Home Rules versus Standards in Developing Countries: the Case for Clear and Precise Legal Norms on Eminent Domain Power
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rules versus Standards in Developing Countries: the Case for Clear and Precise Legal Norms on Eminent Domain Power

  • Hans-Bernd Schäfer EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2019

Abstract

We relate the rules versus standards debate to legal norms of taking law in developing countries and argue in favour of more precise legal norms regulating takings in low-income countries. Clear, specific and exact legal norms should be socially preferred whenever a regulatory law cuts into fundamental rights as this improves the possibilities of supreme courts to check the constitutionality of such norms. This holds equally for rich and poor countries. But in poor countries, precise norms have additional advantages over standards, whose adjudication requires highly qualified and loyal judges and administrators, is information intensive and increases procedural costs for the parties. We argue that in the course of economic development, courts and administrations should be granted more flexibility and rigid rules should gradually be replaced by more adjustable legal standards which are more flexible and can adjust better to the merits of a single case.

Acknowledgements

I thank Christian Bumke, Yun-Chien Chang, Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Michael Fehling. Ariel Porat, Uri Weiss, Ram Singh, participants of the law and economics colloquium at the faculty of law of Tel Aviv University, participants of the law and development workshop at Humboldt University and an unknown referee for valuable comments on an earlier draft. All remaining errors are mine.

References

Ajani, G., Formalism and Anti-Formalism under Socialist Law: The Case of General Clauses within the Codification of Civil Law, Global Jurist Advances (2002).10.2202/1535-1661.1074Search in Google Scholar

Alexy, R., A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).10.2202/1938-2545.1042Search in Google Scholar

Azuela, A and C. Herrera, Taking Land around the World: International Trends in the Expropriation for Urban and Infrastructure Projects, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Working Paper (2007).10.1007/978-1-4020-8862-9_13Search in Google Scholar

BeckOK Grundgesetz/Axer GG Art. 14 Rn. 107-116, beck-online.Search in Google Scholar

Bezemer, D.J. and D. Headey, Agriculture, Development and Urban Bias, 36 World Development, no. 8 (2008).10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Birch, N., “Comparative Compensation,” in W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford Scholarship Online, 2010).Search in Google Scholar

Black, B., et al. Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? (1999).10.2139/ssrn.181348Search in Google Scholar

Black, B. and R. Kraakman. “Corporate Law from the Scratch,” in R. Frydman et al, (ed.), Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia: Insiders and the State (CEU, 1996).10.7829/j.ctv280b7sq.11Search in Google Scholar

Black, B. and R. Kraakman, A Self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law, 109 Harvard Law Review, no. 8 (1996).10.2307/1342080Search in Google Scholar

Casey, A. and A. Niblett, The Death of Rules and Standards, Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics, no. 738 (2015).10.2139/ssrn.2693826Search in Google Scholar

Cernea, M.M. and C. McDowell, Risks and reconstruction: experiences of resettlers and refugees (Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2000), available at: <http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/947311468739277702/Risks-and-reconstruction-experiences-of-resettlers-and-refugees>.10.1596/0-8213-4444-7Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Y.-C., Private Property and Takings Compensation, Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis (Edward Elgar, 2013).10.4337/9780857935281Search in Google Scholar

Diver, C., The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules, 93 Yale Law Journal (1983).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198765295.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Ehrlich, I. and R. Posner, An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking, 3 Journal of the Learning Sciences (1974).10.1086/467515Search in Google Scholar

Faure, M. “Environmental Rules versus Standards in Developing Countries: Learning from Schäfer,” in T. Eger, et al. (eds.), Internationalization of the Law and Its Economic Analysis (Gabler, 2008).10.1007/978-3-8350-5582-7_54Search in Google Scholar

Fehling, M. and P. Overkamp, Beschleunigter Atomausstieg nach Fukushima – Besprechung von BVerfG, Urteil v. 6.12.2016–1 BvR 2821/11, 1 BvR 321/12, 1 BvR 1456/12, 4 Zeitschrift für das juristische Studium 2017, p. 486 (490 et seq.), available at: <http://www.zjs-online.com/index.php?sektion=2>.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, C.A. K. and S.K. Laury, Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects, 92 American Economic Review, no. 5 (2002).10.1257/000282802762024700Search in Google Scholar

Kaplow, L., Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke Law Journal (1992).10.2307/1372840Search in Google Scholar

Koselleck, R., Preußen zwischen Reform und Revolution. Allgemeines Landrecht, Verwaltung und soziale Bewegung von 1791 bis 1848 (Klett-Cotta, 1967).Search in Google Scholar

