Visual metaphtonymy in automobile femvertising

References

Al-Mufarreh, R. (2017). To drive or not to drive: a critical analysis of Saudi female advocates’discourse, Unpublished doctorate thesis. University of Florida.Search in Google Scholar

Ang, S.H. and Low, S.M. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity. Psychol. Market. 17: 835–854.10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<835::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar

Barcelona, A. (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Gruyter, Berlin/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Becker-Herby, E. (2016). The rise of femvertising: authentically reaching female consumers. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11299/181494 (Accessed10 September 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Chen, J., Yang, X., and Smith, R.E. (2016). The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 44: 334–49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0414-5.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, D. (2007). Driving women: fiction and automobile culture in twentieth-century America. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2002). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In: Dirven, R. and Porings, R. (Eds.). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 161–205.10.1515/9783110219197.161Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (2016). The semiotics of emoji: the rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury, London.Search in Google Scholar

Doumato, A.E. (1992). Gender, monarchy, and national identity in Saudi Arabia. Br. J. Middle E. Stud. 19: 31–47.10.1080/13530199208705547Search in Google Scholar

Evans, V. (2017). The emoji code: the linguistics behind smiley faces and scaredy cats. Picador, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge, London/New York.10.4324/9780203272305Search in Google Scholar

Ford Middle East. (2017). Welcome to the driver’s seat. [Tweet], Available at: https://twitter.com/FordMiddleEast/status/913088482838491137.Search in Google Scholar

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/dapsac.23Search in Google Scholar

Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognit. Ling. 1: 323–40, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323.10.1515/9783110219197.349Search in Google Scholar

Hidalgo, L. and Kraljevic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Rev. Cognit. Ling. 9: 153–78, https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid.Search in Google Scholar

Hines, C. (2000). Rebaking the pie: the woman as dessert metaphor. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Jaguar MENA. (2017). The road is yours. [Tweet], Available at: https://twitter.com/i/status/912972424815300610.Search in Google Scholar

Kia Aljabr. (2017). Your future is at your hands. [Tweet], Available at: https://twitter.com/aljabr_kia/status/913336886248263681.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphor creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognit. Ling. 21: 663–97.10.1515/cogl.2010.021Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. and Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognit. Ling. 9: 37–77, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37.Search in Google Scholar

Kemp-Robertson, P. and Barth, C. (2018). The contagious commandments: ten steps to brand bravery. Penguin Books, London.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lambiase, J. (2003). Sex – online and internet advertising. In: Reichert, T., and Lambiase, J. (Eds.). Sex in advertising: perspectives on the erotic appeal. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 247–69.Search in Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781107338814Search in Google Scholar

Lombardot, E. (2007). La nudité en publicité: quelle influence sur l’attention portée à la fonction mémorielle de la marque? Rech. Appl. Market. 22: 23–41, https://doi.org/10.1177/205157070702200401.Search in Google Scholar

Maalej, Z.A. (2001). Processing pictorial metaphors in advertising: a cross-cultural view. Acad. Res. 1: 76–84.Search in Google Scholar

Mårtenson, R. (2003). A note on the role of advertising in memory creation and memory reconstruction of experiences. In: Hansen, F. and Christensen, L.B. (Eds.). Branding and advertising. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, pp. 387–409.Search in Google Scholar

McQuarrie, E.F. and Mick, D.G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. J. Consum. Res. 22: 424–438.10.1086/209459Search in Google Scholar

McStay, A. (2013). Creativity and advertising: affect, events, and process. Routledge, New York.10.4324/9780203492208Search in Google Scholar

Meyers-Levy, J. and Malaviya, P. (1999). Consumers’ processing of persuasive advertisements: an integrative framework of persuasion theories. J. Market. 63: 45–60, https://doi.org/10.2307/1252100.Search in Google Scholar

Negro, I. (2013). Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. RESLA 26: 365–384.Search in Google Scholar

Parkin, K. (2017). Women at the wheel: a century of buying, driving, and fixing cars. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Search in Google Scholar

Peňa, M.S., and Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2009). The metonymic and metaphoric grounding of two image-schema transformations. In: Metonymy and metaphor in grammar. John Benjamins, pp. 339–361.10.1075/hcp.25.21penSearch in Google Scholar

Pérez, R.P.M., and Gutiérrez, M. (2017). Femvertising: female empowering strategies in recent Spanish commercials. Rev. Investig. Fem. 8: 335–351, doi:https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54867.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2013). Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between ultimodal metaphor and metonymy a greenwashing advertisement. In: Gola, E. and Ervas, F. (Eds.). Metaphor in focus: philosophical perspectives on metaphor use. Cambridge Scholars, Cambridge, pp. 67–82.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2016). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: a corpus-based account. Metaphor Symbol 31: 73–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488/2016.1150759.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., and Houghton, D. (2018). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Appl. Linguist. 40: 957–91, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy039.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, B.J. and McQuarrie, E. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: a new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Market. Theor. 4: 113–136.10.1177/1470593104044089Search in Google Scholar

El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoons. Vis. Commun. 2: 75–95, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755.10.1177/1470357203002001755Search in Google Scholar

Rannard, G. and Shukri, M. (2017). Women have ’quarter of brain’ says Saudi cleric [Blog post], Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-41361123.Search in Google Scholar

Reichert, T. and Lambiase, J. (2003). One phenomenon, multiple lenses: bridging perspectives to examine sex advertising. In: Reichert, T. and Lambiase, J. (Eds.). Sex in advertising: perspectives on the erotic appeal. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 1–10.10.4324/9781410607065-6Search in Google Scholar

Reichert, T. and Lambiase, J. (2006). Sex in consumer culture: the erotic content of media and marketing. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2003). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 109–132.10.1515/9783110894677.109Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. and Otal, J.L. (2002). Metonymy, grammar and communication. Comares, Granada.Search in Google Scholar

Sawang, S. (2010). Sex appeal in advertising: what consumers think? J. Promot. Manag. 16: 167–187, https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903578832.Search in Google Scholar

Sengupta, J. and Dahl, D. (2008). Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising. J. Consum. Psychol. 18: 62–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, R.E., Chen, J., and Yang, X. (2008). The impact of advertising creativity on hierarchy of effects. J. Advert. 27: 47–61.10.2753/JOA0091-3367370404Search in Google Scholar

Šorm, E., and Steen, G. (2018). VISMIP: towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In: Steen, G. (Ed.), Visual metaphor: structure and process. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–88.10.1075/celcr.18.03sorSearch in Google Scholar

Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: four case studies. In: Multimodal metaphor. De Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 95–117.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar

Van Mulken, M. and Le Pair, R. (2012). Appreciation and interpretation of visual metaphors in advertising across three European countries. Metaphor Context Cult. Commun. 38: 177–194, https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38/14mul.Search in Google Scholar

Villacanas, B. and White, M. (2013). Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in purificacion Garcia advertising campaigns. Metaphor Soc. World 3: 220–39.10.1075/msw.3.2.06vilSearch in Google Scholar

Volkswagen Middle East. (2017). Your turn to sit at the driver’s seat. [Tweet], Available at: https://twitter.com/VWMiddleEast/status/913046189989404672.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, X. and Smith, R.E. (2009). Beyond attention effects: modeling the persuasive and emotional effects of advertising creativity. Market. Sci. 28: 935–949, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0460.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, F. (2009). Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: a unified account. In: Forceville, C., and Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor. Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 147–172.10.1515/9783110215366.3.147Search in Google Scholar