Abstract
When intra-individual variation in language use is discussed it tends to be seen as not having much significance. The recognizability of the relation of variants to each other is (usually tacitly) acknowledged; intra-individual variation is often attributed to influence across different varieties of the language in question (and, in L2 variation, also across languages); in addition such variation is frequently seen as a concomitant of the way in which the given linguistic feature develops. None of these commentaries actually has much to do with randomness; all seem to relate to identifiable complexes of correlation. The present article begins by exploring how the concept of randomness is to be understood and defined. It proceeds to explore the relationship of intra-individual linguistic variation to the recognizability of the connections between variables, to cross-varietal influence and to acquisitional trajectories. It probes the question of whether, in the light of the putatively explanatory factors for intra-individual variation considered, much room remains for its treatment as straightforwardly random.
References
Batanero, Carmen, David R. Green & Luis Romero Serrano. 1998. Randomness, its meanings and educational implications. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology 29(1). 11–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739980290111.Search in Google Scholar
Berdan, Robert. 1996. Disentangling language acquisition from language variation. In Robert Bayley & Denis R. Preston (eds.), Second language acquisition and language variation, 203–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.10.09berSearch in Google Scholar
Cancino, Herlinda, Ellen J. Rosansky & John H. Schumann. 1975. The recognition of the English auxiliary by native Spanish speakers. Tesol Quarterly 9(4). 421–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585626.Search in Google Scholar
Dechert, Hans W., Dorothea Möhle & Manfred Raupach (eds.). 1984. Second language productions. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Eagle, Antony. 2005. Randomness is unpredictability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56. 749–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi138.Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1985. Sources of variability in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 6(2). 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.2.118.Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1992. Learning to communicate in the classroom: A study of two learners’ requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14(1). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100010445.Search in Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1999. Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics 20(4). 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.4.460.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1985. Function, structure, and language acquisition. In Dan, Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 2, 1005–1028. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Globus, Gordon G. 1991. Dream content: Random or meaningful? Dreaming 1(1). 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094315.Search in Google Scholar
Globus, Gordon G. 1993. Connectionism and sleep. In Alan Moffitt, Milton Kramer & Robert Hoffmann (eds.), Functions of dreaming, 119–138. New York: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Han, Zhao & Elaine Tarone. 2014. Introduction. In Zhao Han & Elaine Tarone (eds.), Interlanguage: Forty years later, 1–6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.39.02intSearch in Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 1977. Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning 27(2). 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00129.x.Search in Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2014. Trying out theories on interlanguage: Description and explanation over 40 years of L2 negation research. In Zhao Han & Elaine Tarone (eds.), Interlanguage: Forty years later, 173–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8Search in Google Scholar
Payne, Jessica D. & Lynn Nadel. 2004. Sleep, dreams, and memory consolidation: The role of the stress hormone cortisol. Learning & Memory 11(6). 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.77104.Search in Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1993. Variation linguistics and SLA. Second Language Research 9(2). 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839300900205.Search in Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 2003. Variation. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 409–435. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch14Search in Google Scholar
Schachter, Jacquelyn. 1986. Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning 36(2). 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00379.x.Search in Google Scholar
Singleton, David. 2016. A critical reaction from second language acquisition research. In Vivian Cook & Li Wei (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence, 502–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107425965.024Search in Google Scholar
Singleton, David. 2018. Multilingualism, multi-competence and (limits to) the interaction between language systems. Teanga: The Irish Journal of Applied Linguistics 25. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35903/teanga.v25i0.46.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Kenny, Amy Perfors, Olga Fehér, Anna Samara, Kate Swoboda & Elizabeth Wonnacott. 2017. Language learning, language use and the evolution of linguistic variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372(1711). 20160051. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0051.Search in Google Scholar
Song, Lichao. 2012. On the variability of interlanguage. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2(4). 778–783. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.778-783.Search in Google Scholar
Tarone, Elaine E. 1982. Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning 32(1). 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00519.x.Search in Google Scholar
Verspoor, Mariolijn, Wander Lowie & Marajn van Dijk. 2008. Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2). 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x.Search in Google Scholar
Zobl, Helmut. 1982. A direction for Contrastive Analysis: The comparative study of developmental sequences. Tesol Quarterly 16(2). 169–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586790.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Introduction: Reconciling approaches to intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics
- Variability as normal as apple pie
- About the INTER and the INTRA in age-related research: Evidence from a longitudinal CLIL study with dense time serial measurements
- Intra-individual variation across the lifespan: Results from an Austrian panel study
- Individual differences in intra-speaker variation: t-glottalling in England and Scotland
- Variation and third age: A sociolinguistic perspective
- Language change across a lifetime: A historical micro-perspective
- The random and the non-random in intra-individual L2 variation
- Intra-individual variation in adults and children: measuring and conceptualizing individual dialect–standard repertoires
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Introduction: Reconciling approaches to intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics
- Variability as normal as apple pie
- About the INTER and the INTRA in age-related research: Evidence from a longitudinal CLIL study with dense time serial measurements
- Intra-individual variation across the lifespan: Results from an Austrian panel study
- Individual differences in intra-speaker variation: t-glottalling in England and Scotland
- Variation and third age: A sociolinguistic perspective
- Language change across a lifetime: A historical micro-perspective
- The random and the non-random in intra-individual L2 variation
- Intra-individual variation in adults and children: measuring and conceptualizing individual dialect–standard repertoires