Home Linguistics & Semiotics Topic marking in Kusaal and selected Mabia (Gur) languages of West Africa
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Topic marking in Kusaal and selected Mabia (Gur) languages of West Africa

  • Hasiyatu Abubakari EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 14, 2020

Abstract

This article looks at topic marking strategies in Kusaal and related Mabia (Gur) languages: Dagaare, Buli, Moore, Dabgani, and Gurene, spoken in Ghana, Togo and Ivory Coast. It is generally observed that these languages use left dislocation as a topic coding strategy. They either use topic phrases or particles, which may be obligatory or optional. It is argued that the languages under discussion cannot be fully classified as subject prominent languages alongside other Niger-Congo languages. It is shown that these languages demonstrate features that put them in between subject prominent and topic prominent languages. To identify a topic constituent in these languages, three tests are suggested: the if+be test, the “aboutness test” and the use of left dislocation accompanied by a resumptive pronoun.


Corresponding author: Hasiyatu Abubakari, Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my deepest appreciation to the editorial team of Linguistics as well as to the two anonymous reviewers of this paper for their comments and suggestions.

References

Abubakari, Hasiyatu. 2018. Aspects of Kusaal Grammar: The Syntax-Information Structure Interface. Vienna: University of Vienna PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. 1998. Les particules énonciatives en ewe. In Suzy Platiel & Raphaël Kaboré (eds.), Les langues d’Afrique Subsaharienne (Faits de Langues 11–12), 179–204. Paris: Ophrys.10.3406/flang.1998.1209Search in Google Scholar

Bodomo, Adams B. 1997. The structure of Dagaare. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Bodomo, Adams B. 2000. Dagááre. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Bodomo, Adams. 2020. Mabia: Its etymological genesis, geographical spread, and some salient genetic features. In Adams, Bodomo, Hasiyatu, Abubakari & Samuel, A. Issah (eds.), Handbook of the Mabia Languages of West Africa. Glienicke: Galda Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen & Stephen Wechsler. 2016. Lexical-functional syntax, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781119105664Search in Google Scholar

Büring, Daniel. 2016. (Contrastive) topic. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), Handbook of information structure, 64–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.002Search in Google Scholar

Caron, Bernard & Aliou Mohamadou. 1999. La spécification du terme topique en haoussa et en peul: Vers une caractérisation contrastive de la thématisation et de la focalisation. In Claude Guimier (ed.), La thématisation dans les langues : Actes du colloque de Caen, 9–11 octobre 1997 (Sciences Pour La Communication), vol. 53. Paris: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–56. London & New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Ermisch, Sonja. 2006. Focus and topic constructions in Akan. In Sonja Ermisch (ed.), Focus and topic (Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 18), 51–68. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar

Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-functional grammar: an introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K. 1974. The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Austin, TX: University of Texas dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.17.16gunSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. The dimensions of topic-comment. Linguistics 39. 641–681. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.027.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumo. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3. 269–320.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

López, Luis. 2016. Dislocation and information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), Handbook of information structure, 709–732 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Masiuk, Nadine. 1994. L’emploi des particules, des formes pronominales fortes, et de l’extraposition en bambara–parler de Bamako: Approche sémiotique et pragmatique de description. Mandenkan 27. 1–110.Search in Google Scholar

Olawsky, Knut J. 1999. Aspects of Dagbane grammar, with special emphasis on phonology and morphology. Munich: LINCOM.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1). 53–94.10.21825/philosophica.82606Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Craige. 2011. Topics. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul, Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/handbooks of linguistics and communication science 33), vol. 2, 1908–1934. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110255072.1908Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, Anne. 2016. All-in-one and one-for-all: Thetic structures in Buli grammar and Discourse. In Doris L. Payne, Sara Pacchiarotti & Mokaya Bosire (eds.), Diversity in African languages, 81–100. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schaefer, P. Roland & Oisaghaede Francis Egbokhare. 2010. Topic and focus construction asymmetry. In Ines Fiedler & Anne Schwarz (eds.), The expression of information structure: A documentation of its diversity across Africa, 261–286. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.91.10schSearch in Google Scholar

Vallduví, Enrique. 1988. Constituent focusing and Catalan right dislocation. Paper presented at the 1988 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans, 27–30 December.Search in Google Scholar

Vallduví, Enrique. 1990. The informational component. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Vermeulen, Reiko. 2011. Non-topical wa-phrases in Japanese. In Rafaella Folli & Christiane Ulbrich (eds.), Interfaces in linguistics: New research perspectives (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 31), 135–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-12-14
Published in Print: 2021-01-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2020-0257/html
Scroll to top button