[In]stability in the use of a stable variable

References

Arnett, Jeffrey. 2012. Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801686Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Search in Google Scholar

Baugh, John. 1996. Dimensions of a theory of econolinguistics. In Gregory Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin & John Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, Volume 1: Variation and change in language and society, 397–419. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/cilt.127.24bauSearch in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 2000. Maori and pakeha english: a case study. In Allan Bell & Koenraad Kuiper (eds.), Varieties of English around the world: New Zealand English, 221–248. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/veaw.g25.13belSearch in Google Scholar

Bordieu, Pierre & Luc Boltanski. 1975. Le fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 4. 2–32.10.3406/arss.1975.3417Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatajana Nikitina and R. Harold Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerlog Bouma, Irene Kraemer and Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. Diagnostics of age graded linguistic behavior. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10( 1). 3–30.10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00315.xSearch in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2016. Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morpho-syntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics 44( 2). 199–229.10.1177/0075424216639645Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle, Anne Krause, Anja Auer & Stefanie Otte. 2017. Levelling across the life-span?: Tracing the FACE vowel in panel data from the North East of England. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21( 1). 3–33.10.1111/josl.12227Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5). 637–659.10.1017/S0047404508080974Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack K. 2008 [1995]. Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781119072256.ch24Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2005. Particle placement in early child language: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1). 89–112.10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.89Search in Google Scholar

Downes, William. 1998. Language and society 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163781Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2005. Variation, convention, and social meaning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Oakland, CA. 1–33.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110307474Search in Google Scholar

Hazen, Kirk. 2006. IN/ING variable. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 5. 581–584. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04716-7Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change: Volume 2: Social factors. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski & Naomi Nagy. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431–463.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.xSearch in Google Scholar

Levon, Erez & Sue Fox. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42(3). 185–217.10.1177/0075424214531487Search in Google Scholar

Levon, Erez & Isabelle Buchstaller. 2016. Toward an integrated model of sociolinguistic perception. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistic Symposium 21, University of Murcia.Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.195Search in Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Laurel. 2017. Frequency effects over the lifespan: A case study of Attenborough’s r’s. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 1–12. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2017-0005.10.1515/lingvan-2017-0005Search in Google Scholar

Mangiafico, Salvatore S. 2016. Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R, version 1.13.6. rcompanion.org/handbook/. (20 August, 2018.)Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam & Erik Schleef. 2012. Variation, contact and social indexicality in the acquisition of (ing) by teenage migrants. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(3). 398–416.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2012.00535.xSearch in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter & Hans van de Velde. 2018. The real-time dynamics of individual and community in grammaticalization, Language. 94(4). 867–901.10.1353/lan.2018.0056Search in Google Scholar

Sankoff, David & Suzanne Laberge. 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods, 239–250. New York & London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian & Hélèn Blondeau. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3). 560–588.10.1353/lan.2007.0106Search in Google Scholar

Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511980541Search in Google Scholar

Schleef, Erik, Miriam Meyerhoff & Lynn Clark. 2011. Teenagers’ acquisition of variation: A comparison of locally-born and migrant teens’ realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London. English World-Wide 32(2). 206–236.10.1075/eww.32.2.04schSearch in Google Scholar

Schleef, Erik & Nicholas Flynn. 2015. Ageing meanings of (ing) in Manchester, England. English World-Wide 36(1). 48–90.10.1075/eww.36.1.04schSearch in Google Scholar

Schleef, Erik, Nicholas Flynn & Will Barras. 2017. Regional diversity in social perceptions of (ing). Language Variation and Change 29. 29–56.10.1017/S0954394517000047Search in Google Scholar

Silfverberg, Miikka, Adam Wiemerslage, Ling Liu & Lingshuang Jack Mao. 2017. Data augmentation for morphological reinflection. Proceedings of the CoNLL SIGMORPHON 2017: 90–99.10.18653/v1/K17-2010Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer, Mercedes Durham, & Liane Fortune. 2007. “Mam, ma troosers is fa’in doon!” Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1). 63–99.10.1017/S0954394507070044Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1). 58–108.10.1353/lan.0.0084Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Erik Schleef (eds.), The Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader, 358–368. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2012. Real-time evidence for age grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 24. 179–202.10.1017/S0954394512000099Search in Google Scholar

Van Hofwegen, Janneke & Walt Wolfram. 2010. Coming of age in African American English: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14. 27–52.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00452.xSearch in Google Scholar

Van Hofwegen, Janneke & Walt Wolfram. 2017. On the utility of composite indices in longitudinal language study. In Suzanne Evans Wagner & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.), Panel studies in language variation and change, 73–98. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315696591-4Search in Google Scholar