Delivery-related knowledge of mothers of NICU infants compared with well-baby-nursery infants

References

[1] Bernstein SN, Matalon-Grazi S, Rosenn BM. Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: are patients making an informed decision? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:204.e1–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.057Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, Spong CY, Portnoy B, DeVoto E, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:57–66.10.1097/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6Search in Google Scholar

[3] Buehner MJ, May J. Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003;56: 865–90.10.1080/02724980244000675Search in Google Scholar

[4] Case A, Paxon C. Parent behavior and child health. Health Affairs. 2002;21:164–78.10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.164Search in Google Scholar

[5] Declerq ER, Sakala C, Cory MP, Applebaum S. Listening to mothers II: report of the second national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection; October 2006. Available at: www.childbirthconnection.org/listeningtomothers/. Accessed 12 Decemebr 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Demontis R, Pisu S, Pinto M, D’Aloja E. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:1470–5.10.3109/14767058.2010.538279Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dylag AM, Shah SI. Administration of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine to parents of high-risk infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e550–5.10.1542/peds.2008-0813Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fuchs K, Wapner R. Elective cesarean section and induction and their impact on late preterm births. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33:793–801.10.1016/j.clp.2006.09.010Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women’s preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth. 2001;28:101–10.10.1046/j.1523-536X.2001.00101.xSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bhattacharya A, Groat TD, Stahl PJ. Women’s perceptions regarding the safety of births at various gestational ages. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1254–8.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2d6a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Green JM, Baston HA. Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study. Birth. 2007;34:6–13.10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00140.xSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait. Preventing Preterm Births through Community-based Interventions: An Implementation Manual. Available at: https://www.prematurityprevention.org/portal/server.pt/community/prematurity_prevention_resource_center/461/healthy_babies_are_worth_the_wait%C2%AE/14247. Accessed 12 December 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Katz M. Multivariable analysis: a practical guide for clinicians and public health researchers. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 146–7.10.1017/CBO9780511974175Search in Google Scholar

[15] Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Hearps SJC, Tomkinson J, Baradaran N, Hall WA, et al. Birth technology and maternal roles in birth: knowledge and attitudes of Canadian women approaching childbirth for the first time. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:598–608.10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34908-8Search in Google Scholar

[16] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2011. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol. 62, no 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, et al. Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG. 2011;118:391–9.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.xSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Moawad AH, Meis PJ, Iams JD, Das AF, et al. (for National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network). The preterm prediction study: effect of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1216–21.10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70111-0Search in Google Scholar

[19] Munro S, Kornelsen J, Hutton E. Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54:373–9.10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.12.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27–29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1386–97.10.1097/00006250-200606000-00027Search in Google Scholar

[21] Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sørlie T, Øian P. Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth. 2006;33:221–8.10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00107.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Parker R. Health literacy: a challenge for American patients and their health care providers. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:277–83.10.1093/heapro/15.4.277Search in Google Scholar

[23] Pevzner L, Goffman D, Freda MC, Dayal A. Patients’ attitudes associated with cesarean delivery on maternal request in an urban population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:e35–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.778Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Pevzner L, Preslicka C, Bush MC, Chan K. Women’s attitudes regarding mode of delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:894–9.10.3109/14767058.2010.531797Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Questionnaire. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/prams/Questionnaire.htm. Accessed 12 Decmber 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Robson S, Carey A, Mishra R, Dear K. Elective caesarean delivery at maternal request: a preliminary study of motivations influencing women’s decision-making. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:415–20.10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00867.xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] The poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 9902(2). Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/08poverty.shtml. Accessed 15 Novmber 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[28] The poverty guidelines updated periodically in the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 9902(2). Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/09poverty.shtml. Accessed 15 Novmber 2012Search in Google Scholar

[29] Thurman AR, Zoller JS, Swift SE. Non-pregnant patients’ preference for delivery route. Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15:308–12.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Turner CE, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Ludlow J, Bennes C, Phipps H. Vaginal delivery compared with elective cesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians. BJOG. 2008;115:1494–1502.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01892.xSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Wagner M. Choosing caesareans section. Lancet. 2000;356:1677–80.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03169-XSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Weaver J, Statham H, Richards M. Are there “unnecessary” cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth. 2007;34:32–41.10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00144.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Young D. “Cesarean delivery on maternal request”: was the NIH Conference based on a faulty premise? Birth. 2006;33:171–4.10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00101.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed