Abstract
Verbal Person Marking is a neglected feature of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages. TH systems are of great typological interest, showing both canonical versions and unusual variations of both hierarchical and accusative alignment. The predominant and ancestral pattern is hierarchical, but we also see innovative accusative patterns. Canonical hierarchical and accusative systems do occur, but a majority of VPM systems of both alignments show variations on the basic patterns. Hierarchical systems sometimes develop means to index both participants in a transitive configuration rather than only the higher. Accusative systems frequently develop secondary O indexation for SAP arguments, and sometimes move further in the direction of hierarchical patterning. Thus Trans-Himalayan offers a wealth of examples of VPM systems, which deserve greater attention from the field of typology.
References
Arden, Michelle. 2010. A phonetic, phonological, and morphosyntactic analysis of the Mara language. MA thesis, San Diego State University. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3744 (accessed 22 January 2012).Search in Google Scholar
Bareh, Curiously & Juanita War. 2014. Verbal agreement in Monsang. In J. War, S. K. Singh, S. A. Lyngdoh & B. Khyriem (eds.), Tibeto-Burman linguistics of North East India, 199–209. Guwahati, India: EBH Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Baruah, P.N. Dutta & V.L.T. Bapui. 1996. Hmar grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, James. 1975. Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.10.32655/LTBA.1.1.05Search in Google Scholar
Bedell, George, Kee Shein Mang & Khar Thuan. 2001. Agreement in Laizo. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1. 11–22.Search in Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2). 1–11.10.32655/LTBA.23.2.01Search in Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Giorgio Iemmolo, Taras Zakharko & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich. 2013. Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 15–36. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110331127.15Search in Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharo & Giorgio Iemmolo. 2015. Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. In Jürg Fleischer, Elizabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 29–52. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110399967-003Search in Google Scholar
Boro, Krishna. 2012. Verb agreement in Hakhun Tangsa. Presented at the18th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Vanarasi.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Victoria Yen-Hsin. 2015. “Split inversion” in Nyagrong Minyag and its implication for the evolution of the rGyalrongic direct/inverse system. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 46.2: 1–20.Search in Google Scholar
Chhangte, Lalnunthangi. 1993. Mizo syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.Search in Google Scholar
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1971. An introduction to the Nocte language. Shillong: North-East Frontier Agency.Search in Google Scholar
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1977. A phrase book in Miju. Shillong: Director of Information and Public Relations, Arunachal Pradesh.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3). 626–57.10.2307/414343Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2010. Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–38.10.5070/H99123042Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2013a. The history of postverbal agreement in Kuki-Chin. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 6. 1–17.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2013b. Argument indexation (verb agreement) in Kuki-Chin. Presented at the 46th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Dartmouth College.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2014a. Creolization in the divergence of Tibeto-Burman. In Nathan Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area, 41–70. Berlin and New York: Mouton.10.1515/9783110310832.41Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2014b. Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 3–33.10.1075/ltba.37.1.01lanSearch in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2014c. Sociolinguistic typology in Northeast India: A tale of two branches. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 1(1). 59–82.10.1515/jsall-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2015a. Morphological evidence for a central branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 44(2). 122–149.10.1163/19606028-00442p02Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2015b. The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13(2). 37–56.10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.463Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2016a. Reconstructing hierarchical indexation for Proto-Trans-Himalayan. Presented at the Fourth Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Southwest China, Seattle, 8 September 2016.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. To appear. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Joana Jansen & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachrony of hierarchical systems. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott, Krishna Boro, Linda Konnerth & Amos Teo. 2015. Tibeto-Burman languages of the Indo-Myanmar borderland. Presented at the 31st South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable, Lancaster, 14 May 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of eastern Nepal. Leiden: Leiden University Ph.D. dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 2013. Biactantial agreement in the Gongduk transitive verb in the broader Tibeto-Burman context. In Tim Thornes et al. (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation, 69–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.103.04vanSearch in Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 2014. Trans-Himalayan. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 11–40. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110310832.11Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1987. Grammatical marking of speech act participants in Tibeto-Burman. Journal of Pragmatics 11(4). 473–482.10.1016/0378-2166(87)90090-7Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1991. Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: Evidence from Belhare. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1). 73–92.10.32655/LTBA.14.1.03Search in Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2007. A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198812Search in Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2014. The personal agreement system of Zbu Rgyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1). 44–60.10.1111/1467-968X.12007Search in Google Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen. 2008. A descriptive grammar of two dialects of Magar in Nepal: Tanahu and Syangjar Magar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian. 1857. Comparative grammar of the broken tribes of Nepal. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 26. 317–332.Search in Google Scholar
Huber, Christian. 2014. Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 221–274. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110310832.221Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1). 127–157.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2012. Agreement morphology: the case of Rgyalrong and Kiranti. Languages and Linguistics 13(1). 83–116.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, & Anton Antonov. 2014. Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7). 301–318.10.1111/lnc3.12079Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1095–1170.Search in Google Scholar
King, John. 2002. Marked transitive scenarios and archaic biactinal agreement morphology in Dhimal. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34. 39–69.10.1080/03740463.2002.10414608Search in Google Scholar
King, John. 2009. A grammar of Dhimal. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda. 2015. A new type of convergence at the deictic center: Second person and cislocative in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). Studies in Language 39(1). 24–45.10.1075/sl.39.1.02konSearch in Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda & Koninglee Wanglar. 2014. Monsang, a Northwestern Kuki-Chin language from Manipur. Presented at the 47th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. Yunnan Normal University, Kunming.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimee. 2003. Thulung Rai. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 1. 1–25 (10 November 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (rGyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 271–285.10.1111/1467-968X.12051Search in Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. 2010. Hierarchical person marking in the Rawang language. In Dai Zhaoming (ed.), Forty years of Sino-Tibetan language studies: Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, 107–113. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang University Press.Search in Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. 2013. Subgrouping in Tibeto-Burman. In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore Grenoble, David Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency, 463–474. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.104.21lapSearch in Google Scholar
Li, Daqin. 2002. Geman Yu Yanjiu [Study of the Kaman language] Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Search in Google Scholar
Lockwood, Hunter & Monica Macaulay. 2012. Prominence hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass 6/7. 431–446.10.1002/lnc3.345Search in Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2016. The internal diversity of Tangsa: Vocabulary and morphosyntax. In Mark Post, Stephen Morey & Scott DeLancey (eds.), Language and culture in northeast India and beyond: In honor of Robbins Burling, 23–40. Canberra, Australian National University: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Saxena, Anju. 1997. Towards a reconstruction of the Proto West Himalayish agreement system. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas (Pacific Linguistics Series A, no.86; Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, 14), 73–94. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, H. Surmangol & N. Gopendro Singh. 2011. Person-marking prefixes of Purum. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics 3, 3–23. New Delhi: Foundation/Cambridge University Press India.10.1017/UPO9788175968875.003Search in Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812729Search in Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2013. Alignment of Verbal Person Marking. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/100 (accessed 8 May 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai & Liu Guangkun. 2009. A grammar of Anong: Language death under intense contact. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson Tian-Shin. 2015. Heishuixian shadanduo Jiarong yu dongci rencheng fanchou de tedian. (Remarkable features in the verb agreement system of Sastod rGyalrong in Khrochu County). Language and Linguistics 16.5: 731–750.10.1177/1606822X15583255Search in Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson Tian-Shin & Tian Qianzi. 2013. Huoer yu Gexi hua dongci duixie (Verb agreement in Gexi Horpa). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 7.2: 221–241.10.1163/2405478X-90000120Search in Google Scholar
Takahashi, Yoshiharu. 2009. On the verbal affixes in West Himalayan. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics (Senri Ethnological Studies 75), 21–49. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Search in Google Scholar
Thounaojam, Harimon & Shobhana Chelliah. 2007. The Lamkhang language: Grammatical sketch, texts and lexicon. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(1). 1–211.Search in Google Scholar
Turin, Mark. 2012. A grammar of the Thangmi language. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Watters, David. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486883Search in Google Scholar
Weidert, Alfons. 1985. Paradigmatic typology and verb agreement analysis. In Ursula Pieper & Gerhard Stickel (eds.), Studia Linguistica Diachronica et Synchronica: Werner Winter Sexagenario Anno MCMLXXXIII, 903–936. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110850604-072Search in Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel. 2015. The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Jürg Fleischer, Elizabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 53–74. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110399967Search in Google Scholar
Willis, Christina. 2007. A descriptive grammar of Darma: An endangered Tibeto-Burman language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Search in Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, Taras Zakharo, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zúñiga & Balthasar Bickel. 2016. Decomposing hierarchical alignment: co-arguments and conditions on alignment. Linguistics 54(3). 483–529.10.1515/ling-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2006. Deixis and alignment: Inverse systems in indigenous languages of the Americas. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.70Search in Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2008. How many hierarchies, really? Evidence from several Algonquian languages. In Marc Richards & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Scales (Linguistische Arbeits Berichte 86), 277–294. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
©2017 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Retroflexion in South Asia: Typological, genetic, and areal patterns
- Typological profile of the Great Andamanese family
- Hierarchical and accusative alignment of Verbal Person Marking in Trans-Himalayan
- Profiling Indo-Aryan in the Hindukush-Karakoram: A preliminary study of micro-typological patterns
- Book Reviews
- Hans Henrich Hock: Vedic studies: Language, texts, culture, and philosophy. Proceedings of the 15th World Sanskrit Conference
- Helmut Humbach and Klaus Faiss: Avestica
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Retroflexion in South Asia: Typological, genetic, and areal patterns
- Typological profile of the Great Andamanese family
- Hierarchical and accusative alignment of Verbal Person Marking in Trans-Himalayan
- Profiling Indo-Aryan in the Hindukush-Karakoram: A preliminary study of micro-typological patterns
- Book Reviews
- Hans Henrich Hock: Vedic studies: Language, texts, culture, and philosophy. Proceedings of the 15th World Sanskrit Conference
- Helmut Humbach and Klaus Faiss: Avestica
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum