Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Theres more than one way to make sense of one-way implications and sense they need to be made of
Published/Copyright:
January 23, 2006
Published Online: 2006-01-23
Published in Print: 2003-06-26
Copyright © 2003 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Language type frequency and learnability from a connectionist perspective
- Diachronic typology and the genealogical unity of Chukotko-Kamchatkan
- Against implicational universals
- A case for implicational universals
- Significant and non-significant implicational universals
- Theres more than one way to make sense of one-way implications and sense they need to be made of
- The UNITYP (re-)view
- Language Relations Across Bering Strait, by Michael Fortescue
Articles in the same Issue
- Language type frequency and learnability from a connectionist perspective
- Diachronic typology and the genealogical unity of Chukotko-Kamchatkan
- Against implicational universals
- A case for implicational universals
- Significant and non-significant implicational universals
- Theres more than one way to make sense of one-way implications and sense they need to be made of
- The UNITYP (re-)view
- Language Relations Across Bering Strait, by Michael Fortescue
