Academic Voice Reimag(in)ed: Interest and Design in Artwork and Three Dimensional Artefacts

References

Andrew, D. (2014). An aesthetic language for teaching and learning: Multimodality and contemporary art practice. In: Multimodal Approaches to Research and Pedagogy: Recognition, Resources and Access, A. Archer and D. Newfield (eds), 174–191. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, A. (2013). Voice as Design: Exploring academic voice in multimodal texts in Higher Education. In: Multimodality and Social Semiosis. Communication, Meaning-Making, and Learning in the Work of Gunther Kress, M. Bock and N. Pachler (Eds), 150–161. New York and London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, A., and Björkvall, A. (2017). The ‘semiotics of value’ in upcycling. In: Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics, S. Zhao, A. Björkvall, M. Boeriis and E. Djonov (eds.), 165 – 180. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315521015-11Search in Google Scholar

Archer, A., and Stent, S. (2011). Red socks and purple rain: The political uses of colour in late apartheid South Africa. Visual Communication, 10(2):115–128.10.1177/1470357211398437Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981). From the Prehistory of Novelistic Discourse. In: The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist (ed. and trans), 41–83. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bateman, J. (2008). Multimodality and Genre. A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230582323Search in Google Scholar

Bell, S. (2016). Writing against formal constraints in art and design: Making Words Count. In: Multimodality in Higher Education, A. Archer and E. Breuer (eds.), G. Rijlaarsdam and T. Olive (Series Eds.), Studies in Writing, Vol. 33, 136–166. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Bezemer, J., and Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts. A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2):166 – 195.10.1177/0741088307313177Search in Google Scholar

Björkvall, A., and Karlsson, A.-M. (2011). The materiality of discourses and the semiotics of materials. A social perspective on the meaning potentials of written texts and furniture. Semiotica, 187(1):141–165.10.1515/semi.2011.068Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295Search in Google Scholar

Brenner, J., and Archer, A. (2014). Arguing Art. In: Multimodal Approaches to Research and Pedagogy: Recognition, Resources and Access, A. Archer and D. Newfield (eds.), 57 – 70. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M. (Eds.), (1993). The powers of literacy. A genre approach to teaching writing. London and Washington: Falmer Press.Search in Google Scholar

Djonov, E., and Van Leeuwen, T. (2011). The semiotics of texture: From tactile to visual. Visual Communication, 10(4):541–564.10.1177/1470357211415786Search in Google Scholar

Elbow, P. (2007). Voice in Writing Again. Embracing contraries. College English, 70(2):168–188.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C. 2015. Argument as design: a multimodal approach to academic argument in a digital age. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Cape Town.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In: Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.), 99 – 121. London and New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2):173–192.10.1177/1461445605050365Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., and Jiang, F. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3):251–274.10.1177/0741088316650399Search in Google Scholar

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/swll.5Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C. (ed.), (2009). The routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., and O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Oxon, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315638027Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Oxon, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G., and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G., and Van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3):343–368.10.1177/147035720200100306Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G., and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Search in Google Scholar

Lillis, T., and Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1):5–32.10.1558/japl.v4i1.5Search in Google Scholar

Machin, D. (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies?. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4):347–355.10.1080/17405904.2013.813770Search in Google Scholar

Mitra, A., and Watts, E. (2002). Theorizing cyberspace: The idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New Media and Society, 4(4):479–498.10.1177/146144402321466778Search in Google Scholar

Prince, R., and Archer, A. (2014). Exploring academic voice in multimodal quantitative texts. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 22(1):39–57.10.5130/lns.v22i1.4178Search in Google Scholar

Thesen, L. (2001). Modes, Literacies and Power: A University Case Study. Language and Education, 14(2 and 3):132–145.10.1080/09500780108666806Search in Google Scholar

Thesen, L. (2014). Risk as productive: Working with dilemmas in the writing of research. In: Risk in Academic Writing. Postgraduate Students, Their Teachers and the Making of Knowledge, L. Thesen and L. Cooper (eds.), 1–24. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Z. 2014. A multimodal social semiotic approach to printmaking pedagogy. An exploration of the intaglio process. Unpublished Masters thesis. University of Cape Town.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). New forms of writing, new visual competencies. Visual Studies, 23(2):130–135.10.1080/14725860802276263Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T., and Jewitt, C. (eds.), (2001). Handbook of visual analysis. London/Thousand Oaks/New Dehli: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar