Artistic imagery in advertising: experiencing advertisements through art

References

Albin, K. (2000). Reklama: przekaz, odbiór, interpretacja. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Alousque, I.N. (2015). Determining the rhetorical nature of visuals in advertising. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 173: 234–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.058.Search in Google Scholar

Ang, S.H. and Low, S.Y. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity. Psychol. Market. 17: 835–854, https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:103.0.10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<835::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. (2011). Percepcja wzrokowa w edukacji. In: Arnheim, R. (Ed.), Myślenie wzrokowe. Wydawnictwo Słowo/Obraz Terytoria, Gdańsk, pp. 345–369.Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, P.H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J. Market. 59: 16–29, https://doi.org/10.2307/1252116.Search in Google Scholar

Brakus, J.J., Schmitt, B.H., and Zarantonello, L. (2009). Brand experience: what is it? How is it measured? Does it affect loyalty? J. Market. 73: 52–68, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.52.Search in Google Scholar

Brakus, J.J., Schmitt, B.H., and Zhang, S. (2014). Experiential product attributes and preferences for new products: the role of processing fluency. J. Bus. Res. 67: 2291–2298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.017.Search in Google Scholar

Brodie, R.J., Hollebeek, L.D., Juric, B., and Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. J. Serv. Res. 14: 252–271, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703.Search in Google Scholar

Callister, M.A. and Stern, L.A. (2008). Inspecting the unexpected: schema and the processing of visual deviations. In: McQuarrie, E.F. and Phillips, B.J. (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp. 127–156.Search in Google Scholar

Carù, A., and Cova, B. (2006). How to facilitate immersion in a consumption experience: appropriation operations and service elements. J. Consum. Behav. 5: 4–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.30.Search in Google Scholar

Cleff, T., Lin, I.C., and Walter, N. (2014). Can you feel it? The effect of brand experience on brand equity. J. Brand Manag. 11: 7–27.Search in Google Scholar

Deighton, J. (1992). The consumption of performance. J. Consum. Res. 19: 362–272, https://doi.org/10.1086/209307.Search in Google Scholar

Delbaere, M., and McQuarriei Phillips, E.B. (2011). Personification in advertising. J. Advert. 40: 121–130, https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367400108.Search in Google Scholar

DeRosia, E.D. (2008). Rediscovering theory: integrating ancient hypotheses and modern empirical evidence of the audience-response effects of rhetorical figures. In: McQuarrie, E.F., and Phillips, B.J. (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp. 23–50.Search in Google Scholar

Dubé, L., and Bel, J.L. (2003). The content and structure of laypeople’s concept of pleasure. Cognit. Emot. 17: 263–295, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302295.Search in Google Scholar

Elkins, J. (1996). The object stares back: on the nature of seeing. Harcourt Brace, San Diego.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, W.D. (1950). A source book of gestalt psychology. Routledge, London.Search in Google Scholar

Feiereisen, S., Wong, V., and Broderick, A.J. (2008). Analogies and mental simulations in learning for really new products: the role of visual attention. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 25: 593–607.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00324.xSearch in Google Scholar

Fornerino, M., Helme-Guizon, A., and Gotteland, D. (2008). Movie consumption experience and immersion: impact on satisfaction. Rech. Appl. Market. 23: 93–110, https://doi.org/10.1177/205157070802300306.Search in Google Scholar

Gkiouzepas, L., and Hogg, M.K. (2011). Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising. J. Advert. 40: 103–120, https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367400107.Search in Google Scholar

Green, M.C., and Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79: 701–721, https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701.Search in Google Scholar

Green, M.C. and Brock, T.C. (2007). Perswazyjność utworów narracyjnych. In: Green, M.C. and Brock, T.C. (Eds.), Perswazja. Perspektywa psychologiczna. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, pp. 147–181.Search in Google Scholar

Hanich, J., Wagner, V., Shah, M., Jacobsen, T., and Menninghaus, W. (2014). Why we like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 8: 130–143, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035690.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, C.A. (2004b). The psychology of rhetorical images. In: Hill, C.A. and Helmers, M. (Eds.), Defining visual rhetoric. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, pp. 25–40.10.4324/9781410609977-6Search in Google Scholar

Huhmann, B., Mothersbaugh, D., and Franke, G. (2002). Rhetorical figures in headings and their effect on text processing: the moderating role of information relevance and text length. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 45: 157–169.10.1109/TPC.2002.801634Search in Google Scholar

Jeong, S.-H. (2008). Visual metaphor in advertising: is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric? J. Market. Commun. 14: 59–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701717488.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J., Baek, Y., and Choi, Y.H. (2012). The structural effects of metaphor-elicited cognitive and affective elaboration levels on attitude toward the ad. J. Advert. 41: 77–96, https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367410206.Search in Google Scholar

