Abstract
Using selected lines from Robert Frost’s poem Mending Wall, this essay seeks to show how the poem can inform the common law of negligence.
Best known for its line “good fences make good neighbors,” Mending Wall involves a narrator recounting his relationship with a neighbor, and the neighbor’s calm persistence that a good boundary wall makes good neighbors. The poem describes how and why, each spring, they walk together to fix a rock wall that is the common boundary of their property. This essay seeks to make the case for how Mending Wall also can inform the common law of negligence.
After a discussion of how the author came to write the piece, the essay briefly discusses the context for, and some commentary about, Mending Wall, with the poem included in the Appendix. The essay then provides seven examples of how selected lines from Mending Wall can inform the common law of negligence. Starting with the adage that good fences make good neighbors, the examples help demonstrate when a legal fence needs to be solid and unyielding in delineating the elements of a prima facie negligence claim; when a fence provides an outer boundary for a negligence claim and when a fence is a boundary excluding a negligence claim; when a fence is not needed to define the boundary between types of remedies; how a fence implies a division of labor in what a judge decides and what a jury decides; that the outlier case can try to pull down a fence and, finally, how gaps in a fence are the grist for the mill that is the common law.
The essay seeks to show that Mending Wall can be used to help inform the common law of negligence, in certain respects when viewed in a certain way. It does so, the essay suggests, episodically. It provides glimpses and clues, not comprehensive directives, and offers general targets to focus on in the study of common law negligence.
Viewed in a concrete way, Mending Wall is about neighbors fixing a stone wall they share on a cold, early spring day. But it is much more than that. In these ways, as the essay suggests, Mending Wall can inform the common law of negligence.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Heather Marking and Laurie Anne Thorhaug for editorial comments on a prior version of this essay as well as Professor Ellen M. Bublick, Dan B. Dobbs Professor of Law, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, and her Spring 2018 Economic and Dignitary Torts class, who provided helpful comments and feedback on a lecture on this same topic. The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Arizona Court of Appeals.
Appendix
https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/mending-wall (last visited July 3, 2018).
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- Editor’s Introduction
- Articles
- Reflections of a Torts Teacher on the Bench
- Deciding Novel and Routine Cases without Evidence
- “Mending Wall” and Negligence: How a Poem can Inform the Common Law
- Evaluating Credibility of Witnesses – are We Instructing Jurors on Invalid Factors?
- Moral Outrage and Betrayal Aversion: The Psychology of Punitive Damages
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- Editor’s Introduction
- Articles
- Reflections of a Torts Teacher on the Bench
- Deciding Novel and Routine Cases without Evidence
- “Mending Wall” and Negligence: How a Poem can Inform the Common Law
- Evaluating Credibility of Witnesses – are We Instructing Jurors on Invalid Factors?
- Moral Outrage and Betrayal Aversion: The Psychology of Punitive Damages