Brandom on Perceptual Knowledge

References

Aguilera, M. 2013. “Pensamiento de primer orden.” Critic 45 (133): 55–81, https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2013.715.Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed, A. 2017. “Wittgenstein on Seeing Aspects.” In A Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by H. Glock and J. Hyman, 517–32. Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118884607.ch33Search in Google Scholar

Anscombe, E. 1965. “The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature.” In Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: Collected Philosophical Papers, Vol. III, 3–20. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baz, A. 2000. “What’s the Point of Seeing Aspects?” Philosophical Investigations 23 (2): 97–121, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9205.00116.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1994. Making it Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1996. “Perception and Rational Constraint: McDowell ‘Mind and World’.” Philosophical Issues 7: 241–59, https://doi.org/10.2307/1522910.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1998. “Perception and Rational Constraint.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 241–59, https://doi.org/10.2307/2653516.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2000. Articulating Reasons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674028739Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2002a. “Non-inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell’s Empiricism.” In Reading McDowell. On Mind and World, edited by N. Smith, 92–105. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203460900-10.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2002b. Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2010 “Reply to John McDowell’s “Brandom on Observation”.” In Reading Brandom, edited by B. Weiss and J. Wandered, 320–6. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, B. 2006. “Perception and Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 14: 165–81, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00220.x.Search in Google Scholar

Brewer, B. 2011. Perception and Its Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260256.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Camp, E. 2009. “Putting Concepts to Work: Sistematicity, and Stimulus-Independence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2): 275–311, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00245.x.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, J. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199243816.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. 2009. “Invertebrate Concepts Confront the Generality Constraint (and Win).” In The Philosophy of Animal Minds, edited by R. Lurz, 89–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819001.006Search in Google Scholar

Crane, T. 2009. “Is Perception a Propositional Attitude?” The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236): 452–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.608.x.Search in Google Scholar

Crane, T. 2013. The Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682744.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cussins, A. 2003. “Content, Conceptual Content, and Nonconceptual Content.” In Essays on Nonconceptual Content, edited by Y. Gunther, 133–63. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2827.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2006. “Perception and the Fall from Eden.” In Perceptual Experience, edited by T. Szabó Gendler and J. Hawthorne, 49–125. Oxford: Clarendon Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0003.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Danón, L. 2013. “Conceptos de sustancia y conceptos de propiedades en animales no humanos.” Critic 45 (133): 27–54, https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2013.712.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 2001. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198237537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gauker, C. 2017. “Three Kinds of Conceptual Seeing-As.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (4): 763–79, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0339-2.Search in Google Scholar

Glock, H. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631185376.1996.xSearch in Google Scholar

Glock, H. 2010. “Can Animal Judge?” Dialéctica 64 (1): 11–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01227.x.Search in Google Scholar

Glock, H. 2016. “Aspect-Perception, Perception, and Animals: Wittgenstein and beyond.” In Wollheim, Wittgenstein, and Pictorial Representation, edited by G. Kemp and M. G. Mras, 77–100. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640983-4.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. 2015. “Contentless Perceiving: The Very Idea.” In Wittgenstein and Perception, edited by M. Campbell and M. O’Sullivan, 63–83. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728476-12.Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, D. 2012. “Two Dogmas of Coherentism.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 85: 213–36, doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208338_010.10.1163/9789401208338_010Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, D. 2014. “The Experience Not Well Lost.” Contemporary Pragmatism 11 (1): 43–56, doi:10.1163/18758185-90000275.10.1163/18758185-90000275Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, D. 2015. “Perceptual Experience and Seeing-as.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1): 123–144, doi:10.15845/nwr.v4i1.3296.10.15845/nwr.v4i1.3296Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, D. 2018. “Percepción y mentes animales.” Revista de filosofía 43 (2): 201–221, doi:10.5209/resf.62027.10.5209/RESF.62027Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, D. 2019. “Perception: A Blind Spot in Brandom’s Normative Pragmatics.” Disputatio. Philosophical research Bulletin 8 (9): 1–22, doi:https://disputatio.usal.es/vols/vol-8-no-9/.Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, D. 2020. “Two Versions of the Conceptual Content of Experience.” International Journal of Philosophical studies 20 (1): 36–55, doi:10.1080/09672559.2019.1690542.10.1080/09672559.2019.1690542Search in Google Scholar

MacPherson, F. 2006. “Ambiguous Figures and the Content of the Experience.” Nous 41 (1): 82–117, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00602.x.10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00602.xSearch in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1996. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjghtzjSearch in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1998. “Reply to Commentators.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2): 403–31, https://doi.org/10.2307/2653521.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 2009. Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 2010. “Brandom on Observation.” In Reading Brandom, edited by B. Weiss and J. Wanderer, 129–44. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

McGinn, M. 1997. Wittgenstein and the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

McGinn, M. 2015. “Two Senses of “See”.” In Wittgenstein and Perception, edited by M. Campbell and M. O’Sullivan, 33–44. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728476-10.Search in Google Scholar

Montague, M. 2016. The Given. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198748908.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morales Ladrón de Guevara, J. 2009. “Racionalidad Animal.” In La Mente Animal, edited by L. X. López-Farjeat, 103–23. México: Los Libros de Homero.Search in Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. 1990. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, T. 1974. “What Is it like to Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review 83: 435–50, https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.Search in Google Scholar

Pautz, A. 2010. “Why Explain Visual Experience in Terms of Content?” In Perceiving the World, edited by B. Nanay, 254–309. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195386196.003.0010.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195386196.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Peacocke, C. 1983. Sense and Content. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. 1998. Truth and Progress. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625404Search in Google Scholar

Schellenberg, S. 2011. “Perceptual Content Defended.” Nous 45 (4): 714–50, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00791.x.Search in Google Scholar

Schellenberg, S. 2018. The Unity of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198827702.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, S. 2010. “A Tale of Two Problems: Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Aspect Perception.” In Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny, J. Cottingham and P.M.S. Hacker, 352–371. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173452Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1967. Science and Metaphysics. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1975. “The Structure of Knowkedge.” In Action, Knowledge, and Reality, Hector-Neri Castañeda, 295–347. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1978. “The Role of the Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Experience.” In Categories: A Colloquium, edited by H. W. Johnstone Jr. University Park, PA: Penn State Univ. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1981. ““Foundations of a Metaphysical of Pure Process” [The Carus Lectures].” The Monist 64: 3–90, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19816412.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1997. Empiricism & the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, S. 1994a. “Self-Knowledge and ‘Inner Sense’: Lecture III: The Phenomenal Character of Experience.” Philosophy and the Phenomenological Research 54 (2): 291–314, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108490.Search in Google Scholar

Shoemaker, S. 1994b. “Phenomenal Character.” Nous 28 (1): 21–38, https://doi.org/10.2307/2215918.Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, S. 2010. The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305296.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1974. “Imagination and Perception.” In Freedom and Resentment, 50–72. London.10.4324/9780203882566-9Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. 1979. “Perception and its Objects.” In Perception and Identity: Essays Presented to A.J. Ayer with His Replies, edited by G. F. MacDonald, 41–60. London: Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04862-5_2.Search in Google Scholar

Travis, C. 2004. “The Silence of the Senses.” Mind 113 (449): 57–94, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/113.449.57.Search in Google Scholar

Travis, C. 2015. “Suffering Intentionally?” In Wittgenstein and Perception, edited by M. Campbell and M. O’Sullivan, 45–62. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tye, M. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6712.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Philosophical Remarks, ed. R.Rhees, trans. R. Hargreaves and R. White. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (2009/1953). Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S.Hacker, and J. Schulte. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar