Home Experimental analysis of the effects of different production directions on the mechanical characteristics of ABS, PLA, and PETG materials produced by FDM
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Experimental analysis of the effects of different production directions on the mechanical characteristics of ABS, PLA, and PETG materials produced by FDM

  • Mehmet Umut Erdaş

    Mehmet Umut Erdaş is a Phd student at the department of automotive engineering. He works as a scholarship student within the scope of YOK 100/2000 and Tübitak 2211-A. His research interests are the finite element analysis of structural components, lightweight design, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and additive manufacturing.

         , Betül Sultan Yıldız

    Dr. Betül Sultan Yıldız completed her BSc and MSc degrees at Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey, and received her PhD.in Mechanical Engineering from Bursa Technical University, Turkey. Her research interests are optimal design, shape optimization, topology optimization, topography optimization, structural optimization methods, meta-heuristic optimization algorithms, and applications to industrial problems.

     EMAIL logo     and Ali Rıza Yıldız

    Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis of structural components, lightweight design, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and additive manufacturing.
Published/Copyright: January 9, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Materials Testing
From the journal Materials Testing Volume 66 Issue 2

Abstract

One of the most researched technologies among technologies used for producing complex and diverse parts today is additive manufacturing. In additive manufacturing, production can be carried out using thermoplastic and metal materials without requiring an additional process. Among the additive manufacturing technologies, the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) method is the most widely used method worldwide due to its affordability and broad application area. FFF is a method in which part formation is achieved by depositing melted materials on each other. In recent years, polymer materials such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) have been frequently used in many industrial areas in the FFF method because they are lightweight, inexpensive, sustainable, and provide sufficient strength for engineering applications. This study conducted tensile, three-point bending, Charpy, and compression tests on PLA, PETG, and ABS materials at angles of 15°–75° and 30°–60°, and the results were compared.

Keywords: fused filament fabrication; mechanical properties; product directions; additive manufacturing; 3-d printer
Corresponding author: Betül Sultan Yıldız, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye, E-mail:

Funding source: Bursa Uludağ University Scientific Research Projects Unit(BAP)

Award Identifier / Grant number: FGA-2022-1192

About the authors

Mehmet Umut Erdaş

Mehmet Umut Erdaş is a Phd student at the department of automotive engineering. He works as a scholarship student within the scope of YOK 100/2000 and Tübitak 2211-A. His research interests are the finite element analysis of structural components, lightweight design, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and additive manufacturing.

Betül Sultan Yıldız

Dr. Betül Sultan Yıldız completed her BSc and MSc degrees at Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey, and received her PhD.in Mechanical Engineering from Bursa Technical University, Turkey. Her research interests are optimal design, shape optimization, topology optimization, topography optimization, structural optimization methods, meta-heuristic optimization algorithms, and applications to industrial problems.

Ali Rıza Yıldız

Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis of structural components, lightweight design, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and additive manufacturing.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The author(s) have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The author(s) state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: Bursa Uludağ University Scientific Research Projects Unit(BAP) with Grant number: FGA-2022-1192.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

[1] Z. Liu, Q. Lei, and S. Xing, “Mechanical characteristics of wood, ceramic, metal and carbon fiber-based PLA composites fabricated by FDM,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 3743–3753, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034.Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. M. Chacón, M. A. Caminero, E. García-Plaza, and P. J. Núñez, “Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection,” Mater. Des., vol. 124, pp. 143–157, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065.Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Marșavina, C. Vălean, M. Mărghitaș, et al.., “Effect of the manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 274, no. August, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108766.Search in Google Scholar

[4] N. Lokesh, B. A. Praveena, J. Sudheer Reddy, V. K. Vasu, and S. Vijaykumar, “Evaluation on effect of printing process parameter through Taguchi approach on mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA specimens using FDM at constant printing temperature,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 52, pp. 1288–1293, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.054.Search in Google Scholar

[5] J. Maszybrocka, M. Dworak, G. Nowakowska, P. Osak, and B. Łosiewicz, “The influence of the gradient infill of PLA samples produced with the FDM technique on their mechanical properties,” Materials (Basel), vol. 15, no. 4, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15041304.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] M. Algarni and S. Ghazali, “Comparative study of the sensitivity of pla, abs, peek, and petg’s mechanical properties to fdm printing process parameters,” Crystals, vol. 11, no. 8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080995.Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. R. Torrado, C. M. Shemelya, J. D. English, Y. Lin, R. B. Wicker, and D. A. Roberson, “Characterizing the effect of additives to ABS on the mechanical property anisotropy of specimens fabricated by material extrusion 3D printing,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 6, pp. 16–29, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

[8] K. Shergill, Y. Chen, and S. Bull, “An investigation into the layer thickness effect on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured polymers: PLA and ABS,” Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol., vol. 126, pp. 3651–3665, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11270-y.Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Rodríguez-Panes, J. Claver, and A. M. Camacho, “The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: a comparative analysis,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081333.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] C. Vǎlean, L. Marşavina, M. Mǎrghitaşl, E. Linul, J. Razavi, F. Berto, “Effect of manufacturing parameters on tensile properties of FDM printed specimens,” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol. 26, no. 2019, pp. 313–320, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.040.Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. Wang, Y. Ma, Z. Deng, S. Zhang, and J. Cai, “Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials”, Polym. Test., vol. 86, no. March, p. 106483, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483.Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Szczepanik and P. Nikiel, “Influence of structural characteristics on the mechanical properties of FDM printed PLA material,” J. Cast. Mater. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7494/jcme.2020.4.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Srinivasan, W. Ruban, A. Deepanraj, R. Bhuvanesh, and T. Bhuvanesh, “Effect on infill density on mechanical properties of PETG part fabricated by fused deposition modelling,” Mater. Today: Proc., vol. 27, pp. 1838–1842, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.797.Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Altan, M. Eryildiz, B. Gumus, and Y. Kahraman, “Effects of process parameters on the quality of PLA products fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM): surface roughness and tensile strength,” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 471–477, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111178.Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Floor, B. van Deursen, E. Tempelman, “Tensile strength of 3D printed materials: review and reassessment of test parameters,” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 7–8, pp. 679–686, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111203.Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Çelebi, “Investigation of fused deposition modeling processing parameters of 3D PLA specimens by an experimental design methodology,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 405–410, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111334.Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Roj, R. Theiß, and P. Dültgen, “Mechanical properties of 16 different FDM-plastic types,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 999–1006, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111413.Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. Roj, J. Nürnberg, R. Theiß, and P. Dültgen, “Comparison of FDM-printed and compression molded tensile samples,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 985–992, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111575.Search in Google Scholar

[19] P. Gupta, S. Kumari, A. Gupta, A. K. Sinha, and P. Jindal, “Effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid parts,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0010.Search in Google Scholar

[20] B. Liu, L. Yang, R. Zhou, B. Hong, “Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of additive manufactured SMP structures based on FDM,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 378–390, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2021-2122.Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Roj, A. Blondrath, R. Theiß, and P. Dültgen, “Quality optimization of FDM-printed (fused deposition modeling) components based on differential scanning calorimetry,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1544–1551, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0199.Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Yilmaz and N. F. Yilmaz, “Effects of raster angle in single- and multi-oriented layers for the production of polyetherimide (PEI/ULTEM 1010) parts with fused deposition modelling,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1651–1661, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0085.Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. Eryildiz, “Comparison of notch fabrication methods on the impact strength of FDM-3D-printed PLA specimens,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 423–430, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0306.Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. O. Ture, Z. Evis, and F. Ozturk, “Additive manufacturing of hexagonal lattice structures: tensile tests and validation,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 505–511, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0401.Search in Google Scholar

[25] B. Yermurat, Ö. Seçgin, and V. Taşdemir, “Multi-material additive manufacturing: investigation of the combined use of ABS and PLA in the same structure,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1119–1126, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0368.Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. R. Yildiz and M. U. Erdas, “A new Hybrid Taguchi-salp swarm optimization algorithm for the robust design of real-world engineering problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0022.Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Gupta, H. Abderazek, B. S. Yildiz, A. R. Yildiz, S. Mirjalili, and S. M. Sait, “Comparison of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for solving constrained mechanical design optimization problems,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 183, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115351.Search in Google Scholar

