Risk of preterm birth by maternal age at first and second pregnancy and race/ethnicity
-
Rebecca J. Baer
, Juan Yang
, Vincenzo Berghella , Christina D. Chambers , Tumaini R. Coker , Miriam Kuppermann , Scott P. Oltman , Larry Rand , Kelli K. Ryckman , Louis J. Muglia , Paul J. Chung and Laura L. Jelliffe-Pawlowski
Abstract
We examined the risk of preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks’ gestation) in a second pregnancy and analyzed the extent to which this risk varies by maternal age and race/ethnicity. The sample included nulligravida mothers in California who delivered two singletons between 2005 and 2011. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of PTB in the second pregnancy. Within each race/ethnicity stratum, women delivering term infants in their first pregnancy and between 25 and 34 years old for both pregnancies served as the referent group. There were 2,90,834 women included in the study. Among women who delivered their first infant at term, the odds of delivering their second infant early differed by race and age. Hispanic, Black and Asian non-Hispanic women who were <18 years for both pregnancies were at higher odds of having a PTB in their second pregnancy (adjusted odds ratios 1.7, 3.3 and 2.9, respectively). Asian non-Hispanic women who were <18 years for their first delivery at term and between 18 and 24 years for their second delivery, or were >34 years for both, were also at higher odds of delivering their second baby prematurely (adjusted odds ratios 1.9 and 1.3, respectively). Women who deliver their first infant at <37 weeks of gestation are at 3 to 7 times higher odds of delivering their second infant preterm. Providers should consider including information about these risks in counseling their patients.
Author’s statement
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Material and Methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee
Funding: Supported by the California Preterm Birth Initiative within the University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
References
[1] Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010;126:443–56.10.1542/peds.2009-2959Search in Google Scholar
[2] Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4Search in Google Scholar
[3] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1–103.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;58:1–85.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Osterman MJ. Births: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;59:1, 3–71.Search in Google Scholar
[6] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;60:1–70.Search in Google Scholar
[7] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61:1–72.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62: 1–69, 72.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Rowley DL. Research issues in the study of very low birthweight and preterm delivery among African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994;86:761–4.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Misra D, Strobino D, Trabert B. Effects of social and psychosocial factors on risk of preterm birth in black women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24:546–54.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01148.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] Rich-Edwards J, Krieger N, Majzoub J, Zierler S, Lieberman E, Gillman M. Maternal experiences of racism and violence as predictors of preterm birth: rationale and study design. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(Suppl 2):124–35.10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00013.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Baer RJ, Blumenfeld YJ, Ryckman KK, O’Brodovich HM, Gould JB, et al. Maternal characteristics and mid-pregnancy serum biomarkers as risk factors for subtypes of preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122:1484–93.10.1111/1471-0528.13495Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[13] Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N, Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Walker M. Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:368–73.10.1093/ije/dyl284Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] da Silva AA, Simoes VM, Barbieri MA, Bettiol H, Lamy-Filho F, Coimbra LC, et al. Young maternal age and preterm birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003;17:332–9.10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00515.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Weng YH, Yang CY, Chiu YW. Risk assessment of adverse birth outcomes in relation to maternal age. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114843.10.1371/journal.pone.0114843Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] Aldous MB, Edmonson MB. Maternal age at first childbirth and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Washington State. J Am Med Assoc. 1993;270:2574–7.10.1001/jama.1993.03510210060028Search in Google Scholar
[17] Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Intarut N, Mori R, Ganchimeg T, Vogel JP, et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(Suppl 1):49–56.10.1097/01.aoa.0000460397.65046.b9Search in Google Scholar
[18] Yang JBR, Berghella V, Chambers C, Chung P, Coker T, Currier RJ, et al. Recurrent preterm birth and early term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:364–72.10.1097/AOG.0000000000001506Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Hsieh TT, Chen SF, Shau WY, Hsieh CC, Hsu JJ, Hung TH. The impact of interpregnancy interval and previous preterm birth on the subsequent risk of preterm birth. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2005;12:202–7.10.1016/j.jsgi.2004.12.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Nerlander LM, Callaghan WM, Smith RA, Barfield WD. Short interpregnancy interval associated with preterm birth in U S adolescents. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:850–8.10.1007/s10995-014-1583-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[21] Shachar BZ, Mayo JA, Lyell DJ, Baer RJ, Jeliffe-Pawlowski LL, Stevenson DK, et al. Interpregnancy interval after live birth or pregnancy termination and estimated risk of preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:2009–17.10.1111/1471-0528.14165Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Baumeister L, Marchi K, Pearl M, Williams R, Braveman P. The validity of information on “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:869–83.Search in Google Scholar
[23] Association AM. International classification of diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification. Chicago, IL: AMA; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Coley SL, Nichols TR, Rulison KL, Aronson RE, Brown-Jeffy SL, Morrison SD. Race, socioeconomic status, and age: exploring intersections in preterm birth disparities among teen mothers. Int J Popul Res. 2015;2015:617907. doi:10.1155/2015/617907.10.1155/2015/617907Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[25] Adams MM, Elam-Evans LD, Wilson HG, Gilbertz DA. Rates of and factors associated with recurrence of preterm delivery. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:1591–6.10.1001/jama.283.12.1591Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] Buescher PA, Mittal M. Racial disparities in birth outcomes increase with maternal age: recent data from North Carolina. N C Med J. 2006;67:16–20.10.18043/ncm.67.1.16Search in Google Scholar
Supplemental Material:
The online version of this article (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0014) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- A transformative icon for modern perinatology
- Highlight: Preterm Labor
- Editorial
- What’s new in preterm birth prediction and prevention?
- Review articles
- Pulmo uterinus: a history of ideas on fetal respiration
- Mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): etiology, diagnosis, classification, international recommendations of treatment options and outcome
- Highlight articles
- A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery
- Association between genital mycoplasmas, acute chorioamnionitis and fetal pneumonia in spontaneous abortions
- Methylation differences reveal heterogeneity in preterm pathophysiology: results from bipartite network analyses
- Understanding fetal factors that contribute to preterm birth: Sjögren-Larsson syndrome as a model
- Safety and efficacy of the cervical pessary combined with vaginal progesterone for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth
- Risk of preterm birth by maternal age at first and second pregnancy and race/ethnicity
- Infant mortality and causes of death by birth weight for gestational age in non-malformed singleton infants: a 2002–2012 population-based study
- Perinatal outcomes after previable preterm premature rupture of membranes before 24 weeks of gestation
- Letter to the Editor
- Fundal pressure: risk factors in uterine rupture. The issue of liability: complication or malpractice?
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- A transformative icon for modern perinatology
- Highlight: Preterm Labor
- Editorial
- What’s new in preterm birth prediction and prevention?
- Review articles
- Pulmo uterinus: a history of ideas on fetal respiration
- Mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): etiology, diagnosis, classification, international recommendations of treatment options and outcome
- Highlight articles
- A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery
- Association between genital mycoplasmas, acute chorioamnionitis and fetal pneumonia in spontaneous abortions
- Methylation differences reveal heterogeneity in preterm pathophysiology: results from bipartite network analyses
- Understanding fetal factors that contribute to preterm birth: Sjögren-Larsson syndrome as a model
- Safety and efficacy of the cervical pessary combined with vaginal progesterone for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth
- Risk of preterm birth by maternal age at first and second pregnancy and race/ethnicity
- Infant mortality and causes of death by birth weight for gestational age in non-malformed singleton infants: a 2002–2012 population-based study
- Perinatal outcomes after previable preterm premature rupture of membranes before 24 weeks of gestation
- Letter to the Editor
- Fundal pressure: risk factors in uterine rupture. The issue of liability: complication or malpractice?