Limbach, J. (2009), Kritische Loyalität üben, Das Parlament, no. 20.Search in Google Scholar

Lipton, M, Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development (Cambridge, Harvard UP, 1977).Search in Google Scholar

Myrdal, G., Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Countries (London, Duckworth, 1957).Search in Google Scholar

Ott, C. and H.B. Schäfer, Negligence as Untaken Precaution, Limited Information, and Efficient Standard Formation in the Civil Liability System, 17 International Review of Law and Economics, no. 1 (1997).10.1016/S0144-8188(96)00065-8Search in Google Scholar

Plato, Laws, Book IX, available at: <http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/laws.9.ix.htm>.Search in Google Scholar

Reich, N., Sozialismus und Zivilrecht (Frankfurt, Athenäum, 1972).Search in Google Scholar

Review, International, Center for International Law, Newsletter, 14 New York Law School, no. 2 (2012), 7–19. Eminent Domain Laws around the World, Taking Property for the Public Good.Search in Google Scholar

Russian Federation: Agency Law for Russian Federation (2016), available at: <http://www.mondaq.com/russianfederation/x/519712/Contract+Law/Agency+Law+of+Russian+Federation+FAQs>.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, H.-B., Landwirtschaftliche Akkumulationslasten und industrielle Entwicklung (Springer, 1982).10.1007/978-3-642-68991-8Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, H.-B., Rules versus Standards in Rich and Poor Countries: Precise Legal Norms as Substitutes for Human Capital in Low-Income Countries, 14 Supreme Court Economic Review (2006).10.1086/scer.14.3655310Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, H.-B., “Taking Law from an Economic Perspective with Reference to German Law,” in I. Kim, H. Lee and I. Somin (eds.), Eminent Domain: A Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, H.-B. and R. Singh, Takings of Land by Self-Interested Governments, Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain Law, 61 The Journal of Law and Economics, no. 3 (2018).10.2139/ssrn.3026204Search in Google Scholar

Schlink, B., Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere but Here?, 22 Duke Journal of Comparative & Brazilian International Law (2012).Search in Google Scholar

Singh, R., Inefficiency and Abuse of Compulsory Land Acquisition: An Enquiry into the Way Forward, 47 Economic and Political Weekly, no. 19 (2012).Search in Google Scholar

Somin, I, Overcoming Poletown: County of Wayne V. Hathcock, Economic Developing Taking and the Future of Public Use, 1005 Michigan State Law Review, no. 2004 (2004).Search in Google Scholar

Somin, I., Controlling the Grasping Hand: Economic Development Takings after Kelo, 15 Supreme Court Economic Review, no. 1 (2007).10.1086/656031Search in Google Scholar

Somin, I, The Grasping Hand: Kelo V. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (Enlarged Edition, University of Chicago Press, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Teichman, D. and E. Zamir, Judicial Decision Making: A Behavioral Perspective (SSRN, 2013), p. 41.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.013.0026Search in Google Scholar

Tischendorf, T. (2014) Das russische Zivilrecht wird modernisiert, available at: <https://international.ruw.de/riw-news/nachrichten/Das-russische-Zivilrecht-wird-modernisiert-14138>.Search in Google Scholar

Voigt, S., Explaining Constitutional Garrulity, 29 International Review of Law and Economics, no. 4 (2009).10.1016/j.irle.2009.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Wahi, N., “The Fundamental Right to Property in the Indian Constitution,” in S. Choudhry, M. Khosla and P.B. Mehta (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/law/9780198704898.003.0052Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, U, The Regressive Effect of Legal Uncertainty, Tel Aviv University Law Faculty Papers, no. 30 (2005).Search in Google Scholar

Willoweit, D., “Die bürgerlichen Rechte und das gemeine Wohl, das rechtspolitische Profil des Allgemeinen Landrechts für die preußischen Staaten,” in D. Willoweit (ed.), Gemeinwohl, Freiheit, Vernunft, Rechtsstaat. 200 Jahre Allgemeines Landrecht für die Preußischen Staaten (Mohr Siebeck, 1995).Search in Google Scholar

World Bank, World Development Report 2002, Building Institutions for Markets, Ch. 6, The Judicial System.Search in Google Scholar

Yuan Cai, P. In the Shadow of Pandora: China’s Expropriation Law, East Asia Forum (Feb. 6, 2010), available at: <www.eastasiaforum.so>.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-04-06
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

© 2019 Law and Development Review

Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ldr-2019-0018/pdf
Scroll to top button