Abstract
The task of this paper is to offer an interpretation of Kant’s notion of proportionality between morality and happiness, which is fundamental to his conception of the highest good. Kant claims that the complete good of humans as both natural and rational beings is a proportionate relation between virtue and happiness. He takes this to mean that nature is purposively designed so it accords with morality, which is only possible in a divine world where God secures this responsiveness. The paper shows various difficulties with this claim and argues that they can be resolved by a nuanced interpretation of what Kant might mean by “happiness”. This finally leads to a conception of proportionality modeled on Kant’s aesthetics.
Funding source: Minerva Foundation
References
Bader, R. M. 2015. “Kant’s Theory of the Highest Good.” In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, edited by R. M. Bader, and J. Aufderheide, 183–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Boyle, M. 2016. “Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique.” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (3): 527–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12135.Search in Google Scholar
Dobe, J. K. 2020. “Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Happiness.” Kantian Review 25 (1): 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415419000451.Search in Google Scholar
Friedlander, E. 2021. “On Different Ways to the Highest Good.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 42 (2): 373–91. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj202142220.Search in Google Scholar
Godess-Riccitelli, M. 2021.“The Problem of the Highest Good: An Aesthetic Outlook.” In The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress, edited by C. Serck-Hanssen, and B. Himmelmann, 1423–30. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110701357-139Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1781–1787/1998. “Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” In Critique of Pure Reason, transl. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1785/1996. “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1788/1996. “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1790/2000. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Critique of Power of Judgment, transl. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804656Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1793/1996a. “Über den Gemeinspruch: das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1793/1996b. “Die Metaphyisik der Sitten.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1798/2006. Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. Kant: Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Of Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, trans. R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. 1995. “What Do the Virtuous Hope for? Re-reading Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good.” In Eight International Kant Congress, edited by H. Robinson, 91–112. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.10.5840/kant199519951Part17Search in Google Scholar
Newton, A. 2017. “Kant on Animal and Human Pleasure.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4): 518–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1261542.Search in Google Scholar
O’Connell, E. 2012. “Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good.” Kantian Review 17 (2): 257–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415412000052.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1997. “Kant on Reason and Religion.” In Tanner Lectures on Human Values 18, edited by G. B. Peterson, 267–308. Utah: University of Utah Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ostaric, L. 2023. The Critique of Judgment and the Unity of Kant’s Critical System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..10.1017/9781009336833Search in Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. 2017. “Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3): 435–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2017.0049.Search in Google Scholar
Reath, A. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4): 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1988.0098.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1984. “Worthiness to Be Happy and Kant’s Concept of the Highest Good.” Kant-Studien 75 (1-4): 168–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1984.75.1-4.168.Search in Google Scholar
Sussman, D. 2015. “The Highest Good : Who Needs it?” In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, edited by J. Aufderheide, and R. M. Bader, 214–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Timmermann, J. 2022. Kant’s Will at the Crossroads: An Essay on the Failings of Practical Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192896032.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Vatansever, S. 2021. “Kant’s Coherent Theory of the Highest Good.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (3): 263–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-020-09782-8.Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, E. 2010. “The Antinomy of Practical Reason: Reason, the Unconditioned and the Highest Good.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by A. Reath, and J. Timmermann, 145–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770869.009Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, E. 2014. “Nature in General as a System of Ends.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by E. Watkins, and I. Goy, 117–30. Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110225792.117Search in Google Scholar
Yovel, Y. 1972. “The Highest Good and History in Kant’s Thought.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 54 (3): 238–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1972.54.3.238.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Proportionality and Purposiveness in Kant’s Highest Good
- Providence and Prudence in Kant’s Theology and Ethics
- Book Reviews
- Samantha Matherne: Seeing More: Kant’s Theory of Imagination
- Dunphy, R., & Lovat, T.: Metaphysics as a Science in Classical German Philosophy
- Morgana Lambeth: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant. The Violence and the Charity
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Proportionality and Purposiveness in Kant’s Highest Good
- Providence and Prudence in Kant’s Theology and Ethics
- Book Reviews
- Samantha Matherne: Seeing More: Kant’s Theory of Imagination
- Dunphy, R., & Lovat, T.: Metaphysics as a Science in Classical German Philosophy
- Morgana Lambeth: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant. The Violence and the Charity