Abstract
Corporate executive compensation in Canada, as in many developed economies, has risen significantly since the 1980s relative to that of the average worker. This has posed an issue for corporate governance due to concerns that the trend may not be serving the corporation and its stakeholders well, and also an issue for society as a whole due to its impact on income inequality more generally. This has raised interest in the role played by institutions in shaping executive pay decisions and also in what role they might play in resolving these issues. This paper looks at the role played by one such institution, the courts, with two ends in mind. The first is to gain an empirical understanding of what the courts actually do with respect to executive pay disputes. It does so by examining a set of decisions by Canadian courts between 1876 and 2018 collected by the author in which the claim of a corporate executive to their pay was at issue in order to get a better picture of how the courts are accessed, who relies on them, what rules they use, how the courts respond and how trends in these have evolved over time. It finds that the litigation of executive pay disputes has varied widely over time with a variety of stakeholders using a variety of legal areas – corporate law, contract law and bankruptcy/arrangement law in particular – to dispute the entitlement of executives to their pay. In recent years however litigation has come to be dominated by oppression remedy applications, with plaintiffs being successful in challenging pay in a majority of decisions. This paints a significantly different picture of the role of the courts than that developed in the American literature which focuses almost exclusively on shareholder use of derivative actions to monitor pay decisions. The second is to examine how better use might be made of the courts in order to remedy the broader problems for corporate stakeholders and society as a whole that corporate executive pay practice presents. It suggests that an expanded role for the oppression remedy by corporate employees should be considered as a policy option which would better reflect a stakeholder model of governance and address broader inequality concerns at the same time.
Funding source: Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences
Award Identifier / Grant number: 19K01367
Table of Cases (alphabetical)
| 1043325 Ontario Ltd. v. CSA Building Sciences Western Ltd., 2016 BCCA 258 |
| 1043325 Ontario Ltd. v. CSA Building Sciences Western Ltd., 2015 BCSC 1160 |
| 1043325 Ontario Ltd. v. Jeck, 2014 BCSC 1197 |
| 1646981 Ontario Ltd. v. Custom VacForm Components Inc. [2008] O.J. No. 1980 |
| 969625 Ontario Ltd. v. Goldstone Resources Inc. [2017] O.J. No. 519 |
| Allish v. Allied Engineering of B.C. Ltd. [1957] B.C.J. No. 137 |
| Arclin Canada Ltd. (Re) 2009 CanLII 55109 |
| Arton Lumber Co. (Liquidation of) (Re) [1960] B.C.J. No. 15 |
| Aurum, LLC v. Calais Resources Inc., 2016 BCSC 1173 |
| Bartlett v. Bartlett Mines Ltd. [1911] O.J. No. 84, 24 O.L.R. 419 |
| Beaudry v. Read [1907] O.J. No. 624 |
| Bell v. Canada Development Investment Corp. 1990 CanLII 8055 (ON SC) |
| Benor v. Canadian Mail Order Co. [1907] O.J. No. 694 |
| Benor v. Canadian Mail Order Co. [1907] O.J. No. 740 |
| Biltrite Rubber (1984) Inc. (Re) 2009 CanLII 12320 (ON SC) |
| Birney v. Toronto Milk Co. [1902] O.J. No. 2 |
| Bohna v. Toffoli and Bonnson School and Athletic Sportswear Co. Ltd. [1981] M.J. No. 364, 12 Man.R. (2d) 1 |
| Brainhunter Inc. (Re) 2009 CanLII 67659 (ON SC) |
| Brokx v. Tattoo Technology Inc. 2004 BCSC 1723 |
| Burland v. Earle [1901] J.C.J. No. 2 |
| Cameron v. Gallagher-Holman Ltd. [1924] 1 D.L.R. 242 |
| Canada (Minister of Railways and Canals) v. Quebec Southern Railway Co. 12 Ex.C.R. 11 |
| Canada Furniture Co. v. Banning [1917] M.J. No. 44 |
| Canadian Credit Men’s Trust Associaton Ltd. v. Reaume [1931] O.R. 398 |
| Cannaday v. McPherson, 25 BLR (2d) 75 |
| Cannaday v. Sun Peaks Resort Corporation 44 BCLR (3d) 195; 102 BCAC 241; 166 WAC 241 |
| Canwest Global Communications Corp. (Re) 2009 CanLII 55114 |
| Cardiff v. Fincentric Corporation 2005 BCSC 173 |
| Carlson Family Trust v. MPL Communications Inc. 2009 ABQB 77 |
| Catalyst Fund General Partner I Inc. v. Hollinger Inc. 48 BLR (3d) 194; [2004] OJ No 3886 (QL) |
| Catalyst Fund General Partner Inc. v. Hollinger Inc. 20 BLR (4th) 249; [2006] OJ No 2818 (QL) |
| Cinram International Inc. (Re) 2012 ONSC 3767 |
| City Safe Deposit and Agency Co. v. Central Railway Co. of Canada 20 Ex.C.R. 346, 57 D.L.R. 145 |
| Clappa v. McPherson et al. 2005 BCSC 1177 |
| Clifton v. Ground Engineering Ltd. [1982] S.J. No. 715, 19 Sask.R. 181, Q.B. No. 1921 A.D. 1981 J.C.R. |
| Cook v. Hinds [1918] O.J. No. 89 |
| Craig Wireless International Inc. v. Look Communications Inc. 2007 CanLII 1331 (ON SC) |
| Crawford v. Bathurst Land and Development Co. [1916] O.J. No. 166, 37 O.L.R. 611 |
| Cytrynbaum et al. v. Look et al. 2012 ONSC 4578 |
| Cytrynbaum v. Look Communications Inc. 2013 ONCA 455 |
| D’Amore v. McDonald et al. [1973] O.J. No. 1860, [1973] 1 O.R. 845, 32 D.L.R. (3d) 543 |
| Danier Leather Inc. (Re) 2016 ONSC 1044 |
| Dixon v. Merland Explorations Ltd. [1984] A.J. No. 816 |
| Dock Marlin’s Pub Ltd. v. Edwards [1998] B.C.J. No. 2942 |
| Dufour v. Dufour-Wilson Motors Limited et al.[1949] S.J. No. 30, [1949] 2 W.W.R. 593 |
| Durost v. Home-Mixed Fertilizers Ltd.[1924] N.B.J. No. 5, [1924] 4 D.L.R. 241 |
| Fisher et al. v. St. John Opera House Co. et al. [1937] 4 D.L.R. 337 |
| Fremont Canning Company et al. v. Wall et al.[1941] O.R. 379 |
| Fullerton v. Crawford 59 S.C.R. 314 |
| Gardner v. Canadian Manufacturer Publishing Co. [1900] O.J. No. 196 |
| Garner v. Devon Canada Corporation 2006 ABQB 6 |
| Geikie v. Westar Mining Ltd. [1987] B.C.J. No. 1117 |
| Grant Forest Products Inc. (Re) 57 CBR (5th) 128 |
| Gray & Farr Ltd. v. Carlile [1932] 1 D.L.R. 391 |
| Halbrick, Johnson and Johnson v. Sutherland, Garfield and Waldman, [1981] M.J. No. 436, 14 Man.R. (2d) 418, 13 A.C.W.S. (2d) 87 |
| Hannan v. Methanex Corporation [1998] 7 WWR 619; 46 BCLR (3d) 230; 37 CCEL (2d) 228; [1998] BCJ No 318 (QL) |
| Hannan v. Methanex Corporation 26 CCEL (2d) 103 |
| Hill v. Develcon Electronics Ltd. (no. 1) 1991 CanLII 7744 (SK QB) |
| Hollinger Canadian Publishing Holdings Co. v. Mostad Publications Ltd. 36 BLR (4th) 276 |
| Hood v. Caldwell [1923] S.C.R. 488 |
| Houston v. Victoria Machinery Depot Co. [1924] B.C.J. No. 105 |
| Huggard v. Prudential Life Insurance Company [1923] M.J. No. 8 |
| Hunter v. Ingarfield [2010] A.J. No. 105, 2010 ABQB 74, 21 Alta. L.R. (5th) 281, 192 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1170 |
| In re The Ontario Express and Transportation Company [1894] O.J. No. 179; 25 O.R. 587 |
| Jover v. Creditloans Canada Financing Inc. 2017 BCSC 2341 |
| Kenny v. Weatherhaven Global Resources 2017 BCSC 1335 |
| König v. Hobza 326 OAC 213, 2014 ONCA 691 |
| König v. Hobza, 2013 ONSC 1060 |
| Lakeshore Palace Motel Ltd. v. Sandor [1961] O.J. No. 237 |
| Lawson v. Dominion Securities Corp. [1977] O.J. No. 1609, [1977] 2 A.C.W.S. 259 |
| Look Communications v. McGoey 2017 ONSC 2165 |
| Loveridge Holdings Ltd. v. King-Pin Ltd. [1992] O.J. No. 47, 5 B.L.R. (2d) 195, 31 A.C.W.S. (3d) 77 |
| Low v. Ascot Jockey Club Ltd. 1986 CanLII 999 (BC SC) |
| Ludlow v. McMillan 1995 CanLII 1521 |
| Luebke v. Manluk Industries Inc 2013 ABQB 264 |
| Lumbers v. Fretz [1928] O.J. No. 84 |
| Mackenzie v. Maple Mountain Mining Co. [1910] O.J. No. 192, 20 O.L.R. 615 |
| Marks v. Rocsand Co. [1920] O.J. No. 39, 48 O.L.R. 224, 55 D.L.R. 557 |
| Marks v. Rocsand Co. [1921] O.J. No. 119, 49 O.L.R. 137, 64 D.L.R. 254 |
| Matthew Guy Carriage and Automobile Co. (Re) [1912] O.J. No. 136 |
| McGuire v. Wardair Canada Ltd. and Ward [1969] A.J. No. 63, 71 W.W.R. 705 |
| McIntosh v. Premier Langmuir Mines Ltd. 66 D.L.R. 278 (1921) |
| McRoberts v. Whissell 2006 ABCA 388 |
| McRoberts v. Whissell 2005 ABQB 30 |
| Michie v. Erie and Huron Railway Co. [1876] O.J. No. 223 |
| Mid-West Collieries Ltd. V. McEwen 63 Can S.C.R. 482 |
| Mimico Sewer Pipe and Brick Manufacturing Co. (Re) [1895] O.J. No. 108 |
| Morlock and Cline Ltd. (Re) [1911] O.J. No. 115 |
| Munro v. Crispin Energy Inc. 2001 ABQB 279 |
| National Health Assn. (Liquidator of) v. National Health Assn. [1948] B.C.J. No. 23, [1948] 2 W.W.R. 329 |
| Neri v. Finch Hardware (1976) Ltd. [1995] O.J. No. 1932 |
| Nolan v. Parsons et al. [1942] O.J. No. 445 |
| Nortel Networks Corporation (Re) 2009 CanLII 10679 (ON SC) |
| Northern Trust Co. v. Butchart [1917] M.J. No. 37 |
| PCAS Patient Care Automation Services Inc. (Re) 2012 ONSC 2423 |
| Peso Silver Mines Ltd. v. Cropper [1965] B.C.J. No. 179, 56 D.L.R. (2d) 117 |
| Pitts v. Okanagan Helicopters Ltd. [1983] B.C.J. No. 639 |
| Premier Trust Company v. McAlister [1933] O.R. 195 |
| Prime Computer of Canada Ltd. v. Jeffrey 6 O.R. (3d) 733, [1991] O.J. No. 2317 |
| Publishers’ Syndicate (Re) [1903] O.J. No. 88, 5 O.L.R. 392, 2 C.L.R. 133 |
| Radford v. MacMillan 2017 BCSC 1168 |
| Radtke v. Machel [2000] O.J. No. 3019, [2000] O.T.C. 632 |
| Re Abraham and Inter Wide Investments Ltd. et al. [1985] O.J. No. 2595 |
| Re Bolt and Iron Company Livingstone’s Case [1887] O.J. No. 153 |
| Re Crystallex International Corporation 2012 ONSC 2125 |
| Re D.J.’s Family Centre Ltd. (1977), 14 O.R. (2d) 615 |
| Re Eric Petersen Construction Ltd. (in Bankruptcy) [1967] B.C.J. No. 103, 60 W.W.R. 103 |
| Re Essar Steel Algoma Inc. et al. 2015 ONSC 7656 |
| Re Queen City plate Glass Co. Eastmure’s Case [1910] O.J. No. 235, 16 O.W.R. 336 |
| Re Unique Brand Systems, Inc. 2014 ONCA 538 |
| Re Unique Brand Systems, Inc. 2013 ONSC 2953 |
| Rooney v. Cree Lake Resources Corp. [1998] O.J. No. 3077, 70 O.T.C. 241 |
| Roray v. Howe Sound Mills and Logging Co. [1915] B.C.J. No. 55, 22 D.L.R. 855, 31 W.L.R. 409 |
| Rowland v. Sakmar [1960] O.J. No. 36 |
| Runnalls v. Regent Holdings Ltd. [2009] 1 WWR 490; 87 BCLR (4th) 322; 49 BLR (4th) 278 |
| Runnalls v. Regent Holdings Ltd. 2010 BCSC 1106, 72 BLR (4th) 297 |
| Rupcich v. Mravcak 2013 SKQB 77, 415 Sask R 85 |
| Schitthelm v. Kelemen 2017 ABQB 546 (CanLII) |
| Sheisel v. Kirsch [1931] O.R. 41 |
| SkyLink Aviation Inc. (Re) 2013 ONSC 1500 |
| Southern Pacific Resources Corp. v. Gulka 2012 ABQB 676 |
| Target Canada Co. (Re) 2015 ONSC 303 |
| Textron Financial Canada Limited v. Beta Limited 36 CBR (5th) 296 |
| Thom v. Goodhost Foods Ltd. [1987] O.J. No. 560, 17 C.C.E.L. 89, 5 A.C.W.S. (3d) 24 |
| Thorpe v. Tisdale [1909] O.J. No. 740, 13 O.W.R. 1044 |
| Timminco Limited (Re) 2012 ONSC 506 |
| Turner v. Canadian Admiral Corp. [1980] O.J. No. 3002, 1 C.C.E.L. 130, 3 A.C.W.S. (2d) 162 |
| Unique Broadband Systems, Inc. (Re) 2013 ONSC 5121 |
| UPM-Kymmene Corp. v. UPM-Kymmene Miramichi Inc., 2002 Canlii 49507 |
| Urton v. SRI Homes Inc., 2007 BCCA 372 |
| Van Hummell v. International Guarantee Company [1913] M.J. No. 7 |
| Victorian Order of Nurses for Canada (Re) 2015 ONSC 7371 |
| Waddell v. Ontario Canning Co. [1889] O.J. No. 63 |
| Walter Energy Canada Holdings, Inc. (Re) 2016 BCSC 107 |
| Warehouse Drug Store Ltd., Re 24 CBR (5th) 275 |
| Warren v. Superior Engravers Ltd. [1940] O.J. No. 217 |
| Weedon v. Sherritt Inc. 2002 ABQB 217 (CanLII) |
| Wigen v. Wynndel Logging Co. Ltd., 2018 BCSC 881 |
| Wilson v. Wollatt [1928] 4 D.L.R. 403 |
| Winkler v. High-Test Electrical Manufacturing Ltd. [1964] O.J. No. 849, [1965] 1 O.R. 386, 48 D.L.R. (2d) 136 |
| Wonsch (Litigation Guardian of) v. Wonsch 76 O.R. (3d) 198, [2005] O.J. No. 3187 |
| Wright v. Donald S. Montgomery Holdings Ltd., 39 BLR (2d) 266 |
| Wright v. Rider Resources Ltd. [1994] A.J. No. 533, 21 Alta. L.R. (3d) 149, 159 A.R. 321 |
References
1043325 Ontario Ltd . v. Jeck, [2014] BCSC 1197.Search in Google Scholar
25 & 26 Vict. c.89.Search in Google Scholar
48 O.R. (3d) 179; [2000] O.J. No. 1721.Search in Google Scholar
969625 Ontario Ltd . v. Goldstone Resources Inc., [2017] O.J. No. 519.Search in Google Scholar
Allaire, Yvan, Executive Compensation: Cutting the Gordian Knot, Institute for Governance of Private and Public Organizations Policy Paper No. 9 (2017).Search in Google Scholar
BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, [2008] SCC 69.Search in Google Scholar
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act , R.S.C.1985, c. B-3.Search in Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucien, and Jesse Fried, Pay Without Performance: The Unfilled Promise of Executive Compensation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004).Search in Google Scholar
Ben-Ishai, Stephanie, and Poonam Puri, The Canadian Oppression Remedy Judicially Considered:1995-2001, 30 Queens Law Journal (2004).10.1093/alrr/2001.1.xvSearch in Google Scholar
Birney v. The Toronto Milk Co., Ltd [1902] O.J. No. 2.Search in Google Scholar
Business Corporations Act of 1982 , R.S.O. [1982], c. 4.Search in Google Scholar
Canada Business Corporations Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44.Search in Google Scholar
Cardiff v. Fincentric Corporation, [2005] BCSC 173.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Zhigong, Yuan, Hang, and K.C. Wei, Executive Pay Disparity and the Cost of Capital, 48 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 3 (2013).10.1017/S0022109013000306Search in Google Scholar
Clappa v. McPherson et al ., [2005] BCSC 1177.Search in Google Scholar
Cobb, Adam, How Firms Shape Income Inequality: Stakeholder Power, Executive Decision Making and the Structuring of Employment Relationships, 41 Academy of Management Review, no. 2 (2016).10.5465/amr.2013.0451Search in Google Scholar
Cuñat, Vincente, and Maria Guadalupe, Executive Compensation and Product Market Competition, LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19985 (2004).Search in Google Scholar
D’Amore v. McDonald et al.. [1973] O.J. No. 1860, [1973] 1 O.R. 845, 32 D.L.R. (3d) 543.Search in Google Scholar
Daniels, R.J., Should Provinces Compete? The Case for a Competitive Corporate Law Market, 36 McGill Law Journal (1991).Search in Google Scholar
Dickerson, Robert W., John L. Howard, and Leon Getz, Proposals for a New Business Corporations Law for Canada Volume 1: Commentary (Ottawa: Information Canada, 1971).Search in Google Scholar
Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd. v. Ontario, 54 O.R. (3d) 161; [2001] O.J. No. 1879.Search in Google Scholar
Edmans, Alex, and Xavier Gaibax, Is CEO Pay Really Inefficient? A Survey of New Optimal Contracting Theories, 15 European Financial Management, no. 3 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036x.2009.00500.x.Search in Google Scholar
Fairfax, Lisa M., Sue on Pay: Say on Pay’s Impact on Director’s Fiduciary Duties, 55 Arizona Law Review, no. 1 (2013).Search in Google Scholar
Frenette, Mark, David A. Green, and Kevin Milligan, The Tale of the Tails: Canadian Income Inequality in the 1980s and 1990s, 40 The Canadian Journal of Economics (2007).10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00429.xSearch in Google Scholar
Frenette, Mark, David A. Green, and Kevin Milligan, Taxes, Transfers and Canadian Income Inequality, 35 Canadian Public Policy (2009). https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.35.4.389.Search in Google Scholar
Gevurtz, Franklin A., Disney in a Comparative Light, 55 American Journal of Comparative Law (2007).10.2139/ssrn.965596Search in Google Scholar
Hannan, v. Methanex Corporation, 26 CCEL (2d) 103.Search in Google Scholar
Institutional Shareholder Services, Canada Proxy Voting Guidelines for TSX-Listed Companies Benchmark Policy Recommendations, available at: https://www.issgovernance.com/file/policy/active/americas/Canada-TSX-Voting-Guidelines.pdf, accessed September 16, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 Journal of Financial Economics, no. 4 (1976).10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XSearch in Google Scholar
Joyer v. Creditloans Canada Financing Inc., [2017] BCSC 2341.Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, William, and Bruce Elwood, Derivative Action: A Shareholder’s Bleak House, 36 University of British Columbia Law Review (2003).Search in Google Scholar
Khimji, Mohamed F., and Jon Viner, Oppression – Reducing Canadian Corporate Law to a Muddy Default, 47 Ottawa Law Review, no. 1 (2016).Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Jerry W., Bruce Kogut, and Jae-Suk Yang, Executive Compensation, Fat Cats and Best Athletes, 80 American Sociological Review (2015).10.1177/0003122415572463Search in Google Scholar
Konig v. Hobza , [2013] ONSC 1060.Search in Google Scholar
Korn Ferry Canada, Corporate Board Governance and Director Compensation in Canada: A Review of 2016 (January, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Kraakman, Reiner, Armour, John, Davies, Paul, Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry, Hertig, Gerard, Hopt, Klaus, Kanda, Hideki, and Rock, Edward, The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Lemieux, Thomas, and W. Craig Ridell, Top Incomes in Canada: Evidence from the Census, NBER Working Paper No. 21347 (2015).10.3386/w21347Search in Google Scholar
Look Communications v. McGoey , [2017] ONSC 2165.Search in Google Scholar
Luebke v. Manluk Industries Inc., [2013] ABQB 264.Search in Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Hugh, Staying Power: CEO Pay in Canada, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Report (January 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Hugh, Throwing Money at the Problem: 10 Years of Executive Compensation, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Report (January 2017).Search in Google Scholar
McDonnell, Brett H., Strategies for an Employee Role in Corporate Governance, 46 Wake Forest Law Review (2011).Search in Google Scholar
McGaughey, Ewan, Do Corporations Increase Inequality? Transnational Law Institute Think Paper 32/2016 (2016).10.2139/ssrn.2697188Search in Google Scholar
Northern Trust Co. v. Butchart , [1917] M.J. No. 37.Search in Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014).Search in Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., “Regulation (Agencies) versus Litigation (Courts)” in Daniel P. Kessler (ed.), Regulation vs. Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Re Bolt and Iron Company Livingstone’s Case [1887] O.J. No. 153.Search in Google Scholar
Re Matthew Guy Carriage and Automobile Co . [1912] O.J. No. 136.Search in Google Scholar
Re Queen City Plate Glass Co . Eastmure’s Case, [1910] O.J. No. 235, 16 O.W.R. 336.Search in Google Scholar
Radford v. MacMillan , [2017] BCSC 1168.Search in Google Scholar
Radtke v. Machel , [2000] O.J. No. 3019.Search in Google Scholar
