Abstract
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, extensive research has been done on how the pandemic has been metaphorised. However, little research has focused on how the pandemic is associated with the depiction of gender relations in political cartoons. Therefore, this study showcases sexism and gender relations by examining how both gender and gender relationships have been expressed metaphorically. It draws on conceptual metaphor theory as well as concepts related to visual metaphors in multimodal discourse, covert sexism, and dehumanisation to analyse a corpus of 100 Arabic cartoons depicting men and women alone and as couples that were published during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results demonstrate that typo-pictorial metaphors and those related to body modification, dehumanisation, and the coronavirus are associated with prevalent covert sexism during the pandemic. In short, the findings suggest that COVID-19 has contributed to how women in relationships have been negatively portrayed in Arabic political cartoons. In terms of theoretical implications, the study results show that a more general theory of multimodal sexism in political cartoons should be used to address various types of identifiable sexism in multimodal contexts; this approach is useful for both multimodal scholars and discourse analysts in various disciplines.
References
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2021). Multimodal metaphor and (im)politeness in political cartoons: a sociocognitive approach. J. Pragmat. 185: 54–72.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.006Search in Google Scholar
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2022a). Cartooning and sexism in the time of Covid-19: metaphors and metonymies in the Arab mind. Discourse Soc.: 09579265221113028, https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221113028.Search in Google Scholar
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2022b). Taboo metaphtonymy, gender, and impoliteness: how male and female Arab cartoonists think and draw. Soc. Semiotic.: 1–37, https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2113971.Search in Google Scholar
Banaji, M.R. and Hardin, C.D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychol. Sci. 7: 136–141, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x.Search in Google Scholar
Barreto, M. and Ellemers, N. (2013). Sexism in contemporary societies: how it is expressed, perceived, confirmed, and resisted. In: Ryan, M.K. and Branscombe, N.R. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and psychology. SAGE Publications, Ltd, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 289–305.10.4135/9781446269930.n18Search in Google Scholar
Bounegru, L. and Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Vis. Commun. 10: 209–229, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446.Search in Google Scholar
Brandes, S. (1984). Animal metaphors and social control in Tzintzuntzan. Ethnology 23: 207–215, https://doi.org/10.2307/3773747.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1978/1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, D. and Kulick, D. (2003). Language and sexuality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511791178Search in Google Scholar
Castrén, L. (2021). Online hate towards Chinese people during the COVID-19 pandemic, [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu.Search in Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2016). Fire metaphors: discourses of awe and authority. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (1987). Metaphor, euphemism, and the militarization of language. War. Peac. Cult. 10: 7–19.Search in Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (2001). Gender and language. In: Unger, R.K. (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender. Wiley, New York, pp. 228–224.Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. and Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. In: Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., and Kádár, D.Z. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London, pp. 199–225.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_9Search in Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2010). The evaluative properties of metaphors. In: Todd, Z., Deignan, A., and Cameron, L. (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 357–373.10.1075/hcp.26.21deiSearch in Google Scholar
Demjen, Z. and Hardaker, C. (2016). Metaphor, impoliteness, and offence in online communication. In: Semino, E. and Demjen, Z. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. Routledge, London, pp. 353–368.10.4324/9781315672953Search in Google Scholar
Domínguez, M. and Sapiña, L. (2022). She-Coronavirus: how cartoonists reflected women health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Wom. Stud. 29: 282–297.10.1177/13505068211048402Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, J.L. (1997). Political Cartoons in the 1988 presidential campaign: image, metaphor, and narrative. Garland, New York & London.Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, J.L. (2014). Cartoons. In: Attardo, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humor studies. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 112–116.Search in Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2011). The pragmatics of humor reception: young people’s responses to a newspaper cartoon. Humor 24: 87–108, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2011.005.Search in Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2016). Analysing metaphors in multimodal texts. In: Semino, E. and Demjen, Z. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 148–162.Search in Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2019). Visual metaphor and embodiment in graphic illness narratives. Oxford University Press, New York.10.1093/oso/9780190678173.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203272305Search in Google Scholar
Gabriel, Y. (1998). An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations. Hum. Relat. 51: 1329–1354, https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805101101.Search in Google Scholar
Gay, W.C. (1997). The reality of linguistic violence against women. In: O’Toole, L.L. and Schiffman, J.R. (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York University Press, New York, pp. 467–473.Search in Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (2006). Humans, animals, and metaphors. Soc. Anim. 14: 15–37, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006776137131.Search in Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., and Sun, P. (2011). Beastly: what makes animal metaphors offensive? J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 30: 311–325, https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x11407168.Search in Google Scholar
Helmy, M.M.M. and Frerichs, S. (2017). Sheherazade says no: artful resistance in contemporary Egyptian political cartoon. In: Awad, S. and Wagoner, B. (Eds.), Street art of resistance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 349–376.10.1007/978-3-319-63330-5_15Search in Google Scholar
Ho, J. and Chiang, E. (2022). ‘Those lunatic zombies’: the discursive framing of Wuhan lockdown escapees in digital space. In: Musolff, A., Breeze, R., Kondo, K., and Vilar-Lluch, S. (Eds.), Pandemic and crisis discourse: communicating COVID-19 and public health strategy. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, London, pp. 339–354.10.5040/9781350232730.ch-019Search in Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. (2020). Arabic cartoonists challenge Cornona with humour and mockery. In: Independent Arabia, Available at: https://www.independentarabia.com/node/133771/تحقيقات-ومطولات/فنانو-الكاريكاتير-العرب-يواجهون-كورونا-بالسخرية-والابتسامة.Search in Google Scholar
Kádár, D.Z. and Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139382717Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lazar, M. (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: gender, power and ideology in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.10.1057/9780230599901Search in Google Scholar
Leech, G.N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Letcher, L. and Catherine, J. (2020). Mixed messages: COVID-19, a cartoon heroine, and violence against women in Mexico (#WitnessingCorona). In: Medizinethnologie: Körper, Gesundheit und Heilung in einer globalisierten Welt, Available at: https://www.medizinethnologie.net/mixed-messages-mexico-witnessing-corona/.Search in Google Scholar
Leyens, J.P., Rodriguez, A.P., Rodriguez, R.T., Gaunt, R., Paladino, P.M., Vaes, J., and Demoulin, S. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to in-groups and out-groups. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 31: 395–411, https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.50.Search in Google Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2020). Of animals, foods, objects, plants, and others, or how women are conceptualized across languages and cultures. In: 4th International Conference on researching and applying metaphor (RAAM 4): metaphor, cognition, and culture.Search in Google Scholar
Maass, A. and Arcuri, L. (1996). Language and stereotyping. In: Macrae, C.N., Stangor, C., and Hewstone, M. (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 193–227.Search in Google Scholar
Madgavkar, A., White, O., Krishan, M., Mahajan, D., and Xavier, A. (2020). COVID-19 and gender equality: Countering the regressive effects. McKinsey Global Institute, Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/covid-19-and-gender-equality-countering-the-regressive-effects.Search in Google Scholar
Mallett, R.K., Ford, T.E., and Woodzicka, J.A. (2016). What did he mean by that? Humor decreases attributions of sexism and confrontation of sexist jokes. Sex. Roles 75: 272–284, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0605-2.Search in Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (2004). Doing and saying: some words on women’s silence. In: Bucholtz, M. (Ed.), Language and woman’s place. Text and commentaries. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 209–215.10.1093/oso/9780195167573.003.0015Search in Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Mottier, V. (2008). Metaphors, mini-narratives and Foucauldian discourse theory. In: Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (Eds.), Political language and metaphor: interpreting and changing the world. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 182–194.Search in Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. J. Lang. Aggress. Confl. 3: 41–56, https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus.Search in Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Irony and sarcasm in follow-ups of metaphorical slogans. In: Athanasiadou, A. and Colston, H.L. (Eds.), Irony in language use and communication. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 127–142.10.1075/ftl.1.07musSearch in Google Scholar
Nasreen, Z. (2021). ‘Have you not got a sense of humour?’: unpacking masculinity through online sexist jokes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Soc. Cult. South Asia 7: 148–154, https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861720977632.Search in Google Scholar
Rutherford, J. (2020). Latinx political cartooning during the COVID-19 global pandemic: coping and processing via Lalo Alcaraz’s and Eric J. Garcia’s social artivism. Prose Stud. 41: 228–252.10.1080/01440357.2020.1819259Search in Google Scholar
Sadler, J.D. (1980/1981). Metaphor and metonymy. Classical J. 76: 157–160.Search in Google Scholar
Saint Laurent, C., Glăveanu, V.P., and Literat, I. (2021). Internet memes as partial stories: identifying political narratives in coronavirus memes. Soc. Media Soc. 7: 205630512198893.10.1177/2056305121988932Search in Google Scholar
Saji, S. Venkatesan, S. Callender, B. (2021). Comics in the time of a pan(dem)ic: COVID-19, graphic medicine, and metaphors. Perspect. Biol. Med. 64: 136–154.10.1353/pbm.2021.0010Search in Google Scholar
Sadock, J.M. (1974). Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. Academic Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2021). “Not soldiers but fire-fighters” - metaphors and Covid-19. Health Commun. 36: 50–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989.Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. Palgrave Macmillan, London.10.1057/9780230505582Search in Google Scholar
Swim, J.K., Mallett, R., and Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: detection and use of sexist language. Sex. Roles 51: 117–128, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000037757.73192.06.10.1023/B:SERS.0000037757.73192.06Search in Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2001). Politeness in Cypriot Greek: a frame-based approach, [unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Topping, L. (2021). No 10 pulls ‘sexist’ Covid ad showing all chores done by women. The Guardian, Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jan/28/no-10-pulls-sexist-covid-ad-showing-all-chores-done-by-women.Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications Ltd, California.Search in Google Scholar
Van Kessel, P., Baronavski, C., Scheller, A., Smilth, A. (2022). How the COVID-19 pandemic has changed Americans’ personal lives. Pew Research Center, Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/2021/03/05/in-their-own-words-americans-describe-the-struggles-and-silver-linings-of-the-covid-19-pandemic/.Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, C. (2001). Gender and discourse: language and power in politics, the church and organisations. Routledge, Abingdon.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Reliability in the identification of metaphors in (filmic) multimodal communication
- Music, multimodality, and narrative viewpoint: Beowulf in performance
- Hybrid Indo-Trinidadian identities and tasty food: a multimodal critical discourse analysis of ‘Doubles with Slight Pepper’
- Multimodal metaphors and sexism in Arabic cartoons depicting gender and gender relations during COVID-19
- book-review
- Review of: Theo van Leeuwen (2022) Multimodality and identity. Routledge
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Reliability in the identification of metaphors in (filmic) multimodal communication
- Music, multimodality, and narrative viewpoint: Beowulf in performance
- Hybrid Indo-Trinidadian identities and tasty food: a multimodal critical discourse analysis of ‘Doubles with Slight Pepper’
- Multimodal metaphors and sexism in Arabic cartoons depicting gender and gender relations during COVID-19
- book-review
- Review of: Theo van Leeuwen (2022) Multimodality and identity. Routledge