Home Medicine Acknowledgment
Article Publicly Available

Acknowledgment

Published/Copyright: November 24, 2018

The editors and the publisher would like to thank the Associate Editors and the following colleagues for their kind assistance in reviewing articles submitted to the Journal of Laboratory Medicine in 2018.[*]

Aksoy, Aziz

Akyildiz, Murat

Aletayeb, Seyyed Mohammad Hassan

Alkan, Senem

Barth, Julian H.

Baum, Hannsjoerg

Beck, Michael

Bettelheim, Dieter

Bietenbeck, Andreas

Birschmann, Ingvild

Boeker, Martin

Bogavac, Mirjana

Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi

Buser, Andreas

Cadamuro, Janne

Carmel, Ralph

Cazzagon, N.

Coen Herak, Desiree

Consolaro, Marcia E.L.

Coskun, Abdurrahman

Daneshmandi, Saeed

Direkel, Sahin

Divers, Mark

Dolscheid-Pommerich, Ramona C.

Eddahibi, Saadia

El-mezayen, Hatem A.

Erel, Ozcan

Ganslandt, Thomas

Gatselis, N.K.

Gauchez, A.S.

Ghasemian, Farnaz

Gholami, Milad

Gonzalez-Bonet, Ileana

Gorji, H.A.

Grunig, Gabriele

Hameister, Erik

Haselmann, Verena

Hirv, Kaimo

Hoffmann, Georg

Hoffmann, Wolfgang

Hofmann, Walter

Huzly, Daniela

Inal, Tamer, Cevat

Jannati, Mansour

Jeffrey, Pope

Jiang, Yanfang

Junker, Ralf

Kalani, Hamed

Karruppaiya, Palaniyandi

Katayev, Alex

Kim, Jae Kyung

Koo, Dong-Hoe

Kraemer-Albers, Eva-Maria

Lablans, Martin

Lanzola, Giordano

Lee, Hae Kyung

Lehmann, Rainer

Leichtle, Alexander

Leiherer, Andreas

Li, Zhi-Qiang

Lippi, Giuseppe

Mandic, Vesna

Mannuß, Steffen

Mayrhofer, Michaela

Meena, Laxman, S

Memarian, Azadeh

Meyer, Sascha

Michellin-Tirelli, Kristiane

Movahedi, Eelaheh

Nunes, Jessica

Nydegger, Urs

Orsatti, Claudio

Ostanek, Barbara

Pawlik, Andrzej

Peng, You-Fan

Petersmann, Astrid

Pezenatto, Monica

Pfennigwerth, Niels

Phillips, Andelka M.

Pum, Joachim

Rafei, R.

Rajendran, Peramaiyan

Rentsch, Katharina M.

Rincón-Sánchez, Ana Rosa

Roggenbuck, Dirk

Röhrig, Gabriele

Saely, Christoph

Sciacovelli, Laura

Silig, Yavuz

Sonagra, Amit D.

Speer, Ronald

Speranca, Marcia Aparecida

Stefanovic, Aleksandra

Steuer, Christian

Stobbe, Silvia

Streichert, Thomas

Suchitra, M.M.

Sulyok, Endre

Thelen, Marc

Thun, Sylvia

van der Meer, Pieter F.

Vekic, Jelena

Vilibic Cavlek, Tatjana

Vogeser, Michael

von Meyer, Alexander

Weber, Christian

Wiegel, Bernhard

Wimmer, Rainer

Yoon, Do-Young

Zachou, K.

Zare Karizi, Shohreh

Zbikowska, Halina Malgorzata

Zschorlich, Volker

Published Online: 2018-11-24
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Shaping the digital transformation of laboratory medicine
  4. Shaping the digital transformation of laboratory medicine
  5. Mini Review
  6. Challenges in data storage and data management in a clinical diagnostic setting
  7. Challenges in data storage and data management in a clinical diagnostic setting
  8. Review
  9. Continuous glucose monitoring: data management and evaluation by patients and health care professionals – current situation and developments
  10. Continuous glucose monitoring: data management and evaluation by patients and health care professionals – current situation and developments
  11. Opinion Paper
  12. Long-term medical data storage: challenges with test results obtained by direct-to-consumer testing
  13. Long-term medical data storage: challenges with test results obtained by direct-to-consumer testing
  14. Legal aspects of storage and transmission of laboratory results
  15. Legal aspects of storage and transmission of laboratory results
  16. Review
  17. Interoperability of laboratory data in Switzerland – a spotlight on Bern
  18. Interoperability of laboratory data in Switzerland – a spotlight on Bern
  19. Mini Review
  20. Using HL7 CDA and LOINC for standardized laboratory results in the Austrian electronic health record
  21. Using HL7 CDA and LOINC for standardized laboratory results in the Austrian electronic health record
  22. NPU, LOINC, and SNOMED CT: a comparison of terminologies for laboratory results reveals individual advantages and a lack of possibilities to encode interpretive comments
  23. NPU, LOINC, and SNOMED CT: a comparison of terminologies for laboratory results reveals individual advantages and a lack of possibilities to encode interpretive comments
  24. Review
  25. Laboratory information system and necessary improvements in function and programming
  26. Laboratory information system and necessary improvements in function and programming
  27. Percentiler and Flagger – low-cost, on-line monitoring of laboratory and manufacturer data and significant surplus to current external quality assessment
  28. Percentiler and Flagger – low-cost, on-line monitoring of laboratory and manufacturer data and significant surplus to current external quality assessment
  29. Review
  30. Informatics External Quality Assurance (IEQA) Down Under: evaluation of a pilot implementation
  31. Informatics External Quality Assurance (IEQA) Down Under: evaluation of a pilot implementation
  32. Acknowledgment
  33. Acknowledgment
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/labmed-2018-0320/html
Scroll to top button