Additional benefits of three-dimensional ultrasound for prenatal assessment of twins

References

1. Wataganara T, Ruangvutilert P, Sunsaneevithayakul P, Russameecharoen K, Nawapun K, Phithakwatchara N. Three-dimensional ultrasound for prenatal assessment of conjoined twins: additional advantages? J Perinat Med 2017;45:667–91.10.1515/jpm-2016-0381Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS Data Brief 2012;80:1–8.Search in Google Scholar

3. Simpson LL. Ultrasound in twins: dichorionic and monochorionic. Semin Perinatol 2013;37:348–58.10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Morin L, Lim K. No. 260-ultrasound in twin pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2017;39:e398–e411.10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Lee YM. Delivery of twins. Semin Perinatol 2012;36:195–200.10.1053/j.semperi.2012.02.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva Costa F, Deter RL, Figueras F, Ghi T, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;53:715–23.10.1002/uog.20272Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Napolitano R, Dhami J, Jhuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy SH, et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts. Br J Obstect Gynecol 2014;121:556–65.10.1111/1471-0528.12478Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Smeets NA, van de Ven J, Oei SG. Inter- and intra-observer variation of fetal volume measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med 2011;39:539–43.10.1515/jpm.2011.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Barra DA, Navarro PA, Mauad Filho F,Ferriani RA. Fetal volume and crown-rump length from 7 to 10 weeks of gestational age in singletons and twins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;145:32–5.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Baken L, van Heesch PN, Wildschut HI, Koning AH, van der Spek PJ, Steegers EA, et al. First-trimester crown-rump length and embryonic volume of aneuploid fetuses measured in virtual reality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:521–5.10.1002/uog.12365Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lu J, Cheng YK, Ting YH, Law KM, Leung TY. Pitfalls in assessing chorioamnionicity: novel observations and literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:242–54.10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Maruotti GM, Saccone G, Morlando M, Martinelli P. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;202:66–70.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Senat MV, Quarello E, Levaillant JM, Buonumano A, Boulvain M, Frydman R. Determining chorionicity in twin gestations: three-dimensional (3D) multiplanar sonographic measurement of intra-amniotic membrane thickness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:665–9.10.1002/uog.2835Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rustico MA, Baietti MG, Coviello D, Orlandi E, Nicolini U. Managing twins discordant for fetal anomaly. Prenat Diagn 2005;25:766–71.10.1002/pd.1260Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Vandecruys H, Avgidou K, Surerus E, Flack N, Nicolaides KH. Dilemmas in the management of twins discordant for anencephaly diagnosed at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:653–8.10.1002/uog.2836Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Moreira de Sa RA, Nassar de Carvalho PR, Kurjak A, Adra A, Dayyabu AL, Ebrashy A, et al. Is intrauterine surgery justified? Report from the working group on ultrasound in obstetrics of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM). J Perinat Med 2016;44:737–43.10.1515/jpm-2015-0132Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Kagan KO, Gazzoni A, Sepulveda-Gonzalez G, Sotiriadis A, Nicolaides KH. Discordance in nuchal translucency thickness in the prediction of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:527–32.10.1002/uog.4006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Wee LK, Chai HY, Samsury SR, Mujamil NF, Supriyanto E. Comparative studies of two dimensional and three dimensional ultrasonic nuchal translucency in trisomy assessments. An Acad Bras Cienc 2012;84:1157–68.10.1590/S0001-37652012000400030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Siqing N, Jinhua Y, Ping C, Yuanyuan W, Yi G, Jian Qiu Z. Automatic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency from three-dimensional ultrasound data. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2017;2017:3417–20.Search in Google Scholar

20. Clementschitsch G, Hasenohrl G, Schaffer H, Steiner H. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasound measurements of nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:475–80.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00566.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Van Keirsbilck J, Dewulf V, Van Calsteren K, De Catte L. Comparison and reproducibility of nuchal translucency measurements using two-dimensional and volume nuchal translucency ultrasound: a prospective study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;34:103–9.10.1159/000353234Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Khalifeh A, Weiner S, Berghella V, Scott S, Gerson A. Comparative analysis of two- versus three-dimensional sonography for nuchal translucency measurement. Am J Perinatol 2016;33:486–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.518Search in Google Scholar

