Abstract
The fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard has emerged as one of the most frequently invoked and scrutinized protections in international investment law, offering a flexible yet controversial means of protecting foreign investors. Although it is often referred to as a “lawyers’ dream clause,” due to its expansive intepretative potential and the lack of precise legal language has led to inconsistent arbitral interpretations and an increasing number of investor claims. These challenges are particularly notable in the energy sector, where states’ sovereign right to regulate intersects with investors’ expectations of legal stability. This article critically examines the evolving contours of the fair and equitable treatment standard in energy-related investment disputes, identifying the factual and legal circumstances under which tribunals have found fair and equitable treatment violations. It asks whether the existing jurisprudence provides sufficient legal predictability and coherence, particularly in balancing investor protection with the host state’s sovereign right to regulate. This article provides a doctrinal and case-based analysis of the fair and equitable treatment standard, examining its normative evolution, treaty formulations, and interpretative patterns in arbitral practice.
References
Baltag, Crina, What’s New with the Energy Charter Treaty? (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 13 June 2015), available at: <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/06/13/whats-new-with-the-energy-charter-treaty/>, accessed April 30, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Bishop, R. Doak, James R. Crawford and W. Michael Reisman, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (2nd ed., The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Di Rosa, Paolo, The New 2012 U.S. Model BIT: Staying the Course (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, June 1, 2012), available at: <https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/06/01/the-new-2012-u-s-model-bit-staying-the-course>, accessed April 30, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Dyalá, Jiménez and others, The Arbitration Review of the Americas 2018 Costa Rica, Global Arbitration Review (February 8, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
European Parliamentary Research Service, EU Withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty, Briefing (PE 754.632, December, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Feighery J. Timothy, Lee M. Caplan, Maya S. Cohen, Derek Ha, More Countries Signal Intention to Withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty – Why Now? National Law Review (December 7, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, Kathryn and Joachim Pohl, Investment Treaties over Time: Treaty Practice and Interpretation in a Changing World OECD Working Papers on International Investment, no. 5 (2015).10.2139/ssrn.2555606Search in Google Scholar
Gray, R. Kevin, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/law/9780199684601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
G8 Hokkaido Toyako Summit Leaders’ Declaration on World Economy (July 8, 2008).Search in Google Scholar
ICSID, “How Long is too Long to Wait for an Award”, Global Arbitration Review (February 18, 2016), available at: <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/how-long-too-long-wait-award>, accessed April 3, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Investment Treaty News, Pakistan Terminates 23 BITs (IISD, October 7, 2021), available at: <https://www.iisd.org/itn/2021/10/07/pakistan-terminates-23-bits/>, accessed October 1, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Margie-Lys, Jaime, Relying Upon Parties’ Interpretation in Treaty-Based Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Filling the Gaps in International Investment Agreements, 46 Georgetown Journal of International Law, no. 1 (2015).Search in Google Scholar
James, Robert A. and John G. Mauel, “An Integrated Approach to International Energy Investment Protection,” 58th Annual Oil and Gas Law Conference, Institute for Energy Law, Center for American and International Law (LexisNexis Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., 2007).Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Lise, The 2012 US Model BIT and What the Changes (or Lack Thereof) Suggest about Future Investment Treaties, 8(2) Political Risk Insurance Newsletter (2012).Search in Google Scholar
Kantor, Mark, Little Has Changed in the New US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, 27 ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal, no. 2 (2012).10.1093/icsidreview/sis029Search in Google Scholar
Karl, Joachim, “FDI in the Energy Sector: Recent Trends and Policy Issues,” in Eric De Brabandere and Tarcisio Gazzini (eds.), Foreign Investment in the Energy Sector: Balancing Private and Public Interests (Leiden: Brill, 2014).10.1163/9789004244719_003Search in Google Scholar
Kapoor, K. Sanjeev, et al., Investment Treaty Arbitration: India, available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/investment-treaty-arbitration/report/india, accessed October 1, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Kempken, Daniel, International Arbitration, Rule of Law and Human Rights: A Litmus Test in the Case of the ZEDEs in Honduras (Due Process of Law Foundation, February 19, 2025), available at: <https://dplf.org/en/2025/02/19/international-arbitration-rule-of-law-and-human-rights-a-litmus-test-in-the-case-of-the-zedes-in-honduras/>, accessed September 13, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Bohuslav, How to Avoid Conflicting Awards: The Lauder and CME Cases, 5 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2004).10.1163/221190004X00164Search in Google Scholar
Leathley, Christian and Daniela Paez, Ecuador’s Legislative Branch Approves Termination of 12 Bilateral Investment Treaties, available at: <https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/arbitration/2017-05/ecuadors-legislative-branch-approves-termination-of-12-bilateral-investment-treaties>, accessed September 20, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Levashova, Yulia, “Fair and Equitable Treatment and the Protection of the Environment: Recent Trends in Investment Treaties and Investment Cases,” in Yulia Levashova, Tineke Lambooy and Ingrid Dekker (eds.), Bridging the Gap Between International Investment Law and the Environment (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Lopez, Claudia Maria Arietti, All Claims by Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands Against Spain are Dismissed (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 26 September 2017), available at: <https://www.iisd.org/itn/2017/09/26/all-claims-by-isolux-infrastructure-netherlands-against-spain-are-dismissed-isolux-infrastructure-netherlands-v-spain-scc-case-v2013-153-claudia-maria-arietti-lopez/>, accessed October 1, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, A. Timothy, Dispute Resolution in the International Energy Sector: An Overview, 4 Journal of World Energy Law and Business, no. 4 (2011).10.1093/jwelb/jwr020Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Gary, Whether Expropriation Without Compensation Would Violate South Africa’s Treaty or International Law Obligations (Rule of Law Project, May 21, 2018), available at: <https://ruleoflaw.org.za/2018/05/21/whether-expropriation-without-compensation-would-violate-sas-treaty-or-international-law-obligations/>, accessed September 13, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Mouyal, Lone Wandahl, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate: A Human Rights Perspective (London: Routledge, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Naseem, Mohammad, International Energy Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew and LIuis Paradell, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Nolte, Georg, 2008 Recommendation: Treaties over Time, in Particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice, Annex A to the Report of the International Law Commission, A/63/10 (2008).Search in Google Scholar
OECD, Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law (OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2004/03).Search in Google Scholar
Osterwalder-Bernsaconi, Nathalie and Lise Johnson, International Investment Law and Sustainable Development: Key Cases from 2000–2010 (International Institute for Sustainable Development 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Pereira, Ricardo, “The Exploration and Exploitation of Energy Resources in International Law” in Karen E. Makuch and Ricardo Pereira (eds.), Environmental and Energy Law (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).Search in Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash, India’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: Rebalancing Investor Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Reinisch, August, “The Proliferation of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: The Threat of Fragmentation vs the Promise of a More Effective System? Some Reflections from the Perspective of Investment Arbitration” in Isabelle Buffard and others (eds.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, Triangular Treaties: The Extent and Limits of Investment Treaty Rights, 56 Harvard International Law Journal, no. 2 (2015).Search in Google Scholar
Sabater, Aníbal and Mark Stadnyk, “International Arbitration and Energy: How Energy Disputes Shaped International Investment Dispute Resolution,” in Kim Talus (ed.), Research Handbook on International Energy Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014).10.4337/9781781002209.00018Search in Google Scholar
Schaugg, Lukas, Why Coordinated Withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty Remains Essential for Effective Climaye Action (International Institute for Sustainable Development, June 30, 2025), available at: <https://www.iisd.org/articles/insight/coordinated-energy-charter-treaty-withdrawal-essential?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22208053183&gbraid=0AAAAADQ3eTCQpGdlvweVEo8d4LeyyQ1GG&gclid=Cj0KCQjw3aLHBhDTARIsAIRij5_8XAltLjXKqQoT-gN2s8NsAGU16-kK2VM88lpLBmfSKGyU_BrD3YsaAnK2EALw_wcB>, accessed September 10, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., “Selected Standards of Treatment Available Under the Energy Charter Treaty, Part I – Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Interactions with Other Standards” in Graham Coop (ed.), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty (Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing, 2008).Search in Google Scholar
Schefer, Krista Nadakavukaren, International Investment Law: Text, Cases and Materials (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).Search in Google Scholar
Shetty Nish et al., India’s Foreign Investment Strategy: Latest Developments (Clifford Chance Briefing, July 2025), at 1, available at: <https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2025/07/latest-developments-in-india-bit.pdf>, accessed October 1, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Sussman, Edna, A Multilateral Energy Sector Investment Treaty: Is it Time for a Call for Adoption by All Nations? 44 The International Lawyer, no. 3 (2010).Search in Google Scholar
Talus, Kim, “Introduction,” in Kim Talus (ed.), Research Handbook on International Energy Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014).10.4337/9781781002209.00007Search in Google Scholar
Tudor, Ioana, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235063.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), International Investment Agreements (IIA) Issues Note: Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Review of Developments (June 2016).Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Recent Trends in Investor-State Arbitration Cases, IIA Issues Note, International Investment Agreements (September 2, 2025).Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investment, Enterprise and Development Commission, Reform of The International Investment Agreement Regime: Phase 2 U.N. Doc. TD/B/C.II/MEM.4/14 (2017).Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Trade and Development, Investment Policy Hub, International Investment Agreements Navigator, available at: <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements>, accessed May 1, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Investment Report: Investment and the Digital Economy (UNCTAD/WIR/2017).Search in Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investment Policy Hub, Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator, <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/advanced-search>, accessed May 2, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Zeyl, Trevor, Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation in Investment Treaty Law, 49 Alberta Law Review, no. 1 (2011).10.29173/alr131Search in Google Scholar
Treaties
Agreement on Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (signed April 29, 1991, entered into force October 1, 1992).Search in Google Scholar
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (opened for signature March 18, 1965, entered into force October 14, 1966) 575 UNTS 159, 17 UST 1270 (“ICSID Convention”).Search in Google Scholar
Energy Charter Treaty (opened for signature December 17, 1994, entered into force April 16, 1998) 2080 UNTS 100, 34 ILM 360.Search in Google Scholar
Geneva Convention Relating to the Development of Hydraulic Power Affecting More Than One State (adopted December 9, 1923, entered into force August 24, 1925) 36 LNTS 76.Search in Google Scholar
Investment Cooperation and Facilitation Treaty Between the Federative Republic of Brazil and the Republic of India <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/5912/download>, accessed May 3, 2025.Search in Google Scholar
Treaty between the United States of America and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment (signed October 22, 1991, entered into force December 19, 1992).Search in Google Scholar
Treaty Establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (signed 1951, entered into force 1952) 261 UNTS 140.Search in Google Scholar
United States Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (“US Model BIT”) 2004 and 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Cases/Arbitral Awards
AES Corporation and Tau Power BV v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No ARB/10/16, Award (November 1, 2013).Search in Google Scholar
American Manufacturing & Trading Inc v. Democratic Republic of the Congo, ICSID Case No ARB/93/1, Final Award (February 21, 1997).Search in Google Scholar
Canepa Green Energy Opportunities I, Sàrl and Canepa Green Energy Opportunities II, Sàrl v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No ARB/19/4, Award (May 31, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Cervin Investissements SA and Rhone Investissements SA v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No ARB/13/2, Award (March 7, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Charanne BV and Construction Investments Sàrl v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No 062/2012, Award (January 21, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
CME Czech Republic B.V. v. Czech Republic, SCC, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Partial Award (September 13, 2001).Search in Google Scholar
CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8, Award (May 12, 2005).Search in Google Scholar
Duke Energy Electroquil Partners and Electroquil SA v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/04/19, Award (August 18, 2008).Search in Google Scholar
Eiser Infrastructure Ltd and Energia Solar Luxemburg SARL v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No ARB/13/36, Final Award (May 4, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Electrabel SA v. Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/07/19, Award (November 25, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Eiser Infrastructure Ltd and Energia Solar Luxemburg SARL v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No ARB/13/36, Final Award (May 4, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Flughafen Zürich AG and Gestión e Ingenería IDC SA v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/10/19, Award (November 18, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Impregilo SpA v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/07/17, Award (June 21, 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Interconexión Eléctrica SA ESP v. Republic of Chile, ICSID Case No ARB/21/27, Award (December 13, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Lauder v. Czech Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/99/2 Award (September 3, 2001).Search in Google Scholar
LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp. and LG&E International Inc. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/02/1, Decision on Liability (October 3, 2006).Search in Google Scholar
Murphy Exploration and Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador [II], PCA Case No 2012-16 (formerly AA 434), Partial Final Award (May 6, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Mr Franck Charles Arif v. Republic of Moldova, ICSID Case No ARB/11/23, Award (April 8, 2013).Search in Google Scholar
Noble Ventures Inc v. Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/01/11, Award (October 12, 2005).Search in Google Scholar
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Republic of Ecuador (I), LCIA Case No UN3467, Award (July 1, 2004).Search in Google Scholar
OI European Group BV v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/11/25, Award (March 10, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Ronald S Lauder v. Czech Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/99/2, Final Award (3 September 2001).Search in Google Scholar
Rusoro Mining Ltd v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/12/5, Award (August 22, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Saluka Investments BV v. Czech Republic, Partial Award (UNCITRAL, March 17, 2006).Search in Google Scholar
Sempra Energy International v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/02/16, Award (September 28, 2007).Search in Google Scholar
Sergei Paushok, CJSC Golden East Company and CJSC Vostokneftegaz Company v. Government of Mongolia, Award on Jurisdiction and Liability (April 28, 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/2, Award (May 29, 2003).Search in Google Scholar
Total SA v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/04/1, Individual Opinion of Henri Alvarez (December 27, 2010).Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston