Home Evaluating fetal tricuspid and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE and MAPSE) using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evaluating fetal tricuspid and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE and MAPSE) using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode

  • Hagai Avnet ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Samantha Thomas , Anna Erenbourg , Simcha Yagel and Alec Welsh
Published/Copyright: May 10, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of tricuspid and mitral annular plane systolic excursion measurements (TAPSE and MAPSE) applying M-mode spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) technology in low-risk pregnancies.

Methods

An initial retrospective pilot study was carried out to assess repeatability, followed by a larger mixed cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal study, both evaluating low-risk singleton pregnancies between 22+6 and 39+1 weeks. As only annuli capture was necessary, STIC acquisition parameters were set to the minimum volume angle of 15° and acquisition time of 7.5 s.

Results

A total of 330 volumes were analysed offline applying STIC M-mode. Acquisition rates were 96.9 % for TAPSE and 93.7 % MAPSE in the pilot study (n=32) and 98.0 % for both in the longitudinal study (n=102). Both study designs revealed good repeatability for both sides of the heart, with higher intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for TAPSE (0.84–0.94) compared to MAPSE (0.80–0.88). Good repeatability was demonstrated for both sides of the heart, more so for TAPSE than MAPSE, with ICCs for TAPSE 0.84–0.91 and MAPSE 0.75–0.76, comparable to prior ICCs for STIC repeatability.

Conclusions

Modified STIC acquisition settings specifically tailored for capturing the longitudinal annular displacement may improve STIC TAPSE and MAPSE acquisition rates, optimising image quality for precise measurement and potentially bringing these modalities closer to clinical application.


Corresponding author: Hagai Avnet, PhD, School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Women’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, TelHashomer, Israel, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted as part of the PhD thesis of Dr Hagai Avnet at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

  1. Research ethics: This study obtained Ethical Approval (SESLHD HREC Reference 13/320) by the Southeastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: All the authors have revised and contribute to draft the manuscript. The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Germanakis, I, Pepes, S, Sifakis, S, Gardiner, H. Fetal longitudinal myocardial function assessment by anatomic M-mode. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330790.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Cruz-Lemini, M, Crispi, F, Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B, Figueras, F, Sitges, M, Gomez, O, et al.. Value of annular M-mode displacement vs tissue Doppler velocities to assess cardiac function in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12374.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Gardiner, HM, Pasquini, L, Wolfenden, J, Barlow, A, Li, W, Kulinskaya, E, et al.. Myocardial tissue Doppler and long axis function in the fetal heart. Int J Cardiol 2006;113:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.10.029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Ortiz, JU, Crispi, F, Yamamoto, R, Masoller, N, Cruz-Lemini, M, Gomez, O, et al.. Longitudinal annular displacement by M-mode (MAPSE and TAPSE) in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome before and after laser surgery. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:1197–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4671.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ho, SY, Nihoyannopoulos, P. Anatomy, echocardiography, and normal right ventricular dimensions. Heart 2006;92(1 Suppl):i2–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.077875.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Kjaergaard, J, Akkan, D, Iversen, KK, Kober, L, Torp-Pedersen, C, Hassager, C. Right ventricular dysfunction as an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2007;9:610–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.03.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Koestenberger, M, Nagel, B, Ravekes, W, Everett, AD, Stueger, HP, Heinzl, B, et al.. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and right ventricular ejection fraction in pediatric and adolescent patients with tetralogy of Fallot, patients with atrial septal defect, and age-matched normal subjects. Clin Res Cardiol 2011;100:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0213-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Carvalho, JS, O’Sullivan, C, Shinebourne, EA, Henein, MY. Right and left ventricular long-axis function in the fetus using angular M-mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:619–22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00587.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Godfrey, ME, Messing, B, Valsky, DV, Cohen, SM, Yagel, S. Fetal cardiac function: M-mode and 4D spatiotemporal image correlation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335357.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Carerj, S, Micari, A, Trono, A, Giordano, G, Cerrito, M, Zito, C, et al.. Anatomical M-mode: an old-new technique. Echocardiography 2003;20:357–61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003.03041.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Yagel, S, Cohen, SM, Achiron, R. Examination of the fetal heart by five short-axis views: a proposed screening method for comprehensive cardiac evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:367–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00414.x.Search in Google Scholar

12. Yagel, S, Cohen, SM, Shapiro, I, Valsky, DV. 3D and 4D ultrasound in fetal cardiac scanning: a new look at the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:81–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3912.Search in Google Scholar

13. Messing, B, Gilboa, Y, Lipschuetz, M, Valsky, DV, Cohen, SM, Yagel, S. Fetal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (f-TAPSE): evaluation of fetal right heart systolic function with conventional M-mode ultrasound and spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:182–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12375.Search in Google Scholar

14. Koo, TK, Li, MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.Search in Google Scholar

15. Walter, SD, Eliasziw, M, Donner, A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998;17:101–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::aid-sim727>3.3.co;2-5.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.3.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar

16. Goncalves, LF, Lee, W, Espinoza, J, Romero, R. Examination of the fetal heart by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound with spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:336–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2724.Search in Google Scholar

17. Avnet, H, Mazaaki, E, Shen, O, Cohen, S, Yagel, S. Evaluating spatiotemporal image correlation technology as a tool for training nonexpert sonographers to perform examinations of the fetal heart. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:111–9. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.01072.Search in Google Scholar

18. WFUMB policy and statements on safety of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:926–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.007. PMID: 23499342.Search in Google Scholar

19. McGraw, KO, Wong, SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlations coefficients (vol 1, pg 30, 1996). Psychol Methods 1996;1:390. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.1.4.390.Search in Google Scholar

20. Tanis, JC, Mohammed, N, Bennasar, M, Martinez, JM, Bijnens, B, Crispi, F, et al.. Online versus offline spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode for the evaluation of cardiac longitudinal annular displacement in fetal growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1330408.Search in Google Scholar

21. Sengupta, PP, Tajik, AJ, Chandrasekaran, K, Khandheria, BK. Twist mechanics of the left ventricle: principles and application. JACC Cardiovasc imaging 2008;1:366–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lee-Tannock, A, Hay, K, Gooi, A, Kumar, S. Longitudinal reference ranges for tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and mitral annular plane systolic excursion in normally grown fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2020;39:929–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15177.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Peixoto, AB, Bravo-Valenzuela, NJ, Martins, WP, Tonni, G, Mattar, R, Moron, AF, et al.. Reference ranges for the fetal mitral, tricuspid, and interventricular septum annular plane systolic excursions (mitral annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and septum annular plane systolic excursion) between 20 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 2020;48:601–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Tedesco, GD, de Souza Bezerra, M, Barros, FSB, Martins, WP, Nardozza, LMM, Mattar, R, et al.. Fetal heart function by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and ventricular shortening fraction using STIC M-mode: reference ranges and validation. Am J Perinatol 2017;34:1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603652.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Welsh, AW, Maheshwari, P, Wang, J, Henry, A, Chang, D, Crispi, F, et al.. Evaluation of an automated fetal myocardial performance index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:496–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15770.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0423).


Received: 2023-10-06
Accepted: 2024-01-28
Published Online: 2024-05-10
Published in Print: 2024-07-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Newborns at risk of COVID-19, the story continues
  4. Opinion Paper
  5. Why do women choose home births
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Association between aneuploidy screening analytes and adverse outcomes in twin gestations
  8. Vaginal matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a potential early predictor of preterm birth
  9. Intrapartum pyrexia, cardiotocography traces and histologic chorioamnionitis: a case-control study
  10. Effect of maternal asthma on fetal pulmonary artery Doppler parameters: a case-control study
  11. Association of BDNF polymorphism with gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a novel insight into genetic predisposition
  12. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of embryonic genital tubercle at 8–10+6 weeks of gestation
  13. Ultrasound prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  14. Comparative analysis of ultrasonographic fetal lung texture in twin and singleton fetuses
  15. Association between first-trimester uterine artery Doppler and crown-rump length with growth discordance: does it make a difference
  16. Original Articles – Fetus
  17. Evaluating fetal tricuspid and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE and MAPSE) using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) M-mode
  18. Hepatic arterial buffer response in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction
  19. Original Articles – Neonates
  20. Increases in drug-related infant mortality in the United States
  21. Factors of poor prognosis in newborns with a prenatal diagnosis of gastroschisis in Bogota, Colombia
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2023-0423/html
Scroll to top button