruction [28] and terahertz pulse shaping [29], have been successfully demonstrated with DNNs. Given 3D two-photon nanolithography (TPN) is applied, 500 million neurons/cm2 can be easily achieved in D2NNs [22, 30].

However, current DNNs may not suitable for on-chip integration applications. This is because current DNNs usually take advantage of centimeter-scale devices to generate the input data passively, such as, spatial light modulators (SLM), digital-micromirror devices (DMD), or diffractive plates [2126], which results in the spatial separation of signal generator and DNNs, and causing the size of entire optical setup at centimeter level or even meter level. Therefore, developing novel DNNs architecture with active inputs at micrometer scale becomes an inevitable pathway for next generation on-chip PNNs.

2 VCSEL array for 3D photonic neural networks

A vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) is a kind of semiconductor laser first invented in 1970s [31]. The structure of a typical VCSEL from top to bottom is usually P-type distributed Bragg reflectors (P-DBR), active layer and N-DBR grown on a III-V semiconductor substrate [32]. As a semiconductor laser source, a VCSEL has the advantages of small size (μm-scale), low threshold, controllable high modulation bandwidth (more than 30 GHz) [3234], and has been widely used in field of optical communication, optical storage and sensing [32]. More importantly, the perpendicular emitting phenomenon of VCSEL makes it convenient to realize a laser array [3537], which can be a perfect candidate as active input source for DNNs. The addressability of VCSEL arrays enables the realization of optical inputs (images) for DNNs, where each VCSEL in the array can be independently controlled through independent electrodes [37].

Therefore, it is necessary to initiate an exciting journey to utilize addressable VCSEL arrays as a promising integrated platform to achieve compact, active DNNs for next-generation on-chip vertical-stacked PNNs. The introduction of addressable VCSEL arrays can replace both the centimeter-scale solid/gas lasers and signal generator (DMD) in the existing DNNs optical setup to generate two-dimensional optical data for DNNs. As shown in Figure 1, based on the advanced bonding techniques, all devices for DNNs can be vertical stacked and on-chip integrated, and a sandwich structure of VCSEL array, DNNs and detector arrays can be constructed to fully realize a 3D photonic chip. In this perspective design, an array of VCSELs functions as the input ports in the DNN. The designed DNNs perform corresponding tasks for different input signals. The detector array can be integrated on the DNNs to receive the output data of DNNs.

Figure 1: 
The on-chip integration design of DNNs based on VCSEL arrays.
Figure 1:

The on-chip integration design of DNNs based on VCSEL arrays.

Addressable VCSEL array pitches are typically hundreds of microns [36, 37]. When used for image recognition, take 28 × 28 pixels handwritten digit images in MNIST (Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology) database as an example [38], 28 × 28 scale VCSEL array can meet the needs of optical image data input. Therefore, the size of this chip can be as small as several millimeters. The addressable driving of a small-scale VCSEL array can be achieved through existing electrical chips, like field programmable gate array (FPGA) chip, but when the scale of VCSEL arrays increases, designing dedicated driver chip will be essential [36]. We can learn the electrical control from micro-light-emitting diodes array [39]. The number of connections between a neuron in the previous layer and neurons in the next layer is a key parameter determining the performance of DNNs. To achieve as many as connections, reducing the neuron size by using TPN or bonding the diffractive layers with a designed substrate thickness together may be possible solutions. Of course, the implementation of VCSEL based DNNs presents unprecedented science and engineering challenges afar current technologies. For example, the superposition of coherent light is the basis in current DNNs, so the realization of coherence between the VCSELs in an array is important. To achieve this, anti-waveguide may be a feasible way [40, 41]. On the other hand, although the optical signals between each VCSELs are generally incoherent, the signal emitted by each individual VCSEL is coherent, therefore, there is another possible way to realize VCSEL-based DNNs by developing new design algorithms of DNNs.

