Home Linguistics & Semiotics Quoting to deceive: fake quotes and political delegitimization in Spanish far right grassroots disinformation campaigns
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Quoting to deceive: fake quotes and political delegitimization in Spanish far right grassroots disinformation campaigns

  • Agnese Sampietro ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 8, 2025
Linguistics Vanguard
From the journal Linguistics Vanguard

Abstract

This paper focuses on the deliberate fabrication of quotations attributed to rival politicians by Spanish far right activists and their dissemination on social media (particularly Twitter/X). It argues that such practices can be viewed as attempts to undermine the credibility and legitimacy of political adversaries. The data were obtained from Al Descubierto (http://aldescubierto.org), an organization specializing in tracking disinformation spread in Spain by the far right. This study examines a collection of anti-government disinformation, specifically focusing on the content of fake quotes attributed to government officials or other left-leaning politicians. The analysis uncovers a calculated attempt to portray left-wing politicians as incompetent leaders, thereby undermining their legitimacy to govern the nation. Specifically, it shows that fake quotes can help present politicians as immoral and their policies as irrational. In short, these fabricated quotes are used to erode trust in governing institutions and delegitimize politicians and policy initiatives.

Resumen

Este artículo estudia las citas falsas inventadas por activistas españoles de extrema derecha y su difusión en las redes sociales (especialmente en Twitter) con el objetivo de socavar la credibilidad y legitimidad de los adversarios políticos. Los datos se obtuvieron de Al Descubierto (https://aldescubierto.org), una organización especializada en el rastreo de la desinformación difundida en España por la extrema derecha. Se estudian ejemplos de desinformación antigubernamental, centrándonos específicamente en el contenido de citas falsas atribuidas a miembros del Gobierno o a otros políticos de izquierdas. El análisis muestra que hay un intento claro de presentar a los políticos de izquierdas como incompetentes para gobernar el país, reduciendo su legitimidad. En concreto, el análisis muestra que las citas falsas contribuyen a presentar a los políticos como personas de dudosa moralidad y a hacer que sus propuestas políticas parezcan irracionales. En resumen, estas citas inventadas se utilizan para erosionar la confianza en las instituciones, deslegitimar a los políticos rivales y despreciar sus iniciativas políticas.


Corresponding author: Agnese Sampietro, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: PID2020-113574RB-I00

Funding source: Universitat Jaume I

Award Identifier / Grant number: 23I462.01/1

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Universitat Jaume I (Grant 23I462.01/1) and partially by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (Grant PID2020-113574RB-I00). I am grateful to Anastasia Ioana Pop for her assistance with the initial compilation of the dataset, and to the anonymous reviewers and the editors of this special issue for their insightful comments.

References

Almansa-Martínez, Ana, María Jesús Fernández Torres & Leticia Rodríguez Fernández. 2022. Desinformación en España un año después de la COVID-19: Análisis de las verificaciones de Newtral y Maldita. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 80. 183–200. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2022-1538.Search in Google Scholar

Alonso, Sonia & Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2014. Spain: No country for the populist radical right? South European Society & Politics 20(1). 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.985448.Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez-Benavides, Antonio & Francisco Jiménez Aguilar. 2020. Estrategias de comunicación de la nueva extrema derecha española: De Hogar Social a Vox, del alter-activismo a la doctrina del shock. Revista Latinoamericana Estudios de la Paz y el Conflicto 1(2). 55–78. https://doi.org/10.5377/rlpc.v1i2.9833.Search in Google Scholar

Amazeen, Michelle A. 2017. Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking. Journalism 21(1). 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730217.Search in Google Scholar

Baldi, Benedetta, Ludovico Franco & Leonardo Savoia. 2019. Alternative truths and delegitimization pragmatic strategies around the 2018 Italian elections. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(2). 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00029.bal.Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul A. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar

Chouza, Paula. 2021. Serigne Mbayé: “Madrid es muy racista”. El País. https://elpais.com/espana/madrid/2021-04-01/serigne-mbaye-madrid-es-muy-racista.html (accessed 12 April 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Christner, Clara. 2023. Does credibility become trivial when the message is right? Populist radical-right attitudes, perceived message credibility, and the spread of disinformation. Communications 49(4). 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0024.Search in Google Scholar

Cordero, Guillermo, Piotr Zagórski & José Rama. 2024. Economic self-interest or cultural threat? Migrant unemployment and class-based support for populist radical right parties in europe. Political Behavior 46. 1397–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09877-8.Search in Google Scholar

De Cock Buning, Madeleine (ed.). 2018. A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent High-level Group on fake news and online disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/386085 (accessed 10 April 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2018. Irony, deception and humour. Berlin: De Gruyter/Mouton.10.1515/9781501507922Search in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita & Daniel Weiss. 2020. Doing things with quotes: Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 157. 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita & Elda Weizman. 2018. “What I would say to John and everyone like John is …”: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society 29(5). 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770259.Search in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita & Elisabeth Reber. 2015. Quoting in political discourse: Professional talk meets ordinary postings. In Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds.), The pragmatics of quoting now and then, 97–124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110427561-006Search in Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita. 2020. “And I quote”: Forms and functions of quotations in prime minister’s questions. Journal of Pragmatics 157. 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Freelon, Deen & Chris Wells. 2020. Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication 37(2). 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755.Search in Google Scholar

