Abstract
This paper addresses one kind of tort duty that is owed by one kind of platform. With respect to the latter, I focus on platforms that aim to bring about “real world” interactions, such as Lyft/Uber, Airbnb, and Tinder/Grindr. With respect to the former, I focus on the duty to protect users from the attacks of other users and/or third parties. Rather than argue that such platforms incur this kind of duty on grounds of current tort doctrine, I argue that a new doctrine is justified according to which the relevant platforms incur a duty to protect against the actions of others by virtue of their distinct nature as intermediators.
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- AI Liability Along the Value Chain: Lessons from the Liability of Suppliers of Components in Product Liability Law
- Tort Liability for Failure to Age Gate: A Promising Regulatory Response to Digital Public Health Hazards
- Swords and Shields: Impact of Private Standards for Liability Determinations of Autonomous Vehicles
- Digital Malpractice: The Role of Professional Negligence and Public Policy in the Regulation of Digital Platforms
- Algorithms and the Privacy Torts
- Bailing Out Biometrics
- A Novel Tort Duty for Platforms That Intermediately Produce Real World User Interactions
- Essay
- Virtual Dignitary Torts
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- AI Liability Along the Value Chain: Lessons from the Liability of Suppliers of Components in Product Liability Law
- Tort Liability for Failure to Age Gate: A Promising Regulatory Response to Digital Public Health Hazards
- Swords and Shields: Impact of Private Standards for Liability Determinations of Autonomous Vehicles
- Digital Malpractice: The Role of Professional Negligence and Public Policy in the Regulation of Digital Platforms
- Algorithms and the Privacy Torts
- Bailing Out Biometrics
- A Novel Tort Duty for Platforms That Intermediately Produce Real World User Interactions
- Essay
- Virtual Dignitary Torts