Home The presentation of Guerrilla gardening in social media – a contrastive analysis of multimodal strategies in French and German
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The presentation of Guerrilla gardening in social media – a contrastive analysis of multimodal strategies in French and German

  • Dominique Dias ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Nadine Rentel ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 28, 2025

Abstract

This paper explores the multimodal communication strategies of German and French Guerrilla gardening activists on social media. Guerrilla gardening is a phenomenon that originated in New York during the 1970s and has since spread worldwide. In the interests of (re)greening the urban space, the representatives of this Guerrilla gardening movement plant vegetation in different places without official approval. In addition to this, the activists present now their actions on social media in order to increase their reach and convince other people of their cause. By using social media, activists bridge the gap between the online sphere and the physical world, leveraging new possibilities for multimodal communication. The study analyzes a corpus of 304 posts (French/German, X and Instagram). Building on the principles of multimodality theory and contrastive discourse analysis, it investigates the features of social media posts as multimodal texts, focusing on the relationships between the different semiotic codes – particularly written text and static images – in relation to their pragmatic functions. The three-level intersemiotic analysis (micro, meso, macro) reveals limited language/culture-specific multimodal preferences, with variations mainly due to platform-specific communicative styles, suggesting a trend towards globalized design principles.


Corresponding author: Dominique Dias, Sorbonne University, Paris, France, E-mail: ; and Nadine Rentel, Westsächsische Hochschule Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany, E-mail:

References

Albert, Georg. 2015. Semiotik und Syntax von Emoticons. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 62(1). 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2015-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Albert, Georg. 2020. Beyond the binary: Emoji as a challenge to the image-word distinction. In Chrispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid & Federica Diémoz (eds.), Visualizing digital discourse, 65–79. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501510113-004Search in Google Scholar

Bateman, John. 2014. Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315773971Search in Google Scholar

Brinker, Klaus. 2010. Linguistische Textanalyse: Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden, 7th edn. Berlin: Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar

Certomà, Chiara & Chiara Tornaghi. 2015. Political gardening. Transforming cities and political agency. Local Environment 20(10). 1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1053724 (accessed 18 July 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Damblé, Ophélie. 2019. Guerilla green: guide de survie végétale en milieu urbain. Paris: Steinkis.Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2017. The semiotics of emoji. The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Daux-Combaudon, Anne-Laure. 2018. Zur Komplementarität von Sprache und Bild in Werbeanzeigen mit narrativem Muster. Cahiers d’Études Germaniques 1(75). 215–236. https://doi.org/10.4000/ceg.4110 (accessed 18 July 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Dias, Dominique & Nadine Rentel. 2024. Das Phänomen des Guerilla Gardening in Sozialen Medien – ein deutsch-französischer Vergleich. Aptum 20(3). 277–293.10.46771/9783967694512_3Search in Google Scholar

Dresner, Eli & Susan Herring. 2012. Emoticons and illocutionary force. In Dana Riesenfeld & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Philosophical dialogue: Writings in honor of Marcelo Dascal, 59–70. London: College Publication.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Dürscheid, Christa & Christina Siever. 2017. Jenseits des Alphabets – Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 45(2). 256–285. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Eckkrammer, Eva Martha. 2019. Textlinguistik und Digitalität. Eine Diskussion. In Nina Janich (ed.), Textlinguistik. 15 Einführungen und eine Diskussion, 2nd edn., 341–366. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Escouflaire, Louis. 2021. Signaling irony, displaying politeness, replacing words. The eight linguistic functions of emoji in computer-mediated discourse. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 44(2). 204–235. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00062.esc.Search in Google Scholar

Fielitz, Maik & Daniel Staemmler. 2020. Hashtags, Tweets, Protest? Varianten des digitalen Aktivismus. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33(2). 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/fjsb-2020-0037.Search in Google Scholar

Finn, Donovan. 2014. DIY urbanism: Implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7(4). 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.891149.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2009. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 19–24. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2021. Multimodality. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.), The routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 676–687. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351034708-45Search in Google Scholar

Giannoulis, Elena & Lukas R. A. Wilde (eds.). 2019. Emoticons, kaomoji, and emoji: The transformation of com-munication in the digital age. New-York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429491757Search in Google Scholar

Gralińska-Toborek, Agnieszka. 2021. The aesthetics of green guerilla. From activism to fine art. On the W@aterfront 63(1). 3–29.10.1344/waterfront2021.63.1.01Search in Google Scholar