Reinier et al., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A. 2d 173 (Del. 1986).Search in Google Scholar
Rooney, v. Cree Lake Resources Corp., [1998] O.J. No. 3077, 70 O.T.C. 241.Search in Google Scholar
Rouen, Ethan, Rethinking Measurement of Pay Disparity and its Relation to Firm Performance, 95 The Accounting Review, no. 1 (2020).10.2308/accr-52440Search in Google Scholar
Runnalls v. Regent Holdings Ltd., [2009] 1 WWR 490.Search in Google Scholar
Re Unique Brand Systems, Inc . 2014 ONCA 538.Search in Google Scholar
Salazar, Alberto R., and John Raggiunti, Why Does Executive Greed Prevail in the United States and Canada But Not Japan? The Pattern of Low CEO Pay and High Worker Welfare in Japanese Corporations, 64 American Journal of Comparative Law, no. 3 (2016).10.1093/ajcl/avw007Search in Google Scholar
Southern Pacific Resources Corp. v. Gulka, [2012] ABQB 676.Search in Google Scholar
The Company Creditors Arrangement Act , R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36.Search in Google Scholar
The Ontario Companies Act , R.S.O. 1897, c 191.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Randall S., and Kenneth J. Martin, Litigating Challenges to Executive Pay: An Exercise in Futility?, 79 Washington University Law Review, no. 2 (2001).10.2139/ssrn.268148Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Randall S., and Harwell Wells, Harwell, Executive Compensation in the Courts: Board Capture, Optimal Contracting and Officer’s Fiduciary Duties, 95 Minnesota Law Review (2011).Search in Google Scholar
Tingle, Bryan C., How Good are Our “Best Practices” When it Comes to Executive Compensation? A Review of Forty Years of Skyrocketing Pay, Regulation and the Forces of Good Governance, 80 Saskatchewan Law Review, (2017a).Search in Google Scholar
Tingle, Bryce C., Framed! The Failure of Traditional Agency Cost Explanations for Executive Pay Practices, 54 Alberta Law Review, no. 4 (2017b).10.29173/alr782Search in Google Scholar
Turner v. Canadian Admiral Corp ., [1980] O.J. No. 3002, 1 C.C.E.L. 130, 3 A.C.W.S. (2d) 162.Search in Google Scholar
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Adopts Rule for Pay Ratio Disclosure, Press Release (August 5, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
UPM-Kymmene v. UPM Miramichi, 2002 Canlii 49507.Search in Google Scholar
UPM-Kymmene Corp. v . UPM-Kymmene-Miramichi, Inc. 214 DLR (4th) 496, 27 BLR (3d) 53, 19 CCEL (3d) 203.Search in Google Scholar
J. Anthony Van Duzer, The Law of Partnerships & Corporations (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Veall, Michael R., Top Income Shares in Canada: Recent Trends and Policy Implications, 45 Canadian Journal of Economics, (2012).10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01744.xSearch in Google Scholar
Veall, Michael R., “Income Inequality has Risen in Canada, but not in a Straight Line”, Policy Options March 9, 2020, available at: https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/march-2020/income-inequality-has-risen-in-canada-but-not-in-a-straight-line/.Search in Google Scholar
Waddell v. Ontario Canning Co. [1889] O.J. No. 63.Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Robert E., Mission Impossible: A Legislative Solution for Executive Compensation, 45 Connecticut Law Review, no. 2 (2012).10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199829583.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Warehouse Drug Store Ltd., Re24 CBR (5th) 275.Search in Google Scholar
Weedon v. Sherrit , [2002] ABQB 217 (CanLII).Search in Google Scholar
Winkler v. High-Test Electrical Manufacturing Ltd ., [1964] O.J. No. 849, [1965] 1 O.R. 386, 48 D.L.R. (2d) 136.Search in Google Scholar
Wonsch (Litigation Guardian of) v. Wonsch, 76 O.R. (3d) 198.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Introduction: Law and Development in High-Income Countries
