Home Can we improve our ability to interpret category II fetal heart rate tracings using additional clinical parameters?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Can we improve our ability to interpret category II fetal heart rate tracings using additional clinical parameters?

  • Yael Yagur EMAIL logo , Omer Weitzner , Tal Biron-Shental , Tzipi Hornik-Lurie , Shiran Bookstein Peretz , Yehuda Tzur and Gil Shechter Maor
Published/Copyright: June 10, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

This study examined predictive factors, in addition to Category II Fetal Herat Rate (FHR) monitoring that might imply fetal acidosis and risk of asphyxia.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared three groups of patients with Category II FHR monitoring indicating need for imminent delivery. Groups were divided based on fetal cord blood pH: pH≤7.0, 7.0<pH<7.2 and pH≥7.2. Demographics, medical history, delivery data and early neonatal outcomes were reviewed.

Results

The cohort included 417 women. Nine (2.2%) had cord pH≤7.0, 105 (25.2%) pH 7.0 to 7.2 and 303 (72.6%) ad pH≥7.2. Background characteristics, pregnancy follow-up and intrauterine fetal evaluation prior to delivery were similar in all groups. As expected, more patients in the low pH group had cesarean section (55.6%), than vaginal delivery or vacuum extraction (p=0.02). Five-minute Apgar scores were similar in all groups.

Conclusions

This retrospective study did not detect a specific parameter that could help predict the prognosis of fetal acidosis and risk of asphyxia. As we only included patients with a Category II tracing that was worrisome enough to lead to imminent delivery, it is reasonable to believe that this is due to patient selection, meaning that when the Category II FHR results in decision for prompt delivery, there is no added value in additional clinical characteristics. The evaluation should be expanded to all patients with Category II tracing for better interpretation tools for Category II FHR monitors, as well as a larger study population.


Corresponding author: Yael Yagur, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St. Kfar Saba, Israel; and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, Phone: +972 97472232, Fax: +972 97472646, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was conducted according to good clinical practice guidelines and was approved by the Meir medical center Institutional Review Board. Due to retrospective nature of the study, informed consent for participation was not required.

References

1. Ahearne, CE, Boylan, GB, Murray, DM. Short and long term prognosis in perinatal asphyxia: an update. World J Clin Pediatr 2016;5:67–74. https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v5.i1.67.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Fatemi, A, Wilson, MA, Johnston, MV. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the term infant. Clin Perinatol 2009;36:835–58. vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2009.07.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Azzopardi, DV, Strohm, B, Edwards, AD, Dyet, L, Halliday, HL, Juszczak, E, et al.. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1349–58. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900854.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Executive summary: Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:896–901. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000445580.65983.d2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Low, JA, Pickersgill, H, Killen, H, Derrick, EJ. The prediction and prevention of intrapartum fetal asphyxia in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:724–30. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.111720.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GML, Cuthbert, A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:CD006066. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Ugwumadu, A. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121:1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12900.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1232–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182004fa9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Macones, GA. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. MacOnes, GA, Hankins, GDV, Spong, CY, Hauth, J, Moore, T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;37:510–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00284.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Jackson, M, Holmgren, CM, Esplin, MS, Henry, E, Varner, MW. Frequency of fetal heart rate categories and short-term neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:803–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f1b50.Search in Google Scholar

12. Cahill, AG, Roehl, KA, Odibo, AO, MacOnes, GA. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:206.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.046.Search in Google Scholar

13. Samueloff, A, Langer, O, Berkus, M, Field, N, Xenakis, E, Ridgway, L. Is fetal heart rate variability a good predictor of fetal outcome? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:39–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349409013391.Search in Google Scholar

14. Parer, JT, King, T, Flanders, S, Fox, M, Kilpatrick, SJ. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: is there evidence of an association? J Matern Neonatal Med 2006;19:289–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050500526172.Search in Google Scholar

15. Martin, CB, de Haan, J, van der Wildt, B, Jongsma, HW, Dieleman, A, Arts, THM. Mechanisms of late decelerations in the fetal heart rate. A study with autonomic blocking agents in fetal lambs. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1979;9:361–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(79)90129-1.Search in Google Scholar