3 Discussion and future perspectives

The future directions of VCSEL-based 3D photonic chips could be more intelligent, more compact, and higher speed (Table 1). More intelligent features means that DNNs can have higher accuracy, handle more complex tasks and more types of tasks. Programmability allows the chip to complete more types of tasks. In this concept, the VCSEL array can not only be used to generate signals, but also to regulate the synaptic weights of DNNs. To achieve this, novel photonic memristive materials [12] for DNNs should be encompassed. The programmable layer can be placed at the forefront of DNNs to facilitate VCSEL control. Meanwhile, multi-task learning algorithms of DNNs also need to be constructed. Multiplexing can increase the bandwidth of DNNs, which is one of the main advantages of PNNs. To enable the VCSEL array to generate optical signals with more dimensions, such as phase and orbital angular momentum, the coupled VCSEL array [41] and the meta-VCSELs [42] may be considered. The VCSELs can also be used as spiking neurons [43, 44] to further develop spiking DNNs, which is much closer to the operation form of human brain. In addition, micro- and nano-lasers may also be considered as spiking neurons to form spiking DNNs [45]. Compared with VCSELs, micro- and nano-lasers have smaller size, which can achieve higher neuron density.

Table 1:

Future directions of VCSEL-based 3D photonic chip.

Future directions Potential features needed Key requirements Applications
More intelligent Programmable Photonic memristive materials (phase change materials, photochromic materials, etc.) Optical computing (matrix multiplication, logic operation)
Image classification
Multiplexing (phase, OAM, etc.) New designs of a VCSEL array Face recognition
Automatic driving
Spiking DNNs New algorithms
6G communication
New integration architecture Optical encryption
Nonlinear activation function Nonlinear optical materials
Higher neuron density Advanced lithography technology, advanced micro–nano fabrication technology
More compact CMOS-chip-controlled addressable VCSEL array Back-emitting VCSELs
Long-term stability Heat dissipation
Higher speed Higher operating speed High-speed VCSELs
High- speed photodetectors

At present, there is a lack of nonlinear activation function in the operation of DNNs, which limits DNNs to become deep DNNs. Therefore, the insertion of one or more nonlinear optical layers between the diffractive layers is important. A higher neuron density, which requires the introduction of more advanced lithography and fabrication technology, can enable DNNs to perform more complex tasks. The DNNs on the VCSEL arrays can be made by 3D printing or semiconductor manufacturing on transparent substrates, such as quartz or sapphire [46].

For being more compact, a flip-chip bonded VCSEL array can be the best choice, in which the back-emitting VCSEL arrays can be bonded onto a CMOS chip to solve the problem of the complex addressing circuits for a large-scale VCSEL array [36]. Another advantage is that the back-emitting VCSEL used in flip-chip bonding has a flat emitting surface, which is benefit for continue vertical integration of DNNs [42]. As the scale of VCSEL arrays increases, the heat dissipation of the VCSELs will be a concern. Excessive temperature can cause changes in the laser power and wavelength, thus affecting the accuracy of DNNs. To solve this, in addition to using conventional heat sinks, the introduction of microfluidics [47] or films with high thermal conductivity, like graphene [48], can also be considered to help the heat dissipation of the VCSELs. Besides, because DNNs can be integrated on the VCSEL array surface, some materials with high thermal conductivity can be chosen to fabricate DNNs.

For higher speed, since DNNs are passive, the operating speed is limited only by the signal input rate of the VCSELs and the readout rate of the photodetectors. Therefore, the further progress on the high-speed VCSELs and photodetectors is essential.

It can be envisaged that the integration scheme of DNNs and VCSEL arrays can be an advanced route of 3D photonic chips with a high feasibility and a wide application prospect. In the future, this chip can be applied to important fields such as optical computing (matrix multiplication and logic operation), image classification, face recognition, automatic driving, 6G communication, and optical encryption. With full play to the high modulation bandwidth of the VCSEL arrays, the task execution speed of this chip can be several orders of the state-of-the-art electronic chips with obvious advantages in parallel operation and energy consumption.


