Abstract
A new approach is developed for improving the point estimation and predictions of parametric time-series models. The method targets performance criteria such as estimation bias, root mean squared error, variance, or prediction error, and produces closed-form estimators focused towards these targets via a computational approximation method. This is done for an autoregression coefficient, for the mean reversion parameter in Vasicek and CIR diffusion models, for the binomial thinning parameter in integer-valued autoregressive (INAR) models, and for predictions from a CIR model. The success of the prediction targeting approach is shown in Monte Carlo simulations and in out-of-sample forecasting of the US Federal Funds rate.
-
The data and code for the application and methods used in Section 5 are available at the author’s GitHub page.
-
Conflict of interest statement: There is no conflict of interest relating to the author and this paper.
A.1 Implementation of the Relative Performance Constraint
The implementation in the examples of Sections 2 and 3 and the Supplementary Appendix requires that the bias and RMSE values of the new estimator be no greater than those of the original at each point in the training set
where λ > 0 is large. This simple penalty function method was sufficient for the applications that were considered, using the subplex global optimisation algorithm.
References
Aït-Sahalia, Y. 1999. “Transition Densities for Interest Rate and Other Nonlinear Diffusions.” The Journal of Finance LIV (4): 1361–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00149.Search in Google Scholar
Aït-Sahalia, Y. 2002. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Discretely Sampled Diffusions: A Closed-form Approximation Approach.” Econometrica 70 (1): 223–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00274.Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, D., and H. Chen. 1994. “Approximately Median-Unbiased Estimation of Autoregressive Models.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 12 (2): 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1994.10510007.Search in Google Scholar
Baltussen, G., S. van Bekkum, and Z. Da. 2019. “Indexing and Stock Market Serial Dependence Around the World.” Journal of Financial Economics 132 (1): 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.07.016.Search in Google Scholar
Bao, Y. 2007. “The Approximate Moments of the Least Squares Estimator for the Stationary Autoregressive Model under a General Error Distribution.” Econometric Theory 23 (05): 1013–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466607070405.Search in Google Scholar
Chambers, M. J. 2013. “Jackknife Estimation of Stationary Autoregressive Models.” Journal of Econometrics 172 (1): 142–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Z., F. Chen, R. Lai, X. Zhang, and C. Lu. 2018. “Rational Neural Networks for Approximating Graph Convolution Operator on Jump Discontinuities.” In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.10.1109/ICDM.2018.00021Search in Google Scholar
Cox, J., J. Igersoll, and S. Ross. 1985. “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Econometrica 53: 385–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911242.Search in Google Scholar
Gallant, A. R., and G. Tauchen. 1996. “Which Moments to Match?” Econometric Theory 12 (4): 657–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600006976.Search in Google Scholar
Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, and E. Renault. 1993. “Indirect Inference.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 8 (2): S85–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950080507.Search in Google Scholar
Hausman, J., and C. Palmer. 2012. “Heteroskedasticity-robust Inference in Finite Samples.” Economics Letters 116 (2): 232–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.007.Search in Google Scholar
Hornik, K. 1991. “Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Feedforward Networks.” Neural Networks 4 (2): 251–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-t.Search in Google Scholar
Iglesias, E. M., and G. D. A. Phillips. 2020. “Further Results on Pseudo-maximum Likelihood Estimation and Testing in the Constant Elasticity of Variance Continuous Time Model.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 41 (2): 357–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12499.Search in Google Scholar
Kendall, M. 1954. “Note on Bias in the Estimation of Autocorrelation.” Biometrika 61: 403–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/41.3-4.403.Search in Google Scholar
Kiviet, J., and G. Phillips. 2012. “Higher-order Asymptotic Expansions of the Least-Squares Estimation Bias in First-Order Dynamic Regression Models.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 56 (11): 3706–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.07.013.Search in Google Scholar
Kiviet, J., and G. Phillips. 2014. “Improved Variance Estimation of Maximum Likelihood Estimators in Stable First-Order Dynamic Regression Models.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 76: 424–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.09.021.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, E. 1983. Theory of Point Estimation, Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, 1st ed. California: Belmont.10.1007/978-1-4757-2769-2Search in Google Scholar
Liu-Evans, G., and G. Phillips. 2012. “Bootstrap, Jackknife and COLS: Bias Correction and Mean Squared Error in Estimation of ARX Models.” Journal of Time Series Econometrics 4 (2).10.1515/1941-1928.1122Search in Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J., and A. Smith. 1998. “Approximate Bias Correction in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 85: 205–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(97)00099-7.Search in Google Scholar
Marriott, F., and J. Pope. 1954. “Bias in the Estimation of Autocorrelations.” Biometrika 61: 393–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332719.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, V., A. Tremayne, and R. Jung. 2014. “Efficient Method of Moments Estimators for Integer Time Series Models.” Journal of Time Series Analysis 35: 491–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12078.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, G., B. McCabe, D. Frazier, W. Maneesoonthorn, and C. Robert. 2019. “Auxiliary Likelihood-Based Approximate Bayesian Computation in State Space Models.” Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics 28 (3): 508–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2018.1552154.Search in Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. 2019. “Estimation Bias and Bias Correction in Reduced Rank Autoregressions.” Econometric Reviews 38 (3): 332–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2017.1308065.Search in Google Scholar
Nowman, K. 1997. “Gaussian Estimation of Single-Factor Continuous-Time Models of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” The Journal of Finance 52: 1695–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01127.x.Search in Google Scholar
Orcutt, G., and H. Winokur. 1969. “First Order Autoregression: Inference, Estimation, and Prediction.” Econometrica 37: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909199.Search in Google Scholar
Orlando, G., R. Mininni, and M. Bufalo. 2020. “Forecasting Interest Rates through Vasicek and CIR Models: A Partitioning Approach.” Journal of Forecasting 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2642.Search in Google Scholar
Pedeli, X., A. Davison, and F. Konstantinos. 2015. “Likelihood Estimation for the Inar(p) Model by Saddlepoint Approximation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 110 (511): 1229–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2014.983230.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips, P., and J. Yu. 2005. “Jackknifing Bond Option Prices.” Review of Financial Studies 18 (2): 707–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi018.Search in Google Scholar
Robbins, H., and S. Monro. 1951. “Approximately Median-Unbiased Estimation of Autoregressive Models.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (3): 400–7. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729586.Search in Google Scholar
Rothenberg, T. J. 1984. “Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models When the Error Covariance Matrix is Nonscalar.” Econometrica 52 (4): 827–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911186.Search in Google Scholar
Tang, C., and S. Chen. 2009. “Parameter Estimation and Bias Correction for Diffusion Processes.” Journal of Econometrics 149 (1): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.11.001.Search in Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122574.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jtse-2021-0051).
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston