Home Kant's Non-Teleological Conception of Purposiveness
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kant's Non-Teleological Conception of Purposiveness

  • Thomas Teufel
Published/Copyright: June 5, 2011
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Kant-Studien
From the journal Volume 102 Issue 2

Abstract

In this paper I argue, first, that Kant's technical definition of purposiveness in § 10 of the third Critique is designed to abstract from all forward-looking considerations (teleological, intentional, normative, etc.) that accompany the conventional understanding of the term. Kant seeks to establish a strictly backward-looking, etiological conception of purposiveness in order to capture the causal link connecting artifacts with their concepts. I argue, second, that he succeeds. Kant's etiological conception of purposiveness neither collapses into mere mechanism, nor smuggles normative considerations in through the backdoor. I frame my discussion by critically engaging Hannah Ginsborg's reading of § 10 – a leading representative of normative interpretations of Kant's notion of purposiveness.

Online erschienen: 2011-06-05
Erschienen im Druck: 2011-June

© Walter de Gruyter 2011

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant.2011.017/html
Scroll to top button