Corresponding authors: Min Gu and Yibo Dong, Institute of Photonic Chips, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093 China; and Centre for Artificial-Intelligence Nanophotonics, School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093 China, E-mail: (M. Gu), (Y. Dong)

Funding source: Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center Program

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2021-2025 No. 20

Funding source: National Key Research and Development program of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2021YFB2802000

Award Identifier / Grant number: 21DZ1100500

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61975123

Funding source: National Key Research and Development program of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2022YFB2804301

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: We would like to acknowledge the support from the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 21DZ1100500), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project, the Shanghai Frontiers Science Center Program (2021–2025 No. 20), the National Key Research and Development program of China (Grant Nos. 2021YFB2802000 and 2022YFB2804301), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61975123).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] D. Amodei, D. Hernandez, G. Sastry, et al.., Ai and Compute, San Francisco, OpenAI, 2018, Available at: https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/#fn1 [accessed: May. 16, 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[2] B. J. Shastri, A. N. Tait, T. Ferreira de Lima, M. A. Nahmias, H. T. Peng, and P. R. Prucnal, “Principles of neuromorphic photonics,” in Unconventional Computing. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science Series, A. Adamatzky, Ed., New York, NY, USA, Springer, 2018, pp. 1–36.10.1007/978-1-4939-6883-1_702Search in Google Scholar

[3] Q. M. Zhang, H. Y. Yu, M. Barbiero, B. K. Wang, and M. Gu, “Artificial neural networks enabled by nanophotonics,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 8, p. 14, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0151-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison, et al.., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] X. Guo, J. Xiang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Su, “Integrated neuromorphic photonics: synapses, neurons, and neural networks,” Adv. Photonics Res., vol. 2, no. 6, p. 2000212, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202000212.Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Liu, Q. Wu, X. Sui, et al.., “Research progress in optical neural networks: theory, applications and developments,” PhotoniX, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 5, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43074-021-00026-0.Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. J. Shastri, A. N. Tait, T. Ferreira de Lima, et al.., “Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 102–114, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00754-y.Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Ashtiani, A. J. Geers, and F. Aflatouni, “An on-chip photonic deep neural network for image classification,” Nature, vol. 606, no. 7914, pp. 501–506, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04714-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Y. Shen, N. C. Harris, S. Skirlo, et al.., “Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 441–446, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.93.Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Ghazi Sarwat, F. Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, G. C. Carrillo Santiago, et al.., “An integrated photonics engine for unsupervised correlation detection,” Sci. Adv., vol. 8, no. 22, p. eabn3243, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn3243.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Z. G. Cheng, C. Rios, W. H. P. Pernice, C. D. Wright, and H. Bhaskaran, “On-chip photonic synapse,” Sci. Adv., vol. 3, no. 9, p. 6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700160.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] C. Ríos, M. Stegmaier, P. Hosseini, et al.., “Integrated all-photonic non-volatile multi-level memory,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 725–732, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.182.Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. Huang, S. Bilodeau, T. Ferreira de Lima, et al.., “Demonstration of scalable microring weight bank control for large-scale photonic integrated circuits,” APL Photonics, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 040803, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5144121.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y. R. Qu, H. Z. Zhu, Y. C. Shen, et al.., “Inverse design of an integrated-nanophotonics optical neural network,” Sci. Bull., vol. 65, no. 14, pp. 1177–1183, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2020.03.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] J. Feldmann, N. Youngblood, C. D. Wright, H. Bhaskaran, and W. H. P. Pernice, “All-optical spiking neurosynaptic networks with self-learning capabilities,” Nature, vol. 569, no. 7755, pp. 208–214, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1157-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] J. Feldmann, N. Youngblood, M. Karpov, et al.., “Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core,” Nature, vol. 589, no. 7840, pp. 52–58, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03070-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] X. Xu, M. Tan, B. Corcoran, et al.., “11 TOPS photonic convolutional accelerator for optical neural networks,” Nature, vol. 589, no. 7840, pp. 44–51, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03063-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] A. F. J. Levi, “Silicon photonics’ last-meter problem: economics and physics still pose challenges to “fiber to the processor” tech,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 38–43, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2018.8449048.Search in Google Scholar

[19] K. Y. Hsu, H. Y. Li, and D. Psaltis, “Holographic implementation of a fully connected neural network,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1637–1645, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.58357.Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. Psaltis, D. Brady, X. G. Gu, and S. Lin, “Holography in artificial neural networks,” Nature, vol. 343, no. 6256, pp. 325–330, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1038/343325a0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] X. Lin, Y. Rivenson, N. T. Yardimei, et al.., “All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks,” Science, vol. 361, no. 6406, pp. 1004–+, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] E. Goi, X. Chen, Q. Zhang, et al.., “Nanoprinted high-neuron-density optical linear perceptrons performing near-infrared inference on a CMOS chip,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 40, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00483-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] J. Li, D. Mengu, N. T. Yardimci, et al.., “Spectrally encoded single-pixel machine vision using diffractive networks,” Sci. Adv., vol. 7, no. 13, p. eabd7690, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd7690.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] C. Liu, Q. Ma, Z. J. Luo, et al.., “A programmable diffractive deep neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array,” Nat. Electron., vol. 5, pp. 113–122, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-022-00719-9.Search in Google Scholar

[25] T. Zhou, X. Lin, J. Wu, et al.., “Large-scale neuromorphic optoelectronic computing with a reconfigurable diffractive processing unit,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 15, pp. 367–373, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00796-w.Search in Google Scholar

[26] C. Qian, X. Lin, X. Lin, et al.., “Performing optical logic operations by a diffractive neural network,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 59, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0303-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] P. Wang, W. Xiong, Z. Huang, et al.., “Orbital angular momentum mode logical operation using optical diffractive neural network,” Photon. Res., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2116–2124, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.432919.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Y. Luo, Y. Zhao, J. Li, et al.., “Computational imaging without a computer: seeing through random diffusers at the speed of light,” eLight, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593-022-00012-4.Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Veli, D. Mengu, N. T. Yardimci, et al.., “Terahertz pulse shaping using diffractive surfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 37, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20268-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] M. Gu, X. Fang, H. Ren, and E. Goi, “Optically digitalized holography: a perspective for all-optical machine learning,” Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 363–365, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.002.Search in Google Scholar

[31] H. Soda, K. I. Iga, C. Kitahara, and Y. Suematsu, “GaInAsP/InP surface emitting injection lasers,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2329–2330, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1143/jjap.18.2329.Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. Liu, P. Wolf, J. A. Lott, and D. Bimberg, “Vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers for data communication and sensing,” Photon. Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 121–136, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.7.000121.Search in Google Scholar

[33] E. Heidari, M. Ahmed, H. Dalir, A. Bakry, A. Alshahrie, and V. J. Sorger, “VCSEL with multi-transverse cavities with bandwidth beyond 100 GHz,” Nanophotonics, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 3779–3788, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0442.Search in Google Scholar

[34] E. Haglund, P. Westbergh, J. S. Gustavsson, et al.., “30 GHz bandwidth 850 nm VCSEL with sub-100 fJ/bit energy dissipation at 25–50 Gbit/s,” Electron. Lett., vol. 51, no. 14, pp. 1096–1098, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2015.0785.Search in Google Scholar

[35] G. Pan, Y. Xie, C. Xu, et al.., “Large-scale proton-implant-defined VCSEL arrays with narrow beamwidth,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 390–393, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2018.2796183.Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. V. Krishnamoorthy, K. W. Goossen, L. M. F. Chirovsky, et al.., “16 x 16 VCSEL array flip-chip bonded to CMOS VLSI circuit,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1073–1075, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/68.868012.Search in Google Scholar

[37] T. Heuser, M. Pflüger, I. Fischer, J. A. Lott, D. Brunner, and S. Reitzenstein, “Developing a photonic hardware platform for brain-inspired computing based on 5 × 5 VCSEL arrays,” J. Phys.: Photonics, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 044002, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/aba671.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Z. Liu, C. H. Lin, B. R. Hyun, et al.., “Micro-light-emitting diodes with quantum dots in display technology,” Light: Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 83, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0268-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] L. Bao, N. H. Kim, L. J. Mawst, et al.., “Near-diffraction-limited coherent emission from large aperture antiguided vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser arrays,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 320–322, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1640799.Search in Google Scholar

[41] M. Xun, C. Xu, Y. Xie, et al.., “Phase tuning in two-dimensional coherently coupled vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser array,” Appl. Opt., vol. 55, no. 20, pp. 5439–5443, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.005439.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Y. Y. Xie, P. N. Ni, Q. H. Wang, et al.., “Metasurface-integrated vertical cavity surface-emitting lasers for programmable directional lasing emissions,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 125–130, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0611-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[43] A. Skalli, J. Robertson, D. Owen-Newns, et al.., “Photonic neuromorphic computing using vertical cavity semiconductor lasers,” Opt. Mater. Express, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2395–2414, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.450926.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Y. Zhang, J. Robertson, S. Xiang, M. Hejda, J. Bueno, and A. J. P. R. Hurtado, “All-optical neuromorphic binary convolution with a spiking VCSEL neuron for image gradient magnitudes,” Photon. Res., vol. 9, no. 5, p. 0500B0201, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1364/prj.412141.Search in Google Scholar

[45] H. Deng, G. L. Lippi, J. Mørk, J. Wiersig, and S. Reitzenstein, “Physics and applications of high-β micro- and nanolasers,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 9, no. 19, p. 2100415, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202100415.Search in Google Scholar

[46] H. Chen, J. Feng, M. Jiang, et al.., “Diffractive deep neural networks at visible wavelengths,” Engineering, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1483–1491, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.032.Search in Google Scholar

[47] R. van Erp, R. Soleimanzadeh, L. Nela, G. Kampitsis, and E. Matioli, “Co-designing electronics with microfluidics for more sustainable cooling,” Nature, vol. 585, no. 7824, pp. 211–216, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2666-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] G. Yang, H. Yi, Y. Yao, C. Li, and Z. Li, “Thermally conductive graphene films for heat dissipation,” ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2149–2155, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b01955.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-07-29
Accepted: 2022-12-02
Published Online: 2023-01-13

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Neural network learning with photonics and for photonic circuit design
  4. Reviews
  5. From 3D to 2D and back again
  6. Photonic multiplexing techniques for neuromorphic computing
  7. Perspectives
  8. A large scale photonic matrix processor enabled by charge accumulation
  9. Perspective on 3D vertically-integrated photonic neural networks based on VCSEL arrays
  10. Photonic online learning: a perspective
  11. Research Articles
  12. All-optical ultrafast ReLU function for energy-efficient nanophotonic deep learning
  13. Artificial optoelectronic spiking neuron based on a resonant tunnelling diode coupled to a vertical cavity surface emitting laser
  14. Parallel and deep reservoir computing using semiconductor lasers with optical feedback
  15. Neural computing with coherent laser networks
  16. Optical multi-task learning using multi-wavelength diffractive deep neural networks
  17. Diffractive interconnects: all-optical permutation operation using diffractive networks
  18. Photonic reservoir computing for nonlinear equalization of 64-QAM signals with a Kramers–Kronig receiver
  19. Deriving task specific performance from the information processing capacity of a reservoir computer
  20. Transfer learning for photonic delay-based reservoir computing to compensate parameter drift
  21. Analog nanophotonic computing going practical: silicon photonic deep learning engines for tiled optical matrix multiplication with dynamic precision
  22. A self-similar sine–cosine fractal architecture for multiport interferometers
  23. Power monitoring in a feedforward photonic network using two output detectors
  24. Fabrication-conscious neural network based inverse design of single-material variable-index multilayer films
  25. Multi-task topology optimization of photonic devices in low-dimensional Fourier domain via deep learning
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0437/html
Scroll to top button