- Role of State, Law, Institutions for Economic Development
- Law and Development in the United States
- The Rule of Law and Its Social Reception as Determinants of Economic Development: A Comparative Analysis of Germany and Poland
- Are OECD Countries in a Rule of Law Recession?
- International Financial Centers as a Model: Facilitating Growth and Development by Connecting to International Legal Frameworks
- Migration, Poverty, the Role of State, (International) Law and Development in the Industrialised Countries of Europe
- Poverty and Inequality in High Income Countries and the Role of Law
- The Role of Law in Addressing Poverty and Inequality in High Income Countries: A Comparative View of Menstrual Hygiene Management and Its Impact on Education and Health in the UK and Select High Income Sub-Saharan African Countries
- International Cooperation Without Just Distributions? Beginning to Map the Role of Rising Economic Inequality in the Formation and Evolution of and Adherence to International Law
- Justice, Corruption, and Social Responsibility
- Toward Aligning with International Gender Goals? Analysis of the Gender Equality Landscape in Japan under the Laws on Women’s Economic and Political Participation and Leadership
- APUNCAC: An International Convention to Fight Corruption, Money Laundering, and Terrorist Financing
- “Unlocking Legal Gridlock in High-Income Countries: How Excessive Litigation Hampers Growth and Harms Democracy”
- International Trade Law, WTO, and Rising Issues
- Can a Complicated “Consensus” Survive a Dose of Populist Poison? Exploring the Potential Impact of Brexit and Trumpism on the Developed Country Approach to Trade Law and Policy
- Universities as Engines of Development
- The Courts and Corporate Executive Compensation in Canada
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Introduction: Law and Development in High-Income Countries
- Role of State, Law, Institutions for Economic Development
- Law and Development in the United States
- The Rule of Law and Its Social Reception as Determinants of Economic Development: A Comparative Analysis of Germany and Poland
- Are OECD Countries in a Rule of Law Recession?
- International Financial Centers as a Model: Facilitating Growth and Development by Connecting to International Legal Frameworks
- Migration, Poverty, the Role of State, (International) Law and Development in the Industrialised Countries of Europe
- Poverty and Inequality in High Income Countries and the Role of Law
- The Role of Law in Addressing Poverty and Inequality in High Income Countries: A Comparative View of Menstrual Hygiene Management and Its Impact on Education and Health in the UK and Select High Income Sub-Saharan African Countries
- International Cooperation Without Just Distributions? Beginning to Map the Role of Rising Economic Inequality in the Formation and Evolution of and Adherence to International Law
- Justice, Corruption, and Social Responsibility
- Toward Aligning with International Gender Goals? Analysis of the Gender Equality Landscape in Japan under the Laws on Women’s Economic and Political Participation and Leadership
- APUNCAC: An International Convention to Fight Corruption, Money Laundering, and Terrorist Financing
- “Unlocking Legal Gridlock in High-Income Countries: How Excessive Litigation Hampers Growth and Harms Democracy”
- International Trade Law, WTO, and Rising Issues
- Can a Complicated “Consensus” Survive a Dose of Populist Poison? Exploring the Potential Impact of Brexit and Trumpism on the Developed Country Approach to Trade Law and Policy
- Universities as Engines of Development
- The Courts and Corporate Executive Compensation in Canada