Home Wigner's theorem for an infinite set
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Wigner's theorem for an infinite set

  • John Harding EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 20, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

It is well known that the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space form an orthomodular lattice. Elements of this orthomodular lattice are the propositions of a quantum mechanical system represented by the Hilbert space, and by Gleason’s theorem atoms of this orthomodular lattice correspond to pure states of the system. Wigner’s theorem says that the automorphism group of this orthomodular lattice corresponds to the group of unitary and anti-unitary operators of the Hilbert space. This result is of basic importance in the use of group representations in quantum mechanics.

The closed subspaces A of a Hilbert space H correspond to direct product decompositions HA×A of the Hilbert space, a result that lies at the heart of the superposition principle. In [10] it was shown that the direct product decompositions of any set, group, vector space, and topological space form an orthomodular poset. This is the basis for a line of study in foundational quantum mechanics replacing Hilbert spaces with other types of structures. It is the purpose of this note to prove a version of Wigner’s theorem: for an infinite set X, the automorphism group of the orthomodular poset Fact(X) of direct product decompositions of X is isomorphic to the permutation group of X.

The structure Fact(X) plays the role for direct product decompositions of a set that the lattice of equivalence relations plays for surjective images of a set. So determining its automorphism group is of interest independent of its application to quantum mechanics. Other properties of Fact(X) are determined in proving our version of Wigner’s theorem, namely that Fact(X) is atomistic in a very strong way.

REFERENCES

[1] BIRKHOFF, G.—VON NEUMANN, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics, Ann. of Math. (2) 37 (4) (1936), 823–843.10.2307/1968621Search in Google Scholar

[2] BURRIS, S.—SANKAPPANAVAR, H. P.: A Course in Universal Algebra. Graduate Texts in Math. 78, Springer, 1981.10.1007/978-1-4613-8130-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] GREECHIE, R. J.: A particular non-atomistic orthomodular poset, Comm. Math. Phys. 14 (1969), 326–328.10.1007/BF01645388Search in Google Scholar

[4] CHEVALIER, G.: Automorphisms of an orthomodular poset of projections, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 44 (7) (2005), 985–998.10.1007/s10773-005-7075-6Search in Google Scholar

[5] CHEVALIER, G.: The orthomodular poset of projections of a symmetric lattice, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 44 (11) (2005), 2073–2089.10.1007/s10773-005-0341-9Search in Google Scholar

[6] CHEVALIER, G.: Wigner’s theorem and its generalizations. In: The Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures, Engesser, Gabbay, and Lehmann (eds.), Elsevier, 2007, pp. 429–475.10.1016/B978-044452870-4/50032-7Search in Google Scholar

[7] CHEVALIER, G.: Wigner type theorems for projections, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 47 (1) (2008), 69–80.10.1007/s10773-007-9368-4Search in Google Scholar

[8] DIXON, J.—MORTIMER, B.: Permutation Groups. Graduate Texts in Math. 163, Springer, 1996.10.1007/978-1-4612-0731-3Search in Google Scholar

[9] HANNAN, T.—HARDING, J.: Automorphisms of decompositions, Math. Slovaca, to appear.10.1515/ms-2015-0153Search in Google Scholar

[10] HARDING, J.: Decompositions in quantum logic, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348 (5) (1996), 1839–1862.10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01548-6Search in Google Scholar

[11] HARDING, J.: Regularity in quantum logic, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 37 (4) (1998), 1173–1212.10.1023/A:1026665818335Search in Google Scholar

[12] HARDING, J.: Axioms of an experimental system, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 38 (6) (1999), 1643–1675.10.1023/A:1026607030592Search in Google Scholar

[13] HARDING, J.: A link between quantum logic and categorical quantum mechanics, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 48 (3) (2009), 769–802.10.1007/s10773-008-9853-4Search in Google Scholar

[14] HARDING, J.: Orthomodularity of decompositions in a categorical setting, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 45 (6) (2006), 1117–1127.10.1007/s10773-006-9109-0Search in Google Scholar

[15] HARDING, J.: Dynamics in the decompositions approach to quantum mechanics, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys., to appear.10.1007/s10773-017-3408-5Search in Google Scholar

[16] HARDING, J.—YANG, T.: Sections in orthomodular structures of decompositions, Houston J. Math., to appear.Search in Google Scholar

[17] HARDING, J.—YANG, T.: The logic of bundles, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys., to appear.10.1007/s10773-015-2760-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] KALMBACH, G.: Orthomodular Lattices. London Math. Soc. Monogr. 18, Academic Press, Inc. London, 1983.10.1007/978-1-4899-3558-8_9Search in Google Scholar

[19] MACKEY, G. W.: The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, A Lecture-Note Volume by W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1963.10.1063/1.3051542Search in Google Scholar

[20] McKENZIE, R.—McNULTY, G.—TAYLOR, W.: Algebras, Lattices, Varieties, vol. 1, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[21] MUSHTARI, D. K.: Projection logics in Banach spaces, Soviet Math. (Iz. VUZ) 33 (1989), 59–70.Search in Google Scholar

[22] OVCHINNIKOV, P.: Automorphisms of the poset of skew projections, J. Funct. Anal. 115 (1993), 184–189.10.1006/jfan.1993.1086Search in Google Scholar

[23] PTA´ K, P.—PULMANNOVA´ , S.: Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics. Fundam. Theor. Phys. 44, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[24] SINGER, S. F.: Linearity, Symmetry, and Prediction in the Hydrogen Atom, Springer, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[25] UHLHORN, U.: Representation of symmetry transformations in quantum mechanics, Ark. Fys. 23 (1963), 307–340.Search in Google Scholar

[26] VARADARAJAN, V. S.: Geometry of Quantum Theory, second ed., Springer-Verlag, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[27] WIGNER, E. P.: Group Theory and its Applications to the Quantum Mechanics of the Atomic Spectra, Academic Press, 1959.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-07-24
Accepted: 2017-08-31
Published Online: 2018-10-20
Published in Print: 2018-10-25

© 2018 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2017-0178/pdf
Scroll to top button