Home Exploring linguistic and cognitive-communicative aspects of vernacular toponyms: a comparative study of English and Kazakh languages
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exploring linguistic and cognitive-communicative aspects of vernacular toponyms: a comparative study of English and Kazakh languages

  • Saltanat Davletova

    Saltanat Davletova is a Doctoral Student, Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Republic of Kazakhstan. Her research interests include pedagogical science, foreign language, translations studies.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    and Aigul Bizhkenova

    Aigul Bizhkenova is a Full Doctor, Professor at the Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Republic of Kazakhstan. Research interest: intercultural communication, cognitive linguistics, pragmatics.

    ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: September 25, 2025

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the vernacular toponymy of Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom through analysis of their linguistic (phonetic, word-formation, lexical-semantic) and cognitive-communicative features. By considering the features of vernacular content, phonetic, word-formation, lexical, cognitive, and communicative resources in the Kazakh and English languages are compared. It was determined that the toponyms of Great Britain retained the phonetic nature of the English language and loanwords from French and other languages are rarely used. The examination of word-formation resources shows that in the toponyms of Great Britain, the word-formation elements of the English language were most often used; in the Kazakh toponyms, both Kazakh and Russian word-formation resources were used. In lexical-semantic terms, both Kazakh and English languages had approximately the same indicators. Lexical and semantic groups, such as lexemes associated with spatial relations, the association of people on national, social, and gender grounds, historical names, and people’s employment, are identified. Nominations pertaining to sarcastic and metaphorical linkages were also observed from a communicative and cognitive perspective. The statistics were given in tables. This study can be used to compare toponyms in different structural languages and examine the lexical-semantic, linguistic, and cultural nature of toponyms.


Corresponding author: Saltanat Davletova, Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010008, 2 Satpayev Str., Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan, E-mail:

About the authors

Saltanat Davletova

Saltanat Davletova is a Doctoral Student, Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Republic of Kazakhstan. Her research interests include pedagogical science, foreign language, translations studies.

Aigul Bizhkenova

Aigul Bizhkenova is a Full Doctor, Professor at the Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Republic of Kazakhstan. Research interest: intercultural communication, cognitive linguistics, pragmatics.

References

Alpatov, Vladislav V. 2013. Toponomastics in Great Britain (20Th-21st centuries): History and main directions of research. Problems of Onomastics 14(1). 112–131.Search in Google Scholar

Atik, Meryem, Abdurrahman Kanabakan, Veli Ortaçeşme & Emrah Yildirim. 2022. Tracing landscape characters through place names in rural Mediterranean. Catena 210. 105912.10.1016/j.catena.2021.105912Search in Google Scholar

Azaryahu, Maoz. 2012. Rabin’s road: The politics of toponymic commemoration of Yitzhak Rabin in Israel. Political Geography 31(2). 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

Bai, J. T., W. Pan & Y. J. Hou. 2021. Building an integrated toponymic information system based on TGIS and big data technology. Journal of Global Change Data & Discovery 5(4). 363–372.Search in Google Scholar

Balduino, Amanda Macedo, Gabriel Antunes De Araujo & Ana Lívia Agostinho. 2021. Toponymy of Sao Tome and Principe. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture 43(2). e56485.10.4025/actascilangcult.v43i2.56485Search in Google Scholar

Basik, Sergei N. 2018. Critical toponymics as a direction of geographic research: Problems and perspectives. Geographical Bulletin 44(1). 56–63. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2018-1-56-63.Search in Google Scholar

Basik, Sergei. 2023. Problematizing urban microtoponyms. Geography Compass 18(1). e12732. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12732.Search in Google Scholar

Beddari, Hicham & Aabi Mustapha. 2024. The role of literary translation strategies in achieving exemplary translation and fostering English major students’ lexico-idiomatic expansion. Dragoman 14(15). 165–190.Search in Google Scholar

Bidzilya, Yuriy. 2015. Slovak press in Zakarpattia as the revival of national identity. European Journal of Science and Theology 11(6). 67–78.Search in Google Scholar

Blair, David & Jan Tent. 2021. A revised typology of place-naming. Names: A Journal of Onomastics 69(4). 30–47. https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2021.2260.Search in Google Scholar

Boillat, Sébastien, Elvira Serrano, Stephan Rist & Fikret Berkes. 2013. The importance of place names in the search for ecosystem-like concepts in indigenous societies: An example from the Bolivian. Environmental Management 51. 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9969-4.Search in Google Scholar

Brait, Beth, Pistori Maria, Dugnani Bruna, Stella Paulo & Rosa Carlos. 2023. Culture, literary scholarship, and great time. Bakhtiniana 18(4). e64121e.10.1590/2176-4573p64121Search in Google Scholar

Chaika, Oksana. 2023. Pedagogical shift in contemporary foreign language teaching: Based on multi-cultural/lingual data sets. International Journal of Philology 27(1). 112–121.10.31548/philolog14(1).2023.012Search in Google Scholar

Choo, Sungjae. 2023. Assessing the validity of critical toponymy perspectives for understanding human perception of places: An analytical framework. In Gerry O’ Reilly (ed.), Place naming, identities and geography: Critical perspectives in a globalizing and standardizing world, 29–50. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-21510-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Chyzhykova, Olha. 2024. Analyzing lexical features and academic vocabulary in academic writing. International Journal of Philology 28(1). 72–80.10.31548/philolog15(1).2024.08Search in Google Scholar

Fasya, Mahmud, Eri Kurniawan, Undang Sudana, Dini Gilang Sari & Rahmawati Rahmawati. 2024. Classification and function of lexicaln in toponyms in the Western Lembang fault area anthropological linguistics study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education, 295–301.10.2991/978-94-6463-376-4_37Search in Google Scholar

