Is There Really Any “Merely Verbal” Ontological Dispute?
-
Carlota G. Llorente
Abstract
Contemporary debates on metaontology focus on discussions between two main positions: realism and deflationism. Ontological realism claims to deal with an independent objective reality, while deflationism downgrades the seriousness of ontology. From a position close to deflationism, E. Hirsch suggests that certain debates in ontology are not substantive but “merely verbal”. From a proper deflationist position, however, it seems doubtful that any ontological dispute can be merely linguistic without further consequences. The aim of this article is to argue that no ontological debate can remain purely verbal. For this purpose, a brief introduction to Hirsch’s ideas will be presented, followed by three different arguments against “merely verbal” disputes: semantic, epistemic and ontological.
Funding source: Ministerio de EconomÃ-a y Competitividad
Award Identifier / Grant number: FPU/00036
References
Berwick, R. C., and N. Chomsky. 2017. Why Only Us. MIT Press. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Blanco Salgueiro, A. 2017. La relatividad lingüística: (variaciones filosóficas). Argentina: Akal.Search in Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2006. “Linguistic Relativity.” In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, edited by L. Nadel. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.10.1002/0470018860.s00567Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1969. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262530071/aspects-of-the-theory-of-syntax/.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press. https://books.google.es/books?id=KdYOYJwjFo0C.Search in Google Scholar
Evans, N., and S. C. Levinson. 2009. “The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5): 429–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X.Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2002. “Quantifier Variance and Realism.” Philosophical Issues 12: 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.36.s1.2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3050542.Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2009. “Ontology and Alternative Languages.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman, 231–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. 2006. Wittgenstein a propósito de reglas y lenguaje privado. Madrid, Spain: Tecnos [Traducción de J. Rodríguez Marqueze 1982/2006].Search in Google Scholar
Linnebo, Ø. 2018. Thin Objects: An Abstractionist Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199641314.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lucy, J. A. 2016. “Recent Advances in the Study of Linguistic Relativity in Historical Context: A Critical Assessment.” Language Learning 66 (3): 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12195.Search in Google Scholar
Miranda Vilchis, R. 2021. “More Than Merely Verbal Disputes.” Metaphilosophy 52 (3–4). https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12503.Search in Google Scholar
Moltmann, F. 2022. “Natural Language Ontology.” In Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta, and U. Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/natural-language-ontolgy.Search in Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K., and I. A. Richards. 1923. “The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism.” In Nature (Issue 2791). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/quin92204Search in Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1949. Language. California, United States: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2009. “Ontological Realism,” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. J. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman, 384–423. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1996. “From “Thought and Language” to “Thinking for speaking.”” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 2011. Philosophical Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587292.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Tahko, T. E. 2015. An Introduction to Metametaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139924832Search in Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 2011. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Connecticut: Martino Fine Books.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
