We Have Yet to See the “Visual Argument”

References

Birdsell, D. S. and Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1):1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Birdsel, D. and Groarke, L. (2007). Outline of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43:103–113.10.1080/00028533.2007.11821666Search in Google Scholar

Blair, J. A. (1996). The possibility the actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1):23–39.10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_16Search in Google Scholar

Blair, J. A. (2012). Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4Search in Google Scholar

Blair, J. A. (2015). Probative norms for multimodal visual arguments. Argumentation, 29(2):217–233.10.1007/s10503-014-9333-3Search in Google Scholar

Dove, I. (2012). On images as evidence and arguments. In: Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies, B. Garssen, and F. H. van Eemeren (Eds.), 223–239. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_15Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van and Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110846089Search in Google Scholar

Eemeren, F. H. van and Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Feteris, E., Groarke, L. and Plug, J. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons:A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In: Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: Essays in Honor of Frans H. Van Eemeren, E. Feteris, B. Garssen, and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.163.05fetSearch in Google Scholar

Fleming, D. (1996). Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1):11–22.Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Ch. and Clark, C. (2014). Can pictures have explicatures? Linguagem Em Discurso, 14(3):451–472.10.1590/1982-4017-140301-0114Search in Google Scholar

Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18(2):105–129.10.22329/il.v18i2.2376Search in Google Scholar

Groarke, L. (2002). Towards a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In: Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), 137–152. Sic Sat and Vale Press: Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Groarke (2003). Why do argumentation theorists find it so difficult to recognize visual arguments? In: Informal Logic at 25, H. V. Hansen (Ed.). Windsor, ON: University of Windsor. CD-ROM.Search in Google Scholar

Groarke, L. (2007). Beyond words: Two dogmas of informal logic. In: Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson, H. V. Hansen, and R. C. Pinto (Eds.), 135–151. Newport News, VI: Vale Press.Search in Google Scholar

Groarke, L. (2015). Going multimodal: what is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation, 29(2):133–155.10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. (2003). Why ‘visual arguments’ aren’t arguments. In: Informal Logic at 25, H. V. Hansen (Ed.). Windsor, ON: University of Windsor. CD-ROM.Search in Google Scholar

Kjeldsen, J. E. (2012). Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In: Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies, B. Garssen, and F. H. van Eemeren (Eds.), 239–257. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_16Search in Google Scholar

Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015). The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29(2):115–132.10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4Search in Google Scholar

Kneupper (1978). On arguments and diagrams. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 14(2):181–186.Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, S. W. (2010). A picture held us captive: The later Wittgenstein on visual argumentation. Cogency, 2(2):105–134.Search in Google Scholar

Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roque, G. (2009). What is visual in visual argumentation? In: Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the OSSA 09 Congress, J. Ritola (Ed.). Windsor, ON: OSSA, CD-ROM.Search in Google Scholar

Roque, G. (2012). Visual argumentation: A further reappraisal. In: Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies, B. Garssen, and F. H. van Eemeren (Eds.), 273–288. Dordrecht and New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_18Search in Google Scholar

Roque, G. (2015). Should visual arguments be propositional in order to be arguments? Argumentation, 29(2):177–195.10.1007/s10503-014-9341-3Search in Google Scholar

Shelley, C. (2001). Aspects of visual argument: A study of the March of progress. Informal Logic, 21(2):85–96.10.22329/il.v21i2.2239Search in Google Scholar

Tseronis, A. (2013). Argumentative function: Beyond claiming and justifying. In: Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, 22–26 May 2013, D. Mohammed, and M. Lewinski (Eds.). Windsor, ON, Canada: CD-ROM.Search in Google Scholar