Abstract
The migration debate highlights a crucial shortcoming of non-ideal theory. Non-ideal theory, this essay argues, is in a sense still too ideal. The open border approach to minimal global justice reveals that non-ideal theory is missing the appropriate tools for engaging moral problems that are brought about by a thorough lack of empathy. To remedy this flaw, I conceptualize a two-tier approach to non-ideal theory. The basic idea behind the two-tier approach is adding the toolset of instrumental morality to non-ideal theory. Instrumental morality, I argue, should take center stage whenever standard non-ideal theory fails to accomplish its task. Applying the approach to global justice, the article will make the case for charter cities. The policy of creating charter cities is built on the insight that in a world plagued by limited empathy, justice must be advanced in accordance with and not against the existing interests.
References
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (London: Profile Books).10.1355/ae29-2jSearch in Google Scholar
Akakpo, C.E. and Lenard, P.T. (2014). ‘New challenges in immigration theory. An overview’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17 (5): 493–502.10.1080/13698230.2014.919055Search in Google Scholar
Beckmann, M. (2011). ‘The social case as a business case: making sense of social entrepreneurship from an ordonomic perspective’, in I. Pies and P. Koslowski (eds.) Corporate Citizenship and New Governance (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands), pp. 91–115.10.1007/978-94-007-1661-2_6Search in Google Scholar
Blake, M. (2001). ‘Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30 (3): 257–296.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.xSearch in Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (2000/1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).Search in Google Scholar
Carens, J.H. (1987). ‘Aliens and citizens. The case for open borders’, The Review of Politics, 49 (02): 251–273.10.1017/S0034670500033817Search in Google Scholar
Carens, J.H. (1996). ‘Realistic and idealistic approaches to the ethics of migration’, International Migration Review, 30 (1): 156–170.10.2307/2547465Search in Google Scholar
Clemens, M.A. (2011). ‘Economics and emigration. Trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (3): 83–106.10.1257/jep.25.3.83Search in Google Scholar
Easterly, W.R. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good (New York: Penguin Press).Search in Google Scholar
Farrelly, C. (2007). ‘Justice in ideal theory. A refutation’, Political Studies, 55 (4): 844–864.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ferracioli, L. and Lora, P. de (2015). ‘Primum nocere. Medical brain drain and the duty to stay’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 40 (5): 601–619.10.1093/jmp/jhv022Search in Google Scholar
Freiman, C. (2013). ‘Cosmopolitanism within borders. On behalf of charter cities’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 30 (1): 40–52.10.1111/japp.12008Search in Google Scholar
Fuller, B., and Romer, P. (2012). ‘Success and the city. How charter cities could transform the developing world’, Macdonald-Laurier Institute, http://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/How-charter-cities-could-transform-the-developing-world-April-2012.pdf (accessed 24th June 2016)Search in Google Scholar
Gilabert, P. and Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). ‘Political feasibility. A conceptual exploration’, Political Studies, 60 (4): 809–825.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hamlin, A. and Stemplowska, Z. (2012). ‘Theory, ideal theory and the theory of ideals’, Political Studies Review, 10 (1): 48–62.10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00244.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hausman, D.M. and McPherson, M.S. (2006). Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511754289Search in Google Scholar
Horton, J. (2010). ‘Realism, liberal moralism and a political theory of modus vivendi’, European Journal of Political Theory, 9 (4): 431–448.10.1177/1474885110374004Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2005). ‘Immigration: The case for limits’, in A.I. Cohen and C.H. Wellman (eds.) Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 193–206.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2015). ‘Justice in immigration’, European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (4): 391–408.10.1177/1474885115584833Search in Google Scholar
Mills, C.W. (2005). ‘“Ideal theory” as ideology’, Hypatia, 20 (3): 165–183.Search in Google Scholar
Moehler, M. (2014). ‘The scope of instrumental morality’, Philosophical Studies, 167 (2): 431–451.10.1007/s11098-013-0106-xSearch in Google Scholar
Narveson, J. (1999). Moral Matters (Peterborough: Broadview Press).Search in Google Scholar
Oberman, K. (2015). ‘Poverty and immigration policy’, American Political Science Review, 109 (02): 239–251.10.1017/S0003055415000106Search in Google Scholar
Peri, G. (2014). ‘Do immigrant workers depress the wages of native workers?’, IZA World of Labor, http://wol.iza.org/articles/do-immigrant-workers-depress-the-wages-of-native-workers/long/ (accessed 12th September 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). ‘The law of peoples’, in J. Rawls (ed.) Collected Papers (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press), pp. 529–64.10.2307/j.ctv1pncngcSearch in Google Scholar
Sagar, R. (2016). ‘Are charter cities legitimate?’, Journal of Political Philosophy, online first.10.1111/jopp.12089Search in Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (2011). ‘Nonideal theory. What it is and what it needs to be’, Ethics, 121 (4): 772–796.10.1086/660816Search in Google Scholar
Seglow, J. (2005). ‘The ethics of immigration’, Political Studies Review, 3 (3): 317–334.10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005.00026.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2006). ‘What do we want from a theory of justice?’, Journal of Philosophy, 103 (5): 215–238.10.5840/jphil2006103517Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, A.J. (2010). ‘Ideal and nonideal theory’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38 (1): 5–36.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.xSearch in Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511975950Search in Google Scholar
UNHCR (2014). ‘UNHCR global trends. Forced displacement in 2014’, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, http://www.unhcr.org/556725e69.pdf (accessed 12th September 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Valentini, L. (2012). ‘Ideal vs. non-ideal theory. A conceptual map’, Philosophy Compass, 7 (9): 654–664.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.xSearch in Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books).Search in Google Scholar
Wellman, C.H. (2008). ‘Immigration and freedom of association’, Ethics, 119 (1): 109–141.10.1086/592311Search in Google Scholar
Wiens, D. (2012). ‘Prescribing institutions without ideal theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 20 (1): 45–70.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00387.xSearch in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- The Ethics of Immigration in a Non-Ideal World: Introduction
- Refugees, Fairness and Taking up the Slack: On Justice and the International Refugee Regime
- The Duty to Disobey Immigration Law
- Wrongs, Rights and Regularization
- Advancing Justice by Appealing to Self-Interest: The Case for Charter Cities
- The Right to Exclude, Human Rights,and Political Facts
- Freedom of Movement and Emigration Pressures: A Defence of Immigration Fees
- Immigration and the Democratic Stability Argument
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- The Ethics of Immigration in a Non-Ideal World: Introduction
- Refugees, Fairness and Taking up the Slack: On Justice and the International Refugee Regime
- The Duty to Disobey Immigration Law
- Wrongs, Rights and Regularization
- Advancing Justice by Appealing to Self-Interest: The Case for Charter Cities
- The Right to Exclude, Human Rights,and Political Facts
- Freedom of Movement and Emigration Pressures: A Defence of Immigration Fees
- Immigration and the Democratic Stability Argument