23. Sebire NJ, D’Ercole C, Sepulveda W, Hughes K, Nicolaides KH. Effects of embryo reduction from trichorionic triplets to twins. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1201–3.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10947.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Denbow ML, Battin MR, Cowan F, Azzopardi D, Edwards AD, Fisk NM. Neonatal cranial ultrasonographic findings in preterm twins complicated by severe fetofetal transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:479–83.10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70424-7Search in Google Scholar

25. Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M, Paupe A, Winer N, Ville Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;351:136–44.10.1056/NEJMoa032597Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Wataganara T, Gratacos E, Jani J, Becker J, Lewi L, Sullivan LM, et al. Persistent elevation of cell-free fetal DNA levels in maternal plasma after selective laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses in severe midgestational twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:604–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Welsh AW, Taylor MJ, Cosgrove D, Fisk NM. Freehand three-dimensional Doppler demonstration of monochorionic vascular anastomoses in vivo: a preliminary report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:317–24.10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00552.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Nawapun K, Phithakwatchara N, Jaingam S, Viboonchart S, Mongkolchat N, Wataganara T. Advanced ultrasound for prenatal interventions. Ultrasonography 2018;37:200–10.10.14366/usg.18011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Taylor MJ, Talbert DG, Fisk NM. Mapping the monochorionic equator – the new frontier. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:372–4.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14060372.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Machin GA, Feldstein VA, van Gemert MJ, Keith LG, Hecher K. Doppler sonographic demonstration of arterio-venous anastomosis in monochorionic twin gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:214–7.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00231.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Wataganara T, Chanprapaph P, Chuangsuwanich T,Kanokpongsakdi S, Chuenwattana P, Titapant V. Reverse twin-twin transfusion syndrome after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of chorionic anastomoses: a case report. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009;26:111–4.10.1159/000238106Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Werner H, Dos Santos JL, Sa RA, Daltro P, Gasparetto E, Marchiori E, et al. Visualisation of the vascular equator in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome by virtual fetoscopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:1183–4.10.1007/s00404-015-3891-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Galluzo RN, Franco MJ, Faust LW, Dacorégio KS, Braga JR, Werner Junior H, et al. Virtual three-dimensional placentoscopy: a new approach to assess residual anastomoses following laser photocoagulation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31:518–20.10.1080/14767058.2017.1286321Search in Google Scholar

34. Mocarzel CC, de Sa RA, Velarde LG, Peixoto-Filho FM, Ville Y. 3D ultrasonography to evaluate fetal urinary production rates in twin gestation: construction of a normal value curve. Twin Res Hum Genet 2014;17:45–50.10.1017/thg.2013.82Search in Google Scholar

35. Yamamoto M, Essaoui M, Nasr B, Malek N, Takahashi Y, Moreira de Sa R, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic assessment of fetal urine production before and after laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:972–6.10.1002/uog.5218Search in Google Scholar

36. Lee SM, Park SK, Shim SS, Jun JK, Park JS, Syn HC. Measurement of fetal urine production by three-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:281–6.10.1002/uog.4038Search in Google Scholar

37. Touboul C, Boulvain M, Picone O, Levaillant JM, Frydman R, Senat MV. Normal fetal urine production rate estimated with 3-dimensional ultrasonography using the rotational technique (virtual organ computer-aided analysis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:57.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.012Search in Google Scholar

38. Lee SM, Jun JK, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Park CW, Park JS, et al. Measurement of fetal urine production to differentiate causes of increased amniotic fluid volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:191–5.10.1002/uog.7519Search in Google Scholar

39. Cheung YF, Taylor MJ, Fisk NM, Redington AN, Gardiner HM. Fetal origins of reduced arterial distensibility in the donor twin in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Lancet 2000;355:1157–8.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02068-7Search in Google Scholar

40. Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Role of sonographic automatic volume calculation in measuring fetal cardiac ventricular volumes using 4-dimensional sonography: comparison with virtual organ computer-aided analysis. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:261–70.10.7863/jum.2010.29.2.261Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Kist WJ, Slaghekke F, Papanna R, Johnson A, Vandenbussche FP, Wolterbeek R, et al. Sonography-based automated volume count to estimate fetal urine production in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:574.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.090Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Favre R, Koch A, Weingertner AS, Sananes N, Trieu NT, Kohler M, et al. Vascular pattern in monochorionic placentas with spontaneous TAPS and TTTS with residual anastomoses after laser: a case-control study. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:979–82.10.1002/pd.4177Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Liao H, Tsuzuki M, Mochizuki T, Kobayashi E, Chiba T, Sakuma I. Fast image mapping of endoscopic image mosaics with three-dimensional ultrasound image for intrauterine fetal surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2009;18:332–40.10.3109/13645700903201217Search in Google Scholar

44. Wataganara T, Ebrashy A, Aliyu LD, Moreira de Sa RA, Pooh R, Kurjak A, et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2016;44:533–42.10.1515/jpm-2015-0226Search in Google Scholar

45. Umur A, van Gemert MJ, van den Wijngaard JP, Ross MG, Nikkels PG. Haemodynamic resistance model of monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by acardiac twinning. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:N205–13.10.1088/0031-9155/49/14/N01Search in Google Scholar

46. Chen CY, Wu YC, Chen CL, Yang ML. Acardiac syndrome coexisting with complex skeletal dysplasia in the co-twin: 3D sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:387–9.10.1002/jcu.20296Search in Google Scholar

47. van Gemert MJ, Ross MG, Nikkels PG, Wijngaard JP. Acardiac twin pregnancies part III: model simulations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2016;106:1008–15.10.1002/bdra.23559Search in Google Scholar

48. Tavares de Sousa M, Glosemeyer P, Diemert A, Bamberg C, Hecher K. Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP): first-trimester intervention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019.10.1002/uog.20817Search in Google Scholar

49. Bornstein E, Monteagudo A, Dong R, Schwartz N, Timor-Tritsch IE. Detection of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence at the time of first-trimester screening: the added value of 3-dimensional volume and color Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1105–9.10.7863/jum.2008.27.7.1105Search in Google Scholar

50. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR. The interobserver reliability of ovarian volume measurement is improved with three-dimensional ultrasound, but dependent upon technique. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1685–90.10.1016/S0301-5629(03)01068-8Search in Google Scholar

51. Chang YL, Chang SD, Chao AS, Hsieh PC, Wang CN, Wang TH. Clinical outcome and placental territory ratio of monochorionic twin pregnancies and selective intrauterine growth restriction with different types of umbilical artery Doppler. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:253–6.10.1002/pd.2193Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. De Paepe ME, Shapiro S, Young L, Luks FI. Placental characteristics of selective birth weight discordance in diamniotic-monochorionic twin gestations. Placenta 2010;31:380–6.10.1016/j.placenta.2010.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Gou C, Li M, Zhang X, Liu X, Huang X, Zhou Y, et al. Placental characteristics in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction assessed by gradient angiography and three-dimensional reconstruction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:2590–5.10.1080/14767058.2016.1256995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Wataganara T, Metzenbauer M, Peter I, Johnson KL, Bianchi DW. Placental volume, as measured by 3-dimensional sonography and levels of maternal plasma cell-free fetal DNA. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:496–500.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Manthati S, Pratumvinit B, Hanyongyuth R, Udompunthurak S, Phaophan A, Wataganara T. Circulating free soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 during late first trimester in relation with placental volume as a surrogate for trophoblastic production: a physiology study in low-risk cohort. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:1976–83.10.1080/14767058.2016.1235697Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Bhuwapathanapun M, Pratumvinit B, Lahfahroengron P, Hanyongyuth S, Phaophan A, Pooliam J, et al. Serum-free placental growth factor isoform 1 at 11–13-week gestation: effects of maternal factors, mean arterial pressure, placental volume, and uterine artery pulsatility index. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31:2813–9.10.1080/14767058.2017.1357168Search in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Wegrzyn P, Fabio C, Peralta A, Faro C, Borenstein M, Nicolaides KH. Placental volume in twin and triplet pregnancies measured by three-dimensional ultrasound at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:647–51.10.1002/uog.2783Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Lai PK, Wang YA, Welsh AW. Reproducibility of regional placental vascularity/perfusion measurement using 3D power Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:202–9.10.1002/uog.7608Search in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Cabezas Lopez E, Martinez-Payo C, Engels Calvo V, San Frutos Llorente L, Perez-Medina T. Reproducibility of first trimester three-dimensional placental measurements. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;201:156–60.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Povoa A, Matias A, Xavier P, Blickstein I. Can early ultrasonography explain the lower miscarriage rates in twin as compared to singleton pregnancies following assisted reproduction? J Perinat Med 2018;46:760–3.10.1515/jpm-2017-0087Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Sun W, Liu J, Zhang Y, Cai A, Yang Z, Zhao Y, et al. Quantitative assessment of placental perfusion by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound for twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction in one twin. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;226:15–20.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Lewi L, Lewi P, Diemert A, Jani J, Gucciardo L, Van Mieghem T, et al. The role of ultrasound examination in the first trimester and at 16 weeks’ gestation to predict fetal complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:493.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Hardin J, Carmichael SL, Selvin S, Lammer EJ, Shaw GM. Increased prevalence of cardiovascular defects among 56,709 California twin pairs. Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:877–86.10.1002/ajmg.a.32745Search in Google Scholar

64. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R, Copel JA, DeVore GR, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:348–59.10.1002/uog.12403Search in Google Scholar

65. D’Antonio F, Familiari A, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou AT, Manzoli L, Khalil A, et al. Sensitivity of first-trimester ultrasound in the detection of congenital anomalies in twin pregnancies: population study and systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:1359–67.10.1111/aogs.13017Search in Google Scholar

66. Dyson RL, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, Johnson DD, Sklansky MS, Cantrell CJ, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:321–8.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00183.xSearch in Google Scholar

67. Werner H, Rolo LC, Araujo Junior E, Dos Santos JR. Manufacturing models of fetal malformations built from 3-dimensional ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scan data. Ultrasound Q 2014;30:69–75.10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000048Search in Google Scholar

68. Chaoui R, Abuhamad A, Martins J, Heling KS. Recent development in three and four dimension fetal echocardiography. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019:1–9 (in press). doi: 10.1159/000500454.10.1159/000500454Search in Google Scholar

69. Henrich W, Tutschek B. Cord entanglement in monoamniotic twins: 2D and 3D colour Doppler studies. Ultraschall Med 2008;29 Suppl 5:271–2.10.1055/s-2007-963641Search in Google Scholar

70. Hanaoka U, Tenkumo C, Ito M, Mori N, Tanaka H, Hata T. Three-dimensional surface-rendered imaging of cord entanglement in monoamniotic twins. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:1091–2.10.1007/s00404-012-2406-3Search in Google Scholar

71. Sepulveda W, Corral E, Kottmann C, Illanes S, Vasquez P,Monckeberg MJ. Umbilical artery aneurysm: prenatal identification in three fetuses with trisomy 18. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:292–6.10.1002/uog.69Search in Google Scholar

72. Welsh AW, Humphries K, Cosgrove DO, Taylor MJ, Fisk NM. Development of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound imaging of fetoplacental vasculature. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1161–70.10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00409-4Search in Google Scholar

73. Zanforlin Filho SM, Araujo Junior E, Filho ND, Dal Corso AL, Guimarães Filho HA, Nardozza LM, et al. Diagnosis of arterio-arterial anastomosis in monochorionic twin by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:178–80.10.1080/14767050802509603Search in Google Scholar

74. Amiel-Tison C. Update of the Amiel-Tison neurologic assessment for the term neonate or at 40 weeks corrected age. Pediatr Neurol 2002;27:196–212.10.1016/S0887-8994(02)00436-8Search in Google Scholar

75. Wataganara T, Grunebaum A, Chervenak F, Wielgos M. Delivery modes in case of fetal malformations. J Perinat Med 2017;45:273–9.10.1515/jpm-2015-0364Search in Google Scholar

76. Bonellie SR, Currie D, Chalmers J. Comparison of risk factors for cerebral palsy in twins and singletons. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005;47:587–91.10.1111/j.1469-8749.2005.tb01208.xSearch in Google Scholar

77. Laplaza FJ, Root L, Tassanawipas A, Cervera P. Cerebral palsy in twins. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992;34:1053–63.10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb11417.xSearch in Google Scholar

78. Fusi L, McParland P, Fisk N, Nicolini U, Wigglesworth J. Acute twin-twin transfusion: a possible mechanism for brain-damaged survivors after intrauterine death of a monochorionic twin. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:517–20.Search in Google Scholar

79. Nicolini U, Poblete A. Single intrauterine death in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:297–301.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14050297.xSearch in Google Scholar

80. Senat MV, Loizeau S, Couderc S, Bernard JP, Ville Y. The value of middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in the diagnosis of fetal anemia after intrauterine death of one monochorionic twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1320–4.10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00644-6Search in Google Scholar

81. Simonazzi G, Segata M, Ghi T, Sandri F, Ancora G, Bernardi B, et al. Accurate neurosonographic prediction of brain injury in the surviving fetus after the death of a monochorionic twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:517–21.10.1002/uog.2945Search in Google Scholar

82. Schwartz N, Keeler SM, Fishman S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Neurosonography to detect brain injury in a surviving monochorionic twin after demise of its co-twin. J Clin Ultrasound 2009;37:165–7.10.1002/jcu.20547Search in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Mackie FL, Morris RK, Kilby MD. Fetal brain injury in survivors of twin pregnancies complicated by demise of one twin: a review. Twin Res Hum Genet 2016;19:262–7.10.1017/thg.2016.39Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Rossi A, Romanello I, Forzano L, Fachechi G, Marchesoni D. Evaluation of fetal cerebral blood flow perfusion using power Doppler ultrasound angiography (3D-PDA) in growth-restricted fetuses. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2011;3:175–80.10.1002/uog.9597Search in Google Scholar

85. Lipa M, Pooh RK, Wielgos M. Three-dimensional neurosonography – a novel field in fetal medicine. Ginekol Pol 2017;88:215–21.10.5603/GP.a2017.0041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

86. Arabin B, Bos R, Rijlaarsdam R, Mohnhaupt A, van Eyck J. The onset of inter-human contacts: longitudinal ultrasound observations in early twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:166–73.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08030166.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

87. Sasaki M, Yanagihara T, Naitoh N, Hata T. Four-dimensional sonographic assessment of inter-twin contact late in the first trimester. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;108:104–7.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.09.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Hata T, Kanenishi K, Sasaki M, Yanagihara T. Fetal reflex movement in twin pregnancies late in the first trimester: 4-D sonographic study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:1948–51.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.06.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

89. Kurjak A, Talic A, Stanojevic M, Honemeyer U, Serra B, Prats P, et al. The study of fetal neurobehavior in twins in all three trimesters of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1186–95.10.3109/14767058.2013.773306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Kurjak A, Antsaklis P, Stanojevic M, Vladareanu R, Vladareanu S, Neto RM, et al. Multicentric studies of the fetal neurobehavior by KANET test. J Perinat Med 2017;45:717–27.10.1515/jpm-2016-0409Search in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Hata T, Sasaki M, Yanagihara T. Difference in the frequency of types of inter-twin contact at 10–13 weeks’ gestation: preliminary four-dimensional sonographic study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:226–30.10.3109/14767058.2011.568551Search in Google Scholar PubMed

92. Martinez L, Fernandez J, Pastor I, Garcia-Guereta L, Lassaletta L, Tovar JA. The contribution of modern imaging to planning separation strategies in conjoined twins. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003;13:120–4.10.1055/s-2003-39586Search in Google Scholar PubMed

93. Wataganara T, Sutanthaviboon A, Ngerncham S, Vantanasiri C. Three-dimensional power Doppler in the diagnosis and surgical management of thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:236–7.10.1002/uog.5326Search in Google Scholar PubMed

94. Liu HC, Lo CW, Weng ZC, Hwang B, Lee PC. Various modalities for evaluation of a fused heart in conjoined twins. Pediatr Cardiol 2012;33:192–200.10.1007/s00246-011-0117-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Timor-Tritsch IE, Rebarber A, MacKenzie A, Caglione CF, Young BK. Four-dimensional real-time sonographically guided cauterization of the umbilical cord in a case of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:741–6.10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.741Search in Google Scholar PubMed

96. Hernandez-Andrade E, Maymon E, Luewan S, Bhatti G, Mehrmohammadi M, Erez O, et al. A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery. J Perinat Med 2018;46:489–501.10.1515/jpm-2018-0062Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

97. Melamed N, Hiersch L, Gabbay-Benziv R, Bardin R, Meizner I, Wiznitzer A, et al. Predictive value of cervical length in women with twin pregnancy presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:73–81.10.1002/uog.14665Search in Google Scholar PubMed

98. De Diego R, Sabria J, Vela A, Rodriguez D, Gomez MD. Role of 3-dimensional power Doppler sonography in differentiating pregnant women with threatened preterm labor from those with an asymptomatic short cervix. J Ultrasound Med 2014;33:673–9.10.7863/ultra.33.4.673Search in Google Scholar PubMed

99. Ahmed AI, Aldhaheri SR, Rodriguez-Kovacs J, Narasimhulu D, Putra M, Minkoff H, et al. Sonographic measurement of cervical volume in pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth using a geometric formula for a frustum versus 3-dimensional automated virtual organ computer-aided analysis. J Ultrasound Med 2017;36:2209–17.10.1002/jum.14253Search in Google Scholar PubMed

100. Wataganara T, Phithakwatchara N, Komoltri C, Tantisirin P, Pooliam J, Titapant V. Functional three-dimensional sonographic study of the postpartum uterus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:2221–7.10.3109/14767058.2014.983063Search in Google Scholar PubMed

101. Kubotani JS, Araujo Junior E, Zanetti MR, Passos JP, de Jarmy Di Bella ZI, Junior JE. Assessing the impact of twin pregnancies on the pelvic floor using 3-dimensional sonography: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2014;33:1179–83.10.7863/ultra.33.7.1179Search in Google Scholar PubMed

102. Bechard F, Castelli C, Alonso S, Vintejoux E, Goffinet F, Letouzey V, et al. Impact of mode of delivery of twins on the pelvic floor 3 and 12 months post-partum-part II. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:893–9.10.1007/s00192-018-3785-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

103. Pooh RK, Maeda K, Kurjak A, Sen C, Ebrashy A, Adra A, et al. 3D/4D sonography – any safety problem. J Perinat Med 2016;44:125–9.10.1515/jpm-2015-0225Search in Google Scholar PubMed

104. Ter Haar G. Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations. Interface Focus 2011;1:686–97.10.1098/rsfs.2011.0029Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

105. Wataganara T, Gosavi A, Nawapun K, Vijayakumar PD, Phithakwatchara N, Choolani M, et al. Model surgical training: skills acquisition in fetoscopic laser photocoagulation of monochorionic diamniotic twin placenta using realistic simulators. J Vis Exp 2018;21. doi: 10.3791/57328.10.3791/57328Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

106. Wataganara T, Viboonchart S, Chumthup W, Chuenwattana P, Pooliam J, Nawapun K, et al. Comparison of mannequin training satisfaction with a conventional box trainer and a low-fidelity fetoscopic surgical simulator for selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019:1–7 (in press). doi: 10.1159/000502180.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

107. Phithakwatchara N, Nawapun K, Viboonchart S, Jaingam S, Wataganara T. Simulation-based fetal shunting training. Prenat Diagn 2019;39:1291–7.10.1002/pd.5599Search in Google Scholar PubMed