Multimodality in environmental discourses: on the framing of meat production and consumption
-
Judith Visser
Abstract
In times of climate change and threatened biodiversity, the meat industry is under pressure: cattle farming produces methane gas and factory farming has a negative impact on biodiversity. Meat-producing companies are confronted with the need to rethink their processes and products in terms of their impact on the environment and to adapt their external communication to changing consumer behaviour; a framing of sustainability and animal welfare seems indispensable, and this must take place not only verbally, but also visually and acoustically. Studies in the field of ecolinguistics traditionally place a clear focus on the analysis of language, metaphors and images. Analyses of the interplay of modes are a research desideratum. Against the background of the omnipresence of the sustainability discourse in a wide variety of media, the state of research thus only selectively reflects the actual use of multimodality in environmental discourse. Using the example of communication under the label La-Viande.fr (Group INTERBEV, Association Nationale Interprofessionelle du Bétail et des Viandes), the aim of the present study is to explore the following questions: How does the interest group frame meat production and consumption? How do the modes interplay to contribute to this framing?
References
Alexander, Richard J. 2018. Investigating texts about environmental degradation using critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistic techniques. In Alwin Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 196–210. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-14Search in Google Scholar
Banerjee, Subhabrata, Charles S. Gulas & Easwar Iyer. 1995. Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising 24(2). 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673473.Search in Google Scholar
Bateman, John, Janina Wildfeuer & Tuomo Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, research and analysis – A problem-oriented introduction. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110479898Search in Google Scholar
Coleman, Renita. 2010. Framing the pictures in our heads: Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In Renita Coleman. Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives, 233–261. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Cook, Guy & Alison Sealey. 2018. The discursive representation of animals. In Alwin Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 311–324. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-21Search in Google Scholar
de Freitas, Netto, Sebastião Vieira, Marcos Felipe Falcão Sobral, Ana Regina Bezerra Ribeiro & Gleibson Robert da Luz Soares. 2020. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe 32(19). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3.Search in Google Scholar
Diekmannshenke, Hajo, Michael Klemm & Hartmut Stöckl (eds.). 2011. Bildlinguistik. Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele. Berlin: Schmidt.10.37307/b.978-3-503-12264-6Search in Google Scholar
Döring, Martin, Klaus Gabriel, Katrin Mutz, Dietmar Osthus, Claudia Polzin-Haumann, Nikola Roßbach & Wilhelm Trampe (eds.). 2003. Metaphor and ecology. [Special issue]. metaphorik.de 4.Search in Google Scholar
Döring, Martin, Olaf Jäkel, Dorothee Meer, Katrin Mutz, Dietmar Osthus, Claudia Polzin-Haumann, Sebastian Susteck & Judith Visser (eds.). 2023. Narrative und Metaphern zur Nachhaltigkeit. [Special issue]. metaphorik.de 33.Search in Google Scholar
Döring, Martin. 2005. „Wir sind der Deich“. Zur metaphorisch-diskursiven Konstruktion von Natur und Nation. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Search in Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43. 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.Search in Google Scholar
Fill, Alwin & Hermine Penz (eds.). 2018. The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391Search in Google Scholar
Fisher, Kim. 1997. Locating frames in the discursive universe. Sociological Research Online 2(3). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/4.html (accessed 10 December 2024).10.5153/sro.78Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication. Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 1996. Green grammar and grammatical metaphors or language and the myth of power or metaphors we die by. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166-95-00057-7.Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erwing. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, Anders. 2018. Using visual images to show environmental problems. In Alwin Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 179–195. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-13Search in Google Scholar
Kann, Christoph & Lars Inderelst. 2018. Gibt es eine einheitliche Frame-Konzeption? Historisch-systematische Perspektiven. In Alexander Ziem, Lars Inderelst & Wulf Detmer (eds.), Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden, 25–67. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.10.1515/9783110720372-002Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Josef. 2018. Frame and Framing. Frametheoretische Konsequenzen aus der Praxis und Analyse strategischen politischen Framings. In Alexander Ziem, Lars Inderelst & Wulf Detmer (eds.), Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden, 289–330. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.10.1515/9783110720372-010Search in Google Scholar
Konerding, Klaus-Peter. 1993. Frames und lexikalisches Bedeutungswissen. Untersuchungen zur linguistischen Grundlegung einer Frametheorie und zu ihrer Anwendung in der Lexikographie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111674926Search in Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2020. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003099857Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Anna, Mattfeldt, Carolin Schwegler & Berbeli Wanning (eds.). 2021. Natur, Umwelt, Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven auf Sprache, Diskurse und Kultur. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110740479Search in Google Scholar
Matthes, Jörg. 2007. Framing-Effekte. Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. München: R. Fischer.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 2000. Der Zusammenhang von Text und Bild. In Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann & Sven F. Sager (eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik, 489–496. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Sachs-Hombach, Klaus & Jörg R. J. Schira. 2011. Prädikative und modale Bildtheorie. In Hajo Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm & Hartmut Stöckl (eds.), Bildlinguistik. Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele, 97–119. Berlin: Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar
Scheufele, Bertram & Ines Engelmann. 2018. Mediale Value-Frames – Theoretisches Konzept und methodische Herausforderungen. In Alexander Ziem, Lars Inderelst & Wulf Detmer (eds.), Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden, 123–153. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.10.1515/9783110720372-005Search in Google Scholar
Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49. 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.Search in Google Scholar
Stibbe, Arran. 2014. An ecolinguistic approach to critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies 11(1). 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789.Search in Google Scholar
Stibbe, Arran. 2021. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by, 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780367855512Search in Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut & Sonja Molnar. 2018. Eco-advertising: The Linguistics and Semiotics of Green(-Washed) Persuasion. In Alwin Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 261–276. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-18Search in Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut. 2011. Sprache-Bild-Texte lesen. Bausteine zur Methodik einer Grundkompetenz. In Hajo Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm & Hartmut Stöckl (eds.). Bildlinguistik. Theorien – Methoden – Fallbeispiele, 45–70. Berlin: Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, Janina, John A. Bateman & Tuomo Hiippala. 2020. Multimodalität: Grundlagen, Forschung und Analyse – Eine problemorientierte Einführung. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110495935Search in Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander, Christian Pentzold & Claudia Fraas. 2018. Medien-Frames als semantische Frames: Aspekte ihrer methodischen und analytischen Verschränkung am Beispiel der ‚Snowdon-Affäre’. In Alexander Ziem, Lars Inderelst & Wulf Detmer (eds.), Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden, 155–182. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.10.1515/9783110720372-006Search in Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. 2008. Sprache und Wissen. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. 2018. Frames interdisziplinär: zur Einleitung. In Alexander Ziem, Lars Inderelst & Wulf Detmer (eds.), Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden, 7–22. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.10.1515/9783110720372-001Search in Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth. 2021. Einführung in die gebrauchsbasierte kognitive Linguistik. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110665642Search in Google Scholar
Online sources
Agriculteurs en colère, https://agriculteursencolere.fr/ (accessed 10 June 2025)Search in Google Scholar
BREP = https://www.la-viande.fr/environnement-ethique/biodiversite-role-ecologique-prairies (accessed 20 August 2024)Search in Google Scholar
Cabot, Cyrielle. 26.02.2023. ‘A wake-up call for the industry’: Meat production in France under scrutiny amid climate change. https://www.france24.com/en/environment/20230226-a-wake-up-call-for-the-industry-meat-production-in-france-under-scrutiny-amid-climate-change (accessed 6 September 2024)Search in Google Scholar
EE = https://www.la-viande.fr/environnement-ethique/elevage-environnement (accessed 20 August 2024)Search in Google Scholar
EHAT = https://www.la-viande.fr/environnement-ethique/elevage-herbivore-amenagement-territoire (accessed 20 August 2024)Search in Google Scholar
EVVA = https://www.la-viande.fr/environnement-ethique/ethique-vis-vis-animaux (accessed 20 August 2024)Search in Google Scholar
FNE 2.4.2016. Quʼest-ce que lʼagroécologie ? https://fne.asso.fr/dossiers/qu-est-ce-que-l-agroecologie (accessed 10 June 2025)Search in Google Scholar
Greenpeace. 2022. Comment les lobbies de la viande nous manipulent pour nous convaincre que l’élevage industriel n’existe pas et que consommer moins de viande n’est pas nécessaire. https://cdn.greenpeace.fr/site/uploads/2022/01/Lobbies-de-la-viande_Greenpeace2022.pdf (accessed 3 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/ (accessed 8 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ (accessed 28 March 2024)Search in Google Scholar
https://www.la-viande.fr (accessed 20 August 2024)Search in Google Scholar
Interbev, FNE, Fondation Nicolas Hulot, Green cross & WWF France. 22.2.2017. Élevage bovin allaitant français et climat. https://www.fnh.org/sites/default/files/elevage_bovin_allaitant_francais_et_climat-interbev-02-2017.pdf (accessed 10 June 2025)Search in Google Scholar
INTERBEV. s.a. Missions. https://www.interbev.fr/interbev/linterprofession/missions/ (accessed 3 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
Investigations et Enquêtes s.a. Fermes, élevage intensif: Attention danger! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20Vz2K1aduM (accessed 2 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
IPCC. 2023. Climate Change 2023. Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf (accessed 10 June 2025)Search in Google Scholar
Konbini s.a., Dans l’enfer d’un élevage intensif de cochons: la nouvelle vidéo choc de L214. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7objt1 (accessed 2 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
L214 s.a. Stop aux nouveaux projets élevages intensifs. https://www.l214.com/agir/stop-nouveaux-projets-elevages-intensifs/ (accessed 2 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
Marketplace s.a. INTERBEV. https://www.marketplace.businessfrance.fr/partner/index/partner/id/80/ (accessed 6 September 2024)Search in Google Scholar
Moulinet, Noah. 25.1.2025. Greenpeace s’attaque aux lobbies de la viande et à leurs méthodes pour pousser à la consommation. https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/greenpeace-sattaque-aux-lobbies-de-la-viande-et-a-leur-methodes-pour-pousser-a-la-consommation-1426377 (accessed 18 September 2024)Search in Google Scholar
OABA s.a. Les combats de l’OABA contre l’élevage intensif. https://oaba.fr/nos-combats-contre-lelevage-intensif/ (accessed 2 January 2025)Search in Google Scholar
PQE = https://www.la-viande.fr/environnement-ethique/preservation-qualite-eau (accessed 20 August 2024).Search in Google Scholar
République Française. 9.9.2022. Alimentation et environnement : les enjeux de la consommation de viande en France. https://www.notre-environnement.gouv.fr/actualites/breves/article/alimentation-et-environnement-les-enjeux-de-la-consommation-de-viande-en-france#:∼:text=Ceci%20est%20li%C3%A9%20au%20fait,kg%20de%20poulet%2C%20par%20exemple (accessed 31 January 2024)Search in Google Scholar
Statista Research Department. 18.3.2024. The meat sector in France – Statistics & Facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/7294/the-meat-sector-in-france/#topicOverview (accessed 6 September 2024)Search in Google Scholar
VCC = https://www.la-viande.fr/environnement-ethique/viande-changement-climatique (accessed 20 August 2024)Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
