Home Medicine Modifiable risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth in nulliparous women: a prospective study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Modifiable risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth in nulliparous women: a prospective study

  • Themistoklis Dagklis , Ioannis Tsakiridis ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Apostolos Mamopoulos , Theodore Dardavessis and Apostolos Athanasiadis
Published/Copyright: December 19, 2019

Abstract

Background

Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) has a detrimental impact on perinatal outcome, as well as on the resources of health systems in high-income countries. Thus, the objective of the current study was to determine the incidence of modifiable risk factors in pregnancy and their impact on the rate of sPTB.

Methods

All nulliparous pregnant women, in singleton pregnancies, with free medical and obstetric history, were eligible to participate in this study. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of specific modifiable risk factors for sPTB. The correlations between these risk factors and sPTB were also investigated.

Results

Overall, 2027 women were eligible for the study and agreed to participate. The incidence of sPTB was 4.9%; 25.5% (n = 518) of the participants were in extreme maternal age (<20 or >35 years), 34.5% (n = 701) had an abnormal body mass index (BMI) (<18.5 or ≥25 kg/m2), 4.4% (n = 89) reported use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and 10.9% (n = 220) reported themselves as smokers in pregnancy. In the multivariate analysis, sPTB was significantly correlated with ART conception [odds ratio (OR): 2.494, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.196–5.199].

Conclusion

Approximately one in 20 primiparous pregnant women in the study had a sPTB. The study population included a high percentage of women of advanced maternal age, with abnormal BMI and smokers, but these characteristics did not affect the incidence of sPTB. On the other hand, conception following ART increased two-fold the risk of sPTB.

  1. Author contributions: Apostolos Athanasiadis developed the original idea for the study and participated in the revision. Themistoklis Dagklis coordinated the recruitment, interviewed patients and recorded patient data. Ioannis Tsakiridis designed, coordinated and implemented the project, evaluated the results, and submitted the article. Apostolos Mamopoulos supervised the sample extraction and cooperated in the results’ analysis. Theodore Dardavessis participated in statistical analysis and also supervised the manuscript development. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. WHO. World Health Organization, March of Dimes: The Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health, Save the Children. In Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

2. Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2006 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010;58:1–31.Search in Google Scholar

3. Crump C, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Winkleby MA. Gestational age at birth and mortality in young adulthood. J Am Med Assoc 2011;306:1233–40.10.1001/jama.2011.1331Search in Google Scholar

4. Zeitlin J, Szamotulska K, Drewniak N, Mohangoo AD, Chalmers J, Sakkeus L, et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;120:1356–65.10.1097/01.aoa.0000455581.02695.03Search in Google Scholar

5. Kazemier BM, Buijs PE, Mignini L, Limpens J, de Groot CJ, Mol BW, et al. Impact of obstetric history on the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton and multiple pregnancies: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121:1197–208; discussion 209.10.1097/01.aoa.0000472703.58220.34Search in Google Scholar

6. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75–84.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4Search in Google Scholar

7. Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2010;362:529–35.10.1056/NEJMra0904308Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. O’Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Alvarado M, et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:756–60.10.1002/uog.17455Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Kleinrouweler CE, Cheong-See FM, Collins GS, Kwee A, Thangaratinam S, Khan KS, et al. Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:79–90 e36.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tsakiridis I, Dagklis T, Mamopoulos A, Gerede A, Athanasiadis A. Cervical length at 31–34 weeks of gestation: transvaginal vs. transperineal ultrasonographic approach. J Perinat Med 2019;47:817–21.10.1515/jpm-2019-0139Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD008991.10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:161–80.10.1097/01.aoa.0000547322.24967.25Search in Google Scholar

13. Jacob J, Lehne M, Mischker A, Klinger N, Zickermann C, Walker J. Cost effects of preterm birth: a comparison of health care costs associated with early preterm, late preterm, and full-term birth in the first 3 years after birth. Eur J Health Econ 2017;18:1041–6.10.1007/s10198-016-0850-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

