Positive polarity indefinites? On how (not) to identify them: An exhaustification-based perspective

References

Aloni, Maria & Angelika Port. 2015. Epistemic indefinites and methods of identifications. In Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic indefinites, 117–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2010. Modal indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 18. 1–31.10.1007/s11050-009-9048-4Search in Google Scholar

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2015. Epistemic indefinites: An overview. In Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic indefinites, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Baker, C. Lee. 1970. Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 169–186.10.1080/08351816909389104Search in Google Scholar

Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14. 1–56.10.1007/s11050-005-4532-ySearch in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh. 1999. Covert modality in non-finite contexts. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector. 2012. Scalar implicatures as a grammatical phenomenon. In Claudia Maienborn, Paul Portner & Klaus Von Heusinger (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2297–2332. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Corblin, Francis. 2004. ‘Quelque’, In Francis Corblin & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French Semantics, 99–107. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Dayal, Veneeta. 1997. Free relatives and ever: Identity and free choice readings. In Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings of SALT VII, 99–116. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v7i0.2787Search in Google Scholar

Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2009. Polarity items and dependent indefinites in Romanian. University of Nantes dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2013. Broaden your views, but try to stay focused: A missing piece in the polarity system. In Ivano Caponigro & Carlo Cecchetto (eds.), From grammar to meaning: The spontaneous logicality of language, 81–107. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139519328.007Search in Google Scholar

Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2015. Romanian epistemic indefinites. In Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic indefinites, 60–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665297.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Fălăuș, Anamaria. 2014. (Partially) Free choice of alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 37. 121–173.10.1007/s10988-014-9146-8Search in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donka. 2002. Extreme non-specificity in Romanian. In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank A. C. Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000, 127–153. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.232.09farSearch in Google Scholar

Farkas, Donka & Adrian Brașoveanu. 2013. A typology of specificity. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LVIII (4). 355–369.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6. 353–375.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, 71–120. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230210752_4Search in Google Scholar

Gajewski, Jon. 2002. L-analiticity and natural language. Ms., University of Connecticut.Search in Google Scholar

Gajewski, Jon. 2011. Licensing strong NPIs. Natural Language Semantics 19. 109–148.10.1007/s11050-010-9067-1Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24. 659–735.10.1023/A:1012758115458Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer. 2013. Exhaustive and non-exhaustive variation with free choice and referential vagueness: Evidence from Greek, Catalan, and Spanish. Lingua 126. 120–149.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Homer, Vincent. 2011. Polarity and modality. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Lawrence R. 1978. Some aspects of negation. In Joseph Greenberg, Charles Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol IV: Syntax, 127–210. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra. 2013. Negation, polarity and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 529–568.10.1162/LING_a_00138Search in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael. 2011. The grammar of polarity – pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975288Search in Google Scholar

Jayez, Jacques & Lucia Tovena. 2006. Epistemic determiners. Journal of Semantics 23(3). 217–250.10.1093/jos/ffl002Search in Google Scholar

Jayez, Jacques & Lucia Tovena. 2007. Evidentiality and determination. In Atle Grønn (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, 271–286. Oslo: Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, University of Oslo.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Host.Search in Google Scholar

Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman. 1993. ‘Any’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 353–422.10.1007/BF00985272Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25. 209–257.Search in Google Scholar

Ladusaw, William. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lahiri, Utpal. 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics 6. 57–123.10.1023/A:1008211808250Search in Google Scholar

Mayr, Clemens. 2013. Consequences of an alternative semantics for the analysis of intervention effects. In Anamaria Fălăuş (ed.), Alternatives in semantics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition), 123–149. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137317247_5Search in Google Scholar

Nicolae, Andreea. 2012a. Negation-resistant polarity items. In Christopher Piñón (ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 9, 225–242. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss9/ (accessed 20 February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Nicolae, Andreea. 2012b. Positive polarity items: An alternative-based account. In Ana Aguilar Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16(2), 475–488. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. http://mitwpl.mit.edu/catalog/sube01/ (accessed 20 February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Nicolae, Andreea. 2017. Deriving the positive polarity behavior of plain disjunction. Semantics and Pragmatics 10(5). 1–21.10.3765/sp.10.5Search in Google Scholar

Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2004. Negative polarity items in Russian and the “Bagel Problem”. In Adam Przepiorkowski & Sue Brown (eds.), Negation in Slavic, 153–178. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, Liliana. 1994. Negative and positive polarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554308Search in Google Scholar

Quer, Josep. 1998. Mood at the interfaces. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sauerland, Uli. 2004. Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 367–391.10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.dbSearch in Google Scholar

Săvescu–Ciucivara, Oana. 2007. Oarecare indefinites are not just any indefinites. In Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei Avram, Larisa Avram & Daniela Isac (eds.), Pitar Moș: A building with a view: Papers in honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, 205–225. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.Search in Google Scholar

Spector, Benjamin. 2014. Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(11). 1–61.10.3765/sp.7.11Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2004. Positive polarity – Negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(2). 409–452.10.1023/B:NALA.0000015791.00288.43Search in Google Scholar

van der Wouden, Ton. 1997. Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

van Rooij, Robert & Katrin Schulz. 2006. Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(2). 205–250.10.1007/s10988-005-3760-4Search in Google Scholar

Zamparelli, Roberto. 2007. On singular existential quantifiers in Italian. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax, 293–328. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_11Search in Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2013. Universal quantifier PPIs. In Maria Aloni, Michael Franke & Floris Roelofsen (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 273–280. http://events.illc.uva.nl/AC/AC2013/ (accessed 20 February 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Zwarts, Frans. 1998. Three types of polarity. In Fritz Hamm & Erhard Hinrichs (eds.), Plural quantification, 177–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-2706-8_5Search in Google Scholar