Home “Face” in retrospective: The use of “thanks” and “to thank” In Old Saxon and Old High German
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Face” in retrospective: The use of “thanks” and “to thank” In Old Saxon and Old High German

  • Valentina Concu

    Valentina Concu is an Assistant Professor for Linguistics and German at the department of Foreign Languages at the Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia. She got her Ph.D. in German Linguistics from Purdue University, Indiana, USA. Her research interests focus on, but are not limited to, historical corpus linguistics, historical pragmatics, complexity theory, complex network science, and second language acquisition. Her current research projects focus on pragmatic variation in Old and Middle High German and the teaching of pronunciation in German as a Foreign Language.

Published/Copyright: July 20, 2023

Abstract

Despite being often criticized, the notion of face has recently begun to be applied in diachronic pragmatic investigations on directives, requests, apologies, and terms of address. The present study also uses the notion of face to investigate the use of Dank ‘thanks’, Dankbarkeit ‘thankfulness’, and danken ‘to thank’ in expressions of gratitude in Old Saxon and Old High German, laying the foundations to a better understanding of the speech act of thanking in the history of German. The data suggest that, although the manifestation of gratitude was common, the expressions containing Dank, Dankbarkeit, and danken could mostly be found when the addresser was in a lower social position than the addressee. The same situation was observed when these nouns and verbs were used with the meaning of “to reward” and “to praise.” These findings provide evidence to the claim that the effects of a speech act on the speaker’s or hearer’s face are mostly situational rather than being an intrinsic property. They also suggest that, in strictly hierarchical societies such as the Old Saxon and Old High German ones, addressers would threaten their own negative face only if they were in a lower social position than the addressees.

About the author

Valentina Concu

Valentina Concu is an Assistant Professor for Linguistics and German at the department of Foreign Languages at the Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia. She got her Ph.D. in German Linguistics from Purdue University, Indiana, USA. Her research interests focus on, but are not limited to, historical corpus linguistics, historical pragmatics, complexity theory, complex network science, and second language acquisition. Her current research projects focus on pragmatic variation in Old and Middle High German and the teaching of pronunciation in German as a Foreign Language.

References

Aijmer, Karin. 2014. Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9781315845128Search in Google Scholar

Beetz, Manfred. 1990. Frühmoderne Höflichkeit. Komplimentierkunst und Gesellschaftsrituale im altdeutschen Sprachraum (Germanistitische Abhandlungen 67). Stuttgart: Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Beetz, Manfred. 1999. The polite answer in pre-modern German conversation culture. In Andreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz & Franz Lebsanft (eds.). Historical Dialogue Analysis. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 66. 139–166. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.66.06beeSearch in Google Scholar

Bentivoglio, Paola. 2003. Spanish forms of address in the sixteenth century. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 177-192. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.107.09benSearch in Google Scholar

Bodman, Jean & Miriam Eisenstein. 1988. May God increase your bounty: the expression of gratitude in English by native and non-native speakers. Cross Currents 15. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Burnley, David. 2003. The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 27–46. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.107.03burSearch in Google Scholar

Busse, Beatrix. Vocative constructions in the language of Shakespeare. Vol. 150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Concu, Valentina. 2019. Temporal Deixis in Old Saxon and Old High German: The Adverb nu in the Hêliand and Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 141(2). 157–181.10.1515/bgsl-2019-0012Search in Google Scholar

Concu, Valentina, 2022. Werden and Periphrases with Present Participles and Infinitives: A Diachronic Corpus Analysis. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 34(1). 1–34.10.1017/S1470542721000064Search in Google Scholar

Concu, Valentina. Forthcoming. Ih gebiude dir, wurm! Directives in Old Saxon and Old High German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics.Search in Google Scholar

Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial community. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English, 115–131. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.07delSearch in Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Miriam & Jean Bodman. 1993. Expressing Gratitude in American English. Interlanguage Pragmatics. In Gabriele Kasper & Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds), 64–81. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195066029.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Peter & Martina Werner (eds.). 2016. Linguistische Pragmatik in historischen Bezügen. Vol. 9. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110353327Search in Google Scholar

Glauch, Sonja. 2001. Die Martianus-Capella-Bearbeitung Notkers des Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Albert. 1998. Grüezi und adieu: Gruss-und Umgangsformen vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart. Zürich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, Tony. 2003. The use of tu/vus in the Anglo-Norman Seinte Resureccion. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 47–59. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.107.04hunSearch in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics. 269–293.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsson, Mattias. 2002. Thank you and thanks in Early Modern English. Icame Journal 26. 63–80.Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 67–95.Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 67–95.10.1075/jhp.1.1.07jucSearch in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. Apologies in the history of English. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English, 176–229. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.12jucSearch in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Joanna Kopaczyk. 2017. Historical (im) politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im) politeness, 433–459. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_17Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott, The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 422–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. 2019. Speech act attenuation in the history of English: The case of apologies. Glossa: A Journal of General linguistics 4.(1).45.10.5334/gjgl.878Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas. 2020. Politeness in the history of English: From the middle ages to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108589147Search in Google Scholar

Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. Explicit performatives in Old English: A corpus-based study of directives. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2). 301–321.10.1075/jhp.1.2.07kohSearch in Google Scholar

Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. Directives in Old English: beyond politeness? In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.04kohSearch in Google Scholar

Kotin, Michail L. 2000. Das Partizip II in hochdeutschen periphrastischen Verbalfügungen im 9.–15. Jh. Zur Ausbildung des analytischen Sprachbaus 28(3). 319–345.10.1515/zfgl.2000.28.3.319Search in Google Scholar

Kotin, Michail L. & Thomas Albert Fritz. 2006. Die werden-Perspektive und die werden-Periphrasen im Deutschen: Historische Entwicklung und Funktionen in der Gegenwartssprache. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 128 (3). 500–503.10.1515/BGSL.2006.500Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 2016. Principles of Pragmatics. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9781315835976Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work 1(1). 9– 33.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9Search in Google Scholar

Lötscher, Andreas. (1981) Zur Sprachgeschichte des Fluchens und Beschimpfens im Schweizerdeutschen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 48. 145–160Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 1978. Expressive illocutionary acts. Journal of Pragmatics 2(3). 277-291.10.1016/0378-2166(78)90005-XSearch in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2017. Face and (Im) politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im) politeness, 89–118. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Pfeifer, Wolfgang. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. Digitalisierte und von Wolfgang Pfeifer überarbeitete Version im Digitalen Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Available at: https://www.dwds.de/d/wb-etymwb (accessed 10 May 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, Rebecca & Sandra, Reimann. 2016. Gruoz enbieten und grüszen. Ein Beitrag zum Desiderat eines syntaktisch-semantischen mittelhochdeutschen Verbwörterbuchs. In Peter Ernst & Martina Werner (eds.). Linguistische Pragmatik in historischen Bezügen, 253–271. Berlin: Lingua Historica Germanica 9.10.1515/9783110353327-017Search in Google Scholar

Schützeichel, Rudolf. 1995. Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch 5.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts 1. Language in society 5(1). 23.10.1017/S0047404500006837Search in Google Scholar

Siebold, Kathrin. 2012. Implicit and explicit thanking in Spanish and German. Linguistic Insights-Studies in Language and Communication 132. 155–172.Search in Google Scholar

Stroebe, Klara. 1911. Altgermanische Grussformen. Heidelberg: Winter10.1515/bgsl.1912.1912.37.173Search in Google Scholar

Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.). 2008. Speech Acts in the History of English, 1–332. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.02taaSearch in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness: key topics in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Search in Google Scholar

Zborowski, Piotr. 2005. Dankbarkeit vs. Höflichkeit und sprachliche Routine. der Dankakt im Schwedischen verglichen mit Polnisch und Deutsch. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-07-20
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2023-0009/html
Scroll to top button