16. Williams, KP, Galerneau, F. Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns in the prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;88:820–3. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.183.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Triebwasser, JE, Colvin, R, Macones, GA, Cahill, AG. Nonreassuring fetal status in the second stage of labor: fetal monitoring features and association with neonatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2016;33:665–70. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1571316.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Xu, H, Mas-Calvet, M, Wei, SQ, Luo, ZC, Fraser, WD. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns in patients with thick meconium staining of the amniotic fluid: association with perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:283.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Galinsky, R, Polglase, GR, Hooper, SB, Black, MJ, Moss, TJM. The consequences of chorioamnionitis: preterm birth and effects on development. J Pregnancy 2013;2013:412831. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/412831.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Delaney, M, Roggensack, A. No. 214-Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 weeks. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2017;39:e164–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.04.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Marroquin, GA, Tudorica, N, Salafia, CM, Hecht, R, Mikhail, M. Induction of labor at 41 weeks of pregnancy among primiparas with an unfavorable Bishop score. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;288:989–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3006-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:386–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. ACOG committee opinion no. 346: Amnioninfusion does not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1053. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200610000-00048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Moshiro, R, Mdoe, P, Perlman, JM. A global view of neonatal asphyxia and resuscitation. Front Pediatr 2019;7:489. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00489.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Soncini, E, Paganelli, S, Vezzani, C, Gargano, G, Giovanni Battista, LS. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity. J Matern Neonatal Med 2014;27:1465–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.858690.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Malin, GL, Morris, RK, Khan, KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;340:c1471. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1471.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Victory, R, Penava, D, Da Silva, O, Natale, R, Richardson, B. Umbilical cord pH and base excess values in relation to adverse outcome events for infants delivering at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;91:2021–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.026.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Tita, ATN, Jablonski, KA, Bailit, JL, Grobman, WA, Wapner, RJ, Reddy, UM, et al.. Neonatal outcomes of elective early-term births after demonstrated fetal lung maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:296.e1–296.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Gabbay-Benziv, R, Hadar, E, Ashwal, E, Chen, R, Wiznitzer, A, Hiersch, L. Induction of labor: does indication matter? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;294:1195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4171-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Starks, GC. Correlation of meconium-Stained amniotic fluid, early intrapartum fetal pH, and apgar scores as predictors of perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56:604–9.Search in Google Scholar

31. Hadar, A, Sheiner, E, Hallak, M, Katz, M, Mazor, M, Shoham-Vardi, I. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:863–8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.117359.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Abdo, RA, Halil, HM, Kebede, BA, Anshebo, AA, Gejo, NG. Prevalence and contributing factors of birth asphyxia among the neonates delivered at Nigist Eleni Mohammed memorial teaching hospital, Southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2696-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Altman, M, Sandström, A, Petersson, G, Frisell, T, Cnattingius, S, Stephansson, O. Prolonged second stage of labor is associated with low Apgar score. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30:1209–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0043-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Zipori, Y, Grunwald, O, Ginsberg, Y, Beloosesky, R, Weiner, Z. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:191.e1–191.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Hannah, ME, Ohlsson, A, Farine, D, Hewson, SA, Hodnett, ED, Myhr, TL, et al.. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1005–10. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199604183341601.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Simon, L, Hashmi, M, Bragg, B. StatPearls [Internet]. APGAR Score. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

37. Committee Opinion No. 644: the apgar score. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e52–5.10.1097/AOG.0000000000001108Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-12-15
Accepted: 2021-05-12
Published Online: 2021-06-10
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Global incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage among extremely preterm infants: a systematic literature review
  4. Commentary
  5. Professional integrity in maternal – fetal innovation and research: an essential component of perinatal medicine
  6. WAPM Recommendations
  7. WAPM-World Association of Perinatal Medicine Practice Guidelines: Fetal central nervous system examination
  8. Corner of Academy
  9. Education in developing countries and reducing maternal mortality: a forgotten piece of the puzzle?
  10. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  11. The contemporary value of dedicated preterm birth clinics for high-risk singleton pregnancies: 15-year outcomes from a leading maternal centre
  12. Chorioamnionitis after premature rupture of membranes in nulliparas undergoing labor induction: prostaglandin E2 vs. oxytocin
  13. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with obstructive sleep apnea
  14. Assessing the involvement of the placental microbiome and virome in preeclampsia using non coding RNA sequencing
  15. Risk of metformin failure in the treatment of women with gestational diabetes
  16. Can we improve our ability to interpret category II fetal heart rate tracings using additional clinical parameters?
  17. New obstetric systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for early identification of high-risk of sepsis in obstetric patients
  18. Bacteria in the amniotic fluid without inflammation: early colonization vs. contamination
  19. Intertwin differences in umbilical artery pulsatility index are associated with infant survival in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
  20. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with disorders of lipid metabolism
  21. The use of PAMG-1 testing in patients with preterm labor, intact membranes and a short sonographic cervix reduces the rate of unnecessary antenatal glucocorticoid administration
  22. Original Articles – Neonates
  23. The effect of postnatal corticosteroids on growth parameters in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  24. Are neonatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies different from those of singletons according to gestational age?
  25. Impact of paternal presence and parental social-demographic characteristics on birth outcomes
  26. Letter to the Editor
  27. Comment on: “amniotic fluid embolism – implementation of international diagnosis criteria and subsequent pregnancy recurrence risk”
Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0592/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button