Home Technology The effects of Gd and Er as burnable absorbers in VVER-1200 assembly using OpenMC: a comparative neutronic study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The effects of Gd and Er as burnable absorbers in VVER-1200 assembly using OpenMC: a comparative neutronic study

  • Mosharat Belal Tahia ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Lamia Zubair ORCID logo , Sumaiya Islam ORCID logo and Abdus Sattar Mollah ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: August 6, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Gadolinia (Gd2O3), known for its high neutron capture cross-section, is used in nuclear reactors to regulate reactivity and extend reactor life by absorbing excess neutrons. This study uses the OpenMC, an open-source Monte Carlo simulation code, to evaluate the use of Erbia (Er2O3) as a potential supplement for Gadolinia in VVER-1200 reactors. Varying fractions of Er2O3 (1 %, 3 %, and 5 %) were compared with the standard 5 % Gd2O3. Using ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data library, criticality, reactivity, depletion up to 60 MW d/kgHM, pin power distribution at 0 MW d/kgHM and 40 MW d/kgHM, effects of control rods were analysed. Additionally, the effect of control rods, fuel and moderator temperature coefficients, and the effect of boron concentration variation have been observed. The results show that different variations of Er2O3 achieve similar reactivity control and power distribution as current designs, although Er2O3 provide excess reactivity at the start of the cycle, it maintains a relatively balanced power among fuel pins. Actinide production was also comparable to that of the reference 5 % Gd2O3 model.


Corresponding author: Mosharat Belal Tahia, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka, 1216, Bangladesh, E-mail:
All authors contributed equally to this work.
  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.

References

Alassaf, S.H., Savander, V.I., and Hassan, A.A. (2020). Use of erbium as a burnable absorber for the VVER reactor core life extension. Nucl. Energy and Technol. 6: 275–279, https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.6.60563.Search in Google Scholar

Burlakov, E., Glembotsky, A., Davydova, G., Jitarev, V., Kuzmin, A., Krayushkin, A., and Fedosov, A. (2000). An analysis of the experiments with erbium for the RBMK design-250. In: ANS international topical meeting on advances in reactor physics and mathematics and computation into the next millennium. American Nuclear Society (ANS), USA, pp. 7–12.Search in Google Scholar

Chadwick, M.B., Herman, M., Obložinský, P., Dunn, M.E., Danon, Y., Kahler, A.C., Smith, D.L., Pritychenko, B., Arbanas, G., Arcilla, R., et al.. (2011). ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl. Data Sheets 112: 2887–2996, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Cudrnak, P. and Necas, V. (2011). Optimization of fuel assemblies with gadolinium for LWRs. J. Power of Technol. 91: 186–190.Search in Google Scholar

Dwiddar, M.S., Badawi, A.A., Abou-Gabal, H.H., and El-Osery, I.A. (2014). From VVER-1000 to VVER-1200: investigation of the effect of the changes in core. In: PHYTRA 3 – The third international conference on Physics and technology of reactors and applications. Tetouan, Morocco, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4876.1281.Search in Google Scholar

Fedosov, A.M. (2018). RBMK uranium-erbium fuel. Atom. Energy 124: 221–226, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-018-0401-x.Search in Google Scholar

Frybortova, L. (2019). Recommended strategy and limitations of burnable absorbers used in VVER fuel assemblies. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0651-x.Search in Google Scholar

Hafez, N., Shahbunder, H., Amin, E., Elfiki, S.A., and Mohamed, A. (2021). Study on criticality and reactivity coefficients of VVER-1200 reactor. Prog. Nucl. Energy 131: 103594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103594.Search in Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency (2011a). Status report 107 – VVER-1200 (V-392M). International Atomic Energy Agency.Search in Google Scholar

International Atomic Energy Agency (2011b). Status report 108 – VVER-1200 (V-491). International Atomic Energy Agency.Search in Google Scholar

Iwasaki, K., Matsui, T., Yanai, K., Yuda, R., Arita, Y., Nagasaki, T., Harada, K., Tokura, I., and Une, K. (2009). Effect of Gd2O3 dispersion on the thermal conductivity of UO2. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 46: 673–676, https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711574.Search in Google Scholar

Kuridan, R.M. (2023). Neutron transport: theory, modeling, and computations. Springer Nature, Cham.10.1007/978-3-031-26932-5Search in Google Scholar

Mohamed, Y.M.M., Abdel-Rahman, M.A.E., Mohamed, S.H., and Abdelghafar Galahom, A. (2022). Searching for the most optimum burnable absorbers (BAs) for AP-1000 from the neutronic, thermal-hydraulic, and solid mechanics points of view. Nucl. Eng. Des. 391: 111728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111728.Search in Google Scholar

Mustafa, S. (2023). Investigating the possibility of extending the BWR cycle length for 15 years of operation by mixing highly enriched UO2 fuel with burnable absorbers. Sci. Rep. 13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37615-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nabila, U.M., Sahadath, M.H., Hossain, M.T., and Reza, F. (2022). An approach to minimize reactivity penalty of Gd2O3 burnable absorber at the early stage of fuel burnup in pressurized water reactor. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54: 3516–3525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.04.015.Search in Google Scholar

Radioactivity.eu.com (n.d.). Spent fuel composition, https://radioactivity.eu.com/articles/radioactive_waste/spent_fuel_composition (Accessed 4 November 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Reda, S.M., Elkhawas, N.A., and Amin, E. (2020). Study of neutronic characteristics for the VVER reactor assembly with five various burnable poisons using MCNPX code. Prog. Nucl. Energy 129: 103512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103512.Search in Google Scholar

Romano, P.K., Horelik, N.E., Herman, B.R., Nelson, A.G., Forget, B., and Smith, K. (2015). OpenMC: a state-of-the-art monte carlo code for research and development. Ann. Nucl. Energy 82: 90–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.048.Search in Google Scholar

ROSATOM (2015). The VVER today: evolution, design, safety. ROSATOM, Moscow.Search in Google Scholar

Waltar, A.E., Todd, D.R., and Tsvetkov, P.V. (2011). Fast spectrum reactors. Springer, New York, NY.10.1007/978-1-4419-9572-8Search in Google Scholar

Wang, L., Chen, B., and Yao, D. (2013). Reactivity temperature coefficient evaluation of uranium zirconium hydride fuel element in power reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 257: 61–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.017.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-03-12
Accepted: 2025-07-23
Published Online: 2025-08-06
Published in Print: 2025-10-27

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kern-2025-0024/html
Scroll to top button