Gamir-Ríos, José & David Lava Santos. 2022. Desinformación sobre historia, memoria democrática y simbología del estado en redes sociales: Estudio de los bulos desmentidos por los fact-checkers españoles. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 28(4). 777–788. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.82846.Search in Google Scholar

Gamir-Ríos, José & Raquel Tarullo. 2022. Características de la desinformación en redes sociales: Estudio comparado de los engaños desmentidos en Argentina y España durante el 2020. Contratexto 37. 203–228. https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2022.n037.5343.Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, Helmut. 2015. Policy-oriented argumentation or ironic evaluation: A study of verbal quoting and positioning in Austrian politicians’ parliamentary debate contributions. Discourse Studies 17(6). 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602377.Search in Google Scholar

Guess, Andrew M. & Benjamin Lyons. 2020. Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda. In Nathaniel Persily & Joshua A. Tucker (eds.), Social media and democracy, 10–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108890960.003Search in Google Scholar

Hodson, Gordon & Cara MacInnis. 2016. Derogating humor as a delegitimization strategy in intergroup contexts. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 2(1). 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000052.Search in Google Scholar

Kirner-Ludwig, Monika. 2020. Creation, dissemination and uptake of fake-quotes in lay political discourse on Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 157. 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.009.Search in Google Scholar

Mendes, Mariana S. & James Dennison. 2021. Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal: Salience, stigma and supply. West European Politics 44(4). 752–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1777504.Search in Google Scholar

Oyebanji, Olubunmi Funmi. 2023. Illegitimation of same-sex sexualities in news reports of selected Nigerian newspapers. Discourse & Society 34(3). 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221142447.Search in Google Scholar

Pablos Romero, Carlos, Lucía Andaluz Antón & José Manuel Corrales Aznar. 2024. La derecha radical populista en España (2019–2024): Estudio de caso del discurso de Vox. European Public & Social Innovation Review 9. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1097.Search in Google Scholar

Rama, José, Lisa Zanotti, Stuart J. Turnbull-Dugarte & Andrés Santana. 2021. VOX: The rise of the Spanish populist radical right. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003049227Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Andrew S. & Damian J. Rivers. 2017. Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S. Presidential candidates. Discourse, Context & Media 16. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Andrew S. 2019. Discursive delegitimisation in metaphorical #secondcivilwarletters: An analysis of a collective Twitter hashtag response. Critical Discourse Studies 17(5). 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1661861.Search in Google Scholar

Sakketou, Flora, Joan Plepi, Henri-Jacques Geiss, Paolo Rosso, Riccardo Cervero & Lucie Flek. 2022. Factoid: A new dataset for identifying misinformation spreaders and political bias. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 3231–3241. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.345.pdf (Accessed 28/03/2025).Search in Google Scholar

Sampietro, Agnese & Sebastían Sánchez Castillo. 2020. Building a political image on Instagram: A study of the personal profile of Santiago Abascal (Vox) in 2018. Communication & Society 33(1). 169–184. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.1.169-184.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Duarte, José Manuel & Raúl Magallón Rosa. 2020. Infodemia y COVID-19: Evolución y viralización de informaciones falsas en España. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud 31. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5417.Search in Google Scholar

Sudbrack, Lucas. 2023. Meritocracy, unfairness, and the directions of anger. Revista Debates 17(1). 63–84. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.129695.Search in Google Scholar

Törnberg, Petter & Juliana Chueri. 2025. When do parties lie? Misinformation and radical-right populism across 26 countries. International Journal of Press/Politics. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241311886.Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, Joshua A., Andrew Guess, Pablo Barbera, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal & Brendan Nyhan. 2018. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN Electronic Journal 1–95. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139.Search in Google Scholar

Van Der Goot, Emma, Karolin Soontjens, Kathleen Beckers, Willem Buyens & Peter Van Aelst. 2024. Pointing fingers in the disinformation era: How journalists and politicians perceive each other’s role in spreading disinformation and its impact on their relationship. Journalism Studies 25(13). 1614–1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2024.2372431.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1). 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Xiong, Bingjuan & Jessica S. Robles. 2023. Functions of quotation in online political comments. Discourse, Context & Media 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100717.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Xiang & Haicui Zheng. 2023. An overview of research on discursive legitimation. Open Journal of Social Sciences 11(10). 112–127. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.1110008.Search in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2022. Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 191. 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xichen & Ali A. Ghorbani. 2020. An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion. Information Processing & Management 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-19
Accepted: 2025-03-05
Published Online: 2025-04-08

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0074/html
Scroll to top button