Evaluations of appropriateness through impoliteness in political discourse reframed for entertainment purposes

References

Allan, Stuart. 2009. Histories of citizen journalism. In Stuart Allan & Einar Thorsen (eds.), Citizen journalism: Global Perspectives (Vol. 1), 17–31. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2020. Political discourse in post-digital societies. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 59. 390–403.10.1590/01031813684701620200408Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Robert. (ed.) forthcoming in 2024. Political Discourse Analysis - Legitimisation Strategies in Crisis and Conflict. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781399523202Search in Google Scholar

Chankova, Mariya. in print-a. Political discourse strategies in online communication: a case study. To appear in Isabela Nedelcu, Irina Paraschiv & Andra Vasilescu (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the Department of Linguistics, Bucharest, 2021. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chankova, Mariya. in print-b. Political discourse and the new media: new architectures of communication. To appear in Robert Butler (ed.), Political Discourse Analysis - Legitimisation Strategies in Crisis and Conflict. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chebib, Nadine K. & Rabia M. Sohail. 2011. The reasons social media contributed to the 2011 Egyptian revolution. International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM) 2(3). 139–162.Search in Google Scholar

Colon, David. 2021. Propagande. La manipulation de masse dans le monde contemporain. Paris: Editions Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2016. Impoliteness strategies. In Alessandro Capone & Jacob May (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, 421–445. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 2006. Frame semantics. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 373–400. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199901.373Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar

Herman, Edward S. & Noam Chomsky. 2010. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. London: Vintage (Random House).Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Kristoffer, Tine U. Figenschou & Lena Frischlich. 2019. Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism 7(7). 860–869.10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2010. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203841686Search in Google Scholar

Jandura, Olaf & Katja Friedrich. 2014. The quality of political media coverage. In Carsten Reinemann (ed.), Political communication, 351–373. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238174.351Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse. The modes and media in contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Kubin, Emily & Christian von Sikorski. 2021. The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association 45(3). 188–206.10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070Search in Google Scholar

Leppänen, Sirpa, Janus S. Møller, Thomas R. Nørreby, Andreas Stæhrc & Samu Kytölä. 2015. Authenticity, normativity and social media. Discourse, Context and Media 8(June). 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.008.10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.008Search in Google Scholar

Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. London: Allen Lane.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-broadcast democracy. How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139878425Search in Google Scholar

Shullenberger, Geoff. 2020. The new net delusion. The New Atlantis 62. 46–52.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1993. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Framing in discourse, 14–56. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah & Cynthia Wallat. 1987. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/ interview. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2), 205–216.10.2307/2786752Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoffrey & Susan Hunston. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoffrey Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Aelst, Peter, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann, Susana Salgado, Nicolas Hubé, Agnieszka Stępińska, Stylianos Papathanassopoulos, Rosa Berganza, Guido Legnante, Carsten Reinemann, Tamir Sheafer & James Stanyer. 2017. Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association 41(1). 3–27.10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551Search in Google Scholar

Wall, Melissa. 2018. Citizen journalism: Practices, propaganda, pedagogy. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351055703Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francesco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.213Search in Google Scholar