Home Mining Community Development in South Africa: A Critical Consideration of How the Law and Development Approach the Concept “Community”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mining Community Development in South Africa: A Critical Consideration of How the Law and Development Approach the Concept “Community”

  • Anri Heyns EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 14, 2019

Abstract

The legislative system that provides for the socio-economic development of mining communities in South Africa has been under significant scrutiny in recent times. Various instances of conflict between mining communities and mining companies, of which the Marikana Massacre of 2012 is certainly the most noteworthy, show that mining communities expect mining companies to contribute more to the improvement of their living conditions. The relationship between mining communities and mining companies are exposed to the various socio-economic challenges that other sectors of the South African economy currently face. However, considering the legislative system in the mining industry specifically and in terms of a conceptual approach may show to the unique challenges the industry faces when it comes to mine community development. A conceptual approach requires asking whether the way in which the legislative system is framed and the rhetoric it promotes do not create expectations with mining communities that cannot be met by mining companies, because mining communities are not accurately depicted in the legislative system. The legislative system promotes “mine community development” by means of a complex interaction between various pieces of legislation and policy guidelines. At the centre of this interaction are the definitions of “community” and “mine community”. These definitions have been amended quite a few times since the enactment of the legislative system, attesting to the difficulty for the law to capture “community”. The latest iterations of the definitions are criticised for their ambiguity, causing uncertainty as to who should benefit from mine community development. This paper proposes that there is a conceptual problem when catering for communities, and not individuals, in a development paradigm, posing challenges for accurately defining “community”. It is not argued that community development should not be promoted, but a possible reason for why mine community development is not successful is proposed. The South African mining legislative system will be considered in parallel with relevant international legal instruments.

References

Badenhorst, PJ. and NJJ. Olivier, Host Communities and Competing Applications for Prospecting Rights in Terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, De Jure (2011).Search in Google Scholar

Badenhorst, PJ., NJJ. Olivier and C. Williams, The Final Judgment, 1 Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (2012).Search in Google Scholar

Bengwenyama Minerals (Pty) Ltd v Genorah Resources (Pty) Ltd 2011 4 SA 113 (CC).Search in Google Scholar

Bengwenyama Minerals (Pty) Ltd v Genorah Resources (unreported TPD decision 39808/2007).Search in Google Scholar

Bengwenyama Minerals (Pty) Ltd v Genorah Resources 2010 3 All SA 577 (SCA).Search in Google Scholar

Bengwenyama-ya-Maswazi Community v Genorah Resources (Pty) Ltd 2014 All SA 673 (SCA).Search in Google Scholar

Bessant, K., Authenticity, Community and Modernity, 41 Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (2010).10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00443.xSearch in Google Scholar

Binns, T. and E. Nel, Devolving Development: Integrated Development Planning and Developmental Local Government in Post-Apartheid South Africa, 36 Regional Studies (2002).10.1080/0034340022000012342Search in Google Scholar

Black Economic Empowerment Commission, Black Economic Empowerment Commission Report (Johannesburg: Skotaville Press, 2001).Search in Google Scholar

Blackburn, S., The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Search in Google Scholar

Bond, P., Elite Transition: From Apartheid to Neoliberalism in South Africa (London: Pluto Press, 2000).Search in Google Scholar

Bond, P., Against Global Apartheid: South Africa Meets the World Bank, IMF and International Finance (Lansdowne: UCT Press, 2001).Search in Google Scholar

Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003.10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2003.wi.00010Search in Google Scholar

Broad-Based Black Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining and Minerals Industry 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Broad-Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the Mining and Minerals Industry (GG 41934 GN 1002 of 27 September 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Broad-Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining and Minerals Industry (GG 33573 GN 838 of 20 September 2010).Search in Google Scholar

Charter, Mining, 2018: Publication of the Draft Broad-Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the Mining and Minerals Industry, 2018 (GG 41714 GN611 of 15 June 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Charter of United Nations (1945).Search in Google Scholar

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996).Search in Google Scholar

Cornell, D., At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex and Inequality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).10.1515/9781400822553Search in Google Scholar

Cornell, D., Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction and the Law (New York: Routledge, 1999).Search in Google Scholar

Cornell, D., Just Cause (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000).Search in Google Scholar

Department of Mineral Resources “Guideline for Consultation with Communities and Interested and Affected Parties” issued as required in terms of sections 10 (1)(b),16 (4)(b),22 (4)(b), 27(5)(b)and 39 of the MPRDA.Search in Google Scholar

Dongier, P., J. Van Domelen, E. Ostrom, A. Rizvi, A. Wakeman, A. Bebbington, S. Alkire, T. Esmail and M. Polski, “Community-Driven Development”, in J Klugman (ed.), A Sourcebook for Poverty Reduction Strategies (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002) of 15 June 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Draft Reviewed Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining and Minerals Industry (GG 39933 GN 450 of 15 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Ensor, L., Mantashe Wants to Axe Long-Delayed MPRDA Amendment Bill (Business Day, 22 August 2018), available at: <https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/2018-08-22-mantashe-wants-to-axe-mineral-and-petroleum-resources-development-amendment-bill/>, accessed August 30, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Freedom Charter of the African National Congress, available at: <http://www.anc.org.za/content/freedom-charter>, accessed July 30, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Goehring, B., Indigenous Peoples of the World (Canada: Purich Publishing, 1993).Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, RE. and JH. Sylvester, Deconstructing Development, 22 Wisconsin International Law Journal (2004).Search in Google Scholar

Growth, Employment and Redistribution: A Macroeconomic Strategy 1996 available at: <http://www.treasury.gov.za/publications/other/gear/chapters.pdf>, accessed October 18, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, P., “Integrated Development Plans and Third Way Politics”, in U Pillay, R Tomlinson and Toit J Du (eds.), Democracy and Delivery: Urban Policy in South Africa (HSRC Press, 2006).Search in Google Scholar

Heyns, A. and H. Mostert, Three Mining Charters and a Draft: How the Politics and Rhetoric of Development in the South African Mining Sector are Keeping Communities in Poverty, 11 Law and Development Review (2018).10.1515/ldr-2018-0038Search in Google Scholar

Howard, J., Half-Hearted Regulation: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Industry, 131 The South African Law Journal (2014).Search in Google Scholar

Humby, T., The Bengwenyama Trilogy: Constitutional Rights and the Fight for Prospecting on Community Land, 15 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (2012).10.4314/pelj.v15i4.5Search in Google Scholar

Humby, T., The Community-Preferent Right to Prospect or Mine: Navigating the Fault-Lines of Community, Land, Benefit and Development in Bengwenyama II, South African Law Journal (2016).Search in Google Scholar

Kapelus, P., Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the “Community”: The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi, 39 Journal of Business Ethics (2002).10.1023/A:1016570929359Search in Google Scholar

Local Government Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Malanczuk, P., Modern Introduction to International Law (London: Routledge, 1997).Search in Google Scholar

Martinez Cobo, JR., Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination against Indigenous Populations in His “Study of the Problem of Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations” (1983) 5 August 1983E/CN4/Sub.2/1983/21, available at:<https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/martinez-cobo-study.html>, accessed February 19, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Mbatha, P and R. Wynberg, “Mining and the Myth of Benefits in South African Rural Coastal Communities”, in R. Wynberg and M. Hauck (eds.), Sharing the Benefits from the Coast (Cape Town: UCT Press, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 53 of 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Act 49 of 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill, 2013 (B15D_2013).Search in Google Scholar

Modiri, J., Law’s Poverty, 18 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (2015).10.4314/pelj.v18i2.06Search in Google Scholar

Polányi, K., The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).Search in Google Scholar

The Reconstruction and Development Programme: A Policy Framework, available at: <http://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/the_reconstruction_and_development_programm_1994.pdf>, accessed October 19, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Regulations in terms of section 107 (1) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (GG 26275 GNR 527 of 23 April 2004).Search in Google Scholar

The Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Seekings, J. and N. Natrass, Class, Race and Inequality in South Africa (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2005).10.12987/yale/9780300108927.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

The South African Human Rights Commission, National Hearing on the Underlying Socio-Economic Challenges of Mining-Affected Communities in South Africa 2016, available at:<https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-publications/hearing-reports>, accessed February 24, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, L., Rights Discourse and Practices, Everyday Violence and Social Protests: Who Counts as Subject and Whose Lives are Real in the Neo-Colonial South African Nation State?, 18 Law Democracy and Development (2014).10.4314/ldd.v18i1.1Search in Google Scholar

Tangri, R. and R. Southall, The Politics of Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa, 34 Journal of Southern African Studies (2008).10.1080/03057070802295856Search in Google Scholar

Terreblanche, S., A History of Inequality in South Africa 1652–2002 (Scottsville: University of Kwazulu-Natal Press, 2002).Search in Google Scholar

Tilman, R., Ferdinand Tonnies, Thorstein Veblen and Karl Marx: From Community to Society and Back? 11 The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (2004).10.1080/0967256042000292114Search in Google Scholar

Tönnies, F. and J. Harris, Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (Cambridge: University Press, 2001).Search in Google Scholar

Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Trubek, D. and A. Santos, “Introduction: The Third Moment in Law and Development Theory and the Emergence of New Critical Practice”, in D. Trubek and A. Santos (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).10.1017/CBO9780511754425Search in Google Scholar

Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report (2003), available at: <http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/>, accessed March 6, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

UN Declaration on the Right to Development A/RES/41/128 (1987).Search in Google Scholar

UN General Assembly Resolution 1803, “Permanent sovereignty over natural resources” December 14, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

Van Marle, K., “No Last Word”: Reflections on the Imaginary Domain, Dignity and Intrinsic Worth, Stellenbosch Law Review (2002).Search in Google Scholar

Walker, A., South Africa: The Economic Challenge (BBC News, February 16, 2018), available at:<https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43073781>, accessed February 24, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Warden-Fernandez, J., Indigenous Communities’ Rights and Mineral Development, 23 Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law (2005).10.1080/02646811.2005.11433413Search in Google Scholar

White Paper on Reconstruction and Development (GG 16085 GN 1954 of 14 November 1994).Search in Google Scholar

Williams, P. and I. Taylor, Neoliberalism and the Political Economy of the “New” South Africa, 5 New Political Economy (2000).10.1080/13563460050001961Search in Google Scholar

Working Group on Indigenous Peoples More information, available at: <https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IPeoples/Pages/IndigenousPeoplesIndex.aspx>, accessed February 1, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-03-14
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

© 2019 Law and Development Review

Downloaded on 5.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ldr-2019-0022/html
Scroll to top button