Home Placental thickness on ultrasound and neonatal birthweight
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Placental thickness on ultrasound and neonatal birthweight

  • Odessa P. Hamidi EMAIL logo , Avi Hameroff , Allen Kunselman , William M. Curtin , Risha Sinha and Serdar H. Ural
Published/Copyright: December 3, 2018

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between maximal placental thickness during routine anatomy scan and birthweight at delivery.

Methods

This retrospective descriptive study analyzed 200 term, singleton deliveries in 2016 at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. We measured maximal placental thickness in the sagittal plane from the ultrasound images of the placenta obtained at the 18–21-week fetal anatomy screen. The relationship between placental thickness and neonatal birthweight was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Logistic regression was used to assess the association between placental thickness and secondary binary outcomes of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and poor Apgar scores. Two-sample t-tests, or exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normally distributed data, were used to assess for differences attributable to medical comorbidities (pre-gestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia).

Results

Placental thickness had a positive correlation with neonatal birthweight [r=0.18, 95% CI=(0.05, 0.32)]. The mean placental thickness measured 34.2±9.7 mm. The strength of the correlation remained similar when adjusting for gestational age (r=0.20) or excluding medical comorbidities (r=0.19). There was no association between placental thickness and NICU admission, Apgar scores <7 or medical comorbidities.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated a positive correlation between sonographic placental thickness and birthweight. Future prospective studies are warranted in order to further investigate whether a clinically significant correlation exists while adjusting for more covariates.


Corresponding author: Odessa P. Hamidi, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA, USA, Tel.: +1 717-531-5394, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Roland MC, Friis CM, Voldner N, Godang K, Bollerslev J, Haugen G, et al. Fetal growth versus birthweight: the role of placenta versus other determinants. PLoS One 2012;7:e39324.10.1371/journal.pone.0039324Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Thornburg KL, Marshall N. The placenta is the center of the chronic disease universe. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213: S14–20.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Barker DJ, Thornburg KL. Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review. Placenta 2013;34:841–5.10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.063Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Barker DJ. Developmental origins of chronic disease. Public Health 2012;126:185–9.10.1007/978-1-4614-6194-4_1Search in Google Scholar

5. Panti AA, Ekele BA, Nwobodo EI, Yakubu A. The relationship between the weight of the placenta and birth weight of the neonate in a Nigerian Hospital. Niger Med J 2012;53:80–4.10.4103/0300-1652.103547Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Salafia CM, Zhang J, Charles AK, Bresnahan M, Shrout P, Sun W, et al. Placental characteristics and birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008;22:229–39.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00935.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Salafia CM, Charles AK, Maas EM. Placenta and fetal growth restriction. Clin Obs Gynecol 2006;49:236–56.10.1097/00003081-200606000-00007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Azpurua H, Funai EF, Coraluzzi LM, Doherty LF, Sasson IE, Kliman M, et al. Determination of placental weight using two-dimensional sonography and volumetric mathematic modeling. Am J Perinatol 2010;27:151–5.10.1055/s-0029-1234034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Gonzalez Gonzalez NL, Gonzalez Davila E, Castro A, Padron E, Plasencia W. Effect of pregestational diabetes mellitus on first trimester placental characteristics: three-dimensional placental volume and power Doppler indices. Placenta 2014;35:147–51.10.1016/j.placenta.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Markey S, Okun N, Girard M, Kingdom J, et al. First-trimester placental thickness and the risk of preeclampsia or SGA. Placenta 2017;57:123–8.10.1016/j.placenta.2017.06.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Eskild A, Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ. Placental weight and birthweight: does the association differ between pregnancies with and without preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:595.e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Ruiz-Quiñonez G, Reza-López SA, Chávez-Corral DV, Sánchez-Ramírez B, Leal-Berumen I, Levario-Carrillo M. Placental maturity, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and birth weight. Hypertens Pregnancy 2014;33:132–44.10.3109/10641955.2013.842583Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Strøm-Roum EM, Haavaldsen C, Tanbo TG, Eskild A. Placental weight relative to birthweight in pregnancies with maternal diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:783–9.10.1111/aogs.12104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. McNamara H, Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Benjamin A, Kramer MS. Risk factors for high and low placental weight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014;28:97–105.10.1111/ppe.12104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81.10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Barker DJ, Larsen G, Osmond C, Thornburg KL, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. The placental origins of sudden cardiac death. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:1394–9.10.1093/ije/dys116Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Shehata F, Levin I, Shrim A, Ata B, Weisz B, Gamzu R, et al. Placenta/birthweight ratio and perinatal outcome: a retrospective cohort analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:741–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02892.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Barker DJ. Outcome of low birthweight. Horm Res 1994;42: 223–30.10.1159/000184197Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Thomson AM, Billewicz WZ, Hytten FE. The weight of the placenta in relation to birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1969;76:865–72.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1969.tb15722.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Effendi M, Demers S, Giguère Y, Forest JC, Brassard N, Girard M, et al. Association between first-trimester placental volume and birth weight. Placenta 2014;35:99–102.10.1016/j.placenta.2013.11.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. David AL, Jauniaux E. Ultrasound and endocrinological markers of first trimester placentation and subsequent fetal size. Placenta 2016;40:29–33.10.1016/j.placenta.2016.02.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-03-21
Accepted: 2018-11-05
Published Online: 2018-12-03
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Tinker, tailor, infection, inflammation
  4. Review
  5. Antenatal magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection: a critical appraisal and systematic review of clinical practice guidelines
  6. Research Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Customised birthweight standard for a Slovenian population
  8. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term IX: in vivo evidence of intra-amniotic inflammasome activation
  9. A high concentration of fetal fibronectin in cervical secretions increases the risk of intra-amniotic infection and inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes
  10. Associations between second-trimester amniotic fluid levels of ADAMTS4, ADAMTS5, IL-6, and TNF-α and spontaneous preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies
  11. Metabolic characterization of amniotic fluids of fetuses with enlarged nuchal translucency
  12. Stillbirths in women with pre-gravid obesity
  13. Dependencies between maternal and fetal autonomic tone
  14. Placental thickness on ultrasound and neonatal birthweight
  15. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of maternal sexuality during pregnancy
  16. Impact of the new guidelines on the management of premature rupture of membranes for the prevention of late preterm birth: an 11-year retrospective study
  17. Diabetes and obesity during pregnancy are associated with oxidative stress genotoxicity in newborns
  18. Prenatal diagnosis, associated findings and postnatal outcome of fetuses with double outlet right ventricle (DORV) in a single center
  19. Research Article – Newborn
  20. Therapeutic hypothermia during neonatal transport at Regional Perinatal Centers: active vs. passive cooling
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2018-0100/html
Scroll to top button