[28] H. Abderazek, F. Hamza, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “Comparative investigation of the moth-flame algorithm and whale optimization algorithm for optimal spur gear design,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 266–271, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0039.Search in Google Scholar

[29] D. Gürses, S. Bureerat, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “Comparison of the arithmetic optimization algorithm, the slime mold optimization algorithm, the marine predators algorithm, the salp swarm algorithm for real-world engineering applications,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 448–452, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0076.Search in Google Scholar

[30] B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, M. U. Erdas, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “Comparision of the political optimization algorithm, the Archimedes optimization algorithm and the Levy flight algorithm for design optimization in industry,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 356–359, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0053.Search in Google Scholar

[31] B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “Enhanced grasshopper optimization algorithm using elite opposition-based learning for solving real-world engineering problems,” Eng. Comput., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01368-w.Search in Google Scholar

[32] A. R. Yildiz and F. Ozturk, “Hybrid enhanced genetic algorithm to select optimal machining parameters in turning operation,” Proc. IME B J. Eng. Manufact., vol. 220, no. 12, pp. 2041–2053, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM570.Search in Google Scholar

[33] B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “Robust design of a robot gripper mechanism using new hybrid grasshopper optimization algorithm,” Expert Syst., vol. 38, no. 3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12666.Search in Google Scholar

[34] B. S. Yildiz, S. Kumar, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “A new chaotic Levy flight distribution optimization algorithm for solving constrained engineering problems,” Expert Syst., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12992.Search in Google Scholar

[35] N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, and S. Mirjalili, “A comparative study of recent multi-objective metaheuristics for solving constrained Truss optimisation problems,” ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 4031–4047, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09531-8.Search in Google Scholar

[36] C. M. Aye, N. Pholdee, A. R. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, and S. M. Sait, “Multi-surrogate-assisted metaheuristics for crashworthiness optimisation,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 80, nos. 2/3/4, p. 223, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2019.109866.Search in Google Scholar

[37] B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, N. Panagant, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “A novel chaotic Henry gas solubility optimization algorithm for solving real-world engineering problems,” Eng. Comput., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01268-5.Search in Google Scholar

[38] A. R. Yildiz and F. Öztürk, “Hybrid Taguchi-Harmony Search Approach for Shape Optimization,” Recent Adv Harmony Search algorithm, pp. 89–98, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04317-8_8.Search in Google Scholar

[39] T. Güler, E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız, and U. Yavuz, “Lightweight design of an automobile hinge component using glass fiber polyamide composites,” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 306–310, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111152.Search in Google Scholar

[40] A. R. Yildiz, N. Kaya, F. Öztürk, and O. Alankuş, “Optimal design of vehicle components using topology design and optimisation,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 387–398, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2004.004064.Search in Google Scholar

[41] N. Öztürk, A. R. Yıldız, N. Kaya, and F. Öztürk, “Neuro-Genetic design optimization framework to support the integrated robust design optimization process in CE,” Concurr. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X06063314.Search in Google Scholar

[42] B. S. Yıldız, “Marine predators algorithm and multi-verse optimisation algorithm for optimal battery case design of electric vehicles,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 88, no. 1, p. 1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2022.124866.Search in Google Scholar

[43] A. Karaduman, B. S. Yıldız, and A. R. Yıldız, “Experimental and numerical fatigue-based design optimisation of clutch diaphragm spring in the automotive industry,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 80, nos. 2/3/4, p. 330, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2019.109875.Search in Google Scholar

[44] E. Demirci and A. R. Yıldız, “A new hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization of structural components,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111291.Search in Google Scholar

[45] B. S. Yıldız, “Robust design of electric vehicle components using a new hybrid salp swarm algorithm and radial basis function-based approach,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 83, no. 1, p. 38, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2020.114779.Search in Google Scholar

[46] B. Aslan and A. R. Yildiz, “Optimum design of automobile components using lattice structures for additive manufacturing,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 633–639, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111527.Search in Google Scholar

[47] P. Mehta, B. S. Yildiz, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “Hunger games search algorithm for global optimization of engineering design problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 524–532, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0013.Search in Google Scholar

[48] B. S. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, N. Panagant, P. Mehta, and A. R. Yildiz, “Reptile search algorithm and kriging surrogate model for structural design optimization with natural frequency constraints,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1504–1511, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0048.Search in Google Scholar

[49] P. Mehta, B. S. Yildiz, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “Gradient-based optimizer for economic optimization of engineering problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 690–696, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0055.Search in Google Scholar

[50] D. Gürses, P. Mehta, V. Patel, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “Artificial gorilla troops algorithm for the optimization of a fine plate heat exchanger,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 1325–1331, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0049.Search in Google Scholar

[51] B. S. Yildiz, V. Patel, N. Pholdee, S. M. Sait, S. Bureerat, and A. R. Yildiz, “Conceptual comparison of the ecogeography-based algorithm, equilibrium algorithm, marine predators algorithm and slime mold algorithm for optimal product design,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 336–340, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0049.Search in Google Scholar

[52] D. Gürses, P. Mehta, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “African vultures optimization algorithm for optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1234–1241, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0050.Search in Google Scholar

[53] A.R. Yildiz, “Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using hybrid teaching learning-based approach,” Int J Adv Manuf Technol, vol. 66, pp. 1319–1326, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4410-y.Search in Google Scholar

[54] E. Demirci and A. R. Yıldız, “An experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of geometry and spot welds on the crashworthiness of vehicle thin-walled structures,” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 553–561, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111187.Search in Google Scholar

[55] H. Gökdağ and A. R. Yildiz, “Structural damage detection using modal parameters and particle swarm optimization,” Mater. Test., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 416–420, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110346.Search in Google Scholar

[56] M.U. Erdaş, M. Kopar, B. S. Yıldız, and A. R. Yıldız, “Optimum design of a seat bracket using artificial neural networks and dandelion optimization algorithm,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1767–1775, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0201.Search in Google Scholar

[57] A. R. Yildiz, “Optimal structural design of vehicle components using topology design and optimization,” Mater. Test., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 224–228, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.100880.Search in Google Scholar

[58] B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “Sine-cosine optimization algorithm for the conceptual design of automobile components,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 744–748, 2020, WE – Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111541.Search in Google Scholar

[59] H. Abderazek, S. M. Sait, and A. R. Yildiz, “Optimal design of planetary gear train for automotive transmissions using advanced meta-heuristics,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 80, nos. 2/3/4, p. 121, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2019.109862.Search in Google Scholar

[60] H. Abderazek, A. R. Yildiz, and S. M. Sait, “Mechanical engineering design optimisation using novel adaptive differential evolution algorithm,” Int. J. Veh. Des., vol. 80, nos. 2/3/4, p. 285, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2019.109873.Search in Google Scholar

[61] M. Kopar and A. R. Yildiz, “Composite disc optimization using hunger games search optimization algorithm,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1222–1229, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0067.Search in Google Scholar

[62] A. R. Yildiz and P. Mehta, “Manta ray foraging optimization algorithm and hybrid Taguchi salp swarm-Nelder-Mead algorithm for the structural design of engineering components,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 706–713, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0012.Search in Google Scholar

[63] B. S. Yildiz, S. Kumar, N. Panagant, et al.., “A novel hybrid arithmetic optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems,” Knowl. Base Syst., vol. 271, p. 110554, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110554.Search in Google Scholar

[64] D. Gürses, P. Mehta, S. M. Sait, S. Kumar, and A. R. Yildiz, “A multi-strategy boosted prairie dog optimization algorithm for global optimization of heat exchangers,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1396–1404, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0082.Search in Google Scholar

[65] S. M. Sait, P. Mehta, D. Gürses, and A. R. Yildiz, “Cheetah optimization algorithm for optimum design of heat exchangers,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1230–1236, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0015.Search in Google Scholar

[66] P. Mehta, B. S. Yıldız, N. Pholdee, et al.., “A novel generalized normal distribution optimizer with elite oppositional based learning for optimization of mechanical engineering problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 210–223, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0259.Search in Google Scholar

[67] S. Kumar, B. S. Yildiz, P. Mehta, et al.., “Chaotic marine predators algorithm for global optimization of real-world engineering problems,” Knowl. Base Syst., vol. 261, 2023, Art. no. 110192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110192.Search in Google Scholar

[68] B. S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, P. Mehta, et al.., “A novel hybrid flow direction optimizer-dynamic oppositional based learning algorithm for solving complex constrained mechanical design problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 134–143, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0183.Search in Google Scholar

[69] B. S. Yıldız, P. Mehta, N. Panagant, S. Mirjalili, and A. R. Yildiz, “A novel chaotic Runge Kutta optimization algorithm for solving constrained engineering problems,” J. Comput. Design Eng., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2452–2465, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwac113.Search in Google Scholar

[70] P. Mehta, B. S. Yildiz, S. Kumar, et al.., “A Nelder Mead-infused INFO algorithm for optimization of mechanical design problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1172–1182, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0119.Search in Google Scholar

[71] B. S. Yildiz, P. Mehta, S. M. Sait, N. Panagant, S. Kumar, and A. R. Yildiz, “A new hybrid artificial hummingbird-simulated annealing algorithm to solve constrained mechanical engineering problems,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1043–1050, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0123.Search in Google Scholar

[72] Z. Meng, Q. Qian, M. Xu, et al., “PINN-FORM: A new physics-informed neural network for reliability analysis with partial differential equation,” Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 414, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116172.Search in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2024-01-09
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. User independent tool for the analysis of data from tensile testing for database systems
  3. Evaluation of corrugated core configuration effects on low-velocity impact response in metallic sandwich panels
  4. Effect of total heat input on coaxiality of rotor shaft in laser cladding
  5. Determination of characteristic properties of Co3O4 loaded LaFe x Al12−x O19 hexaaluminates
  6. Investigation on quasi-static axial crushing of Al/PVC foam-filled Al6063-T5 tubes
  7. Experimental analysis of the effects of different production directions on the mechanical characteristics of ABS, PLA, and PETG materials produced by FDM
  8. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Si3N4/Invar joints using Ag–Cu–In–Ti with Cu foil as an interlayer
  9. Properties of chemically foamed polypropylene materials for application to automobile interior door panels
  10. Tribological and thermal characteristics of copper-free brake friction composites
  11. Dry tribological behaviour of microwave-assisted sintered AA2024 matrix hybrid composites reinforced by TiC/B4C/nano-graphite particles
  12. Erosion rate of AA6082-T6 aluminum alloy subjected to erosive wear determined by the meta-heuristic (SCA) based ANFIS method
  13. Mechanical properties of elevator ropes and belts exposed to corrosion and elevated temperatures
  14. Variants of friction stir based processes: review on process fundamentals, material attributes and mechanical properties
  15. Performance of conventional and wiper CBN inserts under various cooling conditions in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0206
Keywords for this article
fused filament fabrication; mechanical properties; product directions; additive manufacturing; 3-d printer

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. User independent tool for the analysis of data from tensile testing for database systems
  3. Evaluation of corrugated core configuration effects on low-velocity impact response in metallic sandwich panels
  4. Effect of total heat input on coaxiality of rotor shaft in laser cladding
  5. Determination of characteristic properties of Co3O4 loaded LaFe x Al12−x O19 hexaaluminates
  6. Investigation on quasi-static axial crushing of Al/PVC foam-filled Al6063-T5 tubes
  7. Experimental analysis of the effects of different production directions on the mechanical characteristics of ABS, PLA, and PETG materials produced by FDM
  8. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Si3N4/Invar joints using Ag–Cu–In–Ti with Cu foil as an interlayer
  9. Properties of chemically foamed polypropylene materials for application to automobile interior door panels
  10. Tribological and thermal characteristics of copper-free brake friction composites
  11. Dry tribological behaviour of microwave-assisted sintered AA2024 matrix hybrid composites reinforced by TiC/B4C/nano-graphite particles
  12. Erosion rate of AA6082-T6 aluminum alloy subjected to erosive wear determined by the meta-heuristic (SCA) based ANFIS method
  13. Mechanical properties of elevator ropes and belts exposed to corrosion and elevated temperatures
  14. Variants of friction stir based processes: review on process fundamentals, material attributes and mechanical properties
  15. Performance of conventional and wiper CBN inserts under various cooling conditions in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2023-0206/html
Scroll to top button