Konečni, V.J. (2011). Aesthetic trinity theory and the sublime. Philos. Today 55: 64–73, https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201155162.Search in Google Scholar

Labarbera, P.A., and Mazursky, D. (1983). A longitudinal assessment of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction: the dynamic aspect of the cognitive process. J. Market. Res. 20: 393–404, https://doi.org/10.2307/3151443.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen, V. (2008). What the symbol can’t, the icon can: the indispensable icon/symbol distinction. In: McQuarrie, E.F. and Phillips, B.J. (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp. 68–83.Search in Google Scholar

Leder, H., and Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: the aesthetic episode – developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. Br. J. Psychol. 105: 443–464, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084.Search in Google Scholar

Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., and Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br. J. Psychol. 95: 489–508, https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811.Search in Google Scholar

MacInnis, D.J., and Price, L.L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: review and extensions. J. Consum. Res. 13: 473–491, https://doi.org/10.1086/209082.Search in Google Scholar

Maes, A. and Schilperoord, J. (2008). Classifying visual rhetoric: conceptual and structural heuristics. In: McQuarrie, E.F. and Phillips, B.J. (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp. 227–253.Search in Google Scholar

McQuarrie, E.F., and Mick, D.G. (1995). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. J. Consum. Res. 22: 424–438, https://doi.org/10.1086/209459.Search in Google Scholar

McQuarrie, E.F., and Mick, D.G. (1999). Visual rhetoric in advertising: text‐interpretive, experimental, and reader‐response analyses. J. Consum. Res. 26: 37–54, https://doi.org/10.1086/209549.Search in Google Scholar

McQuarrie, E.F., and Mick, D.G. (2003). Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to advertising. J. Consum. Res. 29: 579–587, https://doi.org/10.1086/346252.Search in Google Scholar

McQuarrie, E.F., and Phillips, B. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising: how consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. J. Advert. 34: 7–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188.Search in Google Scholar

Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Search in Google Scholar

Meyers-Levy, J., and Peracchio, L.A. (1995). Understanding the effects of color: how the correspondence between available and required resources affects attitudes. J. Consum. Res. 22: 121–138, https://doi.org/10.1086/209440.Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D.S., and Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics 22: 389–407, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)00011-5.Search in Google Scholar

Mukarovsky, J. (2014). Standard language and poetic language. In: Chovanec, J. (Ed.), Chapters from the history of Czech functional linguistics. Masarykova Univerzita, Brno, pp. 41–53.Search in Google Scholar

Orth, U.R., and Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. J. Market. 72: 64–81, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.64.Search in Google Scholar

Ott, B.L. and Dickinson, G. (2009). Visual rhetoric and/as critical pedagogy. In: Lunsford, A.A., Wilson, K.H., and Eberly, R.A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of rhetorical studies. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 391–406.10.4135/9781412982795.n21Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, B., and McQuarrie, E.F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: a new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Market. Theor. 4: 113–136, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044089.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, B., and McQuarrie, E.F. (2010). Narrative and persuasion in fashion advertising. J. Consum. Res. 37: 368–392, https://doi.org/10.1086/653087.Search in Google Scholar

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., and Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8: 364–382, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. J. Market. Manag. 15: 53–67, https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, L. (1994). Images in advertising: the need for a theory of visual rhetoric. J. Consum. Res. 21: 252–273, https://doi.org/10.1086/209396.Search in Google Scholar

Sheard, C. (1996). The public value of epideictic rhetoric. Coll. Engl. 58: 765–794, https://doi.org/10.2307/378414.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, K., Mahler, S., Peciña, S., and Berridge, K. (2010). Hedonic hotspots: generating sensory pleasure in the brain. In: Kringelbach, M.L. and Berridge, K.C. (Eds.), Pleasures of the brain. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 27–49.Search in Google Scholar

Starr, G. (2013). Feeling beauty. The MIT Press, Massachusetts.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019316.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Strojny, P. and Strojny, A. (2014). Kwestionariusz immersji – polska adaptacja i empiryczna weryfikacja narzędzia. Homo Ludens 1: 171–185.Search in Google Scholar

Toncar, M., and Munch, J. (2001). Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising. J. Advert. 30: 55–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673631.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J., and Calder, B.J. (2006). Media transportation and advertising. J. Consum. Res. 33: 151–162, https://doi.org/10.1086/506296.Search in Google Scholar

Winkielman, P., Huber, D.E., and Olszanowski, M. (2011). Dynamiczne związki: rola płynności przetwarzania w afekcie i procesach wartościowania. In: Doliński, D. and Błaszczak, W. (Eds.), Dynamika emocji. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, pp. 60–87.Search in Google Scholar

Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J. Advert. 23: 59–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1943.10673459.Search in Google Scholar