Home Clinical and cytogenetic features of 516 patients with suspected Turner syndrome – a single-center experience
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Clinical and cytogenetic features of 516 patients with suspected Turner syndrome – a single-center experience

  • Annelise B. Carvalho , Sofia H.V. Lemos-Marini , Gil Guerra-Junior and Andréa T. Maciel-Guerra EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 5, 2018

Abstract

Background:

Clinical suspicion of Turner syndrome (TS) may be challenging. Short stature and absent puberty are not mandatory and the dysmorphic picture is widely variable. The aim of the study was to describe a representative sample of patients with suspected TS in a single center and to verify which set of features may help discriminate those with TS.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of patients with suspected TS evaluated between 1989 and 2012 with the same clinical and cytogenetic protocols. Data regarding reason for referral, age and height at diagnosis, birth data, pubertal features and dysmorphisms were analyzed.

Results:

TS was diagnosed in 36% of 516 patients; structural chromosome anomalies predominated (42%). Short stature was the main reason for referral of patients with and without TS. The mean age of patients at first visit, with TS or without TS was similar (11.89 and 11.35 years, respectively), however, infants and adolescents predominated in the TS group. The mean full-term birth weight was lower in patients with TS as well as height at diagnosis, but normal height z-score was found in 17% of patients. Spontaneous puberty occurred in 30% of TS patients aged 13 years or more, but most had pubertal delay. Residual lymphedema, webbed neck, cubitus valgus, hyperconvex nails, shield chest, abnormal nipples, pigmented nevi, short fourth metacarpal and shorter height were the best discriminators for girls with TS.

Conclusions:

Though short stature, pubertal delay and typical stigmata should prompt investigation of TS, lack of one of these features should not exclude this hypothesis. Dysmorphisms other than those considered “typical” should be sought on physical examination.


Corresponding author: Andréa T. Maciel-Guerra, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126, 13083-887 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, Phone: +55 19 3521-8908, Fax: +55 19 3521-8909

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Cytogenetics Laboratory of the Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, and to Center for Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering – CBMEG, State University of Campinas (Unicamp).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet 1991;87:81–3.10.1007/BF01213097Search in Google Scholar

2. Zhong Q, Layman LC. Genetic considerations in the patient with Turner syndrome – 45,X with or without mosaicism. Fertil Steril 2012;98:775–9.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.021Search in Google Scholar

3. Miguel-Neto J, Carvalho AB, Marques-De-Faria AP, Guerra G, Maciel-Guerra AT. New approach to phenotypic variability and karyotype-phenotype correlation in Turner syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2016;29:475–9.10.1515/jpem-2015-0346Search in Google Scholar

4. Saenger P, Wikland KA, Conway GS, Davenport M, Gravholt CH, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:3061–9.10.1210/jc.86.7.3061Search in Google Scholar

5. Gravholt CH. Epidemiological, endocrine and metabolic features in Turner syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 2004;151:657–87.10.1530/eje.0.1510657Search in Google Scholar

6. Ranke MB, Saenger P. Turner’s syndrome. Lancet 2001;358: 309–14.10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05487-3Search in Google Scholar

7. Hreinsson JG, Otala M, Fridström M, Borgström B, Rasmussen C, et al. Follicles are found in the ovaries of adolescent girls with Turner’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:3618–23.Search in Google Scholar

8. Pasquino A, Passeri F, Pucarelli I, Segni M, Municchi G. Spontaneous pubertal development in Turner’s syndrome Italian Study Group for Turner’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:1810–3.Search in Google Scholar

9. Carpini S, Carvalho AB, Guerra-Júnior G, Baptista MT, Lemos-Marini SH, et al. Spontaneous puberty in girls with early diagnosis of Turner syndrome. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 2012;56:653–7.10.1590/S0004-27302012000900009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Clement-Jones M, Schiller S, Rao E, Blaschke RJ, Zuniga A, et al. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9: 695–702.10.1093/hmg/9.5.695Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. van der Putte SC. Lymphatic malformation in human fetuses. A study of fetuses with Turner’s syndrome or status Bonnevie-Ullrich. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1977;376: 233–46.10.1007/BF00432399Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Carvalho AB, Guerra Júnior G, Baptista MT, de Faria AP, Marini SH, et al. Cardiovascular and renal anomalies in Turner syndrome. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2010;56:655–9.10.1590/S0104-42302010000600012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Sävendahl L, Davenport ML. Delayed diagnoses of Turner’s syndrome: proposed guidelines for change. J Pediatr 2000;137:455–9.10.1067/mpd.2000.107390Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Hagman A, Wennerholm U-B, Källén K, Barrenäs M-L, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, et al. Women who gave birth to girls with Turner syndrome: maternal and neonatal characteristics. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1553–60.10.1093/humrep/deq060Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Massa G, Verlinde F, De Schepper J, Thomas M, Bourguignon JP, et al. Trends in age at diagnosis of Turner syndrome. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:267–8.10.1136/adc.2004.049817Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Bondy CA. Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner syndrome study group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:10–25.10.1210/jc.2006-1374Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Halac I, Zimmerman D. Evaluating short stature in children. Pediatr Ann 2004;33:170–6.10.3928/0090-4481-20040301-08Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Binder G. Short stature due to SHOX deficiency: genotype, phenotype, and therapy. Horm Res Paediatr 2011;75:81–9.10.1159/000324105Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Aoki Y, Niihori T, Inoue S, Matsubara Y. Recent advances in RASopathies. J Hum Genet 2016;61:33–9.10.1038/jhg.2015.114Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Rocha VB, Guerra-Júnior G, Marques-De-Faria AP, De Mello MP, Maciel-Guerra AT. Complete gonadal dysgenesis in clinical practice: the 46,XY karyotype accounts for more than one third of cases. Fertil Steril 2011;96:1431–4.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Daggag H, Srour W, El-Khateeb M, Ajlouni K. Analysis of Turner syndrome patients within the Jordanian population, with a focus on four patients with Y chromosome abnormalities. Sex Dev 2013;7:295–302.10.1159/000354279Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Hook EB. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am J Hum Genet 1977;29:94–7.Search in Google Scholar

23. Barros BA, Moraes SG, Coeli FB, Assumpção JG, De Mello MP, et al. OCT4 immunohistochemistry may be necessary to identify the real risk of gonadal tumors in patients with Turner syndrome and y chromosome sequences. Hum Reprod 2011;26: 3450–5.10.1093/humrep/der310Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Stochholm K, Juul S, Juel K, Naeraa RW, Gravholt CH. Prevalence, incidence, diagnostic delay, and mortality in Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:3897–902.10.1210/jc.2006-0558Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Yeşilkaya E, Bereket A, Darendeliler F, Baş F, Poyrazoğlu Ş, et al. Turner syndrome and associated problems in Turkish children: a multicenter study. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2015;7:27–36.10.4274/jcrpe.1771Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Bernard V, Donadille B, Zenaty D, Courtillot C, Salenave S, et al. Spontaneous fertility and pregnancy outcomes amongst 480 women with Turner syndrome. Hum Reprod 2016;31: 782–8.10.1093/humrep/dew012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Cameron-Pimblett A, La Rosa C, King TF, Davies MC, Conway GS. The Turner syndrome life course project: karyotype-phenotype analyses across the lifespan. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2017;87:532–8.10.1111/cen.13394Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Wisniewski A, Milde K, Stupnicki R, Szufladowicz-Wozniak J. Weight deficit at birth and Turner’s syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2007;20:607–13.10.1515/JPEM.2007.20.5.607Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Ranke MB, Pflüger H, Rosendahl W, Stubbe P, Enders H, et al. Turner syndrome: spontaneous growth in 150 cases and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 1983;141:81–8.10.1007/BF00496795Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. de Araújo C, Galera BB, Galera MF, de Medeiros SF. Clinical and cytogenetic aspects of the Turner syndrome in the Brazilian Western region. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2010;32:381–5.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-7-14
Accepted: 2017-11-16
Published Online: 2018-1-5
Published in Print: 2018-1-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. The role of corticosteroid-binding globulin in the evaluation of adrenal insufficiency
  4. Original Articles
  5. Association of sodium intake with insulin resistance in Korean children and adolescents: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010
  6. Decrease in serum chemerin through aerobic exercise plus dieting and its association with mitigation of cardio-metabolic risk in obese female adolescents
  7. Ultrasonographic assessment of pubertal breast development in obese children: compliance with the clinic
  8. Associations of leptin, insulin and lipids with retinal microvasculature in children and adolescents
  9. Association of cord blood ghrelin, leptin and insulin concentrations in term newborns with anthropometric parameters at birth
  10. Management of thyrotoxicosis in children and adolescents: 35 years’ experience in 304 patients
  11. Clinical and cytogenetic features of 516 patients with suspected Turner syndrome – a single-center experience
  12. Response to growth hormone treatment in very young patients with growth hormone deficiencies and mini-puberty
  13. Reference centile curves for wrist circumference for Indian children aged 3–18 years
  14. Comparison between two inhibin B ELISA assays in 46,XY testicular disorders of sex development (DSD) with normal testosterone secretion
  15. Genetic mutations associated with neonatal diabetes mellitus in Omani patients
  16. Four novel mutations of the BCKDHA, BCKDHB and DBT genes in Iranian patients with maple syrup urine disease
  17. Improved medical-alert ID ownership and utilization in youth with congenital adrenal hyperplasia following a parent educational intervention
  18. Letter to the Editor
  19. Identification of five mutations in a patient with galactose metabolic disorders
  20. Case Reports
  21. Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome due to somatic mosaicism of the androgen receptor
  22. Vaginal bleeding and a giant ovarian cyst in an infant with 21-hydroxylase deficiency
  23. Insulin-mediated pseudoacromegaly: a report of two pediatric patients
  24. Novel compound heterozygous variants in the LHCGR gene identified in a subject with Leydig cell hypoplasia type 1
Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem-2017-0273/pdf
Scroll to top button