14. European IVFmC, European Society of Human R, Embryology, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2017;32:1957–73.10.1093/humrep/dex264Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Cavoretto P, Candiani M, Giorgione V, Inversetti A, Abu-Saba MM, Tiberio F, et al. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:43–53.10.1002/uog.18930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery, low birth weight, and admission to the neonatal in1sive care unit: a prospective follow-up study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2102–6.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Morales-Rosello J, Khalil A, Salvi S, Townsend R, Premakumar Y, Perales-Marin A. Abnormal middle cerebral artery Doppler associates with spontaneous preterm birth in normally grown fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2016;40:41–7.10.1159/000441519Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Kim JS. Chronic inflammation of the placenta: definition, classification, pathogenesis, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(4 Suppl):S53–69.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Eurostat. Statistics explained. Fertility statistics. 2019. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Fertility_statistics#Total_fertility_rate_and_age_of_women_at_birth_of_first_child. Accessed 1 Oct 2019.Search in Google Scholar

20. Keirse MJ, Hanssens M, Devlieger H. Trends in preterm births in Flanders, Belgium, from 1991 to 2002. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009;23:522–32.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01067.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. The incidence of preterm deliveries decreases in Finland. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:38–43.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01565.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. J Am Med Assoc 2010;303:235–41.10.1001/jama.2009.2014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Scott-Pillai R, Spence D, Cardwell CR, Hunter A, Holmes VA. The impact of body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study in a UK obstetric population, 2004–2011. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;120:932–9.10.1097/01.aoa.0000452187.24533.73Search in Google Scholar

24. Heslehurst N, Ells LJ, Simpson H, Batterham A, Wilkinson J, Summerbell CD. Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36,821 women over a 15-year period. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;114:187–94.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01180.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J, Liao G, McDonald SD, Knowledge Synthesis G. Maternal underweight and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:65–101.10.1093/ije/dyq195Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Papazisis G, Petousis S, Liozidou A, Athanasiadis A, et al. Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a cross-sectional study in Northern Greece. Eur J Public Health 2018;28:321–5.10.1093/eurpub/cky004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Fantuzzi G, Aggazzotti G, Righi E, Facchinetti F, Bertucci E, Kanitz S, et al. Preterm delivery and exposure to active and passive smoking during pregnancy: a case-control study from Italy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:194–200.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00815.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-10-08
Accepted: 2019-11-12
Published Online: 2019-12-19
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Variations in long-term outcome reporting among offspring followed up after lifestyle interventions in pregnancy: a systematic review
  4. Corner of Academy
  5. Modifiable risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth in nulliparous women: a prospective study
  6. Additional benefits of three-dimensional ultrasound for prenatal assessment of twins
  7. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  8. Microbial burden and inflammasome activation in amniotic fluid of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes
  9. Amniotic fluid concentrations of soluble endoglin and endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 in pregnancies complicated with neural tube defects
  10. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of women with chronic hypertension: a population-based study
  11. Behavior of fetal longitudinal myocardial fibers assessed by speckle tracking to obtain strain and strain rate values for low-risk pregnancies
  12. The effect of a scheduled regimen of acetaminophen and ibuprofen on opioid use following cesarean delivery
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Comparison of cord blood lactate measurement by gas analyzer and portable electrochemical devices
  15. Perinatal mortality: epidemiological profile, causes and avoidable factors at a reference public maternity hospital in the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil, 2011–2015
  16. Original Articles – Newborns
  17. Maternal smoking and cannabis use during pregnancy and infant outcomes
  18. The utility of cranial ultrasound as a screening tool for neonatal ECMO
  19. Effects of human milk fortifier properties on intrinsic probiotic bacteria
  20. Letter to the Editor
  21. Superb microvascular imaging with Doppler luminance using an 18-MHz probe to visualize fetal intra-abdominal blood vessels and organ microvasculature
Downloaded on 12.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2019-0362/html
Scroll to top button