Home Interfaces between linguistic systems: Evidence from Child Language
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Interfaces between linguistic systems: Evidence from Child Language

  • Lyle Lustigman EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 25, 2016

Abstract

Interfaces between grammatical domains have been considered from various perspectives in child language research and in general linguistics. The study aims to provide evidence for interfaces in acquisition of early clause-structure, based on longitudinal data from three Hebrew-acquiring toddlers. Two facets of their early speech output were examined: Usage productivity in verb-inflection, identified by a criterion of contextual appropriateness; and structural transparency/opacity of children’s speech output, with transparent forms being unambiguous in relation to their grammatical targets. These factors yielded two distinct developmental periods for the three children: I – from the onset of verb usage to productive verb inflection, and II – from productive verb inflection to disappearance of structural opacity. Period II displays a puzzling mixture of both transparent and opaque usages, not only in verb inflection, but also in use of prepositions marking objects and adverbs. These puzzles are resolved by the significant correlations that emerged between apparently unrelated linguistic systems: (1) opaque verb-forms occur mainly together with object/adverbs, and (2) transparent prepositions occur mainly in combination with transparent verbs. These unexpected convergences between different linguistic systems are discussed as underlining the role of structural transparency/opacity and as shedding new light on between-domain interfaces in language acquisition.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and feedback, and Gal Belsitzman for testing coding reliability.

References

Adam, Galit & Outi Bat-El. 2008. Morphological knowledge without morphological structure. In Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan D. Rothstein (eds.), Current Issues in generative Hebrew linguistics, 197–222. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.134.08morSearch in Google Scholar

Allen, Shanley E. M. 2000. A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics 38(3). 483–521.10.1515/ling.38.3.483Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791314Search in Google Scholar

Armon-Lotem, Sharon & Ruth A. Berman. 2003. The emergence of grammar: Early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language 30(4). 845–878.10.1017/S0305000903005750Search in Google Scholar

Bassano, Dominique. 2000. Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27(3). 521–559.10.1017/S0305000900004396Search in Google Scholar

Bat-El, Outi. 1994. Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 571–593.10.1007/BF00992928Search in Google Scholar

Behrens, Heike. 2006. The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(1/2/3). 2–24.10.1080/01690960400001721Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. 1978. Early verbs: How and why a child uses her first words. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 5. 21–29.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. 1993. Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Yonata Levy (ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of acquisition, 189–241. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth A. 2009. Beyond the sentence: Language development in narrative contexts. In Edith Bavin (ed.), Handbook of child language, 354–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, Lois. 1970. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, Lois. 1991. Language development from two to three. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa. 1985. Beyond communicative adequacy: From piecemeal knowledge to an integrated system in the child’s acquisition of language. In Keith E. Nelson (ed.), Children’s language, 369–398. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa. 1990. Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics 28(6). 1253–1289.10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1253Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope. 2008. Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 167–189. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674732469Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L.& Dan I. Slobin. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58(2). 265–289.10.1353/lan.1982.0021Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 39–103. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937Search in Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine, Meghan Patrolia, Jae Yung Song & Matthew Masapollo. 2012. The development of articles in children’s early Spanish: Prosodic interactions between lexical and grammatical form. First Language 32(1/2). 17–37.10.1177/0142723710396796Search in Google Scholar

Demuth, Katherine & Annie Tremblay. 2008. Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language 35(1). 99–127.10.1017/S0305000907008276Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2004. The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486531Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Annemarie Karpf. 1995. The theoretical relevance of pre- and proto-morphology in language acquisition. Yearbook of Morphology. 99–122.10.1007/978-94-017-3714-2_4Search in Google Scholar

Dromi, Esther & Ruth A. Berman. 1982. A morphemic measure of early language development. Journal of Child Language 9(2). 403–424.10.1017/S0305000900004785Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 35). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Danny & Martin Hackl. 2006. The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29. 537–586.10.1007/s10988-006-9004-4Search in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Virginia C. Mueller, Eugenia Sebastián & Pilar Soto. 1999. The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge?. International Journal of Bilingualism 3, 133–182.10.1177/13670069990030020401Search in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Virginia C. Mueller, Eugenia Sebastián & Pilar Soto. 2002. The emergence of linguistic person in Spanish-speaking children. Language Learning. 52(4). 679–722.10.1111/1467-9922.00201Search in Google Scholar

Hadley, Pamela A. & Jannet K. Holt. 2006. Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49(5). 984–1000.10.1044/1092-4388(2006/071)Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs, Journal of Semantics 9(2),183–221.10.1093/jos/9.3.183Search in Google Scholar

Hyams, Nina. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4638-5Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, David. 1989. First language acquisition: Method, description, and explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & Wolfgang U. Dressler. (2000). Are fillers as precursors of morphemes relevant for morphological theory? A case story from the acquisition of French. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, Markus A. Pöchtrager & John R. Rennison (eds.), Morphological analysis in comparison, 89–112. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.201.06kilSearch in Google Scholar

Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & Wolfgang U. Dressler. (2002). The emergence of inflectional paradigms in two French corpora: An illustration of general problems of pre- and protomorphology. In Maria D. Voeikova & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds.), Pre- and protomorphology: Early phases of morphological development in nouns and verbs, 45–59. Munich, Germany: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena V. M. 2008. Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach. In Heike Behrens (ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: Finding structure in data, vol. 6 (Trends in language acquisition research [TILAR]), 60–98. Amsterdam & Philadelphia : John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.6.06lieSearch in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena V. M., Heike Behrens, Jennifer Speares & Michael Tomasello. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30(2). 333–370.10.1017/S0305000903005592Search in Google Scholar

Lustigman, Lyle. 2012. Non-finiteness in early Hebrew verbs. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (BAALL) 4. 213–231.10.1163/18776930-00400010Search in Google Scholar

Lustigman, Lyle. 2013. Developing structural specification: Productivity in early Hebrew verb usage. First Language 33(1). 47–67.10.1177/0142723711426828Search in Google Scholar

Lustigman, Lyle. in press. From opacity to transparency: Transitional categories in early Hebrew grammar. In Ruth A. Berman (ed.), Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence (Trends in Language Acquisition Research [TILAR]). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 1975. Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formation by Hungarian Children. Journal of Child Language 2(1). 65–77.10.1017/S0305000900000891Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2005. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, vol. 1: The format and programs, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Magri, Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. Natural Language Semantics 17(3). 245–297.10.1007/s11050-009-9042-xSearch in Google Scholar

Marchman, Virginia A. & Elizabeth Bates. 1994. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21(2). 339–366.10.1017/S0305000900009302Search in Google Scholar

Maslen, Robert J., Ana L. Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2004. A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 47(6). 1319–1333.10.1044/1092-4388(2004/099)Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1990. Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8. 209–282.10.1007/BF00208524Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), The prosody morphology interface, 218–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627729.008Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Ann M. & Lise Menn. 1993. False starts and filler-syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69(4). 742–777.10.2307/416885Search in Google Scholar

Pizzuto, Elena & Maria Cristina Caselli. 1994. The acquisition of Italian verb morphology in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Yonata Levy (ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of language acquisition, 137–187. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar, Ana Estrella, Jill Thorson & Maria del Mar Vanrell. 2012. Is prosodic development correlated with grammatical development? Evidence from emerging intonation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Child Language 39(2). 221–257.10.1017/S030500091100002XSearch in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 389–436.10.1162/0024389054396881Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Brian J. 1990. Language development and individual differences: A study of auxiliary verb learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519833Search in Google Scholar

Rispoli, Matthew, Pamela A. Hadley & Janet K. Holt. 2009. The growth of tense productivity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52(4). 930–944.10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0079)Search in Google Scholar

Rispoli, Matthew, Pamela A. Hadley & Jannet K. Holt. 2012. Sequence and system in the acquisition of tense and agreement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55(4). 1007–1021.10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0272)Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1993/1994. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3. 371–393.10.4324/9780203461785-19Search in Google Scholar

Rowland, Caroline F., Sarah L. Fletcher, & Daniel Freudenthal. 2008. How big is big enough? Assessing the reliability of data from naturalistic samples. In Heike Behrens (ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: Finding structure in data: vol. 6 (Trends in Language Acquisition Research [TILAR]), 1–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tilar.6.04rowSearch in Google Scholar

Roy, Deb, Rupal Patel, Philip DeCamp, Rony Kubat, Michael Fleischman, Brandon Roy, Nikolaos Mavridis, Stephanie Tellex, Alexia Salata, Jethran Guinness, Michael Levit & Peter Gorniak. 2006. The Human Speechome Project. http://www.media.mit.edu/cogmac/publications/cogsci06.pdf (accessed 24 December 2015)10.1007/11880172_15Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Charles A. Ferguson, & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Studies of child language development, 240–249. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2001. Form function relations: How do children find out what they are? In Melissa Bowerman & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 406–449. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620669.016Search in Google Scholar

Stoel-Gammon, Carol. 2011. Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language 38(1). 1–34.10.1017/S0305000910000425Search in Google Scholar

Thordardóttir, Elin. T., Susan Ellis Weismer & Julia Evans. 2002. Continuity in lexical and morphological development in Icelandic- and English-speaking 2-year-olds. First Language 22(1). 3–28.10.1177/014272370202206401Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael & Daniel Stahl. 2004. Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31(1). 101–12110.1017/S0305000903005944Search in Google Scholar

Veneziano, Edy & Hermine Sinclair. 2000. The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27(3). 461–500.10.1017/S030500090000427XSearch in Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn M., Marlys A. Macken, Ruth Miller, Hazel Simmons & Jim Miller. 1985. From babbling to speech: A re-assessment of the continuity issue. Language 61(2). 397–445.10.2307/414151Search in Google Scholar

Vihman, Marilyn M. & Maigi Vija. 2006. The acquisition of verbal inflection in Estonian. In Natalia Gagarina & Insa Gülzow (eds.), The acquisition of verbs and their grammar: The effect of particular languages, 269–295. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Wexler, Kenneth. 1993. Optional Infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations in child grammar. In David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement, 305–382. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wittek, Angelika & Michael Tomasello. 2005. German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: Local cues help locally. First Language. 25(1). 103–125.10.1177/0142723705049120Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-2-25
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2016-0002/html
Scroll to top button