Home Linguistics & Semiotics On “partitive dislocation” in Sardinian: A Romance and Minimalist perspective
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

On “partitive dislocation” in Sardinian: A Romance and Minimalist perspective

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 20, 2020

Abstract

The traditional philological literature on Sardinian claims that Sardinian has a “partitive object” construction, arguing that it is either inherited from Latin or due to Catalan influence. Under closer examination, however, the construction at issue turns out to be a common Romance clitic right dislocation (CLRD) structure involving the preposition de and a partitive clitic. The article presents the syntactic distribution of this Sardinian construction and its clitic left dislocation (CLLD) counterpart and compares it to similar structures in French, Catalan, and Italian. The result is that the structure appears in all these languages when a bare NP is dislocated, including split-QP/NumP/NP constructions: In all these languages, the dislocated indefinite NP is marked by de/di and a partitive clitic (Sardinian nde, French en, Italian ne, Catalan en/ne) shows up. The article ends with a Minimalist analysis, in which clitics are the spell-out of a probe in v that triggers movement of a complement to the specifier of vP to overcome a phase boundary. In this account, a probe that targets indefinite NPs assigns partitive case, while the probe itself is spelled out as a partitive clitic. While taking Sardinian as a starting point, the article bears on more general issues and unveils a common mechanism in one group of Romance languages.

Acknowledgements

This article is related to my projects Quantification in Old Italian (with Cecilia Poletto) and Long-distance Dependencies in French (with Stefan Müller), both funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. I thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments to previous versions of this article.

Appendix: Map of Sardinian dialects

Figure 3: The Sardinian dialects, from Mensching and Remberger (2016: 271).
Figure 3:

The Sardinian dialects, from Mensching and Remberger (2016: 271).

References

Agouraki, Yoryia. 1992. Clitic left dislocation and clitic doubling: A unification. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 87–112.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1981. The syntax of ne: Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1. 117–154.10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.117Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola. 1988. L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 1: La frase: I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale, 3rd edn., 115–270. Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 1984. Storia linguistica della Sardegna. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111329116Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 1992. Partitive ne and the QP-hypothesis: A case study. In Elisabetta Fava (ed.), Proceedings of the XVII meeting of generative grammar, 121–141. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 2006. The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol. 5, 23–93. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch71Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 2016. The syntax of the Italian indefinite determiner dei. Lingua 181. 58–80.10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Carlier, Anne & Béatrice Lamiroy. 2014. The grammaticalization of the prepositional partitive in Romance. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 477–520. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110346060.477Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of Ā-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cordin, Patrizia. 1988. Il clitico ne. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 1: La frase: I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale, 3rd edn., 633–641. Bologna: il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

DitzLCS = Puddu, Mario. 2000. Ditzionariu de sa limba e de sa cultura sarda. Cagliari: Condaghes.Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph. 1999. How clitics license null phrases: A theory of the lexical interface. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Empirical approaches to language typology: Clitics in the languages of Europe, 292–368. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804010.291Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-9500-1Search in Google Scholar

Giurgea, Ion. 2013. The syntax of determiners and other functional categories. In Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin & Ion Giurgea (eds.), A reference grammar of Romanian, vol. 1: The noun phrase, 97–174. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.207.03giuSearch in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 1991. The categorial status of quantified nominals. Linguistische Berichte 136. 438–454.Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 1992. La sintassi dei sintagma quantificativi. Venice: Università di Venezia dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 1993. La sintassi dei determinanti. Padua: Unipress.Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana. 2002. Le espressioni di quantità in italiano antico: Considerazioni preliminari. Verbum 4. 295–325.10.1556/Verb.4.2002.2.6Search in Google Scholar

Hulk, Aafke. 1996. L’autre ‘de’: Une tête quantificationnelle? Langue Française 109. 44–90.10.3406/lfr.1996.5333Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Michael Allan. 1988. Sardinian. In Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds.), The Romance languages, 314–350. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Michael Allan. 1993. Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Michael Allan. 1995. Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lagae, Véronique. 2001. J’en ai lu deux, de livres: Les structures à détachement de forme de N. In Dany Amiot, Walter De Mulder & Nelly Flaux (eds.), Le syntagme nominal: Syntaxe et sémantique, 215–231. Arras: Artois Presses Université.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Man-Ki. 2016. Spanish Clitic Left Dislocation as a non-quantificational A′-movement. Language Research 52. 283–310.Search in Google Scholar

Leonetti, Manuel. 2013. Information structure and the distribution of Spanish bare plurals. In Johannes Kabatek & Albert Wall (eds.), New perspectives on bare noun phrases in Romance and beyond, 121–156. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.141.05leoSearch in Google Scholar

LSC 2006 = Regione Autonoma della Sardegna. 2006. Limba sarda comuna: Norme linguistiche di riferimento a carattere sperimentale per la lingua scritta dell’Amministrazione regionale. http://www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_72_20060418160308.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia & Tuomas Huumo. 2014. Introduction. In Tuomas Huumo & Silvia Luraghi (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, 1–13. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346060Search in Google Scholar

Martí, Núria. 1995. De in Catalan elliptical nominals: A partitive case marker. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 243–265.Search in Google Scholar

Martí, Núria. 2010. The syntax of partitives. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, Eric. 2004. Split scrambling in Romance. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 107. 91–110.Search in Google Scholar

Mensching, Guido. 2005. Remarks on specificity and related categories in Sardinian. In Klaus von Heusinger, Georg Kaiser & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Nereus II: Specificity and the evolution/emergence of nominal determination systems in Romance. Proceedings of the International Workshop at the Freie Universität Berlin, October 8th–9th, 2004, 81–106. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich für Sprachwissenschaft. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-17181.Search in Google Scholar

Mensching, Guido. 2012. Old Romance word order: A comparative minimalist analysis. In Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds.), Parameter theory and linguistic change, 21–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Mensching, Guido. 2015. New insights on the question particle a in Sardinian. Isogloss, special issue on Italo-Romance morphosyntax. 7–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.22.Search in Google Scholar

Mensching, Guido. 2017. Morfosintassi: sincronia. In Eduardo Blasco Ferrer, Peter Koch & Daniela Marzo (eds.), Manuale di linguistica sarda, 376–396. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110274615-023Search in Google Scholar

Mensching, Guido. 2019. Extraction from DP in French: A minimalist approach. In Ludovico Franco, Mihaela Marchis Moreno & Matthew Reeve (eds.), Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains, 249–277. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2016. Sardinian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 270–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1972 [1899]. Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, vol. 3: Romanische Syntax. Hildesheim & New York: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Nagore Laín, Francho. 1989. Gramática de la lengua aragonesa. 5th edn Zaragoza: Mira Editores.Search in Google Scholar

Nicol, Fabrice. 2005. Romance clitic clusters: On diachronic changes and crosslinguistic contrasts. In Laurie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Clitic and affix combinations, 199–235. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.74.07nicSearch in Google Scholar

Oliviéri, Michèle & Patrick Sauzet. 2016. Southern Gallo-Romance (Occitan). In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 319–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0019Search in Google Scholar

Pescarini, Diego. 2016. Clitic pronominal systems: Morphophonology. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 742–757. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0045Search in Google Scholar

Purroy, Arnal & María Luisa. 1998. El habla de la Baja Ribagorza Occidental. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Marc. 2012. Probing the past: On reconciling long-distance agreement with the phase impenetrability condition. In Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss & Gereon Müller (eds.), Local modelling of non-local dependencies in syntax, 135–154. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110294774.135Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht & Boston: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Saura Rami, José Antonio. 2003. Elementos de fonética y morfosintaxis benasquesas. Zaragoza: Gara d’Edizions & Institución Fernando el Católico.Search in Google Scholar

Sauzet, Patrick . 2014. Partitives, number marking and negation in Occitan. Paper presented at the international exploratory workshop Partitivity in Romance and beyond, Zürich, 11–13 December, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Tovena, Lucia & Giuliana Giusti. 2013. Back to the issue of dei in Italian. Paper presented at the Journées LSALAA, Calcul de la référence nominale/ Langues sans article – Langues avec article, Université Paris 8, 28–29 March, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Max Leopold. 2001 [1950]. La lingua sarda: Storia, spirito e forma. 3rd edn. Tübingen & Basel: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Zamparelli, Roberto. 2000. Layers in the determiner phrase. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-05-20
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2020-0087/html
Scroll to top button