Fize, Jacques, Ludovic Moncla & Bruno Martins. 2021. Deep learning for toponym resolution: Geocoding based on pairs of toponyms. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10(12). 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10120818.Search in Google Scholar

Giraut, Frédéric. 2020. Plural toponyms: When place names coexist. EchoGeo 53. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.20760.Search in Google Scholar

Helleland, Botolv. 2012. Names and identities. Oslo Studies in Language 4(2). 95–116. https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.313.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobsen, Johnny Grandjean Gøgsig. 2020. Danish postcolonial microtoponymy and the ‘threat’ of sustainable tourism: The cases of Tranquebar and the Danish West Indies. Information Bulletin of the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names 59. 19–20.Search in Google Scholar

Lewinski, Peter, Lukasik Michał, Kurdej Konrad, Leonarski Filip, Bielczyk Natalia, Rakowski Franciszek & Plewczynski Dariusz. 2019. The world color survey: Data analysis and simulations. In Complexity applications in language and communication sciences, 289–311. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-04598-2_16Search in Google Scholar

Malak, Alasli. 2021. Hungarian place names from a Moroccan perspective. In Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association, 1–5.10.5194/ica-proc-4-3-2021Search in Google Scholar

Martynenko, Irina A. 2021. Hispanic place names through the prism of critical and political toponymy. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya 85(5). 763–772. https://doi.org/10.31857/S258755662105006X.Search in Google Scholar

Meirbekov, Akylbek. 2021. Research of the toponyms of the Kazakh and English languages in the cognitive direction. Humanities 12. 147–152.Search in Google Scholar

Milo, Andrianna. 2024. The concept of Linguoculture in modern science: Formation and potential. Logos (Lithuania) 118. 58–67.Search in Google Scholar

Njoh, Ambe J. 2010. Toponymic inscription, physical addressing and the challenge of urban management in an era of globalization in Cameroon. Habitat International 34(4). 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Novoseletska, Svitlana, Shapran Natalia, Kolida Elina, Musiichuk Tetiana & Simak Kateryna. 2024. Lexical changes in modern English: Abbreviations and shortened words formed under the influence of various social factors. Dragoman 14(16). 218–243.Search in Google Scholar

Nusubalieva, Eliza, Beishenova Aisulu, Ashymbaeva Toktobubu, Sartbekova Nurzhan & Dogdurbek Nazar. 2023. Civic identity of youth as an important element of modern sociocultural transformation of society. Social and Legal Studios 6(4). 145–154.10.32518/sals4.2023.145Search in Google Scholar

Pardo, José María Fuentes. 2023. Challenges and current research trends for vernacular architecture in a global world: A literature review. Buildings 13(1). 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010162.Search in Google Scholar

Perono Cacciafoco, Francesco & Francesco Cavallaro. 2023. Place names: Approaches and perspectives in toponymy and toponomastics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108780384Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M. Cecilia, Alyssa Parker & Matthew Walls. 2024. Indigenous place names in arctic Canada: A publicly accessible inventory of projects. Polar Science 39. 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2023.101002.Search in Google Scholar

Rusu, Mihai Stelian. 2021. Sequencing toponymic change: A quantitative longitudinal analysis of street renaming in Sibiu, Romania. PLoS One 16(5). e0251558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251558.Search in Google Scholar

Socquet-Juglard, Mylène. 2022. The persistence of silenced toponymic landscapes in disputed territories: The case of Arabic in West-Jerusalem. Judaica 3. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.36950/jndf.2022.22.Search in Google Scholar

Stock, Kristin, Christopher B. Jones, Shaun Russell, Mansi Radke, Prarthana Das & Niloofar Aflaki. 2022. Detecting geospatial location descriptions in natural language text. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 36(3). 547–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.1987441.Search in Google Scholar

Sudrajat, R. 2021. Toponymic information system for description and classification of ethno-informatics of “kampung” naming in the East Priangan of West Java. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1722. 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012018.Search in Google Scholar

Sujatna, Eva Tuckyta Sari, Kasno Pamungkas & Heriyanto. 2021. Tourism sites naming in Ciletuh geopark: Toponymic and morphological studies. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 42(1). 147–152.10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.1.23Search in Google Scholar

Superanskaya, Alexandra V. 1973. General theory of proper names. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Tao, Liufeng, Zhong Xie, Dexin Xu, Kai Ma, Qinjun Qiu, Shengyong Pan & Bo Huang. 2022. Geographic named entity recognition by employing natural language processing and an improved BERT model. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11(12). 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120598.Search in Google Scholar

Urazmetova, Alexandra V. 2016. English toponymy as a lexical subsystem of the language (on the material of toponymic lexicon of Great Britain and the USA). Ufa: Bashkir State University.Search in Google Scholar

Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Yue Sara Zhang. 2023. Place and place names: A unified model. Frontiers in Psychology 14. 1237422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237422.Search in Google Scholar

Vrbík, Daniel & Václav Lábus. 2021. Crowdsourcing of popular toponyms: How to collect and preserve toponyms in spoken use. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10(5). 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050303.Search in Google Scholar

Walkowiak, Justyna B. 2022. Urban names and etymological reinterpretation. Ethnographic Journal 63(2). 483–496.Search in Google Scholar

Williamson, Beth. 2023. Historical geographies of place naming: Colonial practices and beyond. Geography Compass 17(5). e12687. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12687.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-08-08
Accepted: 2025-09-03
Published Online: 2025-09-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2024-0024/pdf
Scroll to top button