Jaki, Silvia & Sarah-Juliane Ruge. 2024. Klima-Emotionen. Emotionsbasierte Persuasion in Instagram-Posts zum Thema Klimakrise. Aptum 20(3). 259–276.10.46771/9783967694512_2Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán & Günther Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9(1). 37–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lobinger, Katharina. 2012. Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung. Medienbilder als Herausforderung für die Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-531-93480-8_8Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Konstanze & Georg Weidacher. 2020. Internetlinguistik: ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Meer, Dorothee & Barbara Wessel. 2024. Wasserstoff ist der neue Aluhut – Ansatzpunkte für Gegenentwürfe zur hegemonialen Wasserstoffstrategie auf Twitter. Aptum 20(3). 313–330.10.46771/9783967694512_5Search in Google Scholar

Münch, Vanessa. 2025. Gesundheits- und Authentizitätsdarstellungen von Fitnessinfluencerinnen und ihren Communities. Ein semiotischer Vergleich des Fitnessdiskurses in Deutschland und Frankreich. Paris & Heidelberg: Université Paris Cité & Ruprecht-Karls-Universität dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 2000. Der Zusammenhang von Text und Bild. In Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann & Sven F. Sager (eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik, Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, vol. 1, 489–496. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Opiłowski, Roman. 2024. Kontrastive Medienlinguistik. Multimodale Kommunikation, Analysen, Forschungsfelder. Stuttgart: Steiner.10.25162/9783515138505Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Richard. 2008. On guerilla gardening. London: Orange Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sackey, Donnie Johnson. 2022. Without permission: Guerrilla gardening, contested places, spatial justice. Review of Communication 22(4). 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2133970.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitz, Ulrich. 2011. Sehflächenforschung. Eine Einführung. In Hans Joachim Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm & Hartmut Stöckl (eds.), Bildlinguistik: Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele, 23–42. Berlin: Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar

Siewer, Christina Margrit. 2015. Multimodale Kommunikation im Social Web. In Forschungsansätze und Analysen zu Text-Bild-Relationen. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2006. Zeichen, Text und Sinn – Theorie und Praxis der multimodalen Textanalyse. In Eva Martha Eckkrammer & Gudrun Held (eds.), Textsemiotik. Studien zu multimodalen Medientexten, 11–26. Wien & Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2011. Sprache-Bild-Texte lesen. Bausteine zur Methodik einer Grundkompetenz. In Hajo Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm & Harmut Stöckl (eds.), Bildlinguistik: Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele, 43–70. Berlin: Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2016. Multimodalität – Semiotische und textlinguistische Grundlagen. In Nina-Maria Klug & Hartmut Stöckl (eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext, 3–35. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110296099-002Search in Google Scholar

Stöckl, Hartmut. 2019. Linguistic multimodality – Multimodal linguistics: A state-of-the-art sketch. In Janina Wildfeuer, Jana Pflaeging, John Bateman, Ognyan Seizov & Chiao-I. Tseng (eds.), Multimodality: Disciplinary thoughts and the challenge of diversity, 41–68. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110608694-002Search in Google Scholar

Tadicken, Monika & Jan-Hinrik Schmidt. 2022. Entwicklung und Verbreitung sozialer Medien. In Jan-Hinrik Schmidt & Monika Tadicken (eds.), Handbuch soziale medien, 3–17. Wiesbaden: Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-25995-2_1Search in Google Scholar

Tienken, Susanne. 2013. Sharing. Zum Teilen von Erzählungen in Online-Foren. In Laura Álvarez López, Charlotta Seiler Brylla & Philip Shaw (eds.), Computer-mediated discourse across languages, 17–43. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tracey, David. 2007. Guerrilla gardening: A manualfesto. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

von der Haide, Ella, Severin Halder, Julia Jahnke & Carolin Mees. 2011. Guerilla Gardening und andere politische Gartenbewegungen. Eine globale Perspektive. In Christa Müller (ed.), Urban Gardening. Über die Rückkehr der Gärten in der Stadt, 266–278. München: Oekom.Search in Google Scholar

Wagener, Albin. 2022. Mèmologie: théorie postdigitale des mèmes. Grenoble: UGA Éditions.10.4000/books.ugaeditions.27751Search in Google Scholar

Wildfeuer, Janina, John A. Bateman & Tuomo Hiippala. 2020. Multimodalität. Grundlagen. Forschung und Analyse. Eine problemorientierte Einführung. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110495935Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2021. Los textos digitales y multimodales. In Óscar Loureda & Angela Schrott (eds.), Manual de lingüística del hablar, 325–344. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335224-017Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-08-20
Accepted: 2025-10-08
Published Online: 2025-10-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2025-0042/html
Scroll to top button