Home Computerized fetal cardiotocography analysis in early preterm fetal growth restriction – a quantitative comparison of two applications
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Computerized fetal cardiotocography analysis in early preterm fetal growth restriction – a quantitative comparison of two applications

  • Hans Wolf EMAIL logo , Claartje Bruin , Johannes G.G. Dobbe , Sanne J. Gordijn and Wessel Ganzevoort
Published/Copyright: April 22, 2019

Abstract

Background

We developed an open-source software for the computerized analysis of antenatal fetal cardiotocography (CTG) without limitation of duration of the registration, enabling batch processing and adaptation to any digital storage system.

Methods

STVcalc was developed based on literature about the FetalCare system (Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd, Cardiff, UK). For comparison with FetalCare, we selected the CTGs of all women who delivered in 2011 a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetus between 24 and 31 weeks by cesarean section (CS) for fetal distress, or had fetal death, before labor onset.

Results

In 471 CTGs from 39 women, the agreement was 99% for a short-term variation (STV) cut-off of 2.6 ms below 29 weeks and 3.0 ms thereafter, and 95% for 3.5 and 4.0 ms, respectively. In 18 (4%) cases, the proportional difference in STV between FetalCare and STVcalc was more than 10%.

Conclusion

As only slight differences were observed between the proposed feature-rich application and the FetalCare system, it can be considered valuable for clinical practice and research purposes.


Corresponding author: Hans Wolf, PhD, Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission. The authors do not have a conflict of interests nor a financial dependency or relationship with this project. The software that was designed for this project is published as freeware (GitHub).

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Bhatia M, Mahtani KR, Nunan D, Reddy A. A cross-sectional comparison of three guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;138:89–93.10.1002/ijgo.12161Search in Google Scholar

2. Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD007863.10.1002/14651858.CD007863.pub4Search in Google Scholar

3. Dawes GS, Visser GH, Goodman JD, Redman CW. Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:43–52.10.1016/0002-9378(81)90673-6Search in Google Scholar

4. Magenes G, Signorini MG, Ferrario M, Lunghi F. 2CTG2: a new system for the antepartum analysis of fetal heart rate. 11th Mediterr. Conf. Med. Biomed. Eng. Comput. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.10.1007/978-3-540-73044-6_203Search in Google Scholar

5. Lobmaier SM, Huhn EA, Pildner von Steinburg S, Muller A, Schuster T, Ortiz JU, et al. Phase-rectified signal averaging as a new method for surveillance of growth restricted fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:2523–8.10.3109/14767058.2012.696163Search in Google Scholar

6. Chudacek V, Spilka J, Bursa M, Janku P, Hruban L, Huptych M, et al. Open access intrapartum CTG database. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:16.10.1186/1471-2393-14-16Search in Google Scholar

7. Comert ZK, Kocamaz AF. Open-access software for analysis of fetal heart rate signals. Biomed Signal Process Control 2018;45:98–108.10.1016/j.bspc.2018.05.016Search in Google Scholar

8. Street P, Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:515–23.10.1016/0002-9378(91)90277-XSearch in Google Scholar

9. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 1996;24:25–36.10.1515/jpme.1996.24.1.25Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Guzman ER, Vintzileos A, Egan JF, Benito C, Lake M, Lai YL. Antenatal prediction of fetal pH in growth restricted fetuses using computer analysis of the fetal heart rate. J Matern Fetal Med 1998;7:43–7.10.3109/14767059809022652Search in Google Scholar

11. Bracero LA, Morgan S, Byrne DW. Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1254–8.10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70118-3Search in Google Scholar

12. Pardey J, Moulden M, Redman CW. A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1095–103.10.1067/mob.2002.122447Search in Google Scholar

13. Anceschi MM, Piazze JJ, Ruozi-Berretta A, Cosmi E, Cerekja A, Maranghi L, et al. Validity of short term variation (STV) in detection of fetal acidemia. J Perinat Med 2003;31:231–6.10.1515/JPM.2003.031Search in Google Scholar

14. Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, Moyano D, Bhide A, Bower S, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:750–6.10.1002/uog.4101Search in Google Scholar

15. Garcia GS, Mariani NC, Araujo JE, Garcia RL, Nardozza LM, Moron AF. Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278:125–8.10.1007/s00404-007-0537-8Search in Google Scholar

16. Serra V, Moulden M, Bellver J, Redman CW. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:1101–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01774.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Serra V, Bellver J, Moulden M, Redman CW. Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:74–9.10.1002/uog.6365Search in Google Scholar

18. Galazios G, Tripsianis G, Tsikouras P, Koutlaki N, Liberis V. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:229–33.10.1007/s00404-009-1119-8Search in Google Scholar

19. Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015;385:2162–72.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3Search in Google Scholar

20. Wolf H, Arabin B, Lees CC, Oepkes D, Prefumo F, Thilaganathan B, et al. Longitudinal study of computerized cardiotocography in early fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:71–8.10.1002/uog.17215Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Dawes GS, Houghton CR, Redman CW. Baseline in human fetal heart-rate records. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:270–5.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04695.xSearch in Google Scholar

22. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Criteria for the design of fetal heart rate analysis systems. Int J Biomed Comput 1990;25:287–94.10.1016/0020-7101(90)90032-PSearch in Google Scholar

23. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med 1991;19:47–51.10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.47Search in Google Scholar

24. Dawes GS, Lobb M, Moulden M, Redman CW, Wheeler T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:791–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14408.xSearch in Google Scholar

25. Dobbe JG, Lunshof S, Boer K, Wolf H, Grimbergen CA. The technique and algorithms for computerized analysis of long-term fetal heart rate recordings. Prenat Neonat Med 2001;6:280–9.Search in Google Scholar

26. Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De RM, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:388–96.10.1002/uog.5225Search in Google Scholar

27. Kapaya H, Jacques R, Rahaim N, Anumba D. “Does short-term variation in fetal heart rate predict fetal acidaemia?” A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:4070–7.10.3109/14767058.2016.1156670Search in Google Scholar

28. Pels A, Mensing van Charante NA, Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, Limpens J, Wolf H, de Boer MA, et al. The prognostic accuracy of short term variation of fetal heart rate in early-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;234:179–84.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.005Search in Google Scholar

29. Nijhuis IJ, Ten HJ, Mulder EJ, Nijhuis JG, Narayan H, Taylor DJ, et al. Fetal heart rate in relation to its variation in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;89:27–33.10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00162-1Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2018-0412).


Received: 2018-12-10
Accepted: 2019-02-08
Published Online: 2019-04-22
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Mini Review
  3. Skin pathologies in pregnancy
  4. Research Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Behcet’s disease and pregnancy: obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in a population-based cohort of 12 million births
  6. Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence and routine monitoring practices amongst maternal-fetal medicine specialists in the United States: an initial investigation
  7. Gestational age-related changes in shear wave speed of the uterine cervix in normal pregnancy at 12–35 weeks’ gestation
  8. Effects of maternal obesity, excessive gestational weight gain and fetal macrosomia on the frequency of cesarean deliveries among migrant and non-migrant women – a prospective study
  9. An exploratory study into social and healthcare variables of maternal mortality: a case-control study
  10. Research Articles – Fetus
  11. Fetal abdominal cysts: antenatal course and postnatal outcomes
  12. Reference range of fetal myocardial area by three-dimensional ultrasonography and its applicability in fetuses of pre-gestational diabetic women
  13. Neurological development may be accelerated in growth-restricted fetuses: a 4D ultrasound study
  14. Characterization of fetal monocytes in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction
  15. Computerized fetal cardiotocography analysis in early preterm fetal growth restriction – a quantitative comparison of two applications
  16. Research Articles – Newborn
  17. Identification of growth patterns of preterm and small-for-gestational age children from birth to 4 years – do they catch up?
  18. Association of maternal disease and medication use with the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a case-control study using logistic regression with a random-effects model
  19. Continuous infusion vs. intermittent flushing of peripheral cannulas in neonates using a needleless connector: a prospective cohort study
  20. Mesenchymal stromal cells and TGF-β1 in tracheal aspirate of premature infants: early predictors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia?
  21. Erythropoietin in perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2018-0412/html
Scroll to top button