Sonographic measurement of cervical length as a predictor of preterm delivery: a systematic review

References

[1] Airoldi J, Berghella V, Sehdev H, Ludmir J. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:553–6.10.1097/01.AOG.0000173987.59595.e2Search in Google Scholar

[2] Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:859–67.10.1016/0002-9378(90)91084-PSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Andrews WW, Copper R, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Neely C, Dubard M. Second-trimester cervical ultrasound: associations with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:222–6.10.1097/00006250-200002000-00010Search in Google Scholar

[4] Barber MA, Eguiluz I, Plasencia W, Medina M, Valle L, Garcia JA. Preterm delivery and ultrasound measurement of cervical length in Gran Canaria, Spain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;108:58–60.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Bittar RE, da Fonseca EB, de Carvalho MH, Martinelli S, Zugaib M. Predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with prior preterm delivery by measurement of cervical length and phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:562–7.10.1002/uog.3989Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Campbell S. Universal cervical-length screening and vaginal progesterone prevents early preterm births, reduces neonatal morbidity and is cost saving: doing nothing is no longer an option. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:1–9.10.1002/uog.9073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Carvalho MH, Bittar RE, Brizot ML, Maganha PP, Borges da Fonseca ES, Zugaib M. Cervical length at 11–14 weeks’ and 22–24 weeks’ gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:135–9.10.1002/uog.32Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] de Carvalho MH, Bittar RE, Brizot Mde L, Bicudo C, Zugaib M. Prediction of preterm delivery in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:532–6.10.1097/01.AOG.0000154157.22500.1dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Br Med J. 2001;323:157–62.10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Fait G, Har-Toov J, Gull I, Lessing JB, Jaffa A, Wolman I. Cervical length, multifetal pregnancy reduction, and prediction of preterm birth. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;33:329–32.10.1002/jcu.20159Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Gibson JL, Macara LM, Owen P, Young D, Macauley J, Mackenzie F. Prediction of preterm delivery in twin pregnancy: a prospective, observational study of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:561–6.10.1002/uog.1048Search in Google Scholar

[12] Goldenberg RL. The management of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1020–37.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4Search in Google Scholar

[14] Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Copper RL, et al. The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:233–8.10.2105/AJPH.88.2.233Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: toward a multiple-marker test for spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:643–51.10.1067/mob.2001.116752Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Heath VC, Daskalakis G, Zagaliki A, Carvalho M, Nicolaides KH. Cervicovaginal fibronectin and cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relative risk of early preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107:1276–81.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11620.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Heath VC, Souka AP, Erasmus I, Gibb DM, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: the value of Shirodkar suture for the short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:318–22.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050318.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:312–7.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Hofmeister C, Brizot Mde L, Liao A, Francisco RP, Zugaib M. Two-stage transvaginal cervical length screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:479–84.10.1515/jpm.2010.088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National institute of child health and human development maternal fetal medicine unit network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567–72.10.1056/NEJM199602293340904Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, Moawad AH, Meis PJ, Das AF, et al. The preterm prediction study: can low-risk women destined for spontaneous preterm birth be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:652–5.10.1067/mob.2001.111248Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Incerti M, Ghidini A, Locatelli A, Poggi SH, Pezzullo JC. Cervical length < or =25 mm in low-risk women: a case control study of cerclage with rest vs rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:315 e1–4.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Leung TN, Pang MW, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Cervical length at 18–22 weeks of gestation for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in Hong Kong Chinese women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:713–7.10.1002/uog.2617Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2700.10.1136/bmj.b2700Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Matijevic R, Grgic O, Knezevic M. Vaginal pH versus cervical length in the mid-trimester as screening predictors of preterm labor in a low-risk population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111:41–4.10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Nakai A, Taniuchi Y, Miyake H, Nakai M, Yokota A, Takeshita T. Increased level of granulocyte elastase in cervical secretion is an independent predictive factor for preterm delivery. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;60:87–91.10.1159/000084839Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O, Erkorkmaz U. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10-14 and 20-24 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;130:176–9.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Palma-Dias RS, Fonseca MM, Stein NR, Schmidt AP, Magalhaes JA. Relation of cervical length at 22–24 weeks of gestation to demographic characteristics and obstetric history. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2004;37:737–44.10.1590/S0100-879X2004000500016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Pedrosa AC, Matias A. Screening for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review of tests combining uterine artery Doppler with other markers. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:619–35.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Pires CR, Moron AF, Mattar R, Diniz AL, Andrade SG, Bussamra LC. Cervical gland area as an ultrasonographic marker for preterm delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;93:214–9.10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.12.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Romero R. Vaginal progesterone to reduce the rate of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity: a solution at last. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2011;7:501–4.10.2217/WHE.11.60Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:124.e1–19.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] Salomon LJ, Diaz-Garcia C, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Reference range for cervical length throughout pregnancy: non-parametric LMS-based model applied to a large sample. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:459–64.10.1002/uog.6332Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Skentou C, Souka AP, To MS, Liao AW, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:7–10.10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00357.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Souka AP, Heath V, Flint S, Sevastopoulou I, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks in twins in predicting spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:450–4.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Sperling L, Kiil C, Larsen LU, Qvist I, Bach D, Wojdemann K, et al. How to identify twins at low risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:138–44.10.1002/uog.1938Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:902–7.Search in Google Scholar

[38] To MS, Skentou CA, Royston P, Yu CK, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:362–7.10.1002/uog.2773Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Vayssiere C, Benoist G, Blondel B, Deruelle P, Favre R, Gallot D, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156:12–7.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36.10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Wilson J, Jungner G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Yoshizato T, Inoue Y, Fukami T, Sanui A, Miyamato S, Kawarabayashi T. Longitudinal changes in canal length at 16–35 weeks in normal twin pregnancies and twin pregnancies with preterm labor and delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:733–8.10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01203.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed