Rejoinder to Myers (2016)
-
Rajitha M. Silva
Abstract
In this rejoinder we summarize the differences between Myers, B. R. 2012. “A Proposed Decision Rule for the Timing of Soccer Substitutions.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports8: Article 9 and Silva, R. M. and T. B. Swartz. 2016. “Analysis of Substitution Times in Soccer.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 12(3):113–122. We also extend the model of Silva and Swartz (2016).
References
Myers, B. R. 2012. “A Proposed Decision Rule for the Timing of Soccer Substitutions.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 8: Article 9.10.1515/1559-0410.1349Search in Google Scholar
Silva, R. M. and T. B. Swartz. 2016. “Analysis of Substitution Times in Soccer.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 12(3):113–122.10.1515/jqas-2015-0114Search in Google Scholar
©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Article
- Analysis of substitution times in soccer
- Commentary
- Analysis of substitution times in soccer (Silva and Swartz)
- Rejoinder
- Rejoinder to Myers (2016)
- Research Articles from the MathSport International Conference
- Searching for the GOAT of tennis win prediction
- A combined approximation for the traveling tournament problem and the traveling umpire problem
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Article
- Analysis of substitution times in soccer
- Commentary
- Analysis of substitution times in soccer (Silva and Swartz)
- Rejoinder
- Rejoinder to Myers (2016)
- Research Articles from the MathSport International Conference
- Searching for the GOAT of tennis win prediction
- A combined approximation for the traveling tournament problem